One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Trump May Hold a Rally During Biden's Inuguaration
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Nov 30, 2020 04:32:24   #
Wildlandfirefighter
 
Radiance3 wrote:
================
Biden is not going to hold an inauguration. judge just offered PA to president Trump.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2020/11/12/pennsylvania-judge-rules-in-favor-of-trump-campaign-orders-state-cant-count-some-b****ts/

As soon as Sidney Powell presents her massive and substantial evidences to the SC. That will change. And they may also check similar v****g violations found in PA. It is possible that president Trump will hold his second inauguration.
================ br Biden is not going to hold an ... (show quote)


You do realize this is ancient news (Nov 12!) and the PA Supreme Court has already thrown this out, plus the b****ts in question were so low in number it would have made no difference.

If Powell tries to waste the SC's time with this she will get spanked, and maybe even disbarred.

You really should try to keep up. Grasping at straws that have already been thrown in the trash is not a good look and seriously degrades what little respect you deserve.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 04:37:19   #
Wildlandfirefighter
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
i certainly hope so....and I'll be there. How ironic would it be if Trump got a bigger crowd than the "crook"? https://conservativebrief.com/trumps-secret-plan-revealed-bombshell-has-biden-furious-29907/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=ProTrumpNews


Trump is the Crook, one of these days you will finally get it.................maybe

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 04:47:22   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Wildlandfirefighter wrote:
Sidney Powell doesn't have squat, just a rehash of all the garbage the courts have already thrown out.

So don't hold your breath, just another nothingburger!
The Trump legal team is focused on the actual instances of v***r f***d and the political chicanery behind it all - like how state courts, judges, and Secretaries violated Article I, Section 4 and Article II, Section 1, paragraphs 2-4 of the Constitution, the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment, and state e******n laws.

Sidney Powell is uncovering the history of corruption in primarily the D******n V**er System and Smartmatic software.

The notion that all of these summary dismissals of law suits around the country are proof positive that e******n corruption and v***r f***d never occurred, that the complaints are all a "Trump conspiracy theory" is absolute bulls**t.

The complaints on v***r f***d filed in all civil courts were based on sufficient evidence necessary to file such a complaint, including, but not limited to, physical and documentary evidence, witness affidavits and testimonials sworn under penalty of perjury, and so forth. However, the complaint is simply filed to put the defendant on notice, it is filed on a reasonable basis in fact and law, the allegations can be made on information and belief.

Traditionally, in accord with federal courts' system of notice pleading, complaints did not need to be very specific, and did not need to specify the facts the plaintiff intends to prove. The Supreme Court introduced a heightened standard for complaints in 2007 with the case Bell Atlantic v. Twombly. This case requires that a complaint must allege "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face."

IOW, the complaint is an allegation of wrong doing, introduction of evidence is not required to justify the legitimacy of the complaint. It is in the next stage - Discovery - when evidence comes into play and again in Pre-trial proceedings, then, in the Trial stage, the evidence and the witnesses are introduced in their entirety.

In all dismissals of v***r f***d complaints, the judges (courts) did not allow the Plaintiff the right to Discovery. Wonder why?

PA Senator Doug Mastriano, "Beam me up, Scotty, no sign of intelligent life anywhere."

Michigan witnesses to v***r f***d: "THE MOST CORRUPT THING I'VE EVER SEEN"

Following the e******n, when multiple reports of v****g chicanery circulated on the Internet and it became apparent v***r f***d had, in fact, been committed on a large scale, several groups of statisticians and other scientists volunteered to examine the reported Pennsylvania results from a scientific statistical perspective. These scientists included:
a former adjunct professor of statistics at Cornell University,
a PhD risk analyst and President of a Denver-based applied operations research and analytics company specializing in data science and statistics,
an adjunct professor of statistics at North Carolina State University, the University of Waterloo and the University of British Columbia, and,
a number of scientists in the fields of statistics and analytics.

They studied the 2020 Pennsylvania v****g records to identify anything they deemed to be statistically significant anomalies — i.e deviations from the norm.

In the process they by-and-large worked separately, consulted with other experts, analyzed the data they were given from different perspectives, obtained some additional data on their own — all in a very limited time allotment.

Their one — and only — objective was to try to assure that every legal Pennsylvania v**e is counted, and only legal Pennsylvania v**es are counted.

