Read the history of e******ns! Seems to me that the more or less expected route for electing a president is what the democrats believe is absolutely the only way it should go forward...

manning5 Loc: Richmond, VA

Seems to me that the more or less expected route for electing a president is what the democrats believe is absolutely the only way it should go forward today, but this simply isn't true and they in fact know it very well. The well-planned constitutional provisions to ensure we do not elect a president by massive fraudulent v****g are very much in play, despite the incessant nonsense noises being made by the democratic opposition, especially here on OPP! These noises are really meant to influence their fellow congressmen and the public to avoid having congress decide the e******n. Trump wins if that happens!

roy

manning5 wrote:

Seems to me that the more or less expected route f... (show quote)

And how fraudulent would that be. Maybe we need to go back and look at 2016 . Was there c***ting then,should Trump ever been elected. Maybe the last 4 years of Trump should be wiped off the record books. Let's just say this e******n had more security measures in place than 2026,or any other year,so if you say this e******n was a fraud,then 2016 definitely was ,dont you agree.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

roy wrote:

And how fraudulent would that be. Maybe we need to go back and look at 2016 . Was there c***ting then,should Trump ever been elected. Maybe the last 4 years of Trump should be wiped off the record books. Let's just say this e******n had more security measures in place than 2026,or any other year,so if you say this e******n was a fraud,then 2016 definitely was ,dont you agree.

Learn English and come back later; much later, dummy.

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

roy wrote:

And how fraudulent would that be. Maybe we need to go back and look at 2016 . Was there c***ting then,should Trump ever been elected. Maybe the last 4 years of Trump should be wiped off the record books. Let's just say this e******n had more security measures in place than 2026,or any other year,so if you say this e******n was a fraud,then 2016 definitely was ,dont you agree.

Report: DNI Ratcliffe Says There Was Foreign Interference in 2020 E******ns
https://insidescooppolitics.com/archives/3362

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

JFlorio wrote:

Learn English and come back later; much later, dummy.

It's called "Open mouth, insert foot"

manning5 Loc: Richmond, VA

roy wrote:

And how fraudulent would that be. Maybe we need to go back and look at 2016 . Was there c***ting then,should Trump ever been elected. Maybe the last 4 years of Trump should be wiped off the record books. Let's just say this e******n had more security measures in place than 2026,or any other year,so if you say this e******n was a fraud,then 2016 definitely was ,dont you agree.

No!

John Meoff

manning5 wrote:

No!

I believe there was fraud in the 2016 e******n committed by the Democrats.

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

John Meoff wrote:

I believe there was fraud in the 2016 e******n committed by the Democrats.

There was! And Hillary tried to appeal the e******n to Congress, but it was too late. She had already conceded.