Perhaps its time for conservatives to finally concede the undeniable t***h: Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and their fellow civil-rights crusaders have apparently been correct all along: There is indeed a whole lot of r****m in America that just wont go away. Thus its wholly understandable that Sharptonemphasizing that We have had enough!has so passionately condemned the recent police execution of Michael Brown in Missouri. Its likewise understandable that he calls this a defining moment for our country, a moment where the nation itselfwith all its weighty, r****t baggageis on trial.
The numbers, after all, dont lie. During the most recent five-year period for which single-offender, interracial crime statistics are available, w****s committed, on average, 65,923 assaults annually against black victims.(1) To frame it another way, 33.5 of every 100,000 w****s in the U.S. assaulted a black victim at some point during each of those five years.
Oh, sure, the nitpickers will point out that during the same five-year period, b****s in the U.S. committed, on average, some 327,900 assaults annually against w****smeaning that about 898 of every 100,000 b****s nationwide assaulted a white victim at some point each year. In other words, statistically the average black was nearly 27 times more likely to assault a white, than vice versa898 versus 33.5 (out of every 100,000).
But therein is heart of the problem, though you may have missed it. The white-on-black assault rate may be low, but it isnt zero. And in the calculus of modern-day civil rights crusaders, anything more than zero means, ultimately, that we still have a long way to go before we can finally get past our countrys troubled racial past. Any incidenthowever rare it may bebecomes the exception that proves the rule.
We find similar evidence of white r****m in other statistics as well. During the same five-year period, w****s committed, on average, 2,738 robberies annually against black victims. In other words, about 1.4 out of every 100,000 w****s in the U.S. robbed a black victim each year.
Meanwhile, 70,302 b****s annually robbed white victimsa rate of 192.4 per 100,000. Statistically the average black was 137 times more likely to rob inter-racially than the average white192.4 versus 1.4 (out of every 100,000).(2)
Once again, any white-on-black crime total above zero means that the hearts of too many w****s still percolate secretly with r****t longings to return to the good-ol days of lynchings and Jim Crow.
But if you really want your blood to boil, consider the stats on interracial sex crimes. During the same five-year period, black offenders were responsible for about 22,980 actual and threatened sexual assaults annually against white victims. By contrast, the number of white-on-black incidents of the same description were so infinitesimal that, in each of those five years, w****s were estimated to have accounted for 0.0% of all sexual assaultsactual or threatenedagainst black victims in the United States.
Such a statistic, of course, runs the dangerous risk of persuading shallow thinkers to wrongly conclude that maybe Americas streets and alleyways arent filled with hordes of white r****ts poised to abuse black women whenever they get an opportunity. But thankfully, we have deep thinkers and keen-eyed social critics like Al Sharpton to shine the light of t***h on white sex offenders, even where a white-dominated criminal-justice apparatus turns a blind eye.
Remember, for instance, how Sharpton helped us all become aware of Tawana Brawleys brutal gang-rape at the hands of w***e s*********ts in 1987? Oh sure, the nitpickers again will moan that the whole thing was one big lie. But dont ever forget: The only thing that prevented young Tawana from actually being raped by a pack of Klansmen was the fact that
well, no one raped her or even attempted to. But apart from that, everything Sharpton said about the case was true.
We must also thank Mr. Sharpton for having alerted us all to the horrors of the rich white boys on the Duke University lacrosse team who gang-raped a black stripper in 2006. Sure, it turned out to be another h**x that d**gged several innocent young men through a cesspool of pain and public humiliationbut hey, the noble quest for racial justice is bound to spit out a few collateral victims. No omelet can be made without breaking an egg or two.
Murder stats likewise bring into stark relief the white r****m that continues to infest our nation. In 2012, for example, 6,454 b****s in the U.S. were victims of homicide. Some 91% of those were k**led by other b****s, and 9% were k**led by everybody else, including w****s. Its unlikely that w****s were responsible for any more than about 3% of all black deaths by homicide. But those were the most significant and troubling 3%, dont ya know? The other 97% of victims can all rot in their graves, but theseah, thesewere the cream of the crop, just like Michael Brown.
In light of the various figures cited above, perhaps youll find it in your heart to be more sympathetic to Al, Jesse, and similar proverbial skunks who are forever seeking out the next picnic where they can show up and spray the potato salad. They have to make the most of Ferguson, you see, because opportunities like that just dont come around very often.
