Oath of office: So if a politician takes an oath to defend the Constitution, and then turns around and tries to take away rights, isn’t that s******n ? Should they then not be held...

Big dog

So if a politician takes an oath to defend the Constitution, and then turns around and tries to take away rights, isn’t that s******n ?
Should they then not be held criminally responsible? And if found guilty, should they not be punished just as the Rosenbergs?

Wonttakeitanymore

Big dog wrote:

So if a politician takes an oath to defend the Constitution, and then turns around and tries to take away rights, isn’t that s******n ?
Should they then not be held criminally responsible? And if found guilty, should they not be punished just as the Rosenbergs?

Stealing the e******n is treason

Sicilianthing

Big dog wrote:

So if a politician takes an oath to defend the Constitution, and then turns around and tries to take away rights, isn’t that s******n ?
Should they then not be held criminally responsible? And if found guilty, should they not be punished just as the Rosenbergs?

>>>

No one is enforcing anything.
The DOJ is a joke !
Your government is criminal and illegitimate.
It’s cooked.
What are you looking or waiting for?

TruePatriot49 Loc: The Democratic People's Republic Rhode Island

Big dog wrote:

So if a politician takes an oath to defend the Constitution, and then turns around and tries to take away rights, isn’t that s******n ?
Should they then not be held criminally responsible? And if found guilty, should they not be punished just as the Rosenbergs?

newbear Loc: New York City

Big dog wrote:

So if a politician takes an oath to defend the Constitution, and then turns around and tries to take away rights, isn’t that s******n ?
Should they then not be held criminally responsible? And if found guilty, should they not be punished just as the Rosenbergs?

Big dog,

you are logically correct, but in practice the found guilty is the big problem. Therefore, no dice.