Squiddiddler Loc: Phoenix

It will be an Army of Sheepies following the L*****t Department Of Defense every order after avowing during the swearing-in, to k**l their fellow American with, yes Sir, no Sir I understand.
-----------------------------

BREAKING: Dictator Biden Expected To Sign Executive Order To Use Social Media To Do THIS To Our Brave Military

Far Left Radical Democrat Maniac Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA
Here we go!

The dems are using the race card on a daily basis. Why?

To further divide the country in order to implement their unconstitutional agenda and policies.
If you are White, the odds are that you are a W***e S*********t according to the crazy Democrats.
Take a look at the latest insanity from a demented California Democrat.
Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA) is pushing President Joe Biden, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, and Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines to include social media posts as part of a military recruit’s background check, in order to prevent “white-s*********ts and extremists” from joining the military, Breitbart reports.
Speier wrote in a January 29, 2021, letter to Biden, Austin, and Haines that the Department of Defense and the U.S. Government at large are not “effectively screening servicemembers and other individuals with sensitive roles for white-s*********t and violent extremist ties.”
In today’s society with social media elites controlling what can and cannot be said, our government is already targeting anyone and everyone who does not fall in line with their agenda.
Let’s face it, teenagers and young adults use social media for everything and parents have very little to no control over what they do on social media.
Breitbart continued:
She wrote, “Social media platforms, such as Facebook, Gab, Parler, and 4Chan, are frequently used by d******c t*******t groups to recruit members and plan violent attacks, including in some of the above cases involving military servicemembers.”
Referring to the J****** 6 protest and Capitol building breach, she added:
These platforms were crucial for planning the J****** 6, 2021, d******c t*******t attack upon the U.S. Capitol and the Congress of the United States. Yet social media is not reviewed during the military’s accessions process or even as part of the background investigation process for security clearances, despite collection and reporting of other intrusive, private data, such as financial and behavioral health information.
As if right on que, the democrats are seeking to weed out potential military recruits that do not bow down to their demands.  They can use the excuse of “political extremism and w***e s*******y” all they want and with no accountability nor any opposition.
Joining the United States military takes fortitude and sense of patriotism, or at least it used too.  The very backbone of our nation that protects the citizens while they sleep, enjoy what little freedoms they have left and live their daily lives, could now keep out young adults based on their social media posts.
She called on Biden to issue an Executive Order identifying w***e s*******y and violent extremism as a critical threat that must be considered as part of the security clearance adjudication process and direct all relevant agencies to update the background investigation process to incorporate a review of social media information to identify w***e s*********t or violent extremist ties.
She called on Austin to direct the military services to establish procedures to review the social media activity of recruits as part of the accessions process, including the development of guidance to assist recruiters in identifying extremist groups and activities.
As the Biden and Harris administration push the political extremism and w***e s*******y agenda,  it is catching fire and with no actual definitions of what and who they view, leaves one to ponder exactly what 2021 holds.

On one level, this is not very remarkable. Not many Americans support W***e s*******y. Most people in this country find it d********g, and they should. But the question is, what does it mean to wage war on W***e s*********ts? Can somebody tell us in very clear language what a W***e s*********t is?
This is not a question of semantics. Joe Biden is the president of the United States, not a high school debate coach. He controls the largest military and law enforcement agencies in the world. He has now declared war, and we have a right to know, specifically and precisely, who exactly he has declared war on. Innocent people could be hurt in this war. They usually are. There could be collateral damage in this war, and the casualties will be Americans.
So, again, what is a W***e s*********t? You might be surprised to learn just how broad the definition has become. Bloomberg News has described a wall along our southern border as “a Monument to W***e S*******y,” so be certain not to support that. Colin Kaepernick, who seems to have the unequivocal support of corporate America, calls the Fourth of July an example of W***e s*******y. Better put away the fireworks and the hot dogs.
The United States Army, a trusted institution if there ever was one, has an entire manual on what is and what is not W***e s*******y. Apparently, among the tell-tale signs of a committed W***e s*********t are these: Celebrating Columbus Day, using the term “American exceptionalism”, any support for federal border security or English-only measures or “education funding from property taxes”. Using the phrase “there’s only one human race” is W***e s*******y, too, according to the Army.
This has the appearance of creating a standing military of loyalists and not soldiers, a Marxist military and not a military of free volunteers who sign the dotted line with their lives.
To achieve peace and unity people should stand united and set aside their anger and frustrations to create an open dialogue to one another.  Sure does seem like the Biden administration only wants peace and unity for those who are willing to submit and bend the knee.

woodguru

I see nothing wrong with eliminating w***e s*********ts from the military, or police for that matter, same goes for b****s that have attitudes against w****s that have been talking s**te on social media.

When you express attitudes on social media you are fair game. Talking about k*****g other americans you don't agree with is not open discussions. Americans are done with r****m and hatred, it is not free speech to express that

Radiance3

================
Biden is unconstitutional president.
https://www.facebook.com/davidjsorensen/posts/3393365584123513

American Vet

Free speech should not include hatred....

Of course, you want to decide what is 'h**eful' - and that's the problem.

woodguru

On his most unconstitutional day he will look like a founding father compared to trump

woodguru

Right now the problem is the spreading of lies and rhetoric, proven by the fact that they have no proof, only many people who also believe it.

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

Keep in mind that these people also use Farcebook etc. to push their c*******t Facist, Marxist agenda and so. looking at these things might be in the Government interests. But like all tools, a hammer can be used to build a country. A sickle can be used to harvest a crop. A hammer and a sickle will be used to destroy a country and ens***e the people

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

Do you also agree with eliminating C*******ts, Socialists, Facists, B*M (I repeat myself), A****a? If not, your jerk meter is pinging well into the danger zone.

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

He does push unconstitutional ideas. And also elected by obvious e******n f***d. FACT.

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

Hatred is qualified Free Speech. It is why the Amendment was created along with minority speech. We are allowed to hare that which is bad, like C*******ts, Facists, Marxists, B*M (I repeat myself) A****a. And we are allowed to express that.

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

***Right now the problem is the spreading of lies and rhetoric, proven by the fact that they have no proof, only many people who also believe it.
>>>You do have a problem with that.

American Vet

Lies and rhetoric are part of free speech.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

So what if they do? Every law enforcement agency in the country uses online content to search out p*******es, drug traffickers, human traffickers and the like, so consider the DoD's efforts as part of a normal criminal background check.

Subversive content may be covered under the 1st amendment, but doesn't excuse or condone it and neither should anyone else.

Grugore

Actually, according to the Constitution, it is protected speech.

Grugore

Without the ability to disagree, there is no such thing as free speech.