The Big Power Grap! Fresh off their efforts in support of a C****-** relief package that will be the biggest source of government funding for a******n and the a******n industry in 10...

ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

Fresh off their efforts in support of a C****-** relief package that will be the biggest source of government funding for a******n and the a******n industry in 10 years, Senate Democrats may now try to ram through another catastrophic bill known as H.R. 1, which would cripple states’ ability to run their own e******ns.

They may try to alter the filibuster to do it. Appearing on “Meet the Press” this past Sunday, Democratic Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia hinted at doing so: “I’m willing to look at any way we can. . . . There’s no need for us to go to reconciliation until the other process has failed. That means the normal process of a committee, a hearing, amendments.”

This means that Senate Democrats are looking at trying to tamper with the traditional 60-v**e threshold for certain v**es, which would enable them to ram through their progressive wish list on H.R. 1 and perhaps other bills like the E******y Act. It even contains a religious test for certain redistricting commissions set up by the bill.

Ironically, while claiming to help “e******n integrity,” H.R. 1 would dramatically increase donor disclosure requirements, severely limiting the ability of non-profit organizations and the individuals who support them to engage in public debate on important issues, including a******n and religious liberty. It would effectively put a target on the backs of those who refuse to bow to cancel culture.

H.R. 1 is also a federal power grab that cripples states’ ability to run e******ns and increases the likelihood of v***r f***d. It would hamper states’ ability to determine v**ers’ qualifications, ensure the accuracy of v***r r**********n rolls, and determine the district boundary lines for electing their representatives. It would also allow individuals to v**e without an ID and would permit online v***r r**********n that is not tied to an existing state record such as a driver’s license. These examples are just the tip of the iceberg! Let your politicians know your feelings!

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

ldsuttonjr wrote:

Fresh off their efforts in support of a C****-** relief package that will be the biggest source of government funding for a******n and the a******n industry in 10 years, Senate Democrats may now try to ram through another catastrophic bill known as H.R. 1, which would cripple states’ ability to run their own e******ns.

They may try to alter the filibuster to do it. Appearing on “Meet the Press” this past Sunday, Democratic Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia hinted at doing so: “I’m willing to look at any way we can. . . . There’s no need for us to go to reconciliation until the other process has failed. That means the normal process of a committee, a hearing, amendments.”

This means that Senate Democrats are looking at trying to tamper with the traditional 60-v**e threshold for certain v**es, which would enable them to ram through their progressive wish list on H.R. 1 and perhaps other bills like the E******y Act. It even contains a religious test for certain redistricting commissions set up by the bill.

Ironically, while claiming to help “e******n integrity,” H.R. 1 would dramatically increase donor disclosure requirements, severely limiting the ability of non-profit organizations and the individuals who support them to engage in public debate on important issues, including a******n and religious liberty. It would effectively put a target on the backs of those who refuse to bow to cancel culture.

H.R. 1 is also a federal power grab that cripples states’ ability to run e******ns and increases the likelihood of v***r f***d. It would hamper states’ ability to determine v**ers’ qualifications, ensure the accuracy of v***r r**********n rolls, and determine the district boundary lines for electing their representatives. It would also allow individuals to v**e without an ID and would permit online v***r r**********n that is not tied to an existing state record such as a driver’s license. These examples are just the tip of the iceberg! Let your politicians know your feelings!

Fresh off their efforts in support of a C****-** r... (show quote)

This will not be funding any such a******n thing.
How could you even say such a thing ?
Have you now resorted to just making chit up like poppy trump ?
This could be serious.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

ldsuttonjr wrote:

Fresh off their efforts in support of a C****-** relief package that will be the biggest source of government funding for a******n and the a******n industry in 10 years, Senate Democrats may now try to ram through another catastrophic bill known as H.R. 1, which would cripple states’ ability to run their own e******ns.

They may try to alter the filibuster to do it. Appearing on “Meet the Press” this past Sunday, Democratic Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia hinted at doing so: “I’m willing to look at any way we can. . . . There’s no need for us to go to reconciliation until the other process has failed. That means the normal process of a committee, a hearing, amendments.”

This means that Senate Democrats are looking at trying to tamper with the traditional 60-v**e threshold for certain v**es, which would enable them to ram through their progressive wish list on H.R. 1 and perhaps other bills like the E******y Act. It even contains a religious test for certain redistricting commissions set up by the bill.

Ironically, while claiming to help “e******n integrity,” H.R. 1 would dramatically increase donor disclosure requirements, severely limiting the ability of non-profit organizations and the individuals who support them to engage in public debate on important issues, including a******n and religious liberty. It would effectively put a target on the backs of those who refuse to bow to cancel culture.

H.R. 1 is also a federal power grab that cripples states’ ability to run e******ns and increases the likelihood of v***r f***d. It would hamper states’ ability to determine v**ers’ qualifications, ensure the accuracy of v***r r**********n rolls, and determine the district boundary lines for electing their representatives. It would also allow individuals to v**e without an ID and would permit online v***r r**********n that is not tied to an existing state record such as a driver’s license. These examples are just the tip of the iceberg! Let your politicians know your feelings!

