One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Annals of Internal Medicine - Effectiveness of Wearing a Mask
Page 1 of 2 next>
Nov 18, 2020 21:27:01   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Do your own fact checking.

https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817

Reply
Nov 18, 2020 21:44:07   #
Sicilianthing
 
BigMike wrote:


>>>

It’s all F**e NEWS Mike....

F**e V***s
F**e H**x
F**e spreading
F**e deaths...

All choreographed years ago in the making... for their New World Order initial phase rollout collapse leading up to the Great Reset...

And Trump is letting it happen.

Reply
Nov 18, 2020 23:39:55   #
ImLogicallyRight
 
BigMike wrote:


For those that can't take the time to read the random study on the effectivness of face masks, here is the results.

participants recommended masks (1.8%)
Without masks (2.1%).
The between-group difference was −0.3 percentage point

This was for a free people randomly selected, wandering around society for at least 3 hours per day.
Those masks are just not all they are played up to be.
If you don't agree, come up with another study that proves different.

Reply
 
 
Nov 18, 2020 23:47:05   #
RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia
 
BigMike wrote:


Very informative article, it's unfortunate Commentators don't really read this type of informative information, the objective of this analysis is described in the opening paragraph headed "Background" describing the uncertainty existing about whether wearing face masks in public is mainly for - quote "protection of uninfected wearers (protective effect), via reduced t***smission from infected mask wearers (source control), or both.

9 paragraphs down headed "Conclusion" - "The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce Sars-Cov-2 infection rates among wearers by more than 50%'.

Next paragraph headed " Primary Funding Source" listed as point number (14) - "The World Health Organisation (WHO) and the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (15) strongly recommend that person's with symptoms or known infection wear masks to prevent t***smission".

Really is a no-brainer, South Australia just had a new cluster of 23 infections starting from ground zero, so all grog shops are shutting for a week, there is a bright side to every dark tail, even ones with an arrow tip at the end.



Reply
Nov 19, 2020 01:08:42   #
zombinis3 Loc: Southwest
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

It’s all F**e NEWS Mike....

F**e V***s
F**e H**x
F**e spreading
F**e deaths...

All choreographed years ago in the making... for their New World Order initial phase rollout collapse leading up to the Great Reset...

And Trump is letting it happen.


Think you had better say that to the people throughout the rooms at the hospital that I work at, that it is a f**e v***s and f**e spreading.

Reply
Nov 19, 2020 07:30:54   #
billy a Loc: South Florida
 
BigMike wrote:


My experience ; I've been generating sawdust, plexi-dust, and concrete dust for fifty years.Lots of it. I wore common dust-masks most of the time, not the medical grade. Facial hair, sweat, facial-muscles moving when you spoke or grimaced...or farted, allowed all but the coarsest of particles to enter my respiratory system. Very few of the masks I see out there are medical-grade.Hospitals, senior living facilities and wh**ever "hot-spots" should require or provide medical-grade masks. But, in general, I think it's futile to mