Here’s Why PA Does Not Add Up
Nov 19, 2020 12:02:06 #
United Patriot News
Here's Why PA Does Not Add Up
More than a week after the e******n day, it’s pretty clear that the enthusiasm and support for President Donald Trump have neither waned nor ended. In the rural area of Pennsylvania, Trump f**gs still fly alongside the American f**g. There was no Biden-Harris sign for miles, which makes Donald Trump’s loss all the weirder.
“There’s no way,” says Marty, who works with the huge Shell Chemical ethane c*****r plant being built in nearby Beaver County, “I will go to my grave believing this e******n was s****n through mail-in b****ts.”
“A buddy of mine there tells me that there’s a not a guy in that plant who didn’t v**e for Donald Trump,” says Marty, who has roughly 5,000 co-workers. “And those are just the guys at the plant. Add in their families and the various support industries. It’s doesn’t add up. There’s no way that Donald Trump lost Pennsylvania. It’s statistically impossible.”
Let’s take a look at the numbers.
On the morning of the e******n, Donald Trump trailed Joe Biden in the RealClearPolitics national average by 7 percent. Trump outperformed by 3.6 percent. Most people figured that Trump would achieve at least a 5 percent overperformance in Pennsylvania polls, especially after spending a lot of time campaigning there.
But how did he do in Pennsylvania in the end? He ultimately lost to Biden, and at one point, it was by 0.8 percent for 49.8 to 49.0 percent.
In other words, Donald Trump vastly outperformed his numbers nationally but vastly underperformed them in Pennsylvania. Who would believe that?
Once you take into account the results from 2020 to 2016, things become even more impossible.
In 2016, Hillary Clinton was favored to win Pennsylvania in the RealClearPolitics average by 1.9 percent. Trump outperformed that easily, by 2.6 percent. Somehow in 2020, even with Biden’s statements on fracking, Trump is allegedly underperforming by 2.0 percent.
As for total v**e margins, Trump beat Hillary in Pennsylvania by 44,000 v**es but is losing to Biden by 55,000 v**es (and counting).
Weeks ago, Pollster Robert Cahaly of the Trafalgar Group had said that Donald Trump in 2020 would “need to win Pennsylvania by four or five [percentage points] to overcome the v***r f***d that’s going to happen there.”
During the e******n, Donald Trump was beating old Joe by over half a million v**es, or 58 to 41 percent, which meant Biden needed another 300,000 v**es. Although it seemed impossible, Joe Biden did it.
“I don’t believe it,” says Marty. “No way. This has to be fraud, from Erie to Philly.”
In 2016, Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton by 2 percent in Erie. He had received 57,168 v**es. This year, he’s losing to Biden in Erie by 1 percent.
Hillary got 54,820 v**es in Erie County in 2016, while Biden got 68,336 v**es in Erie this year. The number of v**es for the Democrats from 2016 to 2020 was almost 30 percent.
“I was at the Trump rally in Erie,” observes Emily, a college student. “There literally were not enough buses to t***sport everyone there.” She asked, confused. “Where did all of those Biden v**es come from?”
Richard Hopkins, a postal worker who signed an affidavit, said that Postmaster Rob Weisenbach directed him and his co-workers to hand over b****ts received after e******n day, which was then back-dated.
“Weisenbach was backdating the postmarks on the b****ts to make it appear as though the b****ts had been collected on November 3, 2020, despite them in fact being collected on November 4 and possibly later,” said Hopkins.
Amid the liberals calling Hopkins’ story as f**e, he stood by his story. “I’m here to say I did not recant my statements,” said Hopkins on video. “That did not happen.” He wants the Washington Post to recant its story.
As Trump’s campaign had warned months ago, mail-in v****g brought this chaos with it and opened the door to potential massive fraud.
“Most developed countries, especially in Europe, ban mail-in v****g to fight vast fraud and v**e-buying that had threatened the integrity of their e******ns, according to an exhaustive review of v****g rules and histories in over 30 major nations,” wrote Paul Bedard in August. “In the European Union, 63% have put a ban on mailing in b****ts except for citizens living overseas.”
He went on: “Given Pennsylvania’s recently decreed rules for receiving and counting mail-in b****ts, there may be no percentage of honest v**es large enough to overcome the v***r f***d already underway in the Keystone State.”
As usual, all the Democrats tell the Republicans is to “prove” that there was e******n f***d present. They know how almost impossible this is, which is why they have the confidence to say so. Just take a quick look at the numbers, and you’ll see they don’t add up. Do you believe there was no fraud?
