Americans Must Rebel Against Lockdowns, Mandated Masks, Forced V******tions
Nov 20, 2020 16:18:38 #
The existential threat to the world, including America, is the tyranny of Technocracy. As the twisted and fraudulent narrative takes on a life of its own, only citizens can throw off the intended yoke of Scientific Dictatorship. ~ Patrick Wood
Americans Must Rebel Against Lockdowns, Mandated Masks, Forced V******tions
Brandon Smith ~ November 19, 2020
With the p**********l e******n highly contested and the mainstream media hyping the rising infection numbers, the public is now facing important questions regarding the future of the p******c response. Some states have decided to unilaterally introduce “executive orders” to restrict citizen movements, business openings and public activities.
Anthony F***i is on the news constantly, calling for families to cancel Thanksgiving and Christmas and telling Americans to just “do what we are told”. The media is generally trying to drum up fear in the minds of the populace and paint images of plague and death everywhere. If Biden does actually end up in the White House, a federalized and national high-level lockdown is on the table starting in January.
In April of this year I published an article titled ‘Waves Of M********n: Medical Tyranny And The Cashless Society’, which outlined a social engineering model put forward by g*******ts at MIT and the Imperial College of London which I called “wave theory”. The model essentially works like this:
Governments must use the p******c as a rationale for “waves” of restrictive lockdowns, followed by controlled re-openings of the economy and of normal human activity. G*******ts claim that this will “slow” the spread of the c****av***s and save lives. However, they also openly admit that these cycles of closures and openings have other uses.
Over time, the citizenry becomes acclimated to governmental intrusion in their everyday lives, and they get used to the idea of bureaucracy telling them what they are not allowed to do when it comes to the simplest activities. The system thus bottlenecks all human interactions to the point that we are constantly asking for permission. We become s***es to the C***d response.
As g*******t Gideon Lichfield from MIT stated in his article ‘We’re Not Going Back To Normal’:
“Ultimately, however, I predict that we’ll restore the ability to socialize safely by developing more sophisticated ways to identify who is a disease risk and who isn’t, and discriminating—legally—against those who are.
…one can imagine a world in which, to get on a flight, perhaps you’ll have to be signed up to a service that tracks your movements via your phone. The airline wouldn’t be able to see where you’d gone, but it would get an alert if you’d been close to known infected people or disease hot spots. There’d be similar requirements at the entrance to large venues, government buildings, or public t***sport hubs. There would be temperature scanners everywhere, and your workplace might demand you wear a monitor that tracks your temperature or other vital signs. Where nightclubs ask for proof of age, in future they might ask for proof of immunity—an identity card or some kind of digital verification via your phone, showing you’ve already recovered from or been v******ted against the latest v***s strains.”
Note that Lichfield suggested that in order to participate in the normal economy you might need to show verification that you have been “v******ted against the latest v***s strains”. In other words, the elites expect there to be many more v***l events or mutations AFTER C***d ** has run its course, and the restrictions and controls we see today are meant to continue, possibly FOREVER.
The reality is that the wave model is not a very practical plan for stopping v***l spread, but it is a perfect method for conditioning people to submit to a high level of control over their personal lives that they never would have accepted otherwise. The C***d response has also been heralded by elites at the World Economic Forum as a perfect “opportunity” to initiate what they call the “Great Reset”. The reset is a plan to deconstruct what’s left of the free market capitalist system, introduce carbon controls in the name of the g****l w*****g fraud, institute a global cashless monetary system, and finally, move humanity into what they call a “shared economy” in which the average person is no longer allowed to own private property of any kind and is completely dependent on the system for their basic necessities.
Of course, such a complex system of “solutions” (dominance) over every individual would need to be managed in a highly centralized way. Meaning, global governance by the elitist establishment would be the end result. Naturally, the g*******ts would “reluctantly” take the reins of power for “the greater good.”
This is the bigger picture, the underlying threat at the core of the lockdowns and C***d laws. That said, there are also numerous arguments based on logic and evidence as to why there is no reason for people to submit to such restrictions. Let’s outline them in a simple list:
The C****av***s K**ls Less Than 1% Of The People It Infects
Medical studies in the US indicate that the c****av***s deaths rate for citizens NOT living in nursing homes has been holding well below 1% on average. The largest percentage of deaths by far in the US has been in nursing homes among elderly people with preexisting conditions. People in long-term care facilities make up 8% of C***d infection cases but they are 45% of all c***d deaths.
Pneumonia alone k**ls around 50,000 Americans each year according to the CDC, and that’s with v******tions, yet, we are supposed to panic and hand over all our freedoms in the name of stopping a disease which affects a tiny percentage of the population? This is why the media and governments have decided to hyperfocus on infection numbers rather than deaths. The death numbers do not warrant the amount of panic the establishment is trying to foment.
Lockdowns Destroy The Economy
It’s basic math and finance; the small business sector of the US economy is dying. Small businesses make up around 50% of US employment. The C***d bailout money, handled by international banks like JP Morgan, did not get to the vast majority of small businesses that were supposed to receive it. Those businesses that did get bailouts are still on the verge of closure or bankruptcy. Any further lockdowns will be the final nail in the coffin for the US economy, except for major corporations which are enjoying the lion’s share of stimulus cash.
How many lives will be damaged or lost due to poverty and economic collapse if the current trend continues? I suspect far more than any lives lost because of C***d.
Why is no one in the mainstream talking about the most practical solution to the p******c? The small percentage of people who are most at risk can STAY HOME and take precautions as necessary, while the rest of us get on with our lives. Why are we being ordered to do the exact opposite just to make less than 1% of the population feel safer? How is this logical, reasonable or scientific? The only answer that makes sense is that the lockdown response is about control, not saving lives.
State Governors Have No Authority To Take Away Your Civil Liberties, And Neither Does The President
Restrictions based on executive orders have no legal authority under the Constitution. They are color of law, not true law. Laws are debated and passed by state legislatures, not by state governors. Executive orders only apply to state employees and have no bearing on the citizenry.
L*****ts and statists argue that during a national crisis the governor has emergency powers and states can do wh**ever they want. This is false. Under the constitution and the Bill of Rights, state governors do not get to proclaim a national emergency based on their personal opinion and then declare themselves dictators in response. Any “laws” exerted because of such a process are therefore null and void; they are meaningless.
If the states have the ability to do wh**ever they want without oversight, then they would be able to bring back Jim Crow laws (among other things). Do l*****ts support that idea as well? If the federal government and the president have the power to violate the Bill of Rights during a national emergency, then Donald Trump has the authority to bring in martial law across the country because of l*****t r**ts. Do l*****ts agree with that outcome?
It is interesting to me that the political left in particular is so keen on defending the idea of states and governors having the power to unilaterally enforce p******c restrictions without oversight or checks and balances. Yet, they have been aggressively opposed to state powers in the past when they had a Democratic president like Obama in office. The left has also been staunchly opposed to executive orders applied by Donald Trump, but they applaud the idea of executive orders on lockdowns being instituted by Biden.
So, l*****ts support unilateral state power only when it works in favor of their agenda, and they support unilateral federal and p**********l power only when it works in favor of their agenda. What a surprise…
The bottom line is this: State government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. Federal government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. NO ONE has the legal power to take away your inherent liberties. Those that claim otherwise have something to gain from your ens***ement.
Mask Laws Are Unscientific
The majority of masks being used by the public today are cloth masks. Not even the CDC recommends the use of cloth masks for their own employees or medical workers. They only recommend N95 masks. They also admit that cloth masks are much less effective at preventing contact with the v***s. Yet, the CDC supports the enforcement of cloth masks for the public.
On top of that, some states and countries with the most stringent mask laws continue to see huge spikes in c****av***s infections. For example, New York has been one of the most tyrannical enforcers of mask laws and lockdowns in the US, but in November the state has witnessed extensive infection increases. California, Michigan and Illinois have also seen dramatic infection spikes this month despite hard enforcement of masks. So, where is the science?
It would appear that masks are a placebo; if they actually worked, then the states with the most aggressive enforcement should be seeing a dramatic downturn in cases, not exponential increases.