FOOTNOTES:
(1) All statistics are from Criminal Victimization in the United States, published annually by the Department of Justice Statistics.
(2) These assault and robbery statistics do not necessarily prove that black offenders are specifically targeting white victims. One reason why the multiples are so high (27:1 and 137:1) is because there are 5.4 times as many w****s as b****s in the U.S. In other words, b****s, in course of their daily travels, are 5.4 times more likely to encounter w****sand thus, potential white victimsthan to encounter other b****s (and potential black victims). To correct for this difference in the respective sizes of Americas white and black populations, we must divide each of the multiples by 5.4. In the case of assaults, the 27:1 ratio becomes 5:1, meaning that the average black offender is 5 times more likely to choose a white victim, than a white offender is likely to choose a black victim. And in the case of robbery, the 137:1 ratio becomes 25.4:1, meaning that the average black offender is 25.4 times more likely to choose a white victim, than a white offender is likely to choose a black victim.
John Perazzo
JMHO wrote:
Perhaps its time for conservatives to finally concede the undeniable t***h: Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and their fellow civil-rights crusaders have apparently been correct all along: There is indeed a whole lot of r****m in America that just wont go away. Thus its wholly understandable that Sharptonemphasizing that We have had enough!has so passionately condemned the recent police execution of Michael Brown in Missouri. Its likewise understandable that he calls this a defining moment for our country, a moment where the nation itselfwith all its weighty, r****t baggageis on trial.
The numbers, after all, dont lie. During the most recent five-year period for which single-offender, interracial crime statistics are available, w****s committed, on average, 65,923 assaults annually against black victims.(1) To frame it another way, 33.5 of every 100,000 w****s in the U.S. assaulted a black victim at some point during each of those five years.
Oh, sure, the nitpickers will point out that during the same five-year period, b****s in the U.S. committed, on average, some 327,900 assaults annually against w****smeaning that about 898 of every 100,000 b****s nationwide assaulted a white victim at some point each year. In other words, statistically the average black was nearly 27 times more likely to assault a white, than vice versa898 versus 33.5 (out of every 100,000).
But therein is heart of the problem, though you may have missed it. The white-on-black assault rate may be low, but it isnt zero. And in the calculus of modern-day civil rights crusaders, anything more than zero means, ultimately, that we still have a long way to go before we can finally get past our countrys troubled racial past. Any incidenthowever rare it may bebecomes the exception that proves the rule.
We find similar evidence of white r****m in other statistics as well. During the same five-year period, w****s committed, on average, 2,738 robberies annually against black victims. In other words, about 1.4 out of every 100,000 w****s in the U.S. robbed a black victim each year.
Meanwhile, 70,302 b****s annually robbed white victimsa rate of 192.4 per 100,000. Statistically the average black was 137 times more likely to rob inter-racially than the average white192.4 versus 1.4 (out of every 100,000).(2)
Once again, any white-on-black crime total above zero means that the hearts of too many w****s still percolate secretly with r****t longings to return to the good-ol days of lynchings and Jim Crow.
But if you really want your blood to boil, consider the stats on interracial sex crimes. During the same five-year period, black offenders were responsible for about 22,980 actual and threatened sexual assaults annually against white victims. By contrast, the number of white-on-black incidents of the same description were so infinitesimal that, in each of those five years, w****s were estimated to have accounted for 0.0% of all sexual assaultsactual or threatenedagainst black victims in the United States.
Such a statistic, of course, runs the dangerous risk of persuading shallow thinkers to wrongly conclude that maybe Americas streets and alleyways arent filled with hordes of white r****ts poised to abuse black women whenever they get an opportunity. But thankfully, we have deep thinkers and keen-eyed social critics like Al Sharpton to shine the light of t***h on white sex offenders, even where a white-dominated criminal-justice apparatus turns a blind eye.
Remember, for instance, how Sharpton helped us all become aware of Tawana Brawleys brutal gang-rape at the hands of w***e s*********ts in 1987? Oh sure, the nitpickers again will moan that the whole thing was one big lie. But dont ever forget: The only thing that prevented young Tawana from actually being raped by a pack of Klansmen was the fact that
well, no one raped her or even attempted to. But apart from that, everything Sharpton said about the case was true.