Here's Why PA Does Not Add Up
More than a week after the e******n day, it’s pretty clear that the enthusiasm and support for President Donald Trump have neither waned nor ended. In the rural area of Pennsylvania, Trump f**gs still fly alongside the American f**g. There was no Biden-Harris sign for miles, which makes Donald Trump’s loss all the weirder.
“There’s no way,” says Marty, who works with the huge Shell Chemical ethane c*****r plant being built in nearby Beaver County, “I will go to my grave believing this e******n was s****n through mail-in b****ts.”
“A buddy of mine there tells me that there’s a not a guy in that plant who didn’t v**e for Donald Trump,” says Marty, who has roughly 5,000 co-workers. “And those are just the guys at the plant. Add in their families and the various support industries. It’s doesn’t add up. There’s no way that Donald Trump lost Pennsylvania. It’s statistically impossible.”
Let’s take a look at the numbers.
On the morning of the e******n, Donald Trump trailed Joe Biden in the RealClearPolitics national average by 7 percent. Trump outperformed by 3.6 percent. Most people figured that Trump would achieve at least a 5 percent overperformance in Pennsylvania polls, especially after spending a lot of time campaigning there.
But how did he do in Pennsylvania in the end? He ultimately lost to Biden, and at one point, it was by 0.8 percent for 49.8 to 49.0 percent.
In other words, Donald Trump vastly outperformed his numbers nationally but vastly underperformed them in Pennsylvania. Who would believe that?
Once you take into account the results from 2020 to 2016, things become even more impossible.
In 2016, Hillary Clinton was favored to win Pennsylvania in the RealClearPolitics average by 1.9 percent. Trump outperformed that easily, by 2.6 percent. Somehow in 2020, even with Biden’s statements on fracking, Trump is allegedly underperforming by 2.0 percent.
As for total v**e margins, Trump beat Hillary in Pennsylvania by 44,000 v**es but is losing to Biden by 55,000 v**es (and counting).
Weeks ago, Pollster Robert Cahaly of the Trafalgar Group had said that Donald Trump in 2020 would “need to win Pennsylvania by four or five [percentage points] to overcome the v***r f***d that’s going to happen there.”
During the e******n, Donald Trump was beating old Joe by over half a million v**es, or 58 to 41 percent, which meant Biden needed another 300,000 v**es. Although it seemed impossible, Joe Biden did it.
“I don’t believe it,” says Marty. “No way. This has to be fraud, from Erie to Philly.”
In 2016, Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton by 2 percent in Erie. He had received 57,168 v**es. This year, he’s losing to Biden in Erie by 1 percent.
Hillary got 54,820 v**es in Erie County in 2016, while Biden got 68,336 v**es in Erie this year. The number of v**es for the Democrats from 2016 to 2020 was almost 30 percent.
“I was at the Trump rally in Erie,” observes Emily, a college student. “There literally were not enough buses to t***sport everyone there.” She asked, confused. “Where did all of those Biden v**es come from?”
Richard Hopkins, a postal worker who signed an affidavit, said that Postmaster Rob Weisenbach directed him and his co-workers to hand over b****ts received after e******n day, which was then back-dated.
“Weisenbach was backdating the postmarks on the b****ts to make it appear as though the b****ts had been collected on November 3, 2020, despite them in fact being collected on November 4 and possibly later,” said Hopkins.
Amid the liberals calling Hopkins’ story as f**e, he stood by his story. “I’m here to say I did not recant my statements,” said Hopkins on video. “That did not happen.” He wants the Washington Post to recant its story.
As Trump’s campaign had warned months ago, mail-in v****g brought this chaos with it and opened the door to potential massive fraud.
“Most developed countries, especially in Europe, ban mail-in v****g to fight vast fraud and v**e-buying that had threatened the integrity of their e******ns, according to an exhaustive review of v****g rules and histories in over 30 major nations,” wrote Paul Bedard in August. “In the European Union, 63% have put a ban on mailing in b****ts except for citizens living overseas.”
He went on: “Given Pennsylvania’s recently decreed rules for receiving and counting mail-in b****ts, there may be no percentage of honest v**es large enough to overcome the v***r f***d already underway in the Keystone State.”
As usual, all the Democrats tell the Republicans is to “prove” that there was e******n f***d present. They know how almost impossible this is, which is why they have the confidence to say so. Just take a quick look at the numbers, and you’ll see they don’t add up. Do you believe there was no fraud?
