Wildlandfirefighter wrote:
Sidney Powell doesn't have squat, just a rehash of all the garbage the courts have already thrown out.
So don't hold your breath, just another nothingburger!
The Trump legal team is focused on the actual instances of v***r f***d and the political chicanery behind it all - like how state courts, judges, and Secretaries violated Article I, Section 4 and Article II, Section 1, paragraphs 2-4 of the Constitution, the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment, and state e******n laws.
Sidney Powell is uncovering the history of corruption in primarily the D******n V**er System and Smartmatic software.
The notion that all of these summary dismissals of law suits around the country are proof positive that e******n corruption and v***r f***d never occurred, that the complaints are all a "Trump conspiracy theory" is absolute bulls**t.
The complaints on v***r f***d filed in all civil courts were based on sufficient evidence necessary to file such a complaint, including, but not limited to, physical and documentary evidence, witness affidavits and testimonials sworn under penalty of perjury, and so forth. However, the complaint is simply filed to put the defendant on notice, it is filed on a reasonable basis in fact and law, the allegations can be made on information and belief.
Traditionally, in accord with federal courts' system of notice pleading, complaints did not need to be very specific, and did not need to specify the facts the plaintiff intends to prove. The Supreme Court introduced a heightened standard for complaints in 2007 with the case Bell Atlantic v. Twombly. This case requires that a complaint must allege "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." IOW, the complaint is an allegation of wrong doing, introduction of evidence is not required to justify the legitimacy of the complaint. It is in the next stage - Discovery - when evidence comes into play and again in Pre-trial proceedings, then, in the Trial stage, the evidence and the witnesses are introduced in their entirety.
In all dismissals of v***r f***d complaints, the judges (courts) did not allow the Plaintiff the right to Discovery. Wonder why?
PA Senator Doug Mastriano, "Beam me up, Scotty, no sign of intelligent life anywhere."Michigan witnesses to v***r f***d: "THE MOST CORRUPT THING I'VE EVER SEEN"Following the e******n, when multiple reports of v****g chicanery circulated on the Internet and it became apparent v***r f***d had, in fact, been committed on a large scale, several groups of statisticians and other scientists volunteered to examine the reported Pennsylvania results from a scientific statistical perspective. These scientists included:
a former adjunct professor of statistics at Cornell University,
a PhD risk analyst and President of a Denver-based applied operations research and analytics company specializing in data science and statistics,
an adjunct professor of statistics at North Carolina State University, the University of Waterloo and the University of British Columbia, and,
a number of scientists in the fields of statistics and analytics.
They studied the 2020 Pennsylvania v****g records to identify anything they deemed to be statistically significant anomalies — i.e deviations from the norm.
In the process they by-and-large worked separately, consulted with other experts, analyzed the data they were given from different perspectives, obtained some additional data on their own — all in a very limited time allotment.
Their one — and only — objective was to try to assure that every legal Pennsylvania v**e is counted, and only legal Pennsylvania v**es are counted.
This is their report The statistical information compiled in this report is mind blowing.
ALL of these experts came to the same conclusions:
1) There are some major statistical aberrations in the PA v****g records, that are extremely unlikely to occur in a normal (i.e. un-manipulated) setting.
2) The anomalies almost exclusively happened with the Biden v**es. Time and again, using a variety of techniques, the Trump v**es looked statistically normal.
3) Eleven (out of 67) Pennsylvania counties stood out from all the rest. These counties showed distinctive signs of v****g a******lities — again, all for Biden.
4) The total number of suspicious v**es in these counties is 300,000 — which greatly exceeds the reported margin of Biden v**es over Trump. (We don’t know how many of these are artificial Biden v**es, or v**es switched from Trump to Biden.)
5) These statistical analyses do not prove fraud, but rather provide scientific evidence that the reported results are highly unlikely to be an accurate reflection of how Pennsylvania citizens v**ed.In addition,
234 pages of affidavits, sworn under penalty of perjury by witnesses to v***r f***d can be read HERE All affidavits are notarized.
The chart below, taken from the report mentioned, shows a comparison of v**e counts in a number of Pennsylvania counties. As you can see, all v**e counts for Biden in the 2020 e******n exceeded by significant margin those for Obama in 2008 and 2012 and for Clinton in 2016.