Let him rot above ground: How do you feel about the Veterans Administration being asked to bury this guy in Arlington National Cemetery. I bet unless he was a gay man even our gay...

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

How do you feel about the Veterans Administration being asked to bury this guy in Arlington National Cemetery. I bet unless he was a gay man even our gay supporters won't agree with this one. Surely nobody thinks he should be buried in that hallowed ground.

Maybe they need to throw him in the ocean like Obama says they did bin Laden and throw her as near as they can to the same place when she passes on.

http://conservativevideos.com/2013/05/boston-bomber-to-be-buried-at-arlington-national-cemetery/

willy7

That is probably the best way to dispose of her remains. No incineration as it would be a waste of gasoline.

Landsharkxray

Hang his body from a yardarm at any international port of entry and let it rot. and do the same with his brother and mother and every terrorist who sets foot on US soil.

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

Landsharkxray wrote:

Hang his body from a yardarm at any international port of entry and let it rot. and do the same with his brother and mother and every terrorist who sets foot on US soil.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I like the way you think! Yes, that's a great idea.

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

oldroy wrote:

How do you feel about the Veterans Administration ... (show quote)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At least then he would be contributing something worthwhile - food for the fish.

Landsharkxray

But, but, but wait a minute, I catch and eat fish from that ocean, and I swim in it. I would rather not have to wonder if the fish I eat had partaken of the trash that is a Tsarnaev.

Tasine wrote:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At least then he would be contributing something worthwhile - food for the fish.

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

Landsharkxray wrote:

But, but, but wait a minute, I catch and eat fish from that ocean, and I swim in it. I would rather not have to wonder if the fish I eat had partaken of the trash that is a Tsarnaev.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'll admit you have a point there, but there must be a way around this conundrum. Chop him up into chum, draw sharks with it - it's not likely you would eat shark. Or might you? I'm not a fish eater so don't really know what is liable to be on a plate of seafood. LOL.

Landsharkxray

Perhaps the remains could be deposited with nuclear waste. and perhaps never again be exposed to any form of life. And yes, several species of shark are quite palatable if the meat is cared for properly. The Mackerel family of sharks are favored by many who partake of them.

Tasine wrote:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'll admit you have a point there, but there must be a way around this conundrum. Chop him up into chum, draw sharks with it - it's not likely you would eat shark. Or might you? I'm not a fish eater so don't really know what is liable to be on a plate of seafood. LOL.

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

Landsharkxray wrote:

Perhaps the remains could be deposited with nuclear waste. and perhaps never again be exposed to any form of life. And yes, several species of shark are quite palatable if the meat is cared for properly. The Mackerel family of sharks are favored by many who partake of them.

~~~~~~~~~~
Bowing to your expertise. :lol:

samarov

A report from MA advises that Tsarnaev's body was buried in "an undisclosed location."

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

samarov wrote:

A report from MA advises that Tsarnaev's body was buried in "an undisclosed location."

I just read that report and the location is somewhere outside one of my Mass favorite cities, Worcester.