Nov 19, 2020 12:07:43 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
ldsuttonjr wrote:
United Patriot News br Here's Why PA Does Not Add ... (show quote)
Don't let Pelosi and the Democrats lie to you either. They are trying to make it sound like these new e******n rules were in response to C***d. In reality these changes, mail in b****ts, and relaxing of v***r r**********n and signature rules were in the very first Bill the House passed in 2019. This fraud was well planned out.
Nov 19, 2020 12:24:32 #
I agree with you.
With the sworn affidavits from poll workers of fraud, it's easy to see how the political offices of the v****g polls lie without good consciousness. It is a c*******tic way to lie continuously until the people will believe the lie!
We don't need a Jamestown or Plymouth colony re-occurrence as the Democrat Platform will bring.
With the sworn affidavits from poll workers of fraud, it's easy to see how the political offices of the v****g polls lie without good consciousness. It is a c*******tic way to lie continuously until the people will believe the lie!
We don't need a Jamestown or Plymouth colony re-occurrence as the Democrat Platform will bring.
Nov 19, 2020 12:46:19 #
The media is at fault for not reporting but covering v***r f***d. Way too many cases are being reported, places with 120.000 are seeing 200,000 v**es, what? Five states are trying his while the other 45 states didn't show their H**E!
Nov 19, 2020 12:52:34 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
bmac32 wrote:
The media is at fault for not reporting but covering v***r f***d. Way too many cases are being reported, places with 120.000 are seeing 200,000 v**es, what? Five states are trying his while the other 45 states didn't show their H**E!
Perfect example is going on right now. If someone doesn't want to believe Rudi and Trumps legal team fine, but the fact most supposed media outlets aren't even carrying this news conference speaks volumes.
Nov 19, 2020 13:37:20 #
Nov 19, 2020 14:36:00 #
bmac32 wrote:
The media is at fault for not reporting but covering v***r f***d. Way too many cases are being reported, places with 120.000 are seeing 200,000 v**es, what? Five states are trying his while the other 45 states didn't show their H**E!
Nobody except Trump and his minions thinks there has been any fraud, that's the reason only the wildass right-wing media is flogging that dead horse.
Nov 19, 2020 14:44:35 #
JFlorio wrote:
Don't let Pelosi and the Democrats lie to you either. They are trying to make it sound like these new e******n rules were in response to C***d. In reality these changes, mail in b****ts, and relaxing of v***r r**********n and signature rules were in the very first Bill the House passed in 2019. This fraud was well planned out.
I have thought that for a few days but figured it was just because I am a silly old lady, but now glad to see there are others who have come to the same conclusion.
Nov 19, 2020 15:11:35 #
If you both to even look ya might ask yourself, 140,000 one way and zero the other, say what?
kemmer wrote:
Nobody except Trump and his minions thinks there has been any fraud, that's the reason only the wildass right-wing media is flogging that dead horse.
Nov 19, 2020 16:50:00 #
kemmer wrote:
Nobody except Trump and his minions thinks there has been any fraud, that's the reason only the wildass right-wing media is flogging that dead horse.
Dead horse? Is that your nickname?
Nov 19, 2020 17:58:09 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
bmac32 wrote:
If you both to even look ya might ask yourself, 140,000 one way and zero the other, say what?
Any statistician in the world will tell you the chance of that happening is 0.
Nov 19, 2020 18:08:20 #
ldsuttonjr wrote:
As usual, all the Democrats tell the Republicans is to “prove” that there was e******n f***d present. They know how almost impossible this is, which is why they have the confidence to say so. Just take a quick look at the numbers, and you’ll see they don’t add up. Do you believe there was no fraud?
As usual, all the Democrats tell the Republicans is to “prove” that there was e******n f***d present. They know how almost impossible this is, which is why they have the confidence to say so. Just take a quick look at the numbers, and you’ll see they don’t add up. Do you believe there was no fraud?
So you know how that works, if you can't prove it you can't do squat about it, if you can't prove it there was no fraud
Nov 19, 2020 18:49:14 #
So does that mean a student with a blank piece of paper starts out higher than zero?
JFlorio wrote:
Any statistician in the world will tell you the chance of that happening is 0.
Nov 19, 2020 18:54:20 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
bmac32 wrote:
So does that mean a student with a blank piece of paper starts out higher than zero?
O.K.. One in a zillion.
Nov 19, 2020 19:01:56 #
Will give you that, one spec on a white sheet of paper.
JFlorio wrote:
O.K.. One in a zillion.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.