grazeem wrote:
I think, the next three years will prove B******i,
as adventagious to the Republicans, against Mrs. Clinton,
as Obama's Kenyan birth certificate has been.
Even if President Obama was born in Kenya he still would have been a U.S. citizen at birth, because his mother was an American, a fact which nobody to this date denies. Even if the child is born out of wedlock, if the mother is a U.S. citizen her citizenship carries to the child, who, assuming everyone was living abroad, had until the age of 21 to decide whether to keep his/her citizenship. In the case of Obama, he was living in the states at that age, not in Kenya or Indonesia, the latter of which country he actually resided in as a small child, due to his mother's second marriage.
Ted Cruz was born in Canada to an American mother and a Cuban father and he is legally eligible to hold the highest office.
JUSTICE! you say--B******i is political and as t***sparent as cellophane. The House Republicans have alrady had 11 meetings, have been given copies of all of the emails. When you believe conspiracy theories and lies the facts become lies.
If the Republicans think changing talking points is a crime, then every BlueBerry in Washington DC is a crime scene.
When the WH had their first B******i meeting--where was John McCain? He was on the "Today" show complaining--I was watching. When Matt Lauer asked him why he wasn't at the meeting--Mr. McCain got mad. How many Republicans attended the meeting--three, how many Democrats--eight. That was just how interested the Republicans had for getting FACTS.
First Republicans attacked Susan Rice, at first it was more about her not being nominated for Secretary of State because they thought President Obama would then select John Kerry--why you ask? Because they wanted the Senate Democrat seat that would be left by Kerry so they could elect a Republican to fill that seat. What could be more t***sparent?? And this is not working out so well since Ed Markey D-MA is ahead of Gabriel Gomez R-MA.
Then the GOP attacked the President--that is self explantory. And now it is Hillary Clinton...Why? Because she is the most popular Democrat candidate for 2016 and if she runs 35% of Republican women will v**e for her--what could be more t***sparent than that?? Maybe cellophane!! I guess I would be doing a lot of lying if I thought 35% of my party would be v****g for another party.
An Astounding Number of Republican Women Would V**e For Hillary Clinton in 2016
http://www.businessinsider.com/hillary-clinton-2016-poll-women-independents-e******n-2012-12