One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
NOT GUILTY..!!!!!
Page <<first <prev 11 of 13 next> last>>
Feb 24, 2021 09:01:05   #
Cuda2020
 
dtucker300 wrote:
You are nothing but a big fraud! An ignorant one, too. You are tip-top at calling people names. (Perhaps even voyeuristic.) Your one redeeming value is that you admit you are delusional. You are neither clever nor funny. LAMO!


Show me

Reply
Feb 24, 2021 09:07:38   #
Cuda2020
 
son of witless wrote:
I am attacking your utter sheer hypocrisy. If I appear arrogant to you, I care not a wit. Everyone who comes to OPP is a hardcore partisan. I am fine with that. I love speaking to those who believe the exact opposite of what I believe. Having to defend your ideas against an antagonist makes sure that you know what you are talking about. You should try it.

What I cannot tolerate is pretense. Every so often someone on your side pretends they are not a hardcore Liberal. You are the latest example. Whenever it occurs I always call the person out. Your comments on this topic show you are not what you claim you are.

I don't care that your views are left. You have the right to express them. I am all about the First Amendment. Be proud of who you are. There is no reason to act.
I am attacking your utter sheer hypocrisy. If I ap... (show quote)


Well, if you really knew me like you try to say you'd know what issues I agree with on the right, but you don't know, there's no pretense here, I do follow one party, I am not a party loyalists like you folks here, period, you believe what ever you want I don't give a #%^* Conservatives are notorious for labeling everyone one way or another. Go for it.

Reply
Feb 24, 2021 09:37:08   #
Cuda2020
 
dtucker300 wrote:
I'll give you partial credit. We are a representative democracy. The only direct democracy we enjoy is directly v****g for our representatives in Congress. We don't get to directly v**e on legislation. Sovereignty may lie with the individual but that is not the definition of democracy. There are lots of countries that call themselves democracies in which sovereignty does not exist with the individual citizen. C*******t countries call themselves democracies all the time.

How am I anti-Democracy?

What party am I entrenched in?

How am I anti-Democracy?

What bias am I blinded by?

Where did I declare half of Americans r****t?

What word did I assert as being spelled only one way?

You can protest with your answer all you want but it doesn't change the facts, no matter how often you dispute them.
I'll give you partial credit. We are a representa... (show quote)


I missed this when I came back on yesterday. Let's back up to words, you've denied it as a c**p because it was unsuccessful, when a c**p can be a *failed*
c**p attempt, examples shown here.

To put the failed c**p leaders in front of a firing squad would secure the president's legacy as the strongman who crushed the army.
Times, Sunday Times (2016)
A similar text message sent on the night of the failed c**p brought droves of people on to the streets to block the tanks.
Times, Sunday Times (2016)
He was serving five years for treason after a failed c**p.
The Sun (2015)
The failed c**p attempt looks set to reshape Turkey's public sphere.
Times, Sunday Times (2016)
In July the head of the navy fled the country after a failed c**p attempt.
Times, Sunday Times (2009)

Next how are you anti- democracy, in denying we are one, we are governed by the people, *we the People, By the people and for the people*,remember that? Therefore our strength, our sovereignty... is in the people.

. Clearly the right.
. Your party biases

The word spelling, as I said, it was an example that words can have more then one way to spell and define. I for one, when I think of a c**p, I think of a well planned strategy to o*******w, I see a revolt more as an impulse of a mob. I saw the capital as a well thought out plan to bring that many people together from different places at that time, on that particular day.

Reply
 
 
Feb 24, 2021 10:08:18   #
Cuda2020
 
dtucker300 wrote:
The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money. Margaret Thatcher


You can just as easily run out of money in a republic, or democracy or a dictatorship.

Reply
Feb 24, 2021 11:55:47   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
You can just as easily run out of money in a republic, or democracy or a dictatorship.


The problem isn't running out of money. It's redistribution that is a problem.

Reply
Feb 24, 2021 11:56:10   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
I missed this when I came back on yesterday. Let's back up to words, you've denied it as a c**p because it was unsuccessful, when a c**p can be a *failed*
c**p attempt, examples shown here.