Furthermore, why are many states and countries trying to force citizens to wear masks outside in open air and sunlight when v***ses cannot survive in such conditions? UV light from the sun is nature’s sterilizer, but no one in the mainstream or in government acknowledges this scientific fact. Again, this shows that mask laws are about control, not about science or saving lives.
C***d V******tion Is Unnecessary And Potentially Dangerous
Why should people get v******ted for a v***s that over 99% of them will easily survive anyway? Why not simply attain “herd immunity” through natural infection spread and antibodies? The mainstream will continue to ignore these questions because they are inconvenient to the wider agenda.
Also, why should anyone trust a v*****e that was rushed out in less than a year’s time? China and the rest of the world spent over a decade trying to develop a v*****e for SARS unsuccessfully, but we are supposed to believe that they created a v*****e for SARS related C***d ** within months?
The last time the government rushed out a v*****e for a v***l epidemic was the 1976 swine flu scare, and that ended with numerous permanently damaged or dead individuals due to faulty v*****es.
As I noted in my article ‘Why The Public Should Rebel Against Forced V******tions’, published in May, there are numerous examples of v*****e tests and implementation going very wrong, from Bill Gates and the World Health Organization giving people polio in various countries through v*****es, to Novartis and their deadly testing of a Bird Flu v*****e on homeless people in Poland, to GlaxoSmithCline and the deaths of children due to their pneumonia v*****e.
Again, it’s simply not worth the risk over a v***s that over 99% of people will survive. The idea of such risk being forced on the public is completely unacceptable, but many government officials have supported the idea over the past six months. It is important for the public to make it clear now that they will NOT be allowing state or federal governments to make v******tion mandatory.
R*******n Is Needed To Put A Stop To The Fear Machine
In closing, there are endless reasons why we must end the p******c lockdown agenda once and for all. Most importantly, the lockdowns, mask orders and v*****e plans are a stepping stone to something much worse – Medical tyranny and centralization on an unprecedented scale. I will not personally follow such rules because they are not scientifically or morally sound. They are nonsense designed to frighten the public into complacency and consent.
A r*******n against such measures would be very easy to win. All we have to do is refuse to follow their mandates. What are they going to do? Lock up millions of people? Shoot us? That would sort of defeat the supposed purpose of the very measures they demand we follow. And, if it comes to violence, so be it. I have no problem fighting to defend my freedoms and the freedoms of future generations. Perhaps it is time for conservatives and moderates that stand against the lockdowns to organize for this possible future.
Americans Must Rebel Against Lockdowns, Mandated Masks, Forced V******tions
Brandon Smith ~ November 19, 2020
With the p**********l e******n highly contested and the mainstream media hyping the rising infection numbers, the public is now facing important questions regarding the future of the p******c response. Some states have decided to unilaterally introduce “executive orders” to restrict citizen movements, business openings and public activities.
Anthony F***i is on the news constantly, calling for families to cancel Thanksgiving and Christmas and telling Americans to just “do what we are told”. The media is generally trying to drum up fear in the minds of the populace and paint images of plague and death everywhere. If Biden does actually end up in the White House, a federalized and national high-level lockdown is on the table starting in January.
In April of this year I published an article titled ‘Waves Of M********n: Medical Tyranny And The Cashless Society’, which outlined a social engineering model put forward by g*******ts at MIT and the Imperial College of London which I called “wave theory”. The model essentially works like this:
Governments must use the p******c as a rationale for “waves” of restrictive lockdowns, followed by controlled re-openings of the economy and of normal human activity. G*******ts claim that this will “slow” the spread of the c****av***s and save lives. However, they also openly admit that these cycles of closures and openings have other uses.
Over time, the citizenry becomes acclimated to governmental intrusion in their everyday lives, and they get used to the idea of bureaucracy telling them what they are not allowed to do when it comes to the simplest activities. The system thus bottlenecks all human interactions to the point that we are constantly asking for permission. We become s***es to the C***d response.
As g*******t Gideon Lichfield from MIT stated in his article ‘We’re Not Going Back To Normal’:
“Ultimately, however, I predict that we’ll restore the ability to socialize safely by developing more sophisticated ways to identify who is a disease risk and who isn’t, and discriminating—legally—against those who are.
…one can imagine a world in which, to get on a flight, perhaps you’ll have to be signed up to a service that tracks your movements via your phone. The airline wouldn’t be able to see where you’d gone, but it would get an alert if you’d been close to known infected people or disease hot spots. There’d be similar requirements at the entrance to large venues, government buildings, or public t***sport hubs. There would be temperature scanners everywhere, and your workplace might demand you wear a monitor that tracks your temperature or other vital signs. Where nightclubs ask for proof of age, in future they might ask for proof of immunity—an identity card or some kind of digital verification via your phone, showing you’ve already recovered from or been v******ted against the latest v***s strains.”
Note that Lichfield suggested that in order to participate in the normal economy you might need to show verification that you have been “v******ted against the latest v***s strains”. In other words, the elites expect there to be many more v***l events or mutations AFTER C***d ** has run its course, and the restrictions and controls we see today are meant to continue, possibly FOREVER.
The reality is that the wave model is not a very practical plan for stopping v***l spread, but it is a perfect method for conditioning people to submit to a high level of control over their personal lives that they never would have accepted otherwise. The C***d response has also been heralded by elites at the World Economic Forum as a perfect “opportunity” to initiate what they call the “Great Reset”. The reset is a plan to deconstruct what’s left of the free market capitalist system, introduce carbon controls in the name of the g****l w*****g fraud, institute a global cashless monetary system, and finally, move humanity into what they call a “shared economy” in which the average person is no longer allowed to own private property of any kind and is completely dependent on the system for their basic necessities.
Of course, such a complex system of “solutions” (dominance) over every individual would need to be managed in a highly centralized way. Meaning, global governance by the elitist establishment would be the end result. Naturally, the g*******ts would “reluctantly” take the reins of power for “the greater good.”
This is the bigger picture, the underlying threat at the core of the lockdowns and C***d laws. That said, there are also numerous arguments based on logic and evidence as to why there is no reason for people to submit to such restrictions. Let’s outline them in a simple list:
The C****av***s K**ls Less Than 1% Of The People It Infects
Medical studies in the US indicate that the c****av***s deaths rate for citizens NOT living in nursing homes has been holding well below 1% on average. The largest percentage of deaths by far in the US has been in nursing homes among elderly people with preexisting conditions. People in long-term care facilities make up 8% of C***d infection cases but they are 45% of all c***d deaths.
Pneumonia alone k**ls around 50,000 Americans each year according to the CDC, and that’s with v******tions, yet, we are supposed to panic and hand over all our freedoms in the name of stopping a disease which affects a tiny percentage of the population? This is why the media and governments have decided to hyperfocus on infection numbers rather than deaths. The death numbers do not warrant the amount of panic the establishment is trying to foment.
Lockdowns Destroy The Economy
It’s basic math and finance; the small business sector of the US economy is dying. Small businesses make up around 50% of US employment. The C***d bailout money, handled by international banks like JP Morgan, did not get to the vast majority of small businesses that were supposed to receive it. Those businesses that did get bailouts are still on the verge of closure or bankruptcy. Any further lockdowns will be the final nail in the coffin for the US economy, except for major corporations which are enjoying the lion’s share of stimulus cash.
How many lives will be damaged or lost due to poverty and economic collapse if the current trend continues? I suspect far more than any lives lost because of C***d.
Why is no one in the mainstream talking about the most practical solution to the p******c? The small percentage of people who are most at risk can STAY HOME and take precautions as necessary, while the rest of us get on with our lives. Why are we being ordered to do the exact opposite just to make less than 1% of the population feel safer? How is this logical, reasonable or scientific? The only answer that makes sense is that the lockdown response is about control, not saving lives.
State Governors Have No Authority To Take Away Your Civil Liberties, And Neither Does The President
Restrictions based on executive orders have no legal authority under the Constitution. They are color of law, not true law. Laws are debated and passed by state legislatures, not by state governors. Executive orders only apply to state employees and have no bearing on the citizenry.
L*****ts and statists argue that during a national crisis the governor has emergency powers and states can do wh**ever they want. This is false. Under the constitution and the Bill of Rights, state governors do not get to proclaim a national emergency based on their personal opinion and then declare themselves dictators in response. Any “laws” exerted because of such a process are therefore null and void; they are meaningless.