This is their report The statistical information compiled in this report is mind blowing.

ALL of these experts came to the same conclusions:

1) There are some major statistical aberrations in the PA v****g records, that are extremely unlikely to occur in a normal (i.e. un-manipulated) setting.

2) The anomalies almost exclusively happened with the Biden v**es. Time and again, using a variety of techniques, the Trump v**es looked statistically normal.

3) Eleven (out of 67) Pennsylvania counties stood out from all the rest. These counties showed distinctive signs of v****g a******lities — again, all for Biden.

4) The total number of suspicious v**es in these counties is 300,000 — which greatly exceeds the reported margin of Biden v**es over Trump. (We don’t know how many of these are artificial Biden v**es, or v**es switched from Trump to Biden.)

5) These statistical analyses do not prove fraud, but rather provide scientific evidence that the reported results are highly unlikely to be an accurate reflection of how Pennsylvania citizens v**ed.


In addition, 234 pages of affidavits, sworn under penalty of perjury by witnesses to v***r f***d can be read HERE All affidavits are notarized.

The chart below, taken from the report mentioned, shows a comparison of v**e counts in a number of Pennsylvania counties. As you can see, all v**e counts for Biden in the 2020 e******n exceeded by significant margin those for Obama in 2008 and 2012 and for Clinton in 2016.



Reply
 
 
Nov 30, 2020 05:30:47   #
Wildlandfirefighter
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
The Trump legal team is focused on the actual instances of v***r f***d and the political chicanery behind it all - like how state courts, judges, and Secretaries violated Article I, Section 4 and Article II, Section 1, paragraphs 2-4 of the Constitution, the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment, and state e******n laws.

Sidney Powell is uncovering the history of corruption in primarily the D******n V**er System and Smartmatic software.

The notion that all of these summary dismissals of law suits around the country are proof positive that e******n corruption and v***r f***d never occurred, that the complaints are all a "Trump conspiracy theory" is absolute bulls**t.

The complaints on v***r f***d filed in all civil courts were based on sufficient evidence necessary to file such a complaint, including, but not limited to, physical and documentary evidence, witness affidavits and testimonials sworn under penalty of perjury, and so forth. However, the complaint is simply filed to put the defendant on notice, it is filed on a reasonable basis in fact and law, the allegations can be made on information and belief.

Traditionally, in accord with federal courts' system of notice pleading, complaints did not need to be very specific, and did not need to specify the facts the plaintiff intends to prove. The Supreme Court introduced a heightened standard for complaints in 2007 with the case Bell Atlantic v. Twombly. This case requires that a complaint must allege "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face."

IOW, the complaint is an allegation of wrong doing, introduction of evidence is not required to justify the legitimacy of the complaint. It is in the next stage - Discovery - when evidence comes into play and again in Pre-trial proceedings, then, in the Trial stage, the evidence and the witnesses are introduced in their entirety.

In all dismissals of v***r f***d complaints, the judges (courts) did not allow the Plaintiff the right to Discovery. Wonder why?

PA Senator Doug Mastriano, "Beam me up, Scotty, no sign of intelligent life anywhere."

Michigan witnesses to v***r f***d: "THE MOST CORRUPT THING I'VE EVER SEEN"

Following the e******n, when multiple reports of v****g chicanery circulated on the Internet and it became apparent v***r f***d had, in fact, been committed on a large scale, several groups of statisticians and other scientists volunteered to examine the reported Pennsylvania results from a scientific statistical perspective. These scientists included:
a former adjunct professor of statistics at Cornell University,
a PhD risk analyst and President of a Denver-based applied operations research and analytics company specializing in data science and statistics,
an adjunct professor of statistics at North Carolina State University, the University of Waterloo and the University of British Columbia, and,
a number of scientists in the fields of statistics and analytics.

They studied the 2020 Pennsylvania v****g records to identify anything they deemed to be statistically significant anomalies — i.e deviations from the norm.

In the process they by-and-large worked separately, consulted with other experts, analyzed the data they were given from different perspectives, obtained some additional data on their own — all in a very limited time allotment.

Their one — and only — objective was to try to assure that every legal Pennsylvania v**e is counted, and only legal Pennsylvania v**es are counted.

This is their report The statistical information compiled in this report is mind blowing.

