It’s Not a ‘Conspiracy Theory’ When THEY Do It: Left Is Questioning Mitch McConnell’s V**e Totals in Kentucky
It’s Not a ‘Conspiracy Theory’ When They Do It: Left Is Questioning Mitch McConnell’s V**e Totals in Kentucky
The following story is brought to you courtesy of PJ Media.
I do so love liberal hypocrisy. What makes it so entertaining is that they are oblivious to their intellectual dishonesty and lack the capacity for introspection. It makes for unintentional humor when they can’t fathom why people laugh at their r**tous inconsistency.
The latest installment of liberal hypocrisy comes from an article in the radical left publication Raw Story. It seems that some liberals are questioning Senator Mitch McConnell’s surprisingly easy victory over Democrat Amy McGrath. The author of the piece, Allison Greene, is blissfully unaware that she’s asking some of the same questions asked by Trump supporters in the aftermath of the e******n.
Just what’s fishy about the v**e?
– McConnell racked up huge v**e leads in traditionally Democratic strongholds, including counties that he had never before carried.
– There were wide, unexplained discrepancies between the v**e counts for p**********l candidates and down-b****t candidates.
– Significant anomalies exist in the state’s v**er records. Forty percent of the state’s counties carry more v**ers on their rolls than v****g-age citizens.
– Kentucky and many other states using v**e tabulation machines made by E******n Systems & Software all reported down-b****t race results at significant odds with pre-e******n polls.
Do you mean to say that a lot of counties in Kentucky have more registered v**ers than v****g-age citizens? Perish the thought! Someone should have told her to ask the cities of Milwaukee, Detroit, and dozens of other Democratic states, cities, and counties how they ended up with more v**ers than v****g-age citizens. I’m sure it would be very instructive.
Just asking questions, you say? Yes…and your point is? The point is that Democrats are allowed to ask questions but if Republicans dare question the results of an e******n it’s a “conspiracy theory.”
As for the rest, Hot Air’s Jazz Shaw performs the necessary lobotomy on Ms. Greene’s gray matter.
They next note “wide, unexplained discrepancies between the v**e counts for p**********l candidates and down-b****t candidates.” Yes, it’s called ticket-splitting. Did Ms. Greene fail to notice that Joe Biden allegedly won the popular v**e in a “landslide” while the Democrats lost a significant number of seats in the House and are barely h*****g on to their majority there? Funny how that works, huh?
How about those “significant anomalies” in the v**er rolls and the fact that 40% of Kentucky’s counties record more registered v**ers than living, v****g-age citizens? Yes, we know. That’s true of a lot of primarily Democratic counties all over the country, but you didn’t seem to take issue with it when a Democrat was winning. I’ve been railing about the need to clean up the nation’s v**er rolls for years but nobody ever listens. I’m so sorry this is happening to you.
This is what happens when you get someone imbued with “the true faith” to write about something she knows nothing about. It’s like asking an Islamic fanatic to write about Christianity. The results can be entertaining.
And finally, Greene notes that v**e totals recorded by the E******n Systems & Software v****g machines were “at significant odds” with pre-e******n polling. Really? Ya think? A very brief Google search will produce enough stories about how the polls were once again a steaming pile of hot garbage to fill up an encyclopedia. I would also note the irony in a liberal complaining about the E******n Systems & Software machines while not uttering a peep about D******n. But hey… you do you, Alison.
We eagerly await Allison’s Greene next article about how strange and suspicious the v**e in the p**********l e******n turned out.
dtucker300 wrote:
It’s Not a ‘Conspiracy Theory’ When They Do It: Left Is Questioning Mitch McConnell’s V**e Totals in Kentucky
The following story is brought to you courtesy of PJ Media.
I do so love liberal hypocrisy. What makes it so entertaining is that they are oblivious to their intellectual dishonesty and lack the capacity for introspection. It makes for unintentional humor when they can’t fathom why people laugh at their r**tous inconsistency.
The latest installment of liberal hypocrisy comes from an article in the radical left publication Raw Story. It seems that some liberals are questioning Senator Mitch McConnell’s surprisingly easy victory over Democrat Amy McGrath. The author of the piece, Allison Greene, is blissfully unaware that she’s asking some of the same questions asked by Trump supporters in the aftermath of the e******n.
Just what’s fishy about the v**e?
– McConnell racked up huge v**e leads in traditionally Democratic strongholds, including counties that he had never before carried.
– There were wide, unexplained discrepancies between the v**e counts for p**********l candidates and down-b****t candidates.
– Significant anomalies exist in the state’s v**er records. Forty percent of the state’s counties carry more v**ers on their rolls than v****g-age citizens.
– Kentucky and many other states using v**e tabulation machines made by E******n Systems & Software all reported down-b****t race results at significant odds with pre-e******n polls.
Do you mean to say that a lot of counties in Kentucky have more registered v**ers than v****g-age citizens? Perish the thought! Someone should have told her to ask the cities of Milwaukee, Detroit, and dozens of other Democratic states, cities, and counties how they ended up with more v**ers than v****g-age citizens. I’m sure it would be very instructive.
Just asking questions, you say? Yes…and your point is? The point is that Democrats are allowed to ask questions but if Republicans dare question the results of an e******n it’s a “conspiracy theory.”
As for the rest, Hot Air’s Jazz Shaw performs the necessary lobotomy on Ms. Greene’s gray matter.
They next note “wide, unexplained discrepancies between the v**e counts for p**********l candidates and down-b****t candidates.” Yes, it’s called ticket-splitting. Did Ms. Greene fail to notice that Joe Biden allegedly won the popular v**e in a “landslide” while the Democrats lost a significant number of seats in the House and are barely h*****g on to their majority there? Funny how that works, huh?
How about those “significant anomalies” in the v**er rolls and the fact that 40% of Kentucky’s counties record more registered v**ers than living, v****g-age citizens? Yes, we know. That’s true of a lot of primarily Democratic counties all over the country, but you didn’t seem to take issue with it when a Democrat was winning. I’ve been railing about the need to clean up the nation’s v**er rolls for years but nobody ever listens. I’m so sorry this is happening to you.
This is what happens when you get someone imbued with “the true faith” to write about something she knows nothing about. It’s like asking an Islamic fanatic to write about Christianity. The results can be entertaining.
And finally, Greene notes that v**e totals recorded by the E******n Systems & Software v****g machines were “at significant odds” with pre-e******n polling. Really? Ya think? A very brief Google search will produce enough stories about how the polls were once again a steaming pile of hot garbage to fill up an encyclopedia. I would also note the irony in a liberal complaining about the E******n Systems & Software machines while not uttering a peep about D******n. But hey… you do you, Alison.
We eagerly await Allison’s Greene next article about how strange and suspicious the v**e in the p**********l e******n turned out.
It’s Not a ‘Conspiracy Theory’ When They Do It: Le... (
show quote)
I've questioned all those v**e totals............for trump that is. How does a universally disliked guy, 70% of the country no less, manage to get 74 million v**es?
I've counseled people for years, telling them that, when a spouse begins accusing you of infidelity out of the blue..................THEY are c***ting. So, all these accusations that democrats conspired to commit massive v***r f***d.........................................enough said.
lpnmajor wrote:
I've questioned all those v**e totals............for trump that is. How does a universally disliked guy, 70% of the country no less, manage to get 74 million v**es?
I've counseled people for years, telling them that, when a spouse begins accusing you of infidelity out of the blue..................THEY are c***ting. So, all these accusations that democrats conspired to commit massive v***r f***d.........................................enough said.
I've questioned all those v**e totals............f... (
show quote)
How did Biden ever get 80 million v**es? For several of the same reasons.
dtucker300 wrote:
It’s Not a ‘Conspiracy Theory’ When They Do It: Left Is Questioning Mitch McConnell’s V**e Totals in Kentucky
The following story is brought to you courtesy of PJ Media.
I do so love liberal hypocrisy. What makes it so entertaining is that they are oblivious to their intellectual dishonesty and lack the capacity for introspection. It makes for unintentional humor when they can’t fathom why people laugh at their r**tous inconsistency.
The latest installment of liberal hypocrisy comes from an article in the radical left publication Raw Story. It seems that some liberals are questioning Senator Mitch McConnell’s surprisingly easy victory over Democrat Amy McGrath. The author of the piece, Allison Greene, is blissfully unaware that she’s asking some of the same questions asked by Trump supporters in the aftermath of the e******n.
Just what’s fishy about the v**e?
– McConnell racked up huge v**e leads in traditionally Democratic strongholds, including counties that he had never before carried.
– There were wide, unexplained discrepancies between the v**e counts for p**********l candidates and down-b****t candidates.
– Significant anomalies exist in the state’s v**er records. Forty percent of the state’s counties carry more v**ers on their rolls than v****g-age citizens.
– Kentucky and many other states using v**e tabulation machines made by E******n Systems & Software all reported down-b****t race results at significant odds with pre-e******n polls.
Do you mean to say that a lot of counties in Kentucky have more registered v**ers than v****g-age citizens? Perish the thought! Someone should have told her to ask the cities of Milwaukee, Detroit, and dozens of other Democratic states, cities, and counties how they ended up with more v**ers than v****g-age citizens. I’m sure it would be very instructive.
Just asking questions, you say? Yes…and your point is? The point is that Democrats are allowed to ask questions but if Republicans dare question the results of an e******n it’s a “conspiracy theory.”
As for the rest, Hot Air’s Jazz Shaw performs the necessary lobotomy on Ms. Greene’s gray matter.
They next note “wide, unexplained discrepancies between the v**e counts for p**********l candidates and down-b****t candidates.” Yes, it’s called ticket-splitting. Did Ms. Greene fail to notice that Joe Biden allegedly won the popular v**e in a “landslide” while the Democrats lost a significant number of seats in the House and are barely h*****g on to their majority there? Funny how that works, huh?
How about those “significant anomalies” in the v**er rolls and the fact that 40% of Kentucky’s counties record more registered v**ers than living, v****g-age citizens? Yes, we know. That’s true of a lot of primarily Democratic counties all over the country, but you didn’t seem to take issue with it when a Democrat was winning. I’ve been railing about the need to clean up the nation’s v**er rolls for years but nobody ever listens. I’m so sorry this is happening to you.
This is what happens when you get someone imbued with “the true faith” to write about something she knows nothing about. It’s like asking an Islamic fanatic to write about Christianity. The results can be entertaining.
And finally, Greene notes that v**e totals recorded by the E******n Systems & Software v****g machines were “at significant odds” with pre-e******n polling. Really? Ya think? A very brief Google search will produce enough stories about how the polls were once again a steaming pile of hot garbage to fill up an encyclopedia. I would also note the irony in a liberal complaining about the E******n Systems & Software machines while not uttering a peep about D******n. But hey… you do you, Alison.
We eagerly await Allison’s Greene next article about how strange and suspicious the v**e in the p**********l e******n turned out.
It’s Not a ‘Conspiracy Theory’ When They Do It: Le... (
show quote)
I did a search and didn't find it. Where is the link to your article...
dtucker300 wrote:
It’s Not a ‘Conspiracy Theory’ When They Do It: Left Is Questioning Mitch McConnell’s V**e Totals in Kentucky
The following story is brought to you courtesy of PJ Media.
I do so love liberal hypocrisy. What makes it so entertaining is that they are oblivious to their intellectual dishonesty and lack the capacity for introspection. It makes for unintentional humor when they can’t fathom why people laugh at their r**tous inconsistency.
The latest installment of liberal hypocrisy comes from an article in the radical left publication Raw Story. It seems that some liberals are questioning Senator Mitch McConnell’s surprisingly easy victory over Democrat Amy McGrath. The author of the piece, Allison Greene, is blissfully unaware that she’s asking some of the same questions asked by Trump supporters in the aftermath of the e******n.
Just what’s fishy about the v**e?
– McConnell racked up huge v**e leads in traditionally Democratic strongholds, including counties that he had never before carried.
– There were wide, unexplained discrepancies between the v**e counts for p**********l candidates and down-b****t candidates.
– Significant anomalies exist in the state’s v**er records. Forty percent of the state’s counties carry more v**ers on their rolls than v****g-age citizens.
– Kentucky and many other states using v**e tabulation machines made by E******n Systems & Software all reported down-b****t race results at significant odds with pre-e******n polls.
Do you mean to say that a lot of counties in Kentucky have more registered v**ers than v****g-age citizens? Perish the thought! Someone should have told her to ask the cities of Milwaukee, Detroit, and dozens of other Democratic states, cities, and counties how they ended up with more v**ers than v****g-age citizens. I’m sure it would be very instructive.
Just asking questions, you say? Yes…and your point is? The point is that Democrats are allowed to ask questions but if Republicans dare question the results of an e******n it’s a “conspiracy theory.”
As for the rest, Hot Air’s Jazz Shaw performs the necessary lobotomy on Ms. Greene’s gray matter.
They next note “wide, unexplained discrepancies between the v**e counts for p**********l candidates and down-b****t candidates.” Yes, it’s called ticket-splitting. Did Ms. Greene fail to notice that Joe Biden allegedly won the popular v**e in a “landslide” while the Democrats lost a significant number of seats in the House and are barely h*****g on to their majority there? Funny how that works, huh?
