The principle of censorship: I understand that we have a first amendment, particularly freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom to assemble. These are...

Ranger7374 Loc: Arizona, 40 miles from the border in the DMZ

I understand that we have a first amendment, particularly freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom to assemble. These are freedom's that should never be infringed upon...whether or not you agree with the subject, these freedom's should never be infringed upon.

With that being said and living in a free society, I should be able to choose for myself and my family whether I want to live a fidelity in life or a wild one or anywhere in between.

But when, in the course of human history, like minded people create a faction and force the government to punish that faction's political enemies, that is absolutely wrong. Censorship should be a tool of safety not a weapon to demonize the people.

Censorship was used in the past to draw people to live a chast life, a life in fidelity. Which is an idea based in all religions to thier own fidelity right. Therefore members of the religion posed to thier beliefs in the fo of safety on the public. Among these examples are, prohibition against certain content in art. Which includes books, radio, tv, movies and soon all media types.

As a people we grow and since the late 1950s we started to rebel against this censorship. For those who were in control of the censorship, and practiced fidelity, thought that censorship was the way to go....yet they took it too far.

And we as a people rebelled against it. The hippocrates destroyed the principles of fidelity and replaced fidelity with a wild sense of freedom. And in the 90s when the public was wild, some thieves came in and assumed power. These hippocrates applied the rules of fidelity in unwise manners. This destroyed all sense of fidelity and what it means.

Censorship is to be used to bring us closer to a life of Chasity and self-control, to assume the power of self-government. That's freedom and a tool to protect that freedom.

But when society has gone wild, none of them understand, lest not comprehend the justice that always befalls the wild. And it is until the wild is defeated, no reward would come to be. Shelter a kid for twenty years, then release them with all the freedom's of society, then tell be how wild they will become.

So it is important to balance the fidelity of life, with the wild feelings of life. A wild person would say, "we should ban all constants in the alphabet, since they control the words, and the vowels need r********n", oh the poor vowels! So the wild bans all constants and the function of pronunciation gets destroyed because the wild did not understand the function of the vowel in the word, therefore all using that alphabet is punished. Both ways in this case.

By censoring words, phrases, etc, we destroy the meanings if those taboo words and create a myth of expression such that the wild and the fidelity cannot communicate. Thus war follows. This was already done with the queens english to the point of certain forbidden and taboo words. But in the end, a word is a word.

So the power of censorship with in it's principle must function as a defender of fidelity and not an aggresive weapon. Wisdom not wild thought should be exercised and hippocrates removed. Then censorship works. Otherwise this double sword will hurt all.

PeterS

Ranger7374 wrote:

I understand that we have a first amendment, particularly freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom to assemble. These are freedom's that should never be infringed upon...whether or not you agree with the subject, these freedom's should never be infringed upon.

With that being said and living in a free society, I should be able to choose for myself and my family whether I want to live a fidelity in life or a wild one or anywhere in between.

But when, in the course of human history, like minded people create a faction and force the government to punish that faction's political enemies, that is absolutely wrong. Censorship should be a tool of safety not a weapon to demonize the people.

Censorship was used in the past to draw people to live a chast life, a life in fidelity. Which is an idea based in all religions to thier own fidelity right. Therefore members of the religion posed to thier beliefs in the fo of safety on the public. Among these examples are, prohibition against certain content in art. Which includes books, radio, tv, movies and soon all media types.

As a people we grow and since the late 1950s we started to rebel against this censorship. For those who were in control of the censorship, and practiced fidelity, thought that censorship was the way to go....yet they took it too far.

And we as a people rebelled against it. The hippocrates destroyed the principles of fidelity and replaced fidelity with a wild sense of freedom. And in the 90s when the public was wild, some thieves came in and assumed power. These hippocrates applied the rules of fidelity in unwise manners. This destroyed all sense of fidelity and what it means.

Censorship is to be used to bring us closer to a life of Chasity and self-control, to assume the power of self-government. That's freedom and a tool to protect that freedom.

But when society has gone wild, none of them understand, lest not comprehend the justice that always befalls the wild. And it is until the wild is defeated, no reward would come to be. Shelter a kid for twenty years, then release them with all the freedom's of society, then tell be how wild they will become.

So it is important to balance the fidelity of life, with the wild feelings of life. A wild person would say, "we should ban all constants in the alphabet, since they control the words, and the vowels need r********n", oh the poor vowels! So the wild bans all constants and the function of pronunciation gets destroyed because the wild did not understand the function of the vowel in the word, therefore all using that alphabet is punished. Both ways in this case.

By censoring words, phrases, etc, we destroy the meanings if those taboo words and create a myth of expression such that the wild and the fidelity cannot communicate. Thus war follows. This was already done with the queens english to the point of certain forbidden and taboo words. But in the end, a word is a word.

