Thanks for making my case for me, Pete. It should be obvious to serious students of politics and v**e stealing that the Democrats were primarily interested in stealing the Presidency. It became obvious to them about 2:00AM on Nov 4 that they were going to have to overcome a much bigger deficit than they thought. They didn't have a lot of time to come up with the required number. There were thousands of b****ts marked only for Biden and nothing lower down on the b****t. I suppose you have a rational explanation for that, huh? All that, coupled with suppressing important information such as the Biden scandal, as well as hyping the mail-in b****ts, sending Republicans poll watchers home, papering over windows so no one could see what was going on, selecting Democrat run cities to pull it off in, using D******n machines and the ever compliant and cooperative media ignoring all negative information was enough to give Biden a very narrow margin. And the left, including the press, has the testicular fortitude to slam anyone who casts the least bit of shadow on this sorry mess. Man, it's hard to figure.

With the passing of Safe Harbor Day, youtube decided to take down any video that claims c***ting took place in the US e******ns. This is YouTubes way of admitting that the e******n is over and it's time to move on. This takes away an important platform for cons to try to press lies that c***ting took place and if Facebook and Twitter follow it will be over for Trump in his effort to steal back the e******n...

https://www.dw.com/en/youtube-to-remove-content-that-claims-result-altering-fraud-in-us-e******n/a-55884687

YouTube will remove all content that alleges that v***r f***d had any impact on the overall results of the US e******n published from now on, it said in a statement on Wednesday.

The new rule coincides with the "safe harbor" deadline that means all state e******n results are deemed to be conclusive. From now on, US courts are expected to throw out all legal challenges to the e******n result. This effectively ends outgoing US President Donald Trump's attempts to challenge the e******n outcome in court.

YouTube's corporate Twitter account said: "Now that enough states certified their P**********l e******n results, we’ll remove any content published today (or anytime after) that alleges widespread fraud or errors changed the 2020 US P**********l e******n outcome."

Examples of the sort of content it intends to remove are videos that claim Joe Biden won the e******n due to widespread software glitches or counting errors.

It will also update its information panel that it displays under e******n-related videos to note that the e******n results are certified.

"There's always more to do. Striking the balance between openness & responsibility is one of our toughest challenges. We're continuing to make improvements & will apply our learnings from this e******n, globally," it said.

Since September, the Google subsidiary has removed more than 8,000 channels for violating its misinformation policies.

Google, meanwhile will reportedly lift its ban on political ads, according to news site Axios. Google banned political ads in the run-up to the US e******n.

Social media networks have struggled to contain misinformation and f**e news. Facebook has attempted to label e******n misinformation with fact check information but a recent report by US non-profit Avaaz found it was failing to detect about 60% of misleading posts.

On most b****t sheets, the senate is right below the president. So your argument is that we democrats are smart enough to c***t in a manner so clever that it can't be legally detected yet we are too dumb to look one space below president on a b****t and v**e for an office which, in this case, was equally as important? Gosh, good thinking.

And if we can program software to flip v**es for us why would we need to stuff b****ts and again, why couldn't we program the machine to go one space down and flip v**es in the Senate?

What is scariest, in this case, is that your argument, to you, makes more sense in your mind than does mine...

I'm sorry I scare you so much, Pete. I'm really not very scary at all. What I am is smart enough to put 2 and 2 together and come out with 4. Your view seems to be that anyone who doesn't see it your way must be scary or at least not very smart. I can assure you that there are lots and lots of very intelligent people out there who think just the opposite. I have just one short 5 minute video sent to me by a friend that I think you might be interested in watching because you do seem like a person with some degree of intelligence who is at least willing to mildly consider other views while trying to come up with a reason why the other views are not valid. See what you think of this one. I don't know this person but I think you will find it interesting. Have at it.

https://youtu.be/24OjIzpKfSs