woodguru

Take it a step further and we are seeing Flynn talking about a real c**p with guns and the military...

The idea being declaring a partial martial law (what the hell is a partial martial law?), and redo the e******n with the military standing over polling stations making sure only Real Americans v**e.

My guess is that partial has something to do with whether you support trump, or are in one of the organized m*****as, apparently you don't want everyone's guns taken away?

Trump is exhausting the legal system because there is no case that supports any real massive v***r f***d, rhetoric and f**e examples with no proof is not going to prevail. Any other means to keep trump in office is a c**p, an e******n successfully won is not a c**p.

Once again we have the right reversing realities and calling the thing that is not the c**p a c**p, while they are actively pushing a c**p based on rhetoric and BS.

Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas

Sure did.......why didn't that matter when Trump one?.......you want to talk about a c**p? Your hypocrisy is astounding to say the least.....alarming better describes it.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

We were here. We saw what your l*****t rulers did to the President. THAT was, and still is, an attempted c**p. You can try and change the definitions but we were here. We saw. And we remember and will continue to do so.
You are wasting your time trying to rewrite history. The right will not accept your lies, and the left do not need to be convinced, because they have already graduated from gullible to out of their minds.

Liberty Tree

He is a fraud and always has been. As long as Biden wins he does not care how. No matter the evidence he will deny fraud took place. It is a waste of time to talk to one who has no sense of fairness or honesty.

Lonewolf

There lies the problem massive fraud would have plenty of evidence real evidence that you can present to a court you have none.
You have out right lies and conspiracy theory not admissible in court.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

And how many lawsuits have already been filed in court? With how many more to come? There has been no venue to present the evidence. Oh, sure, it could have been presented to the MSM, who would give it the same coverage as they have Trumps good economic numbers, or H****r B***n's laptop, or "the big guys" illegal 10%.
Let's see what is presented to the courts.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

How you allowed yourself to be deceived is anybody's guess, and what follows will go through you like s**t through a goose.

In all dismissals of v***r f***d complaints, the judges (courts) did not allow the Plaintiff the right to Discovery. Judge Matthew Brann, the B Hussein O appointee who dismissed the suit in PA, got nasty in his comments and mocked the Trump team:

“Brann compared the legal claims brought up by Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani to ‘Frankenstein’s Monster’ and said some of the campaign’s arguments were ‘unhinged.’ In his ruling, Brann said the Trump campaign presented ‘strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations … unsupported by evidence.’

A formal complaint to initiate a suit DOES NOT require evidence.

The complaints on v***r f***d filed in all civil courts were based on sufficient evidence necessary to file such a complaint, including, but not limited to, physical and documentary evidence, witness affidavits and testimonials sworn under penalty of perjury, and so forth. However, a complaint is simply filed to put the defendant on notice, it is filed on a reasonable basis in fact and law, the allegations can be made on information and belief.

Traditionally, in accord with federal courts' system of notice pleading, complaints did not need to be very specific, and did not need to specify the facts the plaintiff intends to prove. The Supreme Court introduced a heightened standard for complaints in 2007 with the case Bell Atlantic v. Twombly. This case requires that a complaint must allege "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face."

IOW, the complaint is an allegation of wrong doing, introduction of evidence is not required to justify the legitimacy of the complaint. It is in the next stage - Discovery - when evidence comes into play and again in Pre-trial proceedings, then, in the Trial stage, the evidence and the witnesses are introduced in their entirety.


feature length Emmy nominated documentary: Hacking Democracy

The Hack. From the documentary, this video records an alarming anomaly in v**er machine coding with memory cards. This test was run by the e******n board in Leon County, Florida and was verified by computer scientists at UC Berkeley.

A v****g machine was chosen by a random draw of serial numbers and was run through its self test analysis, returning a print out showing zero v**es. The test involved 8 b****ts with one yes or no question. E******n board employees each marked one b****t.

They marked 2 YES, and 6 NO. Following the count, the machine printed out the tally - 7 YES, 1 NO. A nearly complete reversal.


On December 6, 2019, Senators Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar, Ron Wyden, and Rep. Mark Pocan sounded the alarm about the vulnerabilities of v****g machines. The four of them filed a formal complaint with all 3 v**er systems companies. I wonder why.

Here is a key paragraph from a rather long and detailed complaint:

In 2018 alone “v**ers in South Carolina were reporting machines that switched their v**es after they’d inputted them, scanners were rejecting paper b****ts in Missouri, and busted machines were causing long lines in Indiana.” In addition, researchers recently uncovered previously undisclosed vulnerabilities in “nearly three dozen backend e******n systems in 10 states.” And, just this year, after the Democratic candidate’s electronic tally showed he received an improbable 164 v**es out of 55,000 cast in a Pennsylvania state judicial e******n in 2019, the county’s Republican Chairwoman said,”nothing went right on E******n Day. Everything went wrong. That’s a problem.” These problems threaten the integrity of our e******ns and demonstrate the importance of e******n systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.

EmilyD

Well said, Randy!

We saw this attempt at a c**p of our 45th president first hand, with our own eyes. No one can tell us any different what happened and HOW it happened. The Mueller report (that found NO Russian collusion) was a c**p attempt. The impeachment due to a congratulatory phone call was a c**p attempt....and this fraud-filled e******n is a c**p attempt.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

ImLogicallyRight

You can't prove outright lies and we have thousands of sworn affidavits. Does your side have a single one?

LR

Sicilianthing

>>>

Whattabuncha crap!

Wonttakeitanymore

As always backas*wards!!!

meridianlesilie Loc: mars

NO B***N C***TED SEE THE PROOF = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keANzinHWUA&fbclid=IwAR21UcgZYx1xgOFSJjQ-RbvkTyNFLqlr3JRzjWCZQhwdXbLqzc6J_Iwxv0o

meridianlesilie Loc: mars

SEE THIS TO = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keANzinHWUA&fbclid=IwAR21UcgZYx1xgOFSJjQ-RbvkTyNFLqlr3JRzjWCZQhwdXbLqzc6J_Iwxv0o

currahee506

Prove it.