bylm1-Bernie wrote:
What I hear you saying, Straight Up, is that you don't see Christianity as being true but you're not quite sure but rather than explore further you would like to be left alone.
I think a lot of people fall into that category, but I'm not shopping for a religion. I am what you might call an agnostic... someone who doesn't make any claims about the t***h without evidence or logic to explain it. This is in direct contrast to Christians (or Muslims for that matter) who are so sure they are right and everyone else is wrong.
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
I have never understood the "Don't ram it down my throat philosophy." All one has to do is say, "I'm not interested in your beliefs." Is that so hard to say?
Let me help you understand it then... First of all, stop thinking it's a matter of personal belief. FAITH is about personal belief, RELIGION is about politics and THAT is what I am talking about when I say we don't want Christianity rammed down our throats. I am talking about Christian politics. The LAWS that Christians are pushing, like constitutional amendments to prohibit same sex marriage, have a direct impact on people who might not share the same Christian dogma.
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
An analogy I've heard expressed is someone who has a deadly disease and a friend has a cure for it but won't reveal it to the sufferer. Not really a friend, huh. Well, that's the way a true Christian believer feels. He doesn't believe as you do that all religions are the same.
And this is exactly the problem... The Christian is so sure that his cure is true that when the sick friend refuses the jar of l***hes, the well-intentioned Christian is offended. Also, there is a difference between a Christian offering a cure and Christian politics forcing it as a matter of law.
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
Is it any more unreasonable to ask you to consider his faith than it is ask him to accept your non-faith?
Again, try not to claim "faith" as a Christian reference. Faith is a human function that can be applied to ANYTHING, including one's self, the people you depend on, or ANY belief system ever conceived and as I have already stated, faith is a personal matter, so I have no intention of questioning or challenging anyone's faith, Christian or otherwise. Nor do I lack that human property just because I'm not a sworn Christian.
Keep in mind that this conversation started with Parky's post about how Biden didn't appear Christian enough for him because he didn't mention the name of Jesus Christ in his inauguration. My answer was that you don't have to publicly announce your Christian faith to have it. So how do you get that I am asking anyone to consider non-faith?
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
You may not agree with my analogy but that's OK. You don't have to.
No, I don't agree (as I have explained) and you're right, I don't have to agree either.
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
You may live in this Country and enjoy it as much as I do.
Not that I need your permission but yes, I HAVE lived here and enjoyed this country for 57 years and I raised a family here, created business here... I can live here because I have a legal right to live here and I do so because it's my home.
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
We are seeing so much these days of factions not only believing in their philosophy but insisting that those who disagree with them not be silent but accept their views or be destroyed. That's not how this Country was founded; the First Amendment of The Constitution guarantees that. Maybe some are not in agreement with that. They want it for themselves but not for those who do not agree with them.
I could not agree with you more. But I wonder if you don't see the Christian Right as one of those factions. Not only do I see that but I really can't think of any other factions that are as guilty of what you just described.
That argument about prayers in school for instance... Secularists are trying to stop that because it forces non-Christian students to comply with something their own religion may not tolerate. Try putting yourself in a Muslim families shoes for a moment. Or better yet, imagine your Christian child attending a school that wants to allocate time out of every single day for Muslim prayers. Would you be OK with that?
The reaction on the Christian Right is to play the victim card and say the schools aren't letting them practice their religion. But no one is telling them they can't pray at home or in their hearts. The ONLY thing the secularists are prohibiting is the forcing of religion on others. Well, if that's what practicing Christianity means, then we have a serious constitutional problem.
You can't have freedom of religion when one such religion is denying all the others. Just keep it out of public policy, that's all I ask.
BTW, thanks for the thoughtful and civil post. We might not agree on things but it's nice to talk it over.