If the states have the ability to do wh**ever they want without oversight, then they would be able to bring back Jim Crow laws (among other things). Do l*****ts support that idea as well? If the federal government and the president have the power to violate the Bill of Rights during a national emergency, then Donald Trump has the authority to bring in martial law across the country because of l*****t r**ts. Do l*****ts agree with that outcome?
It is interesting to me that the political left in particular is so keen on defending the idea of states and governors having the power to unilaterally enforce p******c restrictions without oversight or checks and balances. Yet, they have been aggressively opposed to state powers in the past when they had a Democratic president like Obama in office. The left has also been staunchly opposed to executive orders applied by Donald Trump, but they applaud the idea of executive orders on lockdowns being instituted by Biden.
So, l*****ts support unilateral state power only when it works in favor of their agenda, and they support unilateral federal and p**********l power only when it works in favor of their agenda. What a surprise…
The bottom line is this: State government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. Federal government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. NO ONE has the legal power to take away your inherent liberties. Those that claim otherwise have something to gain from your ens***ement.
Mask Laws Are Unscientific
The majority of masks being used by the public today are cloth masks. Not even the CDC recommends the use of cloth masks for their own employees or medical workers. They only recommend N95 masks. They also admit that cloth masks are much less effective at preventing contact with the v***s. Yet, the CDC supports the enforcement of cloth masks for the public.
On top of that, some states and countries with the most stringent mask laws continue to see huge spikes in c****av***s infections. For example, New York has been one of the most tyrannical enforcers of mask laws and lockdowns in the US, but in November the state has witnessed extensive infection increases. California, Michigan and Illinois have also seen dramatic infection spikes this month despite hard enforcement of masks. So, where is the science?
It would appear that masks are a placebo; if they actually worked, then the states with the most aggressive enforcement should be seeing a dramatic downturn in cases, not exponential increases.
Furthermore, why are many states and countries trying to force citizens to wear masks outside in open air and sunlight when v***ses cannot survive in such conditions? UV light from the sun is nature’s sterilizer, but no one in the mainstream or in government acknowledges this scientific fact. Again, this shows that mask laws are about control, not about science or saving lives.
C***d V******tion Is Unnecessary And Potentially Dangerous
Why should people get v******ted for a v***s that over 99% of them will easily survive anyway? Why not simply attain “herd immunity” through natural infection spread and antibodies? The mainstream will continue to ignore these questions because they are inconvenient to the wider agenda.
Also, why should anyone trust a v*****e that was rushed out in less than a year’s time? China and the rest of the world spent over a decade trying to develop a v*****e for SARS unsuccessfully, but we are supposed to believe that they created a v*****e for SARS related C***d ** within months?
The last time the government rushed out a v*****e for a v***l epidemic was the 1976 swine flu scare, and that ended with numerous permanently damaged or dead individuals due to faulty v*****es.
As I noted in my article ‘Why The Public Should Rebel Against Forced V******tions’, published in May, there are numerous examples of v*****e tests and implementation going very wrong, from Bill Gates and the World Health Organization giving people polio in various countries through v*****es, to Novartis and their deadly testing of a Bird Flu v*****e on homeless people in Poland, to GlaxoSmithCline and the deaths of children due to their pneumonia v*****e.
Again, it’s simply not worth the risk over a v***s that over 99% of people will survive. The idea of such risk being forced on the public is completely unacceptable, but many government officials have supported the idea over the past six months. It is important for the public to make it clear now that they will NOT be allowing state or federal governments to make v******tion mandatory.
R*******n Is Needed To Put A Stop To The Fear Machine
In closing, there are endless reasons why we must end the p******c lockdown agenda once and for all. Most importantly, the lockdowns, mask orders and v*****e plans are a stepping stone to something much worse – Medical tyranny and centralization on an unprecedented scale. I will not personally follow such rules because they are not scientifically or morally sound. They are nonsense designed to frighten the public into complacency and consent.
A r*******n against such measures would be very easy to win. All we have to do is refuse to follow their mandates. What are they going to do? Lock up millions of people? Shoot us? That would sort of defeat the supposed purpose of the very measures they demand we follow. And, if it comes to violence, so be it. I have no problem fighting to defend my freedoms and the freedoms of future generations. Perhaps it is time for conservatives and moderates that stand against the lockdowns to organize for this possible future.
Nov 20, 2020 16:21:33 #
[quote=Parky60]The existential threat to the world, including America, is the tyranny of Technocracy. As the twisted and fraudulent narrative takes on a life of its own, only citizens can throw off the intended yoke of Scientific Dictatorship. ~ Patrick Wood
Americans Must Rebel Against Lockdowns, Mandated Masks, Forced V******tions
Brandon Smith ~ November 19, 2020
With the p**********l e******n highly contested and the mainstream media hyping the rising infection numbers, the public is now facing important questions regarding the future of the p******c response. Some states have decided to unilaterally introduce “executive orders” to restrict citizen movements, business openings and public activities.
Anthony F***i is on the news constantly, calling for families to cancel Thanksgiving and Christmas and telling Americans to just “do what we are told”. The media is generally trying to drum up fear in the minds of the populace and paint images of plague and death everywhere. If Biden does actually end up in the White House, a federalized and national high-level lockdown is on the table starting in January.
In April of this year I published an article titled ‘Waves Of M********n: Medical Tyranny And The Cashless Society’, which outlined a social engineering model put forward by g*******ts at MIT and the Imperial College of London which I called “wave theory”. The model essentially works like this:
[i]Governments must use the p******c as a rationale for “waves” of restrictive lockdowns, followed by controlled re-openings of the economy and of normal human activity. G*******ts claim that this will “slow” the spread of the c****av***s and save lives. However, they also openly admit that these cycles of closures and openings have other uses.
Over time, the citizenry becomes acclimated to governmental intrusion in their everyday lives, and they get used to the idea of bureaucracy telling them what they are not allowed to do when it comes to the simplest activities. The system thus bottlenecks all human interactions to the point that we are constantly asking for permission. We become s***es to the C***d response.[i]
As g*******t Gideon Lichfield from MIT stated in his article ‘We’re Not Going Back To Normal’:
“Ultimately, however, I predict that we’ll restore the ability to socialize safely by developing more sophisticated ways to identify who is a disease risk and who isn’t, and discriminating—legally—against those who are.
…one can imagine a world in which, to get on a flight, perhaps you’ll have to be signed up to a service that tracks your movements via your phone. The airline wouldn’t be able to see where you’d gone, but it would get an alert if you’d been close to known infected people or disease hot spots. There’d be similar requirements at the entrance to large venues, government buildings, or public t***sport hubs. There would be temperature scanners everywhere, and your workplace might demand you wear a monitor that tracks your temperature or other vital signs. Where nightclubs ask for proof of age, in future they might ask for proof of immunity—an identity card or some kind of digital verification via your phone, showing you’ve already recovered from or been v******ted against the latest v***s strains.”
Note that Lichfield suggested that in order to participate in the normal economy you might need to show verification that you have been “v******ted against the latest v***s strains”. In other words, the elites expect there to be many more v***l events or mutations AFTER C***d ** has run its course, and the restrictions and controls we see today are meant to continue, possibly FOREVER.
The reality is that the wave model is not a very practical plan for stopping v***l spread, but it is a perfect method for conditioning people to submit to a high level of control over their personal lives that they never would have accepted otherwise. The C***d response has also been heralded by elites at the World Economic Forum as a perfect “opportunity” to initiate what they call the “Great Reset”. The reset is a plan to deconstruct what’s left of the free market capitalist system, introduce carbon controls in the name of the g****l w*****g fraud, institute a global cashless monetary system, and finally, move humanity into what they call a “shared economy” in which the average person is no longer allowed to own private property of any kind and is completely dependent on the system for their basic necessities.
Of course, such a complex system of “solutions” (dominance) over every individual would need to be managed in a highly centralized way. Meaning, global governance by the elitist establishment would be the end result. Naturally, the g*******ts would “reluctantly” take the reins of power for “the greater good.”
