One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
If we want our country back, read and think about this commentary.
Mar 18, 2021 14:45:41   #
SWMBO
 
March 18, 2021
Legalizing e******n f***d, forever
By Terry Paulding

H.R. 1 is Nancy Pelosi's signature bill, and exploring it is like taking a deep dive into political depravity. A partisan House passed it on March 3, without any Republican v**es. While it's currently before the Senate, provided the filibuster continues to exist, it's predicted to fail. The filibuster's continuation depends on ethical behavior by a few moderate Democrats, who are probably getting their arms twisted by Chuck Schumer, who wants it gone.

The ludicrously named "For the People Act of 2021" is a dream for elite progressives and a nightmare for everyone else in our great country. Whether or not it fails, it can be viewed as an exposé into the caviar wishes of these liberals, who are the only ones it would serve. Its primary purpose is to prevent f**r e******ns from ever taking place again and to create a one-party dictatorship in perpetuity.

H.R. 1 is designed to eliminate state control of e******ns, which was specified in the Constitution to safeguard against exactly this type of takeover. Because there are more Republican state governments, 27 Republican governors and 30 legislatures, the only way to destroy our e*******l process thoroughly is at the federal level.

No doubt, if the bill is passed, it will be challenged in court on constitutional grounds; the problem is, we now know we have a Supreme Court whose majority is made up of liberals and cowards who would rather not make waves. We've seen that with Obamacare and, most recently, with the integrity of the 2020 e******ns being wholly disregarded by the Court.

Reply
Mar 18, 2021 14:50:14   #
Liberty Tree
 
SWMBO wrote:
March 18, 2021
Legalizing e******n f***d, forever
By Terry Paulding

H.R. 1 is Nancy Pelosi's signature bill, and exploring it is like taking a deep dive into political depravity. A partisan House passed it on March 3, without any Republican v**es. While it's currently before the Senate, provided the filibuster continues to exist, it's predicted to fail. The filibuster's continuation depends on ethical behavior by a few moderate Democrats, who are probably getting their arms twisted by Chuck Schumer, who wants it gone.

The ludicrously named "For the People Act of 2021" is a dream for elite progressives and a nightmare for everyone else in our great country. Whether or not it fails, it can be viewed as an exposé into the caviar wishes of these liberals, who are the only ones it would serve. Its primary purpose is to prevent f**r e******ns from ever taking place again and to create a one-party dictatorship in perpetuity.

H.R. 1 is designed to eliminate state control of e******ns, which was specified in the Constitution to safeguard against exactly this type of takeover. Because there are more Republican state governments, 27 Republican governors and 30 legislatures, the only way to destroy our e*******l process thoroughly is at the federal level.

No doubt, if the bill is passed, it will be challenged in court on constitutional grounds; the problem is, we now know we have a Supreme Court whose majority is made up of liberals and cowards who would rather not make waves. We've seen that with Obamacare and, most recently, with the integrity of the 2020 e******ns being wholly disregarded by the Court.
March 18, 2021 br Legalizing e******n f***d, forev... (show quote)


If it was not to their great advantage Democrats would not propose it. F**r e******ns is the furthest thing from their mind.

Reply
Mar 18, 2021 15:21:02   #
woodguru
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
If it was not to their great advantage Democrats would not propose it. F**r e******ns is the furthest thing from their mind.


Do have the ability to say that making long lines longer is obstruction? Can you say that if lines are longer in a big city such as Atlanta it is up to the e******n board to implement everything they can think of to make the lines shorter, not longer? It is r****ded to try to defend actions taken that could only result in even longer lines when lines are already way too long. Go for it, tell us why it makes sense to do things that make longer lines...

and while you are there tell us why lines in rural white areas shouldn't be longer, why not reduce polling places that serve 6000 people so that you have to drive a couple of hours to stand in a line for a few hours to v**e.

Nobody in this country should be forced to stand in a line for over an hour, and everywhere lines are longer than that needs to have wh**ever is needed done to make them right, not the opposite way to make them longer.

Reply
 
 
Mar 18, 2021 15:23:21   #
woodguru
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
If it was not to their great advantage Democrats would not propose it. F**r e******ns is the furthest thing from their mind.


The problem for the right that is openly acknowledged has to do with more eligible people having it made easier to v**e will k**l republican chances...it's not illegal v**ers, they don't want legal v**es made easy.