We must also thank Mr. Sharpton for having alerted us all to the horrors of the rich white boys on the Duke University lacrosse team who gang-raped a black stripper in 2006. Sure, it turned out to be another h**x that d**gged several innocent young men through a cesspool of pain and public humiliationbut hey, the noble quest for racial justice is bound to spit out a few collateral victims. No omelet can be made without breaking an egg or two.
Murder stats likewise bring into stark relief the white r****m that continues to infest our nation. In 2012, for example, 6,454 b****s in the U.S. were victims of homicide. Some 91% of those were k**led by other b****s, and 9% were k**led by everybody else, including w****s. Its unlikely that w****s were responsible for any more than about 3% of all black deaths by homicide. But those were the most significant and troubling 3%, dont ya know? The other 97% of victims can all rot in their graves, but theseah, thesewere the cream of the crop, just like Michael Brown.
In light of the various figures cited above, perhaps youll find it in your heart to be more sympathetic to Al, Jesse, and similar proverbial skunks who are forever seeking out the next picnic where they can show up and spray the potato salad. They have to make the most of Ferguson, you see, because opportunities like that just dont come around very often.
FOOTNOTES:
(1) All statistics are from Criminal Victimization in the United States, published annually by the Department of Justice Statistics.
(2) These assault and robbery statistics do not necessarily prove that black offenders are specifically targeting white victims. One reason why the multiples are so high (27:1 and 137:1) is because there are 5.4 times as many w****s as b****s in the U.S. In other words, b****s, in course of their daily travels, are 5.4 times more likely to encounter w****sand thus, potential white victimsthan to encounter other b****s (and potential black victims). To correct for this difference in the respective sizes of Americas white and black populations, we must divide each of the multiples by 5.4. In the case of assaults, the 27:1 ratio becomes 5:1, meaning that the average black offender is 5 times more likely to choose a white victim, than a white offender is likely to choose a black victim. And in the case of robbery, the 137:1 ratio becomes 25.4:1, meaning that the average black offender is 25.4 times more likely to choose a white victim, than a white offender is likely to choose a black victim.
John Perazzo
Perhaps its time for conservatives to finally con... (
show quote)
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Stop clouding the issue with facts.
I believe r****m is alive and well, fueled by the media. As the people watch this situation unfold, it further divides them. It takes the spot light off the mess our so called representatives have made of our country.
Keep dividing the people along the lines of race, g****r, and economics and they will never come together. The only color that matters to Washington is green.
JMHO wrote:
Perhaps its time for conservatives to finally concede the undeniable t***h: Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and their fellow civil-rights crusaders have apparently been correct all along: There is indeed a whole lot of r****m in America that just wont go away. Thus its wholly understandable that Sharptonemphasizing that We have had enough!has so passionately condemned the recent police execution of Michael Brown in Missouri. Its likewise understandable that he calls this a defining moment for our country, a moment where the nation itselfwith all its weighty, r****t baggageis on trial.
The numbers, after all, dont lie. During the most recent five-year period for which single-offender, interracial crime statistics are available, w****s committed, on average, 65,923 assaults annually against black victims.(1) To frame it another way, 33.5 of every 100,000 w****s in the U.S. assaulted a black victim at some point during each of those five years.
Oh, sure, the nitpickers will point out that during the same five-year period, b****s in the U.S. committed, on average, some 327,900 assaults annually against w****smeaning that about 898 of every 100,000 b****s nationwide assaulted a white victim at some point each year. In other words, statistically the average black was nearly 27 times more likely to assault a white, than vice versa898 versus 33.5 (out of every 100,000).
But therein is heart of the problem, though you may have missed it. The white-on-black assault rate may be low, but it isnt zero. And in the calculus of modern-day civil rights crusaders, anything more than zero means, ultimately, that we still have a long way to go before we can finally get past our countrys troubled racial past. Any incidenthowever rare it may bebecomes the exception that proves the rule.
We find similar evidence of white r****m in other statistics as well. During the same five-year period, w****s committed, on average, 2,738 robberies annually against black victims. In other words, about 1.4 out of every 100,000 w****s in the U.S. robbed a black victim each year.
Meanwhile, 70,302 b****s annually robbed white victimsa rate of 192.4 per 100,000. Statistically the average black was 137 times more likely to rob inter-racially than the average white192.4 versus 1.4 (out of every 100,000).(2)
Once again, any white-on-black crime total above zero means that the hearts of too many w****s still percolate secretly with r****t longings to return to the good-ol days of lynchings and Jim Crow.