So the power of censorship with in it's principle must function as a defender of fidelity and not an aggresive weapon. Wisdom not wild thought should be exercised and hippocrates removed. Then censorship works. Otherwise this double sword will hurt all.

I understand that we have a first amendment, parti... (show quote)

If this was an effort at vagueness I think you succeeded. Is there a reason you can't state in specific Queens English what has your panties in a bunch???

Ranger7374 Loc: Arizona, 40 miles from the border in the DMZ

PeterS wrote:

If this was an effort at vagueness I think you succeeded. Is there a reason you can't state in specific Queens English what has your panties in a bunch???

Look pete there are no good and bad guys, there are just those who are wild and those who are chaste. Right now the wild ones have power.......

But I am so sick and tired of the hypocrisy it sickens me. And right now I don't care what side you are on, because it is the honest, innocent people who are going to pay and that's screwed up!

Banning dr. Sues really? What's next vowels?

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

PeterS wrote:

If this was an effort at vagueness I think you succeeded. Is there a reason you can't state in specific Queens English what has your panties in a bunch???

PeterS, or any of you left-wing authoritarians for that matter...

Name ONE time in human history when the group fighting to ban books and censor free speech were the good guys.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Ranger7374 wrote:

I understand that we have a first amendment, particularly freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom to assemble. These are freedom's that should never be infringed upon...whether or not you agree with the subject, these freedom's should never be infringed upon.

With that being said and living in a free society, I should be able to choose for myself and my family whether I want to live a fidelity in life or a wild one or anywhere in between.

But when, in the course of human history, like minded people create a faction and force the government to punish that faction's political enemies, that is absolutely wrong. Censorship should be a tool of safety not a weapon to demonize the people.

Censorship was used in the past to draw people to live a chast life, a life in fidelity. Which is an idea based in all religions to thier own fidelity right. Therefore members of the religion posed to thier beliefs in the fo of safety on the public. Among these examples are, prohibition against certain content in art. Which includes books, radio, tv, movies and soon all media types.

As a people we grow and since the late 1950s we started to rebel against this censorship. For those who were in control of the censorship, and practiced fidelity, thought that censorship was the way to go....yet they took it too far.

And we as a people rebelled against it. The hippocrates destroyed the principles of fidelity and replaced fidelity with a wild sense of freedom. And in the 90s when the public was wild, some thieves came in and assumed power. These hippocrates applied the rules of fidelity in unwise manners. This destroyed all sense of fidelity and what it means.

Censorship is to be used to bring us closer to a life of Chasity and self-control, to assume the power of self-government. That's freedom and a tool to protect that freedom.

But when society has gone wild, none of them understand, lest not comprehend the justice that always befalls the wild. And it is until the wild is defeated, no reward would come to be. Shelter a kid for twenty years, then release them with all the freedom's of society, then tell be how wild they will become.

So it is important to balance the fidelity of life, with the wild feelings of life. A wild person would say, "we should ban all constants in the alphabet, since they control the words, and the vowels need r********n", oh the poor vowels! So the wild bans all constants and the function of pronunciation gets destroyed because the wild did not understand the function of the vowel in the word, therefore all using that alphabet is punished. Both ways in this case.

By censoring words, phrases, etc, we destroy the meanings if those taboo words and create a myth of expression such that the wild and the fidelity cannot communicate. Thus war follows. This was already done with the queens english to the point of certain forbidden and taboo words. But in the end, a word is a word.

So the power of censorship with in it's principle must function as a defender of fidelity and not an aggresive weapon. Wisdom not wild thought should be exercised and hippocrates removed. Then censorship works. Otherwise this double sword will hurt all.

I understand that we have a first amendment, parti... (show quote)

Censorship equates to who is doi g the censoring and why... The obvious, as clear as their agenda to “ silence” the people who do not adhere to their free speech of h**e, disclosure of their real intent and the use of the frauds in media who are owned by the same cloth~~ wanna be C*******ts who look to change the Free speech clause of the Constitution... Liars and falsely misguiding people was never to be an approved disgrace under freedom of speech..

Ranger7374 Loc: Arizona, 40 miles from the border in the DMZ

lindajoy wrote:

Censorship equates to who is doi g the censoring and why... The obvious, as clear as their agenda to “ silence” the people who do not adhere to their free speech of h**e, disclosure of their real intent and the use of the frauds in media who are owned by the same cloth~~ wanna be C*******ts who look to change the Free speech clause of the Constitution... Liars and falsely misguiding people was never to be an approved disgrace under freedom of speech..

Nice to see you post... Long time since the Psalms huh?

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Ranger7374 wrote:

Nice to see you post... Long time since the Psalms huh?

Nice to see you as well...Too long since the Psalms... Way too long...