Republican former national security officials urge party to demand Trump concession
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - More than 100 former Republican national security officials demanded on Monday that party leaders denounce President Donald Trump's refusal to concede the p**********l e******n, calling it a dangerous and anti-democratic assault on U.S. institutions.
Comprising some of the most senior national security officials in the Republican administrations of Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush and Trump, the group decried the failure of most congressional Republicans to condemn Trump's unwillingness to acknowledge Democratic President-elect Joe Biden's victory in the Nov. 3 e******n.
The group - Former Republican National Security Officials for Biden - which formed in August and whose members campaigned against Trump, was particularly critical of Republican congressional leaders in a published letter.
Most Republicans have remained largely silent while Trump disputes the e******n results with unsubstantiated claims of widespread e******n f***d and his legal team pursues increasingly desperate and unsuccessful attempts to overturn Biden's victory.
"By encouraging President Trump's delaying tactics or remaining silent, Republican leaders put American democracy and national security at risk," the group writes.
Members of the group include retired General Michael Hayden, who served as national security director and head of the CIA; William Webster, the only man to serve as both head of the CIA and FBI; and John Negroponte, the first director of national intelligence.
Biden won the e******n with 306 E*******l College v**es - well over the 270 needed for victory - to Trump's 232. Biden also leads Trump by over 6 million in the popular v**e.
Michael10 wrote:
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - More than 100 former Republican national security officials demanded on Monday that party leaders denounce President Donald Trump's refusal to concede the p**********l e******n, calling it a dangerous and anti-democratic assault on U.S. institutions.
Comprising some of the most senior national security officials in the Republican administrations of Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush and Trump, the group decried the failure of most congressional Republicans to condemn Trump's unwillingness to acknowledge Democratic President-elect Joe Biden's victory in the Nov. 3 e******n.
The group - Former Republican National Security Officials for Biden - which formed in August and whose members campaigned against Trump, was particularly critical of Republican congressional leaders in a published letter.
Most Republicans have remained largely silent while Trump disputes the e******n results with unsubstantiated claims of widespread e******n f***d and his legal team pursues increasingly desperate and unsuccessful attempts to overturn Biden's victory.
"By encouraging President Trump's delaying tactics or remaining silent, Republican leaders put American democracy and national security at risk," the group writes.
Members of the group include retired General Michael Hayden, who served as national security director and head of the CIA; William Webster, the only man to serve as both head of the CIA and FBI; and John Negroponte, the first director of national intelligence.
Biden won the e******n with 306 E*******l College v**es - well over the 270 needed for victory - to Trump's 232. Biden also leads Trump by over 6 million in the popular v**e.
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - More than 100 former Repub... (
show quote)
Here’s the problem, the pig likes rolling in the mud.
That’s 100 more eyeballs on trump, waiting to see what he’ll do next.
If they left a ball gag and a straightjacket on his Resolute do you think he
would get the hint ?
Michael10 wrote:
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - More than 100 former Republican national security officials demanded on Monday that party leaders denounce President Donald Trump's refusal to concede the p**********l e******n, calling it a dangerous and anti-democratic assault on U.S. institutions.
Comprising some of the most senior national security officials in the Republican administrations of Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush and Trump, the group decried the failure of most congressional Republicans to condemn Trump's unwillingness to acknowledge Democratic President-elect Joe Biden's victory in the Nov. 3 e******n.
The group - Former Republican National Security Officials for Biden - which formed in August and whose members campaigned against Trump, was particularly critical of Republican congressional leaders in a published letter.
Most Republicans have remained largely silent while Trump disputes the e******n results with unsubstantiated claims of widespread e******n f***d and his legal team pursues increasingly desperate and unsuccessful attempts to overturn Biden's victory.
"By encouraging President Trump's delaying tactics or remaining silent, Republican leaders put American democracy and national security at risk," the group writes.
Members of the group include retired General Michael Hayden, who served as national security director and head of the CIA; William Webster, the only man to serve as both head of the CIA and FBI; and John Negroponte, the first director of national intelligence.
Biden won the e******n with 306 E*******l College v**es - well over the 270 needed for victory - to Trump's 232. Biden also leads Trump by over 6 million in the popular v**e.
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - More than 100 former Repub... (
show quote)
That’s a no brainer , now trump has them all riding the waves against the trumptanic destruction.
What oh what should they do ? Oh my!
What? What oh what, if only there was an answer.
Parky60
Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
Milosia2 wrote:
That’s a no brainer , now trump has them all riding the waves against the trumptanic destruction.
What oh what should they do ? Oh my!
What? What oh what, if only there was an answer.
Who cares what those RINOS think? If the shoe were on the other foot you guys would be crying that we have to overturn every rock and pursue every legal way possible to ensure that we had a f**r e******n.
I just looked up the word hypocrite in the dictionary and unsurprisingly your pictures came up.
Parky60 wrote:
Who cares what those RINOS think? If the shoe were on the other foot you guys would be crying that we have to overturn every rock and pursue every legal way possible to ensure that we had a f**r e******n.
I just looked up the word hypocrite in the dictionary and unsurprisingly your pictures came up.
The shoe has been on the other foot many times. For 124 years presidents have been conceding when they lost. HE LOST by 6 million v**es.
Parky60
Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
Unintended Consequences wrote:
The shoe has been on the other foot many times. For 124 years presidents have been conceding when they lost. HE LOST by 6 million v**es.
How many LEGAL v**es did he lose by? Until that detail is hashed out, President Trump has EVERY right to NOT concede and explore every legal avenue possible to ensure that he in fact lost e******n.