But if you really want your blood to boil, consider the stats on interracial sex crimes. During the same five-year period, black offenders were responsible for about 22,980 actual and threatened sexual assaults annually against white victims. By contrast, the number of white-on-black incidents of the same description were so infinitesimal that, in each of those five years, w****s were estimated to have accounted for 0.0% of all sexual assaultsactual or threatenedagainst black victims in the United States.
Such a statistic, of course, runs the dangerous risk of persuading shallow thinkers to wrongly conclude that maybe Americas streets and alleyways arent filled with hordes of white r****ts poised to abuse black women whenever they get an opportunity. But thankfully, we have deep thinkers and keen-eyed social critics like Al Sharpton to shine the light of t***h on white sex offenders, even where a white-dominated criminal-justice apparatus turns a blind eye.
Remember, for instance, how Sharpton helped us all become aware of Tawana Brawleys brutal gang-rape at the hands of w***e s*********ts in 1987? Oh sure, the nitpickers again will moan that the whole thing was one big lie. But dont ever forget: The only thing that prevented young Tawana from actually being raped by a pack of Klansmen was the fact that
well, no one raped her or even attempted to. But apart from that, everything Sharpton said about the case was true.
We must also thank Mr. Sharpton for having alerted us all to the horrors of the rich white boys on the Duke University lacrosse team who gang-raped a black stripper in 2006. Sure, it turned out to be another h**x that d**gged several innocent young men through a cesspool of pain and public humiliationbut hey, the noble quest for racial justice is bound to spit out a few collateral victims. No omelet can be made without breaking an egg or two.
Murder stats likewise bring into stark relief the white r****m that continues to infest our nation. In 2012, for example, 6,454 b****s in the U.S. were victims of homicide. Some 91% of those were k**led by other b****s, and 9% were k**led by everybody else, including w****s. Its unlikely that w****s were responsible for any more than about 3% of all black deaths by homicide. But those were the most significant and troubling 3%, dont ya know? The other 97% of victims can all rot in their graves, but theseah, thesewere the cream of the crop, just like Michael Brown.
In light of the various figures cited above, perhaps youll find it in your heart to be more sympathetic to Al, Jesse, and similar proverbial skunks who are forever seeking out the next picnic where they can show up and spray the potato salad. They have to make the most of Ferguson, you see, because opportunities like that just dont come around very often.
FOOTNOTES:
(1) All statistics are from Criminal Victimization in the United States, published annually by the Department of Justice Statistics.
(2) These assault and robbery statistics do not necessarily prove that black offenders are specifically targeting white victims. One reason why the multiples are so high (27:1 and 137:1) is because there are 5.4 times as many w****s as b****s in the U.S. In other words, b****s, in course of their daily travels, are 5.4 times more likely to encounter w****sand thus, potential white victimsthan to encounter other b****s (and potential black victims). To correct for this difference in the respective sizes of Americas white and black populations, we must divide each of the multiples by 5.4. In the case of assaults, the 27:1 ratio becomes 5:1, meaning that the average black offender is 5 times more likely to choose a white victim, than a white offender is likely to choose a black victim. And in the case of robbery, the 137:1 ratio becomes 25.4:1, meaning that the average black offender is 25.4 times more likely to choose a white victim, than a white offender is likely to choose a black victim.
John Perazzo
Perhaps its time for conservatives to finally con... (
show quote)
Al Sharpton is right, the Black Community is very r****t against w****s and would love to take us on. The Black Community thing it can win a race war against w****s.
Ah-- Now the whole t***h of the Black and White picture is exposed . Now what the HELL are Jessie and Al gonna do to make a honest living ?
saveamerica wrote:
Al Sharpton is right, the Black Community is very r****t against w****s and would love to take us on. The Black Community thing it can win a race war against w****s.
saveamerica-both Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are agitators who fuel the flames rather than lead their flocks. There are many good black leaders out there who are trying to guide their people but that neither makes headlines nor enriches either Sharpton or Jackson so we do not here about those. A black police officer recently shot a white 20 year old. Where is Holder ? How about Obama ? Too busy fundraising or golfing to do his job while he fiddles the world burns. I am afraid we no longer have a president as he has not shown any interest in doing his duties for the past two years and we have another two to go. He enjoys the perks of the office but he is either too weak and inept to fulfill his oath
or is sticking his finger in America's eye determined to bring the country down to a level acceptable to him. Good Luck America !!!