How about those “significant anomalies” in the v**er rolls and the fact that 40% of Kentucky’s counties record more registered v**ers than living, v****g-age citizens? Yes, we know. That’s true of a lot of primarily Democratic counties all over the country, but you didn’t seem to take issue with it when a Democrat was winning. I’ve been railing about the need to clean up the nation’s v**er rolls for years but nobody ever listens. I’m so sorry this is happening to you.
This is what happens when you get someone imbued with “the true faith” to write about something she knows nothing about. It’s like asking an Islamic fanatic to write about Christianity. The results can be entertaining.
And finally, Greene notes that v**e totals recorded by the E******n Systems & Software v****g machines were “at significant odds” with pre-e******n polling. Really? Ya think? A very brief Google search will produce enough stories about how the polls were once again a steaming pile of hot garbage to fill up an encyclopedia. I would also note the irony in a liberal complaining about the E******n Systems & Software machines while not uttering a peep about D******n. But hey… you do you, Alison.
We eagerly await Allison’s Greene next article about how strange and suspicious the v**e in the p**********l e******n turned out.
It’s Not a ‘Conspiracy Theory’ When They Do It: Le... (
show quote)
No, hard numbers tell a tale, all that's left ois to look at the hard b****ts and verify it, same as what is happening with GOP challenges.
This Kentucky charge is simple, straight forward, and easily checked out, the claim being that more v**es were cast than there are registered v**ers. If those numbers are proved we have a problem, not vague claims about things that could have happened but can't be proved.
woodguru wrote:
No, hard numbers tell a tale, all that's left ois to look at the hard b****ts and verify it, same as what is happening with GOP challenges.
This Kentucky charge is simple, straight forward, and easily checked out, the claim being that more v**es were cast than there are registered v**ers. If those numbers are proved we have a problem, not vague claims about things that could have happened but can't be proved.
That's the exact same claim about many v****g precincts in battleground states. Statistical anomalies of extremely high turnout and more v**es than registered v**ers, especially in some states that do not allow same-day registrations.
All e******ns in the south are suspecte the only way republicans stay in power is by preventing minorities from v**eing.
Another reason many red states refuse to use paper b****ts
dtucker300 wrote:
How did Biden ever get 80 million v**es? For several of the same reasons.
Have you ever seen the numbers on registered v**ers? Start there
Lonewolf wrote:
All e******ns in the south are suspecte the only way republicans stay in power is by preventing minorities from v**eing.
Another reason many red states refuse to use paper b****ts
You're still living in Jim Crow, are you?
dtucker300 wrote:
You're still living in Jim Crow, are you?
No but know why the south stays red some things never change
dtucker300 wrote:
You're still living in Jim Crow, are you?
If the Democrats are so absolutely certain no v**e/b****t fraud occurred that they should have no objection to complete forensic analysis of b****ts and machines to prove it. And it would put to rest once and for all the claim that Fraud was the decisive factor in this e******n. What are you so afraid may be discovered that you have to so fiercely and adamantly deny any fraud occurred?
Lonewolf wrote:
No but know why the south stays red some things never change
A lot has changed. The Dixiecrats are no more. Southern Democrats tried to prevent the civil rights act and v****g rights act in the 1960s. These were passed because Republicans supported them.
dtucker300 wrote:
If the Democrats are so absolutely certain no v**e/b****t fraud occurred that they should have no objection to complete forensic analysis of b****ts and machines to prove it. And it would put to rest once and for all the claim that Fraud was the decisive factor in this e******n. What are you so afraid may be discovered that you have to so fiercely and adamantly deny any fraud occurred?
“No objection”? They should be DEMANDING a complete and thorough investigation to put everything to rest.
But they aren’t, are they? Hmmm
dtucker300 wrote:
It’s Not a ‘Conspiracy Theory’ When They Do It: Left Is Questioning Mitch McConnell’s V**e Totals in Kentucky
Numbers, real ones that can be checked against hard b****ts
Numbers of registered v**ers that can be checked against more b****ts cast than v**es
Numbers of v**es for Biden but not for the dem senate seat (in impossible percentages)
All these can be squared with a recount or even an audit of the raw data that doesn't work
Other hinky races as well where the republican should not have won
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/12/why-the-numbers-behind-mitch-mcconnells-re-e******n-dont-add-up/
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.