To put the failed c**p leaders in front of a firing squad would secure the president's legacy as the strongman who crushed the army.
Times, Sunday Times (2016)
A similar text message sent on the night of the failed c**p brought droves of people on to the streets to block the tanks.
Times, Sunday Times (2016)
He was serving five years for treason after a failed c**p.
The Sun (2015)
The failed c**p attempt looks set to reshape Turkey's public sphere.
Times, Sunday Times (2016)
In July the head of the navy fled the country after a failed c**p attempt.
Times, Sunday Times (2009)

Next how are you anti- democracy, in denying we are one, we are governed by the people, *we the People, By the people and for the people*,remember that? Therefore our strength, our sovereignty... is in the people.

. Clearly the right.
. Your party biases

The word spelling, as I said, it was an example that words can have more then one way to spell and define. I for one, when I think of a c**p, I think of a well planned strategy to o*******w, I see a revolt more as an impulse of a mob. I saw the capital as a well thought out plan to bring that many people together from different places at that time, on that particular day.
I missed this when I came back on yesterday. Let's... (show quote)


Non-answer.

Reply
Feb 24, 2021 12:11:38   #
Cuda2020
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Non-answer.


Hahah of course

Reply
 
 
Feb 24, 2021 12:16:16   #
Cuda2020
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Well, if you really knew me like you try to say you'd know what issues I agree with on the right, but you don't know, there's no pretense here, I do follow one party, I am not a party loyalists like you folks here, period, you believe what ever you want I don't give a #%^* Conservatives are notorious for labeling everyone one way or another. Go for it.


Correction, I don't follow one party, go issue by issue, as we all should IMO

Reply
Feb 24, 2021 12:19:43   #
Cuda2020
 
dtucker300 wrote:
The problem isn't running out of money. It's redistribution that is a problem.


Isn't that what it is when they redistribute our taxes, where a billionaire like Trump or Bloomberg pays less then their secretary?

Reply
Feb 24, 2021 12:22:53   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Isn't that what it is when they redistribute our taxes, where a billionaire like Trump or Bloomberg pays less then their secretary?


It the manner in which they redistribute. The money going to people and programs that don't work. Far outside the purview of the Federal Government's enumerated responsibilities.

Reply
Feb 24, 2021 19:27:15   #
son of witless
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Well, if you really knew me like you try to say you'd know what issues I agree with on the right, but you don't know, there's no pretense here, I do follow one party, I am not a party loyalists like you folks here, period, you believe what ever you want I don't give a #%^* Conservatives are notorious for labeling everyone one way or another. Go for it.


I judge you by your comments on OPP. If you were the free thinker you claim to be, you would be far harsher of Democrats to balance out the vitriol you spit at Donald J. Trump .

Reply
 
 
Feb 26, 2021 12:53:08   #
Cuda2020
 
son of witless wrote:
I judge you by your comments on OPP. If you were the free thinker you claim to be, you would be far harsher of Democrats to balance out the vitriol you spit at Donald J. Trump .


I would feel the same way to any lying fraud t*****r. You righty's spit on Hillary when she said some people were deplorables, Well Trump has said much worse towards the Democrats and Liberals. So yeah, he gets spit on and for good reason.

Reply
Feb 26, 2021 13:07:37   #
Cuda2020
 
son of witless wrote:
I judge you by your comments on OPP. If you were the free thinker you claim to be, you would be far harsher of Democrats to balance out the vitriol you spit at Donald J. Trump .


Where did I claim to be a free thinker? What I said is I'm unaffiliated, you do know what that means? No, well let me explain, it means... despite of any of my views I choose not to be attached to any party, got it? Goood. I am, country first.

Reply
Feb 26, 2021 14:05:00   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Where did I claim to be a free thinker? What I said is I'm unaffiliated, you do know what that means? No, well let me explain, it means... despite of any of my views I choose not to be attached to any party, got it? Goood. I am, country first.


So besides not thinking freely you also don't stand for anything based on what we have seen of your views. Wishy-washy.

Reply
Feb 26, 2021 14:07:21   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
I would feel the same way to any lying fraud t*****r. You righty's spit on Hillary when she said some people were deplorables, Well Trump has said much worse towards the Democrats and Liberals. So yeah, he gets spit on and for good reason.


Trump doesn't go around calling people f*****t, N**i, Hitler, r****t, and many more, anywhere nearing the level of h**eful rhetoric from the L*****ts and Democrats.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 11 of 13 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.