Supreme Court to consider e******n lawsuits in February: "The Supreme Court on Friday listed several high-profile e******n lawsuits for consideration at its mid-February conference.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

"The Supreme Court on Friday listed several high-profile e******n lawsuits for consideration at its mid-February conference.

The cases include challenges to the 2020 e******n from Trump-aligned lawyers Lin Wood and Sidney Powell, as well as Republican Rep. Mike Kelly's Pennsylvania lawsuit. Nearly every lawsuit takes issue with the expanded use of mail-in b****ts by many states.

The decision came after the court declined to fast-track all e******n-related litigation in early January.

In nearly every plea for expedition, lawyers backing former President Donald Trump told the court that if the cases were not heard before President Biden's inauguration, their success would be unlikely.

But after the court pushed them off, many lawyers said that the challenges were still important and could have long-term implications for e******n fairness. Trump lawyer John Eastman told the Washington Examiner that even with Trump out of office, it was important to settle the issues raised by expanded mail-in v****g.

"Our legal issue," he said, referring to the way in which Pennsylvania conducted the 2020 e******n, "remains important and in need of the court’s review."

Similarly, Kelly's lawyer Greg Teufel, told the Washington Examiner after the court refused to hear his case before the inauguration that the 10-year congressman and major Trump ally had no intention of dropping the suit.

As e******n litigation continues to play out in the courts, many Republican state legislators have begun introducing bills to curb mail-in v****g through law.

If the Supreme Court accepts any of the e******n lawsuits, it is likely that they won't be heard until October."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/supreme-court-e******n-challenge-february

woodguru

None of them will affect the outcome, there was an e******n, and the results have been formalized according to law. Without proof of the actual numbers that were affected versus numbers that could have been affected, it's like Russian e******n i**********e. You can say okay, it is proved that there was interference, but no way to prove the quantitative effect...ergo, so what? Trump was still president.

ChJoe

woodguru wrote:

None of them will affect the outcome, there was an e******n, and the results have been formalized according to law. Without proof of the actual numbers that were affected versus numbers that could have been affected, it's like Russian e******n i**********e. You can say okay, it is proved that there was interference, but no way to prove the quantitative effect...ergo, so what? Trump was still president.

At issue now are future e******ns. Especially where states changed their own e******n laws illegally, allowing illegal and unconstitutional v**es to be counted. At the front also are the mail in b****ts and how they were handled. At this point it is clear that the e******n of Biden will stand, everyone gets that, but unless we know our e******ns are fair and not fraudulent, we are just another banana republic.

Sicilianthing

BigMike wrote:

color=blue "The Supreme Court on Friday list... (show quote)

>>>

Oh boy and you still trust the Clowns in Gowns ?

woodguru

ChJoe wrote:

At issue now are future e******ns. Especially where states changed their own e******n laws illegally, allowing illegal and unconstitutional v**es to be counted. At the front also are the mail in b****ts and how they were handled. At this point it is clear that the e******n of Biden will stand, everyone gets that, but unless we know our e******ns are fair and not fraudulent, we are just another banana republic.

I would agree with that, and the states "changing" laws were actually coming into a compliance with the exact things that work in dozens of other states, and changes to facilitate v****g in a world where c***d is a threat someone should not have to expose themselves to unless they choose to.

Red states that threw up challenges that meant nothing as far as e******n integrity were merely creating the potential of plausibility if trump lost, had t***p w*n they'd have seen nothing wrong.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

woodguru wrote:

None of them will affect the outcome, there was an e******n, and the results have been formalized according to law. Without proof of the actual numbers that were affected versus numbers that could have been affected, it's like Russian e******n i**********e. You can say okay, it is proved that there was interference, but no way to prove the quantitative effect...ergo, so what? Trump was still president.

It may affect the next one, however and many after that so the issue is worth pressing regardless.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Sicilianthing wrote:

>>>

Oh boy and you still trust the Clowns in Gowns ?

No. But so far they haven't actually heard a case...so I'd like to see the uproar when they do.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

ChJoe wrote:

At issue now are future e******ns. Especially where states changed their own e******n laws illegally, allowing illegal and unconstitutional v**es to be counted. At the front also are the mail in b****ts and how they were handled. At this point it is clear that the e******n of Biden will stand, everyone gets that, but unless we know our e******ns are fair and not fraudulent, we are just another banana republic.

E******n Day is e******n DAY.

PeterS

BigMike wrote:

color=blue "The Supreme Court on Friday list... (show quote)

Sorta a day late and a dollar short aren't you? Besides, I thought the problem was D******n software which produced millions of v**es for Sleepy Joe Biden then magically erased all evidence that it happened? I think the question is--which red herring are we going to chase?

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

woodguru wrote:

I would agree with that, and the states "chan... (show quote)

***and changes to facilitate v****g in a world where c***d is a threat someone should not have to expose themselves to unless they choose to.
>>>The Democrats are always saying we need to follow the science. Well, Dr F***i said there was no problem with on site, e******n day v****g. Follow the science and don't steal or set up for theft, our e******n for a threat that science say, doesn't exist.

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

BigMike wrote:

E******n Day is e******n DAY.

And that is how it should be. Period.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

PeterS wrote:

Sorta a day late and a dollar short aren't you? Besides, I thought the problem was D******n software which produced millions of v**es for Sleepy Joe Biden then magically erased all evidence that it happened? I think the question is--which red herring are we going to chase?

All of 'em. We aren't late.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

BigMike wrote:

color=blue "The Supreme Court on Friday list... (show quote)

None of their rulings will affect the 2020 e******n, only future e******ns.

manning5 Loc: Richmond, VA

lpnmajor wrote:

None of their rulings will affect the 2020 e******n, only future e******ns.

Please explain that if you will. Why can't the court affect the e******n results if they decide it was invalid?

ChJoe

woodguru wrote:

I would agree with that, and the states "chan... (show quote)

The appearance of C***d did not negate the constitution nor did it prevent people from requesting mail in b****ts as has always been available. This you should know. It is the wholesale distribution of millions of mail in b****ts which became the source of mail in b****t fraud; this as well as not checking signatures, verifying addresses of those registered to v**e etc. You, of course, know all this but try to sweep it under the rug.