This is the bigger picture, the underlying threat at the core of the lockdowns and C***d laws. That said, there are also numerous arguments based on logic and evidence as to why there is no reason for people to submit to such restrictions. Let’s outline them in a simple list:
The C****av***s K**ls Less Than 1% Of The People It Infects
Medical studies in the US indicate that the c****av***s deaths rate for citizens NOT living in nursing homes has been holding well below 1% on average. The largest percentage of deaths by far in the US has been in nursing homes among elderly people with preexisting conditions. People in long-term care facilities make up 8% of C***d infection cases but they are 45% of all c***d deaths.
Pneumonia alone k**ls around 50,000 Americans each year according to the CDC, and that’s with v******tions, yet, we are supposed to panic and hand over all our freedoms in the name of stopping a disease which affects a tiny percentage of the population? This is why the media and governments have decided to hyperfocus on infection numbers rather than deaths. The death numbers do not warrant the amount of panic the establishment is trying to foment.
Lockdowns Destroy The Economy
It’s basic math and finance; the small business sector of the US economy is dying. Small businesses make up around 50% of US employment. The C***d bailout money, handled by international banks like JP Morgan, did not get to the vast majority of small businesses that were supposed to receive it. Those businesses that did get bailouts are still on the verge of closure or bankruptcy. Any further lockdowns will be the final nail in the coffin for the US economy, except for major corporations which are enjoying the lion’s share of stimulus cash.
How many lives will be damaged or lost due to poverty and economic collapse if the current trend continues? I suspect far more than any lives lost because of C***d.
Why is no one in the mainstream talking about the most practical solution to the p******c? The small percentage of people who are most at risk can STAY HOME and take precautions as necessary, while the rest of us get on with our lives. Why are we being ordered to do the exact opposite just to make less than 1% of the population feel safer? How is this logical, reasonable or scientific? The only answer that makes sense is that the lockdown response is about control, not saving lives.
State Governors Have No Authority To Take Away Your Civil Liberties, And Neither Does The President
Restrictions based on executive orders have no legal authority under the Constitution. They are color of law, not true law. Laws are debated and passed by state legislatures, not by state governors. Executive orders only apply to state employees and have no bearing on the citizenry.
L*****ts and statists argue that during a national crisis the governor has emergency powers and states can do wh**ever they want. This is false. Under the constitution and the Bill of Rights, state governors do not get to proclaim a national emergency based on their personal opinion and then declare themselves dictators in response. Any “laws” exerted because of such a process are therefore null and void; they are meaningless.
If the states have the ability to do wh**ever they want without oversight, then they would be able to bring back Jim Crow laws (among other things). Do l*****ts support that idea as well? If the federal government and the president have the power to violate the Bill of Rights during a national emergency, then Donald Trump has the authority to bring in martial law across the country because of l*****t r**ts. Do l*****ts agree with that outcome?
It is interesting to me that the political left in particular is so keen on defending the idea of states and governors having the power to unilaterally enforce p******c restrictions without oversight or checks and balances. Yet, they have been aggressively opposed to state powers in the past when they had a Democratic president like Obama in office. The left has also been staunchly opposed to executive orders applied by Donald Trump, but they applaud the idea of executive orders on lockdowns being instituted by Biden.
So, l*****ts support unilateral state power only when it works in favor of their agenda, and they support unilateral federal and p**********l power only when it works in favor of their agenda. What a surprise…
The bottom line is this: State government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. Federal government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. NO ONE has the legal power to take away your inherent liberties. Those that claim otherwise have something to gain from your ens***ement.
Mask Laws Are Unscientific
The majority of masks being used by the public today are cloth masks. Not even the CDC recommends the use of cloth masks for their own employees or medical workers. They only recommend N95 masks. They also admit that cloth masks are much less effective at preventing contact with the v***s. Yet, the CDC supports the enforcement of cloth masks for the public.
On top of that, some states and countries with the most stringent mask laws continue to see huge spikes in c****av***s infections. For example, New York has been one of the most tyrannical enforcers of mask laws and lockdowns in the US, but in November the state has witnessed extensive infection increases. California, Michigan and Illinois have also seen dramatic infection spikes this month despite hard enforcement of masks. So, where is the science?
It would appear that masks are a placebo; if they actually worked, then the states with the most aggressive enforcement should be seeing a dramatic downturn in cases, not exponential increases.
Furthermore, why are many states and countries trying to force citizens to wear masks outside in open air and sunlight when v***ses cannot survive in such conditions? UV light from the sun is nature’s sterilizer, but no one in the mainstream or in government acknowledges this scientific fact. Again, this shows that mask laws are about control, not about science or saving lives.
C***d V******tion Is Unnecessary And Potentially Dangerous
Why should people get v******ted for a v***s that over 99% of them will easily survive anyway? Why not simply attain “herd immunity” through natural infection spread and antibodies? The mainstream will continue to ignore these questions because they are inconvenient to the wider agenda.
Also, why should anyone trust a v*****e that was rushed out in less than a year’s time? China and the rest of the world spent over a decade trying to develop a v*****e for SARS unsuccessfully, but we are supposed to believe that they created a v*****e for SARS related C***d ** within months?
The last time the government rushed out a v*****e for a v***l epidemic was the 1976 swine flu scare, and that ended with numerous permanently damaged or dead individuals due to faulty v*****es.
As I noted in my article ‘Why The Public Should Rebel Against Forced V******tions’, published in May, there are numerous examples of v*****e tests and implementation going very wrong, from Bill Gates and the World Health Organization giving people polio in various countries through v*****es, to Novartis and their deadly testing of a Bird Flu v*****e on homeless people in Poland, to GlaxoSmithCline and the deaths of children due to their pneumonia v*****e.
Again, it’s simply not worth the risk over a v***s that over 99% of people will survive. The idea of such risk being forced on the public is completely unacceptable, but many government officials have supported the idea over the past six months. It is important for the public to make it clear now that they will NOT be allowing state or federal governments to make v******tion mandatory.
R*******n Is Needed To Put A Stop To The Fear Machine
In closing, there are endless reasons why we must end the p******c lockdown agenda once and for all. Most importantly, the lockdowns, mask orders and v*****e plans are a stepping stone to something much worse – Medical tyranny and centralization on an unprecedented scale. I will not personally follow such rules because they are not scientifically or morally sound. They are nonsense designed to frighten the public into complacency and consent.
A r*******n against such measures would be very easy to win. All we have to do is refuse to follow their mandates. What are they going to do? Lock up millions of people? Shoot us? That would sort of defeat the supposed purpose of the very measures they demand we follow. And, if it comes to violence, so be it. I have no problem fighting to defend my freedoms and the freedoms of future generations. Perhaps it is time for conservatives and moderates that stand against the lockdowns to organize for this possible future.[/quote]
Wow that's a lot of b.s. go for it
Americans Must Rebel Against Lockdowns, Mandated Masks, Forced V******tions
Brandon Smith ~ November 19, 2020
With the p**********l e******n highly contested and the mainstream media hyping the rising infection numbers, the public is now facing important questions regarding the future of the p******c response. Some states have decided to unilaterally introduce “executive orders” to restrict citizen movements, business openings and public activities.
Anthony F***i is on the news constantly, calling for families to cancel Thanksgiving and Christmas and telling Americans to just “do what we are told”. The media is generally trying to drum up fear in the minds of the populace and paint images of plague and death everywhere. If Biden does actually end up in the White House, a federalized and national high-level lockdown is on the table starting in January.
In April of this year I published an article titled ‘Waves Of M********n: Medical Tyranny And The Cashless Society’, which outlined a social engineering model put forward by g*******ts at MIT and the Imperial College of London which I called “wave theory”. The model essentially works like this:
[i]Governments must use the p******c as a rationale for “waves” of restrictive lockdowns, followed by controlled re-openings of the economy and of normal human activity. G*******ts claim that this will “slow” the spread of the c****av***s and save lives. However, they also openly admit that these cycles of closures and openings have other uses.
Over time, the citizenry becomes acclimated to governmental intrusion in their everyday lives, and they get used to the idea of bureaucracy telling them what they are not allowed to do when it comes to the simplest activities. The system thus bottlenecks all human interactions to the point that we are constantly asking for permission. We become s***es to the C***d response.[i]
As g*******t Gideon Lichfield from MIT stated in his article ‘We’re Not Going Back To Normal’:
“Ultimately, however, I predict that we’ll restore the ability to socialize safely by developing more sophisticated ways to identify who is a disease risk and who isn’t, and discriminating—legally—against those who are.
