Shooting mad!!!
Dec 12, 2020 15:50:53 #
Geo wrote:
Fire Teams? Am I right when I assume you talking about people with guns? What is it, too many video games, a twenty something year old that wants to play grownup Patriot. Are you going to grab your musket and take on the U.S. military? Maybe your going to shot everyone that h**es Trump? That's a lot of people.
https://military.wikia.org/wiki/Fireteam
You got it. See you could make crazy azz claims on the internet, too.
Dec 12, 2020 16:26:23 #
Ted_68 wrote:
?? So you don’t want to come visit ??
If you promise to serve crawfish etoufee I'll be happy to visit.
No need to send your address. I'll find you.
Dec 12, 2020 17:07:12 #
rebelwidacoz wrote:
The one thing this political medium is good for an... (show quote)
So your advocating for the thought police?
Lock them up for just thinking about defending our constitution? Where will that end?
Dec 12, 2020 17:29:07 #
OK, I am confused.
How is law enforcement monitoring people plotting (that takes communication, and it seems very LITTLE rational thought) to kidnap and execute public servants being "thought police"?
How is holding a person accountable for traveling across state lines with a firearm, then deciding to "protect" another person's property (haha) then traveling from one k*****g to another k*****g and attempted k*****g and goodness knows what in between being thought police?
How is either of those activities carried out by private citizens defending the US Constitution?
Where will it end? Hopefully where men who need to carry a gun to compensate for their inadequacies decide that giving up their freedom for decades really isn't worth it. Wh**ever that spot is.
Now, personally, I think that the Rittenhouser kid's case deserves some thoughtful consideration since he is well shy of being fully cognizant of the ramifications of his actions. I believe that there are people who share responsibility for his actions; his wackadoodle mommy, perhaps, has something to answer for.
How is law enforcement monitoring people plotting (that takes communication, and it seems very LITTLE rational thought) to kidnap and execute public servants being "thought police"?
How is holding a person accountable for traveling across state lines with a firearm, then deciding to "protect" another person's property (haha) then traveling from one k*****g to another k*****g and attempted k*****g and goodness knows what in between being thought police?
How is either of those activities carried out by private citizens defending the US Constitution?
Where will it end? Hopefully where men who need to carry a gun to compensate for their inadequacies decide that giving up their freedom for decades really isn't worth it. Wh**ever that spot is.
Now, personally, I think that the Rittenhouser kid's case deserves some thoughtful consideration since he is well shy of being fully cognizant of the ramifications of his actions. I believe that there are people who share responsibility for his actions; his wackadoodle mommy, perhaps, has something to answer for.
nonalien1 wrote:
So your advocating for the thought police?
Lock them up for just thinking about defending our constitution? Where will that end?
Lock them up for just thinking about defending our constitution? Where will that end?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.