ALL of these experts came to the same conclusions:

1) There are some major statistical aberrations in the PA v****g records, that are extremely unlikely to occur in a normal (i.e. un-manipulated) setting.

2) The anomalies almost exclusively happened with the Biden v**es. Time and again, using a variety of techniques, the Trump v**es looked statistically normal.

3) Eleven (out of 67) Pennsylvania counties stood out from all the rest. These counties showed distinctive signs of v****g a******lities — again, all for Biden.

4) The total number of suspicious v**es in these counties is 300,000 — which greatly exceeds the reported margin of Biden v**es over Trump. (We don’t know how many of these are artificial Biden v**es, or v**es switched from Trump to Biden.)

5) These statistical analyses do not prove fraud, but rather provide scientific evidence that the reported results are highly unlikely to be an accurate reflection of how Pennsylvania citizens v**ed.


In addition, 234 pages of affidavits, sworn under penalty of perjury by witnesses to v***r f***d can be read HERE All affidavits are notarized.

The chart below, taken from the report mentioned, shows a comparison of v**e counts in a number of Pennsylvania counties. As you can see, all v**e counts for Biden in the 2020 e******n exceeded by significant margin those for Obama in 2008 and 2012 and for Clinton in 2016.
The Trump legal team is focused on the actual inst... (show quote)


Yeah I read through the affidavits and they don't mean squat. They have already been brought forward in numerous cases and have been thrown out. Opinions and heresay mean nothing in a court of law. And none of those affidavits were given under threat of perjury and under oath in a court or legal setting.

Anyone can go to a local notary public and get them to sign a document. All the notary is doing is substantiating that you are the person that signed the document. It does not mean that ANYTHING in that document is true or proven or evidence.

If those people were to go in front of a court, then they would take an oath that would put them in jail if they lie. So yeah, anybody could fabricate anything, get it motorized, but it still means nothing. Do you GET IT now, or are you still confused?

So more people came out to v**e this year, DUH. You just figuring that out now?

Let's see that exact same chart for Trump because I bet it says the same thing. 136 million v**ed in 2016. 154 million in 2018. That is an average increase of nearly 13% across the board, which actually matches up pretty well with your table. And given that Biden is from Scranton originally, you would think he would have done even better in his birth state.

Again, where is your evidence of wrongdoing, I really don't give a sh!t about the opinions of a bunch of Trump lovers trying to help him steal an e******n and grasping for straws because it isn't working.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 09:16:25   #
Radiance3
 
Wildlandfirefighter wrote:
Sidney Powell doesn't have squat, just a rehash of all the garbage the courts have already thrown out.

So don't hold your breath, just another nothingburger!


===============
Sidney Powel one of the most intelligent and experienced litigants, in civil cases, and more on public prosecutions combined, has earned the highest integrity of accurate resolutions for the government system, and overall for the public.

Sidney has all the documents and statements with video tapes of the fraudulent events the c*******t democrat poll workers did thru fraud , moving , manufacturing, and adding v**es, to the crooked Biden. Several evidences, sworn statements under oath of professional experts, accompanied by video tapes who witnessed how the fraud was conducted by the democrat thieves.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 09:17:20   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Kevyn wrote:
Cool, a superspreader h**e fest for his race h**e death cult!


And what would you call the inauguration? Or do you believe no one’s going to attend out of fear of the v***s?

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 09:17:59   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
i certainly hope so....and I'll be there. How ironic would it be if Trump got a bigger crowd than the "crook"? https://conservativebrief.com/trumps-secret-plan-revealed-bombshell-has-biden-furious-29907/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=ProTrumpNews


If anything like his campaign rally’s it’s a shoo-in on what you say.

Reply
 
 
Nov 30, 2020 15:30:03   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
i certainly hope so....and I'll be there. How ironic would it be if Trump got a bigger crowd than the "crook"? https://conservativebrief.com/trumps-secret-plan-revealed-bombshell-has-biden-furious-29907/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=ProTrumpNews


He will!! Inauguration ain’t gonna happen!!!

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 16:32:59   #
Radiance3
 
lindajoy wrote:
If anything like his campaign rally’s it’s a shoo-in on what you say.


===============
How many do you think v**ed for Biden out of his empty seats during rally? Chairs 6 feet distancing were empty.

Versus president Trump's million people. How dumb is that Biden claim as president "elect" but massive fraud put him there? PA alone claimed only 25 people who attended for Biden. While the president Trump had millions who attended. Any democrat dumb people could analyze this?