…one can imagine a world in which, to get on a flight, perhaps you’ll have to be signed up to a service that tracks your movements via your phone. The airline wouldn’t be able to see where you’d gone, but it would get an alert if you’d been close to known infected people or disease hot spots. There’d be similar requirements at the entrance to large venues, government buildings, or public t***sport hubs. There would be temperature scanners everywhere, and your workplace might demand you wear a monitor that tracks your temperature or other vital signs. Where nightclubs ask for proof of age, in future they might ask for proof of immunity—an identity card or some kind of digital verification via your phone, showing you’ve already recovered from or been v******ted against the latest v***s strains.”
Note that Lichfield suggested that in order to participate in the normal economy you might need to show verification that you have been “v******ted against the latest v***s strains”. In other words, the elites expect there to be many more v***l events or mutations AFTER C***d ** has run its course, and the restrictions and controls we see today are meant to continue, possibly FOREVER.
The reality is that the wave model is not a very practical plan for stopping v***l spread, but it is a perfect method for conditioning people to submit to a high level of control over their personal lives that they never would have accepted otherwise. The C***d response has also been heralded by elites at the World Economic Forum as a perfect “opportunity” to initiate what they call the “Great Reset”. The reset is a plan to deconstruct what’s left of the free market capitalist system, introduce carbon controls in the name of the g****l w*****g fraud, institute a global cashless monetary system, and finally, move humanity into what they call a “shared economy” in which the average person is no longer allowed to own private property of any kind and is completely dependent on the system for their basic necessities.
Of course, such a complex system of “solutions” (dominance) over every individual would need to be managed in a highly centralized way. Meaning, global governance by the elitist establishment would be the end result. Naturally, the g*******ts would “reluctantly” take the reins of power for “the greater good.”
This is the bigger picture, the underlying threat at the core of the lockdowns and C***d laws. That said, there are also numerous arguments based on logic and evidence as to why there is no reason for people to submit to such restrictions. Let’s outline them in a simple list:
The C****av***s K**ls Less Than 1% Of The People It Infects
Medical studies in the US indicate that the c****av***s deaths rate for citizens NOT living in nursing homes has been holding well below 1% on average. The largest percentage of deaths by far in the US has been in nursing homes among elderly people with preexisting conditions. People in long-term care facilities make up 8% of C***d infection cases but they are 45% of all c***d deaths.
Pneumonia alone k**ls around 50,000 Americans each year according to the CDC, and that’s with v******tions, yet, we are supposed to panic and hand over all our freedoms in the name of stopping a disease which affects a tiny percentage of the population? This is why the media and governments have decided to hyperfocus on infection numbers rather than deaths. The death numbers do not warrant the amount of panic the establishment is trying to foment.
Lockdowns Destroy The Economy
It’s basic math and finance; the small business sector of the US economy is dying. Small businesses make up around 50% of US employment. The C***d bailout money, handled by international banks like JP Morgan, did not get to the vast majority of small businesses that were supposed to receive it. Those businesses that did get bailouts are still on the verge of closure or bankruptcy. Any further lockdowns will be the final nail in the coffin for the US economy, except for major corporations which are enjoying the lion’s share of stimulus cash.
How many lives will be damaged or lost due to poverty and economic collapse if the current trend continues? I suspect far more than any lives lost because of C***d.
Why is no one in the mainstream talking about the most practical solution to the p******c? The small percentage of people who are most at risk can STAY HOME and take precautions as necessary, while the rest of us get on with our lives. Why are we being ordered to do the exact opposite just to make less than 1% of the population feel safer? How is this logical, reasonable or scientific? The only answer that makes sense is that the lockdown response is about control, not saving lives.
State Governors Have No Authority To Take Away Your Civil Liberties, And Neither Does The President
Restrictions based on executive orders have no legal authority under the Constitution. They are color of law, not true law. Laws are debated and passed by state legislatures, not by state governors. Executive orders only apply to state employees and have no bearing on the citizenry.
L*****ts and statists argue that during a national crisis the governor has emergency powers and states can do wh**ever they want. This is false. Under the constitution and the Bill of Rights, state governors do not get to proclaim a national emergency based on their personal opinion and then declare themselves dictators in response. Any “laws” exerted because of such a process are therefore null and void; they are meaningless.
If the states have the ability to do wh**ever they want without oversight, then they would be able to bring back Jim Crow laws (among other things). Do l*****ts support that idea as well? If the federal government and the president have the power to violate the Bill of Rights during a national emergency, then Donald Trump has the authority to bring in martial law across the country because of l*****t r**ts. Do l*****ts agree with that outcome?
It is interesting to me that the political left in particular is so keen on defending the idea of states and governors having the power to unilaterally enforce p******c restrictions without oversight or checks and balances. Yet, they have been aggressively opposed to state powers in the past when they had a Democratic president like Obama in office. The left has also been staunchly opposed to executive orders applied by Donald Trump, but they applaud the idea of executive orders on lockdowns being instituted by Biden.
So, l*****ts support unilateral state power only when it works in favor of their agenda, and they support unilateral federal and p**********l power only when it works in favor of their agenda. What a surprise…
The bottom line is this: State government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. Federal government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. NO ONE has the legal power to take away your inherent liberties. Those that claim otherwise have something to gain from your ens***ement.
Mask Laws Are Unscientific
The majority of masks being used by the public today are cloth masks. Not even the CDC recommends the use of cloth masks for their own employees or medical workers. They only recommend N95 masks. They also admit that cloth masks are much less effective at preventing contact with the v***s. Yet, the CDC supports the enforcement of cloth masks for the public.
On top of that, some states and countries with the most stringent mask laws continue to see huge spikes in c****av***s infections. For example, New York has been one of the most tyrannical enforcers of mask laws and lockdowns in the US, but in November the state has witnessed extensive infection increases. California, Michigan and Illinois have also seen dramatic infection spikes this month despite hard enforcement of masks. So, where is the science?
It would appear that masks are a placebo; if they actually worked, then the states with the most aggressive enforcement should be seeing a dramatic downturn in cases, not exponential increases.
Furthermore, why are many states and countries trying to force citizens to wear masks outside in open air and sunlight when v***ses cannot survive in such conditions? UV light from the sun is nature’s sterilizer, but no one in the mainstream or in government acknowledges this scientific fact. Again, this shows that mask laws are about control, not about science or saving lives.
C***d V******tion Is Unnecessary And Potentially Dangerous
Why should people get v******ted for a v***s that over 99% of them will easily survive anyway? Why not simply attain “herd immunity” through natural infection spread and antibodies? The mainstream will continue to ignore these questions because they are inconvenient to the wider agenda.
Also, why should anyone trust a v*****e that was rushed out in less than a year’s time? China and the rest of the world spent over a decade trying to develop a v*****e for SARS unsuccessfully, but we are supposed to believe that they created a v*****e for SARS related C***d ** within months?
The last time the government rushed out a v*****e for a v***l epidemic was the 1976 swine flu scare, and that ended with numerous permanently damaged or dead individuals due to faulty v*****es.
As I noted in my article ‘Why The Public Should Rebel Against Forced V******tions’, published in May, there are numerous examples of v*****e tests and implementation going very wrong, from Bill Gates and the World Health Organization giving people polio in various countries through v*****es, to Novartis and their deadly testing of a Bird Flu v*****e on homeless people in Poland, to GlaxoSmithCline and the deaths of children due to their pneumonia v*****e.
Again, it’s simply not worth the risk over a v***s that over 99% of people will survive. The idea of such risk being forced on the public is completely unacceptable, but many government officials have supported the idea over the past six months. It is important for the public to make it clear now that they will NOT be allowing state or federal governments to make v******tion mandatory.
R*******n Is Needed To Put A Stop To The Fear Machine
In closing, there are endless reasons why we must end the p******c lockdown agenda once and for all. Most importantly, the lockdowns, mask orders and v*****e plans are a stepping stone to something much worse – Medical tyranny and centralization on an unprecedented scale. I will not personally follow such rules because they are not scientifically or morally sound. They are nonsense designed to frighten the public into complacency and consent.