Reply
Mar 18, 2021 18:28:02   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
woodguru wrote:
Do have the ability to say that making long lines longer is obstruction? Can you say that if lines are longer in a big city such as Atlanta it is up to the e******n board to implement everything they can think of to make the lines shorter, not longer? It is r****ded to try to defend actions taken that could only result in even longer lines when lines are already way too long. Go for it, tell us why it makes sense to do things that make longer lines...

and while you are there tell us why lines in rural white areas shouldn't be longer, why not reduce polling places that serve 6000 people so that you have to drive a couple of hours to stand in a line for a few hours to v**e.

Nobody in this country should be forced to stand in a line for over an hour, and everywhere lines are longer than that needs to have wh**ever is needed done to make them right, not the opposite way to make them longer.
Do have the ability to say that making long lines ... (show quote)


You may be right. And they should all have a picture I. D. They should all be registered to v**e there and be only able to v**e there. They should also be legal citizens. We could go on.

Reply
Mar 18, 2021 18:29:26   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
woodguru wrote:
The problem for the right that is openly acknowledged has to do with more eligible people having it made easier to v**e will k**l republican chances...it's not illegal v**ers, they don't want legal v**es made easy.


Now that one is a lie.

Reply
Mar 18, 2021 19:41:04   #
woodguru
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
You may be right. And they should all have a picture I. D. They should all be registered to v**e there and be only able to v**e there. They should also be legal citizens. We could go on.


All of that, but shorter lines...they have to show ID, that isn't even an issue anymore...

To be in line it takes being a legal v**er, showing ID, being vetted with registration...this is about lines being intentionally made longer than they were...nothing else matters, fix those ridiculously long lines.

And more importantly you should be willing to weigh into the parts that are wrong and stick to supporting what your party wants that you think is right. The problem with partisanship is you won't speak out about anything that your party does that is wrong. The GOP is operating on the premise that people are t*****rs if they speak out against any single thing.

The GOP in red states is attacking things that there are no problems with, or their fixes do nothing but make it harder to v**e.

Reply
 
 
Mar 18, 2021 21:18:53   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
SWMBO wrote:
March 18, 2021
Legalizing e******n f***d, forever
By Terry Paulding

H.R. 1 is Nancy Pelosi's signature bill, and exploring it is like taking a deep dive into political depravity. A partisan House passed it on March 3, without any Republican v**es. While it's currently before the Senate, provided the filibuster continues to exist, it's predicted to fail. The filibuster's continuation depends on ethical behavior by a few moderate Democrats, who are probably getting their arms twisted by Chuck Schumer, who wants it gone.

The ludicrously named "For the People Act of 2021" is a dream for elite progressives and a nightmare for everyone else in our great country. Whether or not it fails, it can be viewed as an exposé into the caviar wishes of these liberals, who are the only ones it would serve. Its primary purpose is to prevent f**r e******ns from ever taking place again and to create a one-party dictatorship in perpetuity.

H.R. 1 is designed to eliminate state control of e******ns, which was specified in the Constitution to safeguard against exactly this type of takeover. Because there are more Republican state governments, 27 Republican governors and 30 legislatures, the only way to destroy our e*******l process thoroughly is at the federal level.

No doubt, if the bill is passed, it will be challenged in court on constitutional grounds; the problem is, we now know we have a Supreme Court whose majority is made up of liberals and cowards who would rather not make waves. We've seen that with Obamacare and, most recently, with the integrity of the 2020 e******ns being wholly disregarded by the Court.
March 18, 2021 br Legalizing e******n f***d, forev... (show quote)


So much for Trump's SCOTUS triumphs. ..


I'm still pretty happy with his picks

Reply
Mar 18, 2021 22:10:24   #
Sicilianthing
 
SWMBO wrote:
March 18, 2021
Legalizing e******n f***d, forever
By Terry Paulding

H.R. 1 is Nancy Pelosi's signature bill, and exploring it is like taking a deep dive into political depravity. A partisan House passed it on March 3, without any Republican v**es. While it's currently before the Senate, provided the filibuster continues to exist, it's predicted to fail. The filibuster's continuation depends on ethical behavior by a few moderate Democrats, who are probably getting their arms twisted by Chuck Schumer, who wants it gone.

The ludicrously named "For the People Act of 2021" is a dream for elite progressives and a nightmare for everyone else in our great country. Whether or not it fails, it can be viewed as an exposé into the caviar wishes of these liberals, who are the only ones it would serve. Its primary purpose is to prevent f**r e******ns from ever taking place again and to create a one-party dictatorship in perpetuity.

H.R. 1 is designed to eliminate state control of e******ns, which was specified in the Constitution to safeguard against exactly this type of takeover. Because there are more Republican state governments, 27 Republican governors and 30 legislatures, the only way to destroy our e*******l process thoroughly is at the federal level.

