Jack wrote:
I am disappointed, and unhappy at the tone and dishonesty of this entry. Does the author really expect a press secretary to be extemporaneous in the face of members of the press when he or she is speaking for the President, or other policy maker? To refer to notes should surely be seen as prudent. Your writer is being unfair, and unworthy of trust.
Is it the blog writer or me that you are playing Saul Alinsky's favorite trick on? I am asking this because I see nothing but an attack of the messenger wotj nothing about the message. Well, I guess talking about how well Carney performed is an attack on what did happen with him.
Maybe you could tell us what about the things he said from his study of his papers were really true. I think you maybe should do that, since what he was saying was, much of it, untrue as all hell. Go ahead and tell me what we did that was so wrong.