A r*******n against such measures would be very easy to win. All we have to do is refuse to follow their mandates. What are they going to do? Lock up millions of people? Shoot us? That would sort of defeat the supposed purpose of the very measures they demand we follow. And, if it comes to violence, so be it. I have no problem fighting to defend my freedoms and the freedoms of future generations. Perhaps it is time for conservatives and moderates that stand against the lockdowns to organize for this possible future.[/quote]
Wow that's a lot of b.s. go for it
Nov 20, 2020 16:36:46 #
Lonewolf wrote:
Wow that's a lot of b.s. go for it
The reason it's a lot of BS to you is because you're ignorant.
Nov 20, 2020 16:41:26 #
[quote=Parky60]The existential threat to the world, including America, is the tyranny of Technocracy. As the twisted and fraudulent narrative takes on a life of its own, only citizens can throw off the intended yoke of Scientific Dictatorship. ~ Patrick Wood
Americans Must Rebel Against Lockdowns, Mandated Masks, Forced V******tions
Brandon Smith ~ November 19, 2020
With the p**********l e******n highly contested and the mainstream media hyping the rising infection numbers, the public is now facing important questions regarding the future of the p******c response. Some states have decided to unilaterally introduce “executive orders” to restrict citizen movements, business openings and public activities.
Anthony F***i is on the news constantly, calling for families to cancel Thanksgiving and Christmas and telling Americans to just “do what we are told”. The media is generally trying to drum up fear in the minds of the populace and paint images of plague and death everywhere. If Biden does actually end up in the White House, a federalized and national high-level lockdown is on the table starting in January.
In April of this year I published an article titled ‘Waves Of M********n: Medical Tyranny And The Cashless Society’, which outlined a social engineering model put forward by g*******ts at MIT and the Imperial College of London which I called “wave theory”. The model essentially works like this:
[i]Governments must use the p******c as a rationale for “waves” of restrictive lockdowns, followed by controlled re-openings of the economy and of normal human activity. G*******ts claim that this will “slow” the spread of the c****av***s and save lives. However, they also openly admit that these cycles of closures and openings have other uses.
Over time, the citizenry becomes acclimated to governmental intrusion in their everyday lives, and they get used to the idea of bureaucracy telling them what they are not allowed to do when it comes to the simplest activities. The system thus bottlenecks all human interactions to the point that we are constantly asking for permission. We become s***es to the C***d response.[i]
As g*******t Gideon Lichfield from MIT stated in his article ‘We’re Not Going Back To Normal’:
“Ultimately, however, I predict that we’ll restore the ability to socialize safely by developing more sophisticated ways to identify who is a disease risk and who isn’t, and discriminating—legally—against those who are.
…one can imagine a world in which, to get on a flight, perhaps you’ll have to be signed up to a service that tracks your movements via your phone. The airline wouldn’t be able to see where you’d gone, but it would get an alert if you’d been close to known infected people or disease hot spots. There’d be similar requirements at the entrance to large venues, government buildings, or public t***sport hubs. There would be temperature scanners everywhere, and your workplace might demand you wear a monitor that tracks your temperature or other vital signs. Where nightclubs ask for proof of age, in future they might ask for proof of immunity—an identity card or some kind of digital verification via your phone, showing you’ve already recovered from or been v******ted against the latest v***s strains.”
Note that Lichfield suggested that in order to participate in the normal economy you might need to show verification that you have been “v******ted against the latest v***s strains”. In other words, the elites expect there to be many more v***l events or mutations AFTER C***d ** has run its course, and the restrictions and controls we see today are meant to continue, possibly FOREVER.
The reality is that the wave model is not a very practical plan for stopping v***l spread, but it is a perfect method for conditioning people to submit to a high level of control over their personal lives that they never would have accepted otherwise. The C***d response has also been heralded by elites at the World Economic Forum as a perfect “opportunity” to initiate what they call the “Great Reset”. The reset is a plan to deconstruct what’s left of the free market capitalist system, introduce carbon controls in the name of the g****l w*****g fraud, institute a global cashless monetary system, and finally, move humanity into what they call a “shared economy” in which the average person is no longer allowed to own private property of any kind and is completely dependent on the system for their basic necessities.
Of course, such a complex system of “solutions” (dominance) over every individual would need to be managed in a highly centralized way. Meaning, global governance by the elitist establishment would be the end result. Naturally, the g*******ts would “reluctantly” take the reins of power for “the greater good.”
This is the bigger picture, the underlying threat at the core of the lockdowns and C***d laws. That said, there are also numerous arguments based on logic and evidence as to why there is no reason for people to submit to such restrictions. Let’s outline them in a simple list:
The C****av***s K**ls Less Than 1% Of The People It Infects
Medical studies in the US indicate that the c****av***s deaths rate for citizens NOT living in nursing homes has been holding well below 1% on average. The largest percentage of deaths by far in the US has been in nursing homes among elderly people with preexisting conditions. People in long-term care facilities make up 8% of C***d infection cases but they are 45% of all c***d deaths.
Pneumonia alone k**ls around 50,000 Americans each year according to the CDC, and that’s with v******tions, yet, we are supposed to panic and hand over all our freedoms in the name of stopping a disease which affects a tiny percentage of the population? This is why the media and governments have decided to hyperfocus on infection numbers rather than deaths. The death numbers do not warrant the amount of panic the establishment is trying to foment.
Lockdowns Destroy The Economy
It’s basic math and finance; the small business sector of the US economy is dying. Small businesses make up around 50% of US employment. The C***d bailout money, handled by international banks like JP Morgan, did not get to the vast majority of small businesses that were supposed to receive it. Those businesses that did get bailouts are still on the verge of closure or bankruptcy. Any further lockdowns will be the final nail in the coffin for the US economy, except for major corporations which are enjoying the lion’s share of stimulus cash.
How many lives will be damaged or lost due to poverty and economic collapse if the current trend continues? I suspect far more than any lives lost because of C***d.
Why is no one in the mainstream talking about the most practical solution to the p******c? The small percentage of people who are most at risk can STAY HOME and take precautions as necessary, while the rest of us get on with our lives. Why are we being ordered to do the exact opposite just to make less than 1% of the population feel safer? How is this logical, reasonable or scientific? The only answer that makes sense is that the lockdown response is about control, not saving lives.
State Governors Have No Authority To Take Away Your Civil Liberties, And Neither Does The President
Restrictions based on executive orders have no legal authority under the Constitution. They are color of law, not true law. Laws are debated and passed by state legislatures, not by state governors. Executive orders only apply to state employees and have no bearing on the citizenry.
L*****ts and statists argue that during a national crisis the governor has emergency powers and states can do wh**ever they want. This is false. Under the constitution and the Bill of Rights, state governors do not get to proclaim a national emergency based on their personal opinion and then declare themselves dictators in response. Any “laws” exerted because of such a process are therefore null and void; they are meaningless.
If the states have the ability to do wh**ever they want without oversight, then they would be able to bring back Jim Crow laws (among other things). Do l*****ts support that idea as well? If the federal government and the president have the power to violate the Bill of Rights during a national emergency, then Donald Trump has the authority to bring in martial law across the country because of l*****t r**ts. Do l*****ts agree with that outcome?
It is interesting to me that the political left in particular is so keen on defending the idea of states and governors having the power to unilaterally enforce p******c restrictions without oversight or checks and balances. Yet, they have been aggressively opposed to state powers in the past when they had a Democratic president like Obama in office. The left has also been staunchly opposed to executive orders applied by Donald Trump, but they applaud the idea of executive orders on lockdowns being instituted by Biden.
So, l*****ts support unilateral state power only when it works in favor of their agenda, and they support unilateral federal and p**********l power only when it works in favor of their agenda. What a surprise…
The bottom line is this: State government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. Federal government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. NO ONE has the legal power to take away your inherent liberties. Those that claim otherwise have something to gain from your ens***ement.
Mask Laws Are Unscientific
The majority of masks being used by the public today are cloth masks. Not even the CDC recommends the use of cloth masks for their own employees or medical workers. They only recommend N95 masks. They also admit that cloth masks are much less effective at preventing contact with the v***s. Yet, the CDC supports the enforcement of cloth masks for the public.
