Kraken Released
Nov 26, 2020 11:51:06 #
Nutter
Loc: Fly Over Zone
https://defendingtherepublic.org/
As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of
the evidence” to show, as the Georgia Supreme Court has made clear that, “[i]
was not incumbent upon [Plaintiff] to show how the [] v**ers would have v**ed
if their [absentee] b****ts had been regular. [Plaintiff] only had to show that
there were enough irregular b****ts to place in doubt the result.” Mead v.
Sheffield, 278 Ga. 268, 272, 601 S.E.2d 99, 102 (2004) (citing Howell v. Fears,
275 Ga. 627, 571 S.E.2d 392 (2002).
As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of
the evidence” to show, as the Georgia Supreme Court has made clear that, “[i]
was not incumbent upon [Plaintiff] to show how the [] v**ers would have v**ed
if their [absentee] b****ts had been regular. [Plaintiff] only had to show that
there were enough irregular b****ts to place in doubt the result.” Mead v.
Sheffield, 278 Ga. 268, 272, 601 S.E.2d 99, 102 (2004) (citing Howell v. Fears,
275 Ga. 627, 571 S.E.2d 392 (2002).
Nov 26, 2020 12:04:36 #
[quote=Nutter]https://defendingtherepublic.org/
As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of
the evidence” to show, as the Georgia Supreme Court has made clear that, “[i]
was not incumbent upon [Plaintiff] to show how the [] v**ers would have v**ed
if their [absentee] b****ts had been regular. [Plaintiff] only had to show that
there were enough irregular b****ts to place in doubt the result.” Mead v.
Sheffield, 278 Ga. 268, 272, 601 S.E.2d 99, 102 (2004) (citing Howell v. Fears,
275 Ga. 627, 571 S.E.2d 392 (2002).[/quote]
Past precedent set.
As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of
the evidence” to show, as the Georgia Supreme Court has made clear that, “[i]
was not incumbent upon [Plaintiff] to show how the [] v**ers would have v**ed
if their [absentee] b****ts had been regular. [Plaintiff] only had to show that
there were enough irregular b****ts to place in doubt the result.” Mead v.
Sheffield, 278 Ga. 268, 272, 601 S.E.2d 99, 102 (2004) (citing Howell v. Fears,
275 Ga. 627, 571 S.E.2d 392 (2002).[/quote]
Past precedent set.
Nov 26, 2020 16:39:24 #
lpnmajor
Loc: Arkansas
[quote=Nutter]https://defendingtherepublic.org/
As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of
the evidence” to show, as the Georgia Supreme Court has made clear that, “[i]
was not incumbent upon [Plaintiff] to show how the [] v**ers would have v**ed
if their [absentee] b****ts had been regular. [Plaintiff] only had to show that
there were enough irregular b****ts to place in doubt the result.” Mead v.
Sheffield, 278 Ga. 268, 272, 601 S.E.2d 99, 102 (2004) (citing Howell v. Fears,
275 Ga. 627, 571 S.E.2d 392 (2002).[/quote]
As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of
the evidence” to show, as the Georgia Supreme Court has made clear that, “[i]
was not incumbent upon [Plaintiff] to show how the [] v**ers would have v**ed
if their [absentee] b****ts had been regular. [Plaintiff] only had to show that
there were enough irregular b****ts to place in doubt the result.” Mead v.
Sheffield, 278 Ga. 268, 272, 601 S.E.2d 99, 102 (2004) (citing Howell v. Fears,
275 Ga. 627, 571 S.E.2d 392 (2002).[/quote]
Nov 26, 2020 18:11:56 #
[quote=Nutter]https://defendingtherepublic.org/
As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of
the evidence” to show, as the Georgia Supreme Court has made clear that, “[i]
was not incumbent upon [Plaintiff] to show how the [] v**ers would have v**ed
if their [absentee] b****ts had been regular. [Plaintiff] only had to show that
there were enough irregular b****ts to place in doubt the result.” Mead v.
Sheffield, 278 Ga. 268, 272, 601 S.E.2d 99, 102 (2004) (citing Howell v. Fears,
275 Ga. 627, 571 S.E.2d 392 (2002).[/quote]
>>>
Nutter !
Trump just admitted he’s going to leave the White House and concede !
He’s a liar
A rat
A t*****r and a Pussy like all the others...
No one will ever be arrested...
As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of
the evidence” to show, as the Georgia Supreme Court has made clear that, “[i]
was not incumbent upon [Plaintiff] to show how the [] v**ers would have v**ed
if their [absentee] b****ts had been regular. [Plaintiff] only had to show that
there were enough irregular b****ts to place in doubt the result.” Mead v.
Sheffield, 278 Ga. 268, 272, 601 S.E.2d 99, 102 (2004) (citing Howell v. Fears,
275 Ga. 627, 571 S.E.2d 392 (2002).[/quote]
>>>
Nutter !
Trump just admitted he’s going to leave the White House and concede !
He’s a liar
A rat
A t*****r and a Pussy like all the others...
No one will ever be arrested...
Nov 27, 2020 00:40:25 #
Nov 27, 2020 14:56:19 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.