Reply
Nov 30, 2020 18:36:03   #
elledee
 
the know it all lib-prog hammerheads on this site cannot see past their DTS

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 19:11:46   #
Kateri Loc: Florida
 
You are sick!

Reply
 
 
Nov 30, 2020 19:13:29   #
Kateri Loc: Florida
 
The real crocks are Oboma Biden and Hillary get real

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 20:18:33   #
Radiance3
 
Wildlandfirefighter wrote:
You do realize this is ancient news (Nov 12!) and the PA Supreme Court has already thrown this out, plus the b****ts in question were so low in number it would have made no difference.

If Powell tries to waste the SC's time with this she will get spanked, and maybe even disbarred.

You really should try to keep up. Grasping at straws that have already been thrown in the trash is not a good look and seriously degrades what little respect you deserve.

================
Unfortunately your brain is so clouded and dark. You could not convince me any iota of your dumbness.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 20:27:01   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Radiance3 wrote:
===============
How many do you think v**ed for Biden out of his empty seats during rally? Chairs 6 feet distancing were empty.

Versus president Trump's million people. How dumb is that Biden claim as president "elect" but massive fraud put him there? PA alone claimed only 25 people who attended for Biden. While the president Trump had millions who attended. Any democrat dumb people could analyze this?


Very true and everyone will remember exactly what those rallies brought along with knowing what biden did not bring or win~~ stolen, yes, win, absolutely not..

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 20:42:43   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Wildlandfirefighter wrote:
Yeah I read through the affidavits and they don't mean squat. They have already been brought forward in numerous cases and have been thrown out. Opinions and heresay mean nothing in a court of law. And none of those affidavits were given under threat of perjury and under oath in a court or legal setting.

Anyone can go to a local notary public and get them to sign a document. All the notary is doing is substantiating that you are the person that signed the document. It does not mean that ANYTHING in that document is true or proven or evidence.

If those people were to go in front of a court, then they would take an oath that would put them in jail if they lie. So yeah, anybody could fabricate anything, get it motorized, but it still means nothing. Do you GET IT now, or are you still confused?

So more people came out to v**e this year, DUH. You just figuring that out now?

Let's see that exact same chart for Trump because I bet it says the same thing. 136 million v**ed in 2016. 154 million in 2018. That is an average increase of nearly 13% across the board, which actually matches up pretty well with your table. And given that Biden is from Scranton originally, you would think he would have done even better in his birth state.

Again, where is your evidence of wrongdoing, I really don't give a sh!t about the opinions of a bunch of Trump lovers trying to help him steal an e******n and grasping for straws because it isn't working.
Yeah I read through the affidavits and they don't ... (show quote)
Our Constitution and the Rule of Law don't mean jack s**t to you, do they?

I don't know if it is mass hysteria or mass hypnosis or if it is just the protracted erosion of human intelligence by ideological propaganda that drove the left into a frenzy of wicked machinations, deception and chicanery in their attempt to destroy president Trump and throw him out of office. They tried every underhanded and subversive trick in their playbook to oust him and added more as each attempt failed. The Machiavellian schemes and diabolical unscrupulousness of their attempts to o*******w an e******n, destroy a president, and throw him out of office are unprecedented in American history.

For four plus years, the Grand Poobahs of the Socialist Progressive movement, without principle, without compassion or remorse, have waged an aggressive war on president Trump, they demonized him, his wife, his family and everyone he ever came in contact with, and in the process destroyed the lives of men associated with him. They investigated him, tore his entire life apart, attempted to remove him through impeachment on bogus charges, damned him, condemned him, spit in his face, d**gged him through the coals, blamed him for every misfortune and tragedy known to man, disenfranchised 80 million Americans who support him; they violated our Constitution and the rule of law to get Trump out of office, everything short of k*****g him, and that option was not off the table. They failed on every count.

And, you deluded fools actually believe the C*******t backed power brokers ruling your "party" would suddenly cease fire and withdraw from another attempt to throw him out of office? This time through an institutionalized v***r f***d campaign?

How loathsome can humans become? Is there no low to which you will not sink?

The depth of your ignorance is astonishing; the magnitude and intensity of your hatred of one man is demonic.

.

┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐
┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐...



Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.