No doubt, if the bill is passed, it will be challenged in court on constitutional grounds; the problem is, we now know we have a Supreme Court whose majority is made up of liberals and cowards who would rather not make waves. We've seen that with Obamacare and, most recently, with the integrity of the 2020 e******ns being wholly disregarded by the Court.
March 18, 2021 br Legalizing e******n f***d, forev... (show quote)


>>>

The Only way you get America back is by MAGA M*****as... so you better get serious about it.

Nothing else any of you have done past or present is going to work !

Do You understand ?

Reply
Mar 19, 2021 09:37:50   #
FallenOak Loc: St George Utah
 
woodguru wrote:
All of that, but shorter lines...they have to show ID, that isn't even an issue anymore...

To be in line it takes being a legal v**er, showing ID, being vetted with registration...this is about lines being intentionally made longer than they were...nothing else matters, fix those ridiculously long lines.

And more importantly you should be willing to weigh into the parts that are wrong and stick to supporting what your party wants that you think is right. The problem with partisanship is you won't speak out about anything that your party does that is wrong. The GOP is operating on the premise that people are t*****rs if they speak out against any single thing.

The GOP in red states is attacking things that there are no problems with, or their fixes do nothing but make it harder to v**e.
All of that, but shorter lines...they have to show... (show quote)


I am failing to understand your anger against long lines. When I was young you expected to be drafted and to spend the next two years in line. Now that is a long time, not just an hour or two in a line. Time to bring back the draft and teach the people residing in this land to honor its history and the good way of life they have.

Reply
Mar 19, 2021 15:39:57   #
Auntie Dee
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
If it was not to their great advantage Democrats would not propose it. F**r e******ns is the furthest thing from their mind.


Absolutely!

Reply
 
 
Mar 19, 2021 22:57:56   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
Auntie Dee wrote:
Absolutely!


Majority:
The majority has the v**es already to win.
Why do you persist to try to spin the left
As scheming to win e******ns?
They are the Majority.
When the right hasn’t got one single platform to run on , why do you think the left are the the lying scheming c***ting side of the equation ?

Reply
Mar 20, 2021 09:36:34   #
WEBCO
 
woodguru wrote:
Do have the ability to say that making long lines longer is obstruction? Can you say that if lines are longer in a big city such as Atlanta it is up to the e******n board to implement everything they can think of to make the lines shorter, not longer? It is r****ded to try to defend actions taken that could only result in even longer lines when lines are already way too long. Go for it, tell us why it makes sense to do things that make longer lines...

and while you are there tell us why lines in rural white areas shouldn't be longer, why not reduce polling places that serve 6000 people so that you have to drive a couple of hours to stand in a line for a few hours to v**e.

Nobody in this country should be forced to stand in a line for over an hour, and everywhere lines are longer than that needs to have wh**ever is needed done to make them right, not the opposite way to make them longer.
Do have the ability to say that making long lines ... (show quote)


People will stand in line for hours to get $100 off the price of a TV and you think v****g should be easier?

This bill is unconstitutional and completely unethical. If it passes I predict we'll have over 400,000,000 v**es cast in the next e******n.

Reply
Mar 20, 2021 09:58:04   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
SWMBO wrote:
March 18, 2021
Legalizing e******n f***d, forever
By Terry Paulding

H.R. 1 is Nancy Pelosi's signature bill, and exploring it is like taking a deep dive into political depravity. A partisan House passed it on March 3, without any Republican v**es. While it's currently before the Senate, provided the filibuster continues to exist, it's predicted to fail. The filibuster's continuation depends on ethical behavior by a few moderate Democrats, who are probably getting their arms twisted by Chuck Schumer, who wants it gone.

The ludicrously named "For the People Act of 2021" is a dream for elite progressives and a nightmare for everyone else in our great country. Whether or not it fails, it can be viewed as an exposé into the caviar wishes of these liberals, who are the only ones it would serve. Its primary purpose is to prevent f**r e******ns from ever taking place again and to create a one-party dictatorship in perpetuity.

H.R. 1 is designed to eliminate state control of e******ns, which was specified in the Constitution to safeguard against exactly this type of takeover. Because there are more Republican state governments, 27 Republican governors and 30 legislatures, the only way to destroy our e*******l process thoroughly is at the federal level.

No doubt, if the bill is passed, it will be challenged in court on constitutional grounds; the problem is, we now know we have a Supreme Court whose majority is made up of liberals and cowards who would rather not make waves. We've seen that with Obamacare and, most recently, with the integrity of the 2020 e******ns being wholly disregarded by the Court.
March 18, 2021 br Legalizing e******n f***d, forev... (show quote)



The Tyranny of The Minority. !

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.