nwtk2007 wrote:
You are correct, ACP. Although, I am not too comfortable with Trump in the leadership position of martial law, I suppose it IS possible he might do something like that. It all needs to be pursued but I think not at the expense of civil conflict which is, I think, why the SCOTUS didn't hear the Texas case.
Welcome back! Hope all is well...and I agree with you. Martial law would be an extreme move. I've also heard the "theory" that SCOTUS didn't want r**ts and crime and possibly threats to them and their families, so they caved to that. Although, being a Justice makes them targets all the time for lots of reasons...