Big A.... Al is right but to find out who they are ,go to a mirror, we are ALL R****T IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.but the it the way we deal with it matters.
Ricko : The ILLEAGAL NARSASSIST in chief in the WH has NEVER shown any interest in his job since day 1 . To him it's ALL about lying / campaigning / golf / vacation / EO's . The DUDE is a national disgrace and the laughing stock of the world . Yet the SHEEPLE love his BS --- BAHA- BAHA
JMHO wrote:
Perhaps its time for conservatives to finally concede the undeniable t***h: Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and their fellow civil-rights crusaders have apparently been correct all along: There is indeed a whole lot of r****m in America that just wont go away. Thus its wholly understandable that Sharptonemphasizing that We have had enough!has so passionately condemned the recent police execution of Michael Brown in Missouri. Its likewise understandable that he calls this a defining moment for our country, a moment where the nation itselfwith all its weighty, r****t baggageis on trial.
The numbers, after all, dont lie. During the most recent five-year period for which single-offender, interracial crime statistics are available, w****s committed, on average, 65,923 assaults annually against black victims.(1) To frame it another way, 33.5 of every 100,000 w****s in the U.S. assaulted a black victim at some point during each of those five years.
Oh, sure, the nitpickers will point out that during the same five-year period, b****s in the U.S. committed, on average, some 327,900 assaults annually against w****smeaning that about 898 of every 100,000 b****s nationwide assaulted a white victim at some point each year. In other words, statistically the average black was nearly 27 times more likely to assault a white, than vice versa898 versus 33.5 (out of every 100,000).
But therein is heart of the problem, though you may have missed it. The white-on-black assault rate may be low, but it isnt zero. And in the calculus of modern-day civil rights crusaders, anything more than zero means, ultimately, that we still have a long way to go before we can finally get past our countrys troubled racial past. Any incidenthowever rare it may bebecomes the exception that proves the rule.
We find similar evidence of white r****m in other statistics as well. During the same five-year period, w****s committed, on average, 2,738 robberies annually against black victims. In other words, about 1.4 out of every 100,000 w****s in the U.S. robbed a black victim each year.
Meanwhile, 70,302 b****s annually robbed white victimsa rate of 192.4 per 100,000. Statistically the average black was 137 times more likely to rob inter-racially than the average white192.4 versus 1.4 (out of every 100,000).(2)
Once again, any white-on-black crime total above zero means that the hearts of too many w****s still percolate secretly with r****t longings to return to the good-ol days of lynchings and Jim Crow.
But if you really want your blood to boil, consider the stats on interracial sex crimes. During the same five-year period, black offenders were responsible for about 22,980 actual and threatened sexual assaults annually against white victims. By contrast, the number of white-on-black incidents of the same description were so infinitesimal that, in each of those five years, w****s were estimated to have accounted for 0.0% of all sexual assaultsactual or threatenedagainst black victims in the United States.
Such a statistic, of course, runs the dangerous risk of persuading shallow thinkers to wrongly conclude that maybe Americas streets and alleyways arent filled with hordes of white r****ts poised to abuse black women whenever they get an opportunity. But thankfully, we have deep thinkers and keen-eyed social critics like Al Sharpton to shine the light of t***h on white sex offenders, even where a white-dominated criminal-justice apparatus turns a blind eye.
Remember, for instance, how Sharpton helped us all become aware of Tawana Brawleys brutal gang-rape at the hands of w***e s*********ts in 1987? Oh sure, the nitpickers again will moan that the whole thing was one big lie. But dont ever forget: The only thing that prevented young Tawana from actually being raped by a pack of Klansmen was the fact that
well, no one raped her or even attempted to. But apart from that, everything Sharpton said about the case was true.
We must also thank Mr. Sharpton for having alerted us all to the horrors of the rich white boys on the Duke University lacrosse team who gang-raped a black stripper in 2006. Sure, it turned out to be another h**x that d**gged several innocent young men through a cesspool of pain and public humiliationbut hey, the noble quest for racial justice is bound to spit out a few collateral victims. No omelet can be made without breaking an egg or two.
