One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
White House at full lie mode about Behghazi
May 9, 2013 12:37:52   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Here is a chance to hear the Liar in Chief of the White House, Jay Carney, at his best. Of course, he came to the presser prepared since he keeps reading his responses and flipping pages all the time to get the answers. He keeps talking about the 100% cooperation of the administration with the 5 House committees when both Issa and Boehner say that stonewall is the kind of cooperation they got. Some unclassified e-mails were showed to committee members but not one copy was allowed to leave the room they saw them in.

Jay the Liar, is in full voice trying to see how deep and wide he can dig the hole they have been digging for 8 months. He said, at least two times here that our Leader is determined to find the perps in the attack and dispense with them. The man has been saying just that for 8 months. I wonder how many more 8 month periods will pass before they bring even the leaders of the terrorist group, who they claim they know, to justice. Obama may not be around long enough to get it done.

Read some of the comments that follow the video. Not many libs commented.

http://conservativebyte.com/2013/05/obama-white-house-struggles-to-respond-to-new-b******i-revelations/

Reply
May 9, 2013 16:30:40   #
Jack
 
I am disappointed, and unhappy at the tone and dishonesty of this entry. Does the author really expect a press secretary to be extemporaneous in the face of members of the press when he or she is speaking for the President, or other policy maker? To refer to notes should surely be seen as prudent. Your writer is being unfair, and unworthy of trust.

Reply
May 9, 2013 18:01:11   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Jack wrote:
I am disappointed, and unhappy at the tone and dishonesty of this entry. Does the author really expect a press secretary to be extemporaneous in the face of members of the press when he or she is speaking for the President, or other policy maker? To refer to notes should surely be seen as prudent. Your writer is being unfair, and unworthy of trust.


Is it the blog writer or me that you are playing Saul Alinsky's favorite trick on? I am asking this because I see nothing but an attack of the messenger wotj nothing about the message. Well, I guess talking about how well Carney performed is an attack on what did happen with him.

Maybe you could tell us what about the things he said from his study of his papers were really true. I think you maybe should do that, since what he was saying was, much of it, untrue as all hell. Go ahead and tell me what we did that was so wrong.

Reply
 
 
May 11, 2013 01:39:06   #
Liberty
 
oldroy wrote:
Is it the blog writer or me that you are playing Saul Alinsky's favorite trick on? I am asking this because I see nothing but an attack of the messenger wotj nothing about the message. Well, I guess talking about how well Carney performed is an attack on what did happen with him.

Maybe you could tell us what about the things he said from his study of his papers were really true. I think you maybe should do that, since what he was saying was, much of it, untrue as all hell. Go ahead and tell me what we did that was so wrong.
Is it the blog writer or me that you are playing S... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
May 14, 2013 18:27:35   #
LAwrence
 
The entire Obama admi knows they have the press and the congress in their hip pocket and that they can do or say anything they want with impunity.

Reply
May 14, 2013 19:23:05   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
LAwrence wrote:
The entire Obama admi knows they have the press and the congress in their hip pocket and that they can do or say anything they want with impunity.


I would have to disagree with you here in that he only has the Speaker of the House and the Democrats there on his side. Of course, he has Harry Reid on his side and that makes the Senate his but he doesn't have all the House on his side. As long as he doesn't have both sides on his side he doesn't have the Congress.

Of course, Boehner who is very establishment which puts him in with the establishment Democrats is his or seems to have been for some time, but he will have to work with the other party members out of the House.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.