God says what we think He is saying, and that is made good or bad by conflict, psychological mainly but usually becomes military, I use my ability to keep it psychological, but Malthus hit the nail on the head with his idea that wants are infinite and the Planet is only provisioned with finite capability to supply infinity, incredibly must end excess one way or the other, credibility in the end will eliminate story telling.

Actually at the moment it your interested in what happened after the Soviet Economy was destroyed - by its inability to harvest the wealth of what was then known as the of the 3 rd World, mainly because it didn't need it, and also it was though at the time by the Soviets that good would triumph over bad, - there is a really good lecture on "Yale Courses" 1. year ago, titled "Capitalist Economics with C*******t Policies China and Vietnam".

One point the lecturer makes is that it's the indirect reasons which determine the miraculous reason for the Chinese and now Vietnamese economic miracles, he doesn't dwell on the IMF's support but does mention it if I remember correctly, that is the reason I believe IMF support, but many other reasons are drilled into, the fact is now the Russian Federation, China and Vietnam are a single economic block brought into fruition by the Israeli l*****ts who control the IMF completely after they used mind control techniques to eliminate Dominique Strauss-Khan.

About Malthus' connection to this lecture which I mentioned, one point is clearly presented by the lecturer who makes a big deal about the trade off between ine******y and economic prosperity which China and Vietnam are presently exhibiting.

So as their economies are exploding wealth is being distributed with a greater proportion going to the top causing ine******y, which was seen as anathema in the Soviet Union who were applying Malthusian logic, now the 3 Nations Russia, China and Vietnam are not interested in egalitarianism, however Malthus clearly stated this is a short term aberration, when it ends the Jews will own everything.

Then why is it in every other senate impeachment trial in history they called and heard witnesses? This is the only Senate trial where not a single witness was heard.

This is from WWW senate.gov: The Senate sits as a High Court of Impeachment in which senators consider evidence, hear witnesses, and v**e to acquit or convict the impeached official. In the case of p**********l impeachment trials, the chief justice of the United States presides.

So you can't "hear witnesses" without calling them and in this case by not doing so, the t***h was kept silent all so the senate could keep a guilty president in power.

The problem was the secretary of state and the liberal state supreme court changed the rules just prior to the e******n. Also, the bill could have been passed by a unanimous v**e and it would still be defective. Under Pennsylvania law, v****g laws must be changed by a constitutional amendment, no other law or executive order can change a constitutional requirement.
It is also a catch-22 situation, nobody could sue when the law was passed because nobody was affected by it at that time. In other words, nobody had legal standing to bring suit. Now, they are saying that because suit wasn't brought at that time, it is too late to do so now.
When the ACA was passed, groups tried to take it to court over the penalty/tax. The cases were thrown out because nobody had been assessed the penalty/tax, therefore there was nobody who had standing to bring the case.
The legal system is very simple, there are a set of procedures that must be followed to bring any case to court. It's just that sometimes the procedures don't seem to make any logical sense.

If you are willing and able to get your brain out of Lock Down, your mind out of quarantine, take off your mask and open your fkg eyes, we can show you the c***ting and the fraud. Lots of it, all over the place, hundreds and hundreds of instances of fraud on large scales and small.

These acts of fraud violated Article I, Section 4 & Article II, Section 1, para 2-4 of the US Constitution, the 14th amendment equal protection clause, and state e******n laws - not to mention violating the unwritten laws of moral decency, honor and good will toward men.

Please try to understand or get someone to explain it to you in very simple terms. The Senate does not call witnesses, that is the job of the House managers acting as the prosecution. The President would then have the opportunity to call his own witnesses to refute the prosecution's witnesses and evidence. The House managers chose not to call any witnesses, instead they presented the transcripts of witness testimony from the House hearings. If you have incompetent prosecutors, you lose cases at every level of the court system. If this is still over your head, you will need to seek professional help.

And these accusations have been reviewed and dismissed by over 40 courts all across the land. Even the Supreme Court has now refused to listen to the nonsense you people are spewing--yet, somehow, we are supposed to believe that anomalies, improbable occurrences, and questionable happening--to you--is reason to enlist a FULL investigation of our e******n?

And what I love about all this is that you cons are more than willing to cancel the v**es of 81 million people even though you have ZERO evidence that any irregularities took place! So what you are doing is saying FUK you, I THINK I've been wronged--and no, I have no evidence that will stand up in a single court in this land--but I want all v**es (for Biden) canceled and only v**es for Donald J Trump to be counted!

Sure, nothing to it. I'll just snap my fingers and it will be so...

Who could verify the transcript that Trump provided?

(These individuals listened from the situation room)

Mike Pompeo, Secretary of State
Timothy Morrison, Senior Director for European Affairs
Charles Kupperman, Deputy National Security Adviser
Robert Blair, Senior Adviser to White House Chief of Staff
Keith Kellogg, National Security Adviser to Vice President
Jennifer Williams, Adviser to Vice President for Europe and Russia
Alexander Vindman, Top Ukraine expert, National Security Council
Jennifer Williams, a special adviser to Vice President Mike Pence on Europe and Russia

There were many others but these were subpoenaed and all but Vindman FAILED to appear before congress because Trump blocked their appearance and told them to defy a Congressional subpoena in violation of the rule of law and our Constitution...