On top of that, some states and countries with the most stringent mask laws continue to see huge spikes in c****av***s infections. For example, New York has been one of the most tyrannical enforcers of mask laws and lockdowns in the US, but in November the state has witnessed extensive infection increases. California, Michigan and Illinois have also seen dramatic infection spikes this month despite hard enforcement of masks. So, where is the science?
It would appear that masks are a placebo; if they actually worked, then the states with the most aggressive enforcement should be seeing a dramatic downturn in cases, not exponential increases.
Furthermore, why are many states and countries trying to force citizens to wear masks outside in open air and sunlight when v***ses cannot survive in such conditions? UV light from the sun is nature’s sterilizer, but no one in the mainstream or in government acknowledges this scientific fact. Again, this shows that mask laws are about control, not about science or saving lives.
C***d V******tion Is Unnecessary And Potentially Dangerous
Why should people get v******ted for a v***s that over 99% of them will easily survive anyway? Why not simply attain “herd immunity” through natural infection spread and antibodies? The mainstream will continue to ignore these questions because they are inconvenient to the wider agenda.
Also, why should anyone trust a v*****e that was rushed out in less than a year’s time? China and the rest of the world spent over a decade trying to develop a v*****e for SARS unsuccessfully, but we are supposed to believe that they created a v*****e for SARS related C***d ** within months?
The last time the government rushed out a v*****e for a v***l epidemic was the 1976 swine flu scare, and that ended with numerous permanently damaged or dead individuals due to faulty v*****es.
As I noted in my article ‘Why The Public Should Rebel Against Forced V******tions’, published in May, there are numerous examples of v*****e tests and implementation going very wrong, from Bill Gates and the World Health Organization giving people polio in various countries through v*****es, to Novartis and their deadly testing of a Bird Flu v*****e on homeless people in Poland, to GlaxoSmithCline and the deaths of children due to their pneumonia v*****e.
Again, it’s simply not worth the risk over a v***s that over 99% of people will survive. The idea of such risk being forced on the public is completely unacceptable, but many government officials have supported the idea over the past six months. It is important for the public to make it clear now that they will NOT be allowing state or federal governments to make v******tion mandatory.
R*******n Is Needed To Put A Stop To The Fear Machine
In closing, there are endless reasons why we must end the p******c lockdown agenda once and for all. Most importantly, the lockdowns, mask orders and v*****e plans are a stepping stone to something much worse – Medical tyranny and centralization on an unprecedented scale. I will not personally follow such rules because they are not scientifically or morally sound. They are nonsense designed to frighten the public into complacency and consent.
A r*******n against such measures would be very easy to win. All we have to do is refuse to follow their mandates. What are they going to do? Lock up millions of people? Shoot us? That would sort of defeat the supposed purpose of the very measures they demand we follow. And, if it comes to violence, so be it. I have no problem fighting to defend my freedoms and the freedoms of future generations. Perhaps it is time for conservatives and moderates that stand against the lockdowns to organize for this possible future.[/quote]
Begin with Thanksgiving. They can’t arrest us in our own homes. Don’t let them shoot that v*****e into your arms. It is very, very dangerous. Anything thatBig Tech is involved in has to be mind bending. Everything I read creates worries about this v*****e. It can take years to develop something that truly works to our advantage.
Look at the measles v*****e and the polio v*****e.
Americans Must Rebel Against Lockdowns, Mandated Masks, Forced V******tions
Brandon Smith ~ November 19, 2020
With the p**********l e******n highly contested and the mainstream media hyping the rising infection numbers, the public is now facing important questions regarding the future of the p******c response. Some states have decided to unilaterally introduce “executive orders” to restrict citizen movements, business openings and public activities.
Anthony F***i is on the news constantly, calling for families to cancel Thanksgiving and Christmas and telling Americans to just “do what we are told”. The media is generally trying to drum up fear in the minds of the populace and paint images of plague and death everywhere. If Biden does actually end up in the White House, a federalized and national high-level lockdown is on the table starting in January.
In April of this year I published an article titled ‘Waves Of M********n: Medical Tyranny And The Cashless Society’, which outlined a social engineering model put forward by g*******ts at MIT and the Imperial College of London which I called “wave theory”. The model essentially works like this:
[i]Governments must use the p******c as a rationale for “waves” of restrictive lockdowns, followed by controlled re-openings of the economy and of normal human activity. G*******ts claim that this will “slow” the spread of the c****av***s and save lives. However, they also openly admit that these cycles of closures and openings have other uses.
Over time, the citizenry becomes acclimated to governmental intrusion in their everyday lives, and they get used to the idea of bureaucracy telling them what they are not allowed to do when it comes to the simplest activities. The system thus bottlenecks all human interactions to the point that we are constantly asking for permission. We become s***es to the C***d response.[i]
As g*******t Gideon Lichfield from MIT stated in his article ‘We’re Not Going Back To Normal’:
“Ultimately, however, I predict that we’ll restore the ability to socialize safely by developing more sophisticated ways to identify who is a disease risk and who isn’t, and discriminating—legally—against those who are.
…one can imagine a world in which, to get on a flight, perhaps you’ll have to be signed up to a service that tracks your movements via your phone. The airline wouldn’t be able to see where you’d gone, but it would get an alert if you’d been close to known infected people or disease hot spots. There’d be similar requirements at the entrance to large venues, government buildings, or public t***sport hubs. There would be temperature scanners everywhere, and your workplace might demand you wear a monitor that tracks your temperature or other vital signs. Where nightclubs ask for proof of age, in future they might ask for proof of immunity—an identity card or some kind of digital verification via your phone, showing you’ve already recovered from or been v******ted against the latest v***s strains.”
Note that Lichfield suggested that in order to participate in the normal economy you might need to show verification that you have been “v******ted against the latest v***s strains”. In other words, the elites expect there to be many more v***l events or mutations AFTER C***d ** has run its course, and the restrictions and controls we see today are meant to continue, possibly FOREVER.
The reality is that the wave model is not a very practical plan for stopping v***l spread, but it is a perfect method for conditioning people to submit to a high level of control over their personal lives that they never would have accepted otherwise. The C***d response has also been heralded by elites at the World Economic Forum as a perfect “opportunity” to initiate what they call the “Great Reset”. The reset is a plan to deconstruct what’s left of the free market capitalist system, introduce carbon controls in the name of the g****l w*****g fraud, institute a global cashless monetary system, and finally, move humanity into what they call a “shared economy” in which the average person is no longer allowed to own private property of any kind and is completely dependent on the system for their basic necessities.
Of course, such a complex system of “solutions” (dominance) over every individual would need to be managed in a highly centralized way. Meaning, global governance by the elitist establishment would be the end result. Naturally, the g*******ts would “reluctantly” take the reins of power for “the greater good.”
This is the bigger picture, the underlying threat at the core of the lockdowns and C***d laws. That said, there are also numerous arguments based on logic and evidence as to why there is no reason for people to submit to such restrictions. Let’s outline them in a simple list:
The C****av***s K**ls Less Than 1% Of The People It Infects
Medical studies in the US indicate that the c****av***s deaths rate for citizens NOT living in nursing homes has been holding well below 1% on average. The largest percentage of deaths by far in the US has been in nursing homes among elderly people with preexisting conditions. People in long-term care facilities make up 8% of C***d infection cases but they are 45% of all c***d deaths.
Pneumonia alone k**ls around 50,000 Americans each year according to the CDC, and that’s with v******tions, yet, we are supposed to panic and hand over all our freedoms in the name of stopping a disease which affects a tiny percentage of the population? This is why the media and governments have decided to hyperfocus on infection numbers rather than deaths. The death numbers do not warrant the amount of panic the establishment is trying to foment.
Lockdowns Destroy The Economy
It’s basic math and finance; the small business sector of the US economy is dying. Small businesses make up around 50% of US employment. The C***d bailout money, handled by international banks like JP Morgan, did not get to the vast majority of small businesses that were supposed to receive it. Those businesses that did get bailouts are still on the verge of closure or bankruptcy. Any further lockdowns will be the final nail in the coffin for the US economy, except for major corporations which are enjoying the lion’s share of stimulus cash.