Why are you so impatient for him to concede if you're so sure he lost? He doesn't have much more time to legally pursue and prove his allegations.
Parky60
Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
Unintended Consequences wrote:
The shoe has been on the other foot many times. For 124 years presidents have been conceding when they lost. HE LOST by 6 million v**es.
And yet Hitlery told Joe not to concede under ANY circumstances.
Michael10 wrote:
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - More than 100 former Republican national security officials demanded on Monday that party leaders denounce President Donald Trump's refusal to concede the p**********l e******n, calling it a dangerous and anti-democratic assault on U.S. institutions.
Comprising some of the most senior national security officials in the Republican administrations of Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush and Trump, the group decried the failure of most congressional Republicans to condemn Trump's unwillingness to acknowledge Democratic President-elect Joe Biden's victory in the Nov. 3 e******n.
The group - Former Republican National Security Officials for Biden - which formed in August and whose members campaigned against Trump, was particularly critical of Republican congressional leaders in a published letter.
Most Republicans have remained largely silent while Trump disputes the e******n results with unsubstantiated claims of widespread e******n f***d and his legal team pursues increasingly desperate and unsuccessful attempts to overturn Biden's victory.
"By encouraging President Trump's delaying tactics or remaining silent, Republican leaders put American democracy and national security at risk," the group writes.
Members of the group include retired General Michael Hayden, who served as national security director and head of the CIA; William Webster, the only man to serve as both head of the CIA and FBI; and John Negroponte, the first director of national intelligence.
Biden won the e******n with 306 E*******l College v**es - well over the 270 needed for victory - to Trump's 232. Biden also leads Trump by over 6 million in the popular v**e.
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - More than 100 former Repub... (
show quote)
Who cares what they think?
That's why they're
former officials.
Parky60 wrote:
How many LEGAL v**es did he lose by? Until that detail is hashed out, President Trump has EVERY right to NOT concede and explore every legal avenue possible to ensure that he in fact lost e******n.
Why are you so impatient for him to concede if you're so sure he lost? He doesn't have much more time to legally pursue and prove his allegations.
Have you not been paying attention, The states have said NO FRAUD so that would be 6 million legal v**es
Evidence, Evidence, Evidence, if there were any trump would have shown it. He's a nut case narcissist who can't stand to loose. End of story
Michael10 wrote:
Evidence, Evidence, Evidence, if there were any trump would have shown it. He's a nut case narcissist who can't stand to loose. End of story
===============
Your huge mouth can't provide any proof of your claims.
Parky60
Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
Michael10 wrote:
Evidence, Evidence, Evidence, if there were any trump would have shown it. He's a nut case narcissist who can't stand to loose. End of story
Here is evidence of irregularities in the 2020 p**********l e******n. These are OFFICIAL Nevada websites. The man who researched this is a well-respected attorney who has been practicing law for over 40 years.
Of interest are
the time stamps from 13:55 to 19:45.
Don't you think it behooves us to investigate this along with other states that appear to have e******n irregularities to ensure that this was a fair and honest e******n? I strongly suspect that this is just the tip of the iceberg.
But you l*****ts just want us to lie down and accept the results. RIIIIIGHT!
Parky60 wrote:
How many LEGAL v**es did he lose by? Until that detail is hashed out, President Trump has EVERY right to NOT concede and explore every legal avenue possible to ensure that he in fact lost e******n.
Why are you so impatient for him to concede if you're so sure he lost? He doesn't have much more time to legally pursue and prove his allegations.
By delaying with a bunch of bogus lawsuits, Trump has convinced his diehard followers that the e******n was s****n. Now Biden is supposed to get things done when a good portion of the people don't accept that he is president. There is massive breakdown of trust in this country. We don't trust the e******n officials in each state who said there was no fraud. We don't trust the owners of D******n e******n machines when they say the machines are not capable of switching v**es. We don't trust the thousands of poll workers and poll watchers who spent long hours trying to assure us that the v**e was correct. We can't afford more years of inaction because we don't trust the other team. The west coast is burning up; the southeast is getting flooded; bridges are falling down; roads need to be repaired; 1000 people a day are dying of a v***s while we argue about masks. While we are fighting about who won and everything else we're fighting about, our enemies are seeing that no one is minding the store and they are getting ready to invade. For once can we agree to disagree and get the important stuff taken care of?
Parky60
Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
Unintended Consequences wrote:
By delaying with a bunch of bogus lawsuits, Trump has convinced his diehard followers that the e******n was s****n. Now Biden is supposed to get things done when a good portion of the people don't accept that he is president. There is massive breakdown of trust in this country. We don't trust the e******n officials in each state who said there was no fraud. We don't trust the owners of D******n e******n machines when they say the machines are not capable of switching v**es. We don't trust the thousands of poll workers and poll watchers who spent long hours trying to assure us that the v**e was correct. We can't afford more years of inaction because we don't trust the other team. The west coast is burning up; the southeast is getting flooded; bridges are falling down; roads need to be repaired; 1000 people a day are dying of a v***s while we argue about masks. While we are fighting about who won and everything else we're fighting about, our enemies are seeing that no one is minding the store and they are getting ready to invade. For once can we agree to disagree and get the important stuff taken care of?
By delaying with a bunch of bogus lawsuits, Trump ... (
show quote)
Did you watch the video that STRONGLY suggests the need to investigate this and other potential incidences of e******n f***d that could have cost President Trump the e******n?
Here I'll help you out and post it again. This is from a well-respected Ohio attorney who has been in practice for over 40 years. Of interest are
the time stamps from 13:55 to 19:45.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.