Murder stats likewise bring into stark relief the white r****m that continues to infest our nation. In 2012, for example, 6,454 b****s in the U.S. were victims of homicide. Some 91% of those were k**led by other b****s, and 9% were k**led by everybody else, including w****s. Its unlikely that w****s were responsible for any more than about 3% of all black deaths by homicide. But those were the most significant and troubling 3%, dont ya know? The other 97% of victims can all rot in their graves, but theseah, thesewere the cream of the crop, just like Michael Brown.
In light of the various figures cited above, perhaps youll find it in your heart to be more sympathetic to Al, Jesse, and similar proverbial skunks who are forever seeking out the next picnic where they can show up and spray the potato salad. They have to make the most of Ferguson, you see, because opportunities like that just dont come around very often.
FOOTNOTES:
(1) All statistics are from Criminal Victimization in the United States, published annually by the Department of Justice Statistics.
(2) These assault and robbery statistics do not necessarily prove that black offenders are specifically targeting white victims. One reason why the multiples are so high (27:1 and 137:1) is because there are 5.4 times as many w****s as b****s in the U.S. In other words, b****s, in course of their daily travels, are 5.4 times more likely to encounter w****sand thus, potential white victimsthan to encounter other b****s (and potential black victims). To correct for this difference in the respective sizes of Americas white and black populations, we must divide each of the multiples by 5.4. In the case of assaults, the 27:1 ratio becomes 5:1, meaning that the average black offender is 5 times more likely to choose a white victim, than a white offender is likely to choose a black victim. And in the case of robbery, the 137:1 ratio becomes 25.4:1, meaning that the average black offender is 25.4 times more likely to choose a white victim, than a white offender is likely to choose a black victim.
John Perazzo
Perhaps its time for conservatives to finally con... (
show quote)
Hey! What's with all the crazy new math? :lol: :lol:
JMHO wrote:
Perhaps its time for conservatives to finally concede the undeniable t***h: Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and their fellow civil-rights crusaders have apparently been correct all along: There is indeed a whole lot of r****m in America that just wont go away. Thus its wholly understandable that Sharptonemphasizing that We have had enough!has so passionately condemned the recent police execution of Michael Brown in Missouri. Its likewise understandable that he calls this a defining moment for our country, a moment where the nation itselfwith all its weighty, r****t baggageis on trial.
The numbers, after all, dont lie. During the most recent five-year period for which single-offender, interracial crime statistics are available, w****s committed, on average, 65,923 assaults annually against black victims.(1) To frame it another way, 33.5 of every 100,000 w****s in the U.S. assaulted a black victim at some point during each of those five years.
Oh, sure, the nitpickers will point out that during the same five-year period, b****s in the U.S. committed, on average, some 327,900 assaults annually against w****smeaning that about 898 of every 100,000 b****s nationwide assaulted a white victim at some point each year. In other words, statistically the average black was nearly 27 times more likely to assault a white, than vice versa898 versus 33.5 (out of every 100,000).
But therein is heart of the problem, though you may have missed it. The white-on-black assault rate may be low, but it isnt zero. And in the calculus of modern-day civil rights crusaders, anything more than zero means, ultimately, that we still have a long way to go before we can finally get past our countrys troubled racial past. Any incidenthowever rare it may bebecomes the exception that proves the rule.
We find similar evidence of white r****m in other statistics as well. During the same five-year period, w****s committed, on average, 2,738 robberies annually against black victims. In other words, about 1.4 out of every 100,000 w****s in the U.S. robbed a black victim each year.
Meanwhile, 70,302 b****s annually robbed white victimsa rate of 192.4 per 100,000. Statistically the average black was 137 times more likely to rob inter-racially than the average white192.4 versus 1.4 (out of every 100,000).(2)
Once again, any white-on-black crime total above zero means that the hearts of too many w****s still percolate secretly with r****t longings to return to the good-ol days of lynchings and Jim Crow.
But if you really want your blood to boil, consider the stats on interracial sex crimes. During the same five-year period, black offenders were responsible for about 22,980 actual and threatened sexual assaults annually against white victims. By contrast, the number of white-on-black incidents of the same description were so infinitesimal that, in each of those five years, w****s were estimated to have accounted for 0.0% of all sexual assaultsactual or threatenedagainst black victims in the United States.
Such a statistic, of course, runs the dangerous risk of persuading shallow thinkers to wrongly conclude that maybe Americas streets and alleyways arent filled with hordes of white r****ts poised to abuse black women whenever they get an opportunity. But thankfully, we have deep thinkers and keen-eyed social critics like Al Sharpton to shine the light of t***h on white sex offenders, even where a white-dominated criminal-justice apparatus turns a blind eye.