How many lives will be damaged or lost due to poverty and economic collapse if the current trend continues? I suspect far more than any lives lost because of C***d.
Why is no one in the mainstream talking about the most practical solution to the p******c? The small percentage of people who are most at risk can STAY HOME and take precautions as necessary, while the rest of us get on with our lives. Why are we being ordered to do the exact opposite just to make less than 1% of the population feel safer? How is this logical, reasonable or scientific? The only answer that makes sense is that the lockdown response is about control, not saving lives.
State Governors Have No Authority To Take Away Your Civil Liberties, And Neither Does The President
Restrictions based on executive orders have no legal authority under the Constitution. They are color of law, not true law. Laws are debated and passed by state legislatures, not by state governors. Executive orders only apply to state employees and have no bearing on the citizenry.
L*****ts and statists argue that during a national crisis the governor has emergency powers and states can do wh**ever they want. This is false. Under the constitution and the Bill of Rights, state governors do not get to proclaim a national emergency based on their personal opinion and then declare themselves dictators in response. Any “laws” exerted because of such a process are therefore null and void; they are meaningless.
If the states have the ability to do wh**ever they want without oversight, then they would be able to bring back Jim Crow laws (among other things). Do l*****ts support that idea as well? If the federal government and the president have the power to violate the Bill of Rights during a national emergency, then Donald Trump has the authority to bring in martial law across the country because of l*****t r**ts. Do l*****ts agree with that outcome?
It is interesting to me that the political left in particular is so keen on defending the idea of states and governors having the power to unilaterally enforce p******c restrictions without oversight or checks and balances. Yet, they have been aggressively opposed to state powers in the past when they had a Democratic president like Obama in office. The left has also been staunchly opposed to executive orders applied by Donald Trump, but they applaud the idea of executive orders on lockdowns being instituted by Biden.
So, l*****ts support unilateral state power only when it works in favor of their agenda, and they support unilateral federal and p**********l power only when it works in favor of their agenda. What a surprise…
The bottom line is this: State government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. Federal government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. NO ONE has the legal power to take away your inherent liberties. Those that claim otherwise have something to gain from your ens***ement.
Mask Laws Are Unscientific
The majority of masks being used by the public today are cloth masks. Not even the CDC recommends the use of cloth masks for their own employees or medical workers. They only recommend N95 masks. They also admit that cloth masks are much less effective at preventing contact with the v***s. Yet, the CDC supports the enforcement of cloth masks for the public.
On top of that, some states and countries with the most stringent mask laws continue to see huge spikes in c****av***s infections. For example, New York has been one of the most tyrannical enforcers of mask laws and lockdowns in the US, but in November the state has witnessed extensive infection increases. California, Michigan and Illinois have also seen dramatic infection spikes this month despite hard enforcement of masks. So, where is the science?
It would appear that masks are a placebo; if they actually worked, then the states with the most aggressive enforcement should be seeing a dramatic downturn in cases, not exponential increases.
Furthermore, why are many states and countries trying to force citizens to wear masks outside in open air and sunlight when v***ses cannot survive in such conditions? UV light from the sun is nature’s sterilizer, but no one in the mainstream or in government acknowledges this scientific fact. Again, this shows that mask laws are about control, not about science or saving lives.
C***d V******tion Is Unnecessary And Potentially Dangerous
Why should people get v******ted for a v***s that over 99% of them will easily survive anyway? Why not simply attain “herd immunity” through natural infection spread and antibodies? The mainstream will continue to ignore these questions because they are inconvenient to the wider agenda.
Also, why should anyone trust a v*****e that was rushed out in less than a year’s time? China and the rest of the world spent over a decade trying to develop a v*****e for SARS unsuccessfully, but we are supposed to believe that they created a v*****e for SARS related C***d ** within months?
The last time the government rushed out a v*****e for a v***l epidemic was the 1976 swine flu scare, and that ended with numerous permanently damaged or dead individuals due to faulty v*****es.
As I noted in my article ‘Why The Public Should Rebel Against Forced V******tions’, published in May, there are numerous examples of v*****e tests and implementation going very wrong, from Bill Gates and the World Health Organization giving people polio in various countries through v*****es, to Novartis and their deadly testing of a Bird Flu v*****e on homeless people in Poland, to GlaxoSmithCline and the deaths of children due to their pneumonia v*****e.
Again, it’s simply not worth the risk over a v***s that over 99% of people will survive. The idea of such risk being forced on the public is completely unacceptable, but many government officials have supported the idea over the past six months. It is important for the public to make it clear now that they will NOT be allowing state or federal governments to make v******tion mandatory.
R*******n Is Needed To Put A Stop To The Fear Machine
In closing, there are endless reasons why we must end the p******c lockdown agenda once and for all. Most importantly, the lockdowns, mask orders and v*****e plans are a stepping stone to something much worse – Medical tyranny and centralization on an unprecedented scale. I will not personally follow such rules because they are not scientifically or morally sound. They are nonsense designed to frighten the public into complacency and consent.
A r*******n against such measures would be very easy to win. All we have to do is refuse to follow their mandates. What are they going to do? Lock up millions of people? Shoot us? That would sort of defeat the supposed purpose of the very measures they demand we follow. And, if it comes to violence, so be it. I have no problem fighting to defend my freedoms and the freedoms of future generations. Perhaps it is time for conservatives and moderates that stand against the lockdowns to organize for this possible future.[/quote]
Begin with Thanksgiving. They can’t arrest us in our own homes. Don’t let them shoot that v*****e into your arms. It is very, very dangerous. Anything thatBig Tech is involved in has to be mind bending. Everything I read creates worries about this v*****e. It can take years to develop something that truly works to our advantage.
Look at the measles v*****e and the polio v*****e.
Nov 20, 2020 16:45:24 #
Carol Kelly wrote:
Begin with Thanksgiving. They can’t arrest us in our own homes. Don’t let them shoot that v*****e into your arms. It is very, very dangerous. Anything thatBig Tech is involved in has to be mind bending. Everything I read creates worries about this v*****e. It can take years to develop something that truly works to our advantage.
Look at the measles v*****e and the polio v*****e.
Look at the measles v*****e and the polio v*****e.
The Arabs used this mask thing to subdue folks way back when.
Nov 20, 2020 16:55:42 #
Tiptop789
Loc: State of Denial
Parky60 wrote:
i The existential threat to the world, including ... (show quote)
Go for it brave guy, go tour SD. Make shore you visit the ICUs. And don't let them make you where a mask!
Nov 20, 2020 16:57:35 #
Tiptop789 wrote:
Go for it brave guy, go tour SD. Make shore you visit the ICUs. And don't let them make you where a mask!
Now you’re being ridiculous.
Nov 20, 2020 17:17:50 #
Tiptop789 wrote:
Go for it brave guy, go tour SD. Make shore you visit the ICUs. And don't let them make you where a mask!
I see that you didn't bother to read the article. Just buy in and repeat what your handlers tell you to believe.
Nov 22, 2020 12:56:20 #
I had it (c***d- pfft 😐)* and now I'VE HAD IT...with so much over-reaction!
*as well as half the people I know...
*as well as half the people I know...
Nov 22, 2020 14:12:28 #
Roamin' Catholic wrote:
I had it (c***d- pfft 😐)* and now I'VE HAD IT...with so much over-reaction!
*as well as half the people I know...
*as well as half the people I know...
*Many of us in our '60's-
We don't have to organize m*****as- just use common sense and civil disobedience.
Wear the mask when going into a building where there are people, if for no other reason than virtue signaling. After all, we are guests there and should honor the wishes of our host.
Don't wear masks when you're in the wide open spaces, no matter what The Man says. And don't hassle the scaredy cats that do.
Don't be v******ted if you object, especially if the v*****e is derived from aborted babies.
Pray for an end to c***d. Don't expect it to miraculously vanish suddenly, but do expect the Lord to guide you safely through it.
I know c***d k**ls some, and I pray for victims and families and will do what I can to stop the spread. Realistically. But it's not worth the lock downs and total submission to The Man.
I will NOT participate in unhealthy mass paranoia. 🤪
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.