This stimulus provision – which Republicans call essential – is actually a 'poison pill': Gillibrand
Well! Well!
When Gillibrand speaks nobody listens!
She isn’t E. F. Hutton!
Bad Bob wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/this-stimulus-provision-which-republicans-call-essential-is-actually-a-poison-pill-sen-gillibrand-162653374.html
Businesses won't need immunity from law suits if they simply follow guidelines and protect their workers, giving them immunity would mean they will do wh**ever they want, which would not be complying.
Already we are seeing some very weird iterations of how a "sick" person is being handled. Companies are telling people to come to work sick, don't say anything to other workers. It's really really weird, before c***d if you called in sick with a cold or flu you weren't told to come in, you were rarely required to get a doctors note. When I have a cold or flu the very last thing I want to do is leave the house to go anywhere.
It's like companies don't want C***d acknowledged because they don't want the resulting quarantines with people who were exposed to someone who has it.
These are your most clueless and just plain dumb statements to date, and that’s saying something.
woodguru wrote:
Businesses won't need immunity from law suits if they simply follow guidelines and protect their workers, giving them immunity would mean they will do wh**ever they want, which would not be complying.
Already we are seeing some very weird iterations of how a "sick" person is being handled. Companies are telling people to come to work sick, don't say anything to other workers. It's really really weird, before c***d if you called in sick with a cold or flu you weren't told to come in, you were rarely required to get a doctors note. When I have a cold or flu the very last thing I want to do is leave the house to go anywhere.
It's like companies don't want C***d acknowledged because they don't want the resulting quarantines with people who were exposed to someone who has it.
Businesses won't need immunity from law suits if t... (
show quote)
woodguru wrote:
Businesses won't need immunity from law suits if they simply follow guidelines and protect their workers, giving them immunity would mean they will do wh**ever they want, which would not be complying.
Already we are seeing some very weird iterations of how a "sick" person is being handled. Companies are telling people to come to work sick, don't say anything to other workers. It's really really weird, before c***d if you called in sick with a cold or flu you weren't told to come in, you were rarely required to get a doctors note. When I have a cold or flu the very last thing I want to do is leave the house to go anywhere.
It's like companies don't want C***d acknowledged because they don't want the resulting quarantines with people who were exposed to someone who has it.
Businesses won't need immunity from law suits if t... (
show quote)
Not true! Our company made it plain and simple. Their policy: “If you feel ill and have any flu symptoms, stay home!”
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.