Fresh off their efforts in support of a C****-** r... (show quote)

Here we go with the a******n meme again.

If want to get people cranked up, tell them how much over budget the F35 is, why the planes aren't battle ready and why maintenance costs are way higher than any other aircraft in our stable.

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

ldsuttonjr wrote:

Fresh off their efforts in support of a C****-** relief package that will be the biggest source of government funding for a******n and the a******n industry in 10 years, Senate Democrats may now try to ram through another catastrophic bill known as H.R. 1, which would cripple states’ ability to run their own e******ns.

They may try to alter the filibuster to do it. Appearing on “Meet the Press” this past Sunday, Democratic Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia hinted at doing so: “I’m willing to look at any way we can. . . . There’s no need for us to go to reconciliation until the other process has failed. That means the normal process of a committee, a hearing, amendments.”

This means that Senate Democrats are looking at trying to tamper with the traditional 60-v**e threshold for certain v**es, which would enable them to ram through their progressive wish list on H.R. 1 and perhaps other bills like the E******y Act. It even contains a religious test for certain redistricting commissions set up by the bill.

Ironically, while claiming to help “e******n integrity,” H.R. 1 would dramatically increase donor disclosure requirements, severely limiting the ability of non-profit organizations and the individuals who support them to engage in public debate on important issues, including a******n and religious liberty. It would effectively put a target on the backs of those who refuse to bow to cancel culture.

H.R. 1 is also a federal power grab that cripples states’ ability to run e******ns and increases the likelihood of v***r f***d. It would hamper states’ ability to determine v**ers’ qualifications, ensure the accuracy of v***r r**********n rolls, and determine the district boundary lines for electing their representatives. It would also allow individuals to v**e without an ID and would permit online v***r r**********n that is not tied to an existing state record such as a driver’s license. These examples are just the tip of the iceberg! Let your politicians know your feelings!

Fresh off their efforts in support of a C****-** r... (show quote)

What are your feelings?
Do you know you are speaking out against a bill that will probably do more for you than any Republican bill ever has , all combined ?
Why would you take side of rich oligarchs who don’t need more money but don’t want you to have it either.
I may never understand.

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

lpnmajor wrote:

Here we go with the a******n meme again.

If want to get people cranked up, tell them how much over budget the F35 is, why the planes aren't battle ready and why maintenance costs are way higher than any other aircraft in our stable.

And that they can’t fly a night or in the rain.

Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas

Milosia2 wrote:

And that they can’t fly a night or in the rain.

The two of you have no idea what you're talking about, you really should stop.

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:

The two of you have no idea what you're talking about, you really should stop.

Where has the F35 been seen in flight.
Oh knowledgeable one.
All the times we needed jets, none were F35s.
The cost overruns continue.
Still no flight.
I think they’re around $2Billion each by now.

DaWg44

Milosia2 wrote:

What are your feelings?
Do you know you are speaking out against a bill that will probably do more for you than any Republican bill ever has , all combined ?
Why would you take side of rich oligarchs who don’t need more money but don’t want you to have it either.
I may never understand.

Milusia, have you read the Bill at all? Is English your 3-4th language? What does an F-35 plane have to do with v***r f***d?

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

DaWg44 wrote:

Milusia, have you read the Bill at all? Is English your 3-4th language? What does an F-35 plane have to do with v***r f***d?

Nothing. That’s the point !

ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

Milosia2 wrote:

This will not be funding any such a******n thing.
How could you even say such a thing ?
Have you now resorted to just making chit up like poppy trump ?
This could be serious.

Who could ever take you seriously! Get back to your drugs!

ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

lpnmajor wrote:

Here we go with the a******n meme again.

If want to get people cranked up, tell them how much over budget the F35 is, why the planes aren't battle ready and why maintenance costs are way higher than any other aircraft in our stable.

Hey Bozo get back to the subject HR-1! If you think the F-35 is expensive just wait for this red heron!

ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

Milosia2 wrote:

What are your feelings?
Do you know you are speaking out against a bill that will probably do more for you than any Republican bill ever has , all combined ?
Why would you take side of rich oligarchs who don’t need more money but don’t want you to have it either.
I may never understand.

Go see your shrink! What are you drinking?

ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

Milosia2 wrote:

Where has the F35 been seen in flight.
Oh knowledgeable one.
All the times we needed jets, none were F35s.
The cost overruns continue.
Still no flight.
I think they’re around $2Billion each by now.

Get back on the subject!

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

ldsuttonjr wrote:

Get back on the subject!

I was on the subject. It seemed nobody wanted to discuss it.
Do you know you are speaking out against a bill that will probably do more for you than any Republican bill ever has , all combined ?
Why would you take side of rich oligarchs who don’t need more money but don’t want you to have it either.
I may never understand.

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

DaWg44 wrote:

Milusia, have you read the Bill at all? Is English your 3-4th language? What does an F-35 plane have to do with v***r f***d?

I pay representatives to read it for me.
That’s why they’re there, right !
What good could I do if I had read the bill ?
If you’ve read it, tell me what your plans are.
I mean aside from criticizing everyone that that’s trying to get you some sort of economic relief !