Back Ground Checks: What would be the cost be in loss of sales to American gun manufacturers and in turn the cost to their bought and paid for Republican lawmaker puppies if a sanity...

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

What would be the cost be in loss of sales to American gun manufacturers and in turn the cost to their bought and paid for Republican lawmaker puppies if a sanity check was required to buy an automatic weapon.

https://www.politicususa.com/2021/03/23/senate-republicans-boulder-shooting.html?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=senate-republicans-boulder-shooting

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

RascalRiley wrote:

What would be the cost be in loss of sales to American gun manufacturers and in turn the cost to their bought and paid for Republican lawmaker puppies if a sanity check was required to buy an automatic weapon.

https://www.politicususa.com/2021/03/23/senate-republicans-boulder-shooting.html?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=senate-republicans-boulder-shooting

Just what does expanded background check mean to you fool? He had a background check. He also had a criminal record. He also was seen, by his family "playing with a gun" and they said they were worried because he had documented mental problems. Yet he passed and bought a gun. You'd think his i***t family might have mentioned to the police that their crazy relation had a gun. Another case of we don't need anymore gun laws, ?We need to enforce the gun laws we have.

Weasel Loc: In the Great State Of Indiana!!

JFlorio wrote:

Just what does expanded background check mean to you fool? He had a background check. He also had a criminal record. He also was seen, by his family "playing with a gun" and they said they were worried because he had documented mental problems. Yet he passed and bought a gun. You'd think his i***t family might have mentioned to the police that their crazy relation had a gun. Another case of we don't need anymore gun laws, ?We need to enforce the gun laws we have.

RIGHT YOU ARE

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

JFlorio wrote:

Just what does expanded background check mean to you fool? He had a background check. He also had a criminal record. He also was seen, by his family "playing with a gun" and they said they were worried because he had documented mental problems. Yet he passed and bought a gun. You'd think his i***t family might have mentioned to the police that their crazy relation had a gun. Another case of we don't need anymore gun laws, ?We need to enforce the gun laws we have.

Thank you for making my point. Background checks need to be beefed up to include the applicants circle

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

RascalRiley wrote:

Thank you for making my point. Background checks need to be beefed up to include the applicants circle

B.S.. That is subjective. Someone in the applicants “circle” may hold an unfounded grudge against the applicant. Like I said fool the laws there. Wasn’t enforced.

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

JFlorio wrote:

B.S.. That is subjective. Someone in the applicants “circle” may hold an unfounded grudge against the applicant. Like I said fool the laws there. Wasn’t enforced.

I am at logically at a loss.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

RascalRiley wrote:

I am at logically at a loss.

Wh**ever that means.

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

JFlorio wrote:

Wh**ever that means.

Sorry. I am logically at a loss

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

RascalRiley wrote:

Sorry. I am logically at a loss

There’s one of the few things you’ve said I agree with.

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

JFlorio wrote:

There’s one of the few things you’ve said I agree with.

I knew you would. It went over your head

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

RascalRiley wrote:

I knew you would. It went over your head

Not really. However; it’s obvious you couldn’t rebut my points.

steve66613

RascalRiley wrote:

What would be the cost be in loss of sales to American gun manufacturers and in turn the cost to their bought and paid for Republican lawmaker puppies if a sanity check was required to buy an automatic weapon.

https://www.politicususa.com/2021/03/23/senate-republicans-boulder-shooting.html?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=senate-republicans-boulder-shooting

Another LWNJ who doesn’t know what an “automatic weapon” is.

Please don’t post anything until you “get a clue”! (You might want to proofread your drivel as well.)

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

steve66613 wrote:

Another LWNJ who doesn’t know what an “automatic weapon” is.

Please don’t post anything until you “get a clue”! (You might want to proofread your drivel as well.)

Can’t believe I bothered responding to the snowflake. Waste of time.

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

steve66613 wrote:

Another LWNJ who doesn’t know what an “automatic weapon” is.

Please don’t post anything until you “get a clue”! (You might want to proofread your drivel as well.)

Would it not be a good thing if people who were acting irrational and wanting to k**l people did not get guns?

steve66613

RascalRiley wrote:

Would it not be a good thing if people who were acting irrational and wanting to k**l people did not get guns?

Great idea! Do you read minds? Can you foretell the actions of crazy demented criminals? Read palms? Read tarot cards?
Stop every drunk who decides to drive?

If you can see into the future, and could’ve stopped every crime, which happened just today, then YOU’RE CULPABLE and should be punished!

If the people around the Colorado culprit didn’t stop him, who’s going to do it? The government?

So, let’s assume that you can’t predict when and who are going to commit crimes. But, you’re going to punish me for crimes committed by someone else(?) You’re going to restrict or eliminate my rights(?)

Why?