Remember, for instance, how Sharpton helped us all become aware of Tawana Brawleys brutal gang-rape at the hands of w***e s*********ts in 1987? Oh sure, the nitpickers again will moan that the whole thing was one big lie. But dont ever forget: The only thing that prevented young Tawana from actually being raped by a pack of Klansmen was the fact that
well, no one raped her or even attempted to. But apart from that, everything Sharpton said about the case was true.
We must also thank Mr. Sharpton for having alerted us all to the horrors of the rich white boys on the Duke University lacrosse team who gang-raped a black stripper in 2006. Sure, it turned out to be another h**x that d**gged several innocent young men through a cesspool of pain and public humiliationbut hey, the noble quest for racial justice is bound to spit out a few collateral victims. No omelet can be made without breaking an egg or two.
Murder stats likewise bring into stark relief the white r****m that continues to infest our nation. In 2012, for example, 6,454 b****s in the U.S. were victims of homicide. Some 91% of those were k**led by other b****s, and 9% were k**led by everybody else, including w****s. Its unlikely that w****s were responsible for any more than about 3% of all black deaths by homicide. But those were the most significant and troubling 3%, dont ya know? The other 97% of victims can all rot in their graves, but theseah, thesewere the cream of the crop, just like Michael Brown.
In light of the various figures cited above, perhaps youll find it in your heart to be more sympathetic to Al, Jesse, and similar proverbial skunks who are forever seeking out the next picnic where they can show up and spray the potato salad. They have to make the most of Ferguson, you see, because opportunities like that just dont come around very often.
FOOTNOTES:
(1) All statistics are from Criminal Victimization in the United States, published annually by the Department of Justice Statistics.
(2) These assault and robbery statistics do not necessarily prove that black offenders are specifically targeting white victims. One reason why the multiples are so high (27:1 and 137:1) is because there are 5.4 times as many w****s as b****s in the U.S. In other words, b****s, in course of their daily travels, are 5.4 times more likely to encounter w****sand thus, potential white victimsthan to encounter other b****s (and potential black victims). To correct for this difference in the respective sizes of Americas white and black populations, we must divide each of the multiples by 5.4. In the case of assaults, the 27:1 ratio becomes 5:1, meaning that the average black offender is 5 times more likely to choose a white victim, than a white offender is likely to choose a black victim. And in the case of robbery, the 137:1 ratio becomes 25.4:1, meaning that the average black offender is 25.4 times more likely to choose a white victim, than a white offender is likely to choose a black victim.
John Perazzo
Perhaps its time for conservatives to finally con... (
show quote)
Hey! What's with all the crazy new math? :lol: :lol:
Ricko wrote:
saveamerica-both Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are agitators who fuel the flames rather than lead their flocks. There are many good black leaders out there who are trying to guide their people but that neither makes headlines nor enriches either Sharpton or Jackson so we do not here about those. A black police officer recently shot a white 20 year old. Where is Holder ? How about Obama ? Too busy fundraising or golfing to do his job while he fiddles the world burns. I am afraid we no longer have a president as he has not shown any interest in doing his duties for the past two years and we have another two to go. He enjoys the perks of the office but he is either too weak and inept to fulfill his oath
or is sticking his finger in America's eye determined to bring the country down to a level acceptable to him. Good Luck America !!!
saveamerica-both Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are... (
show quote)
Just because Obama has shown little interest publicly doesn't mean he is anything but fully invested in the radical, fundamental t***sformation of this country. He just doesn't want his fingerprints on the evidence, Obama is implementing his agenda while working on plausible deniability.
"... shot an unarmed black male..." and the race balloon goes up! Any stats on how many people, including police officers, are k**led by unarmed people? Either with their own weapons or knives, clubs, hammers, pipe wrenches, axes, hatchets, crow bars, rebar, screw drivers, baseball bats, hockey sticks, sickles, scythes, shovels, rakes, hoes, etc.?? Just wondering.
Ricktloml wrote:
Just because Obama has shown little interest publicly doesn't mean he is anything but fully invested in the radical, fundamental t***sformation of this country. He just doesn't want his fingerprints on the evidence, Obama is implementing his agenda while working on plausible deniability.
That he is, and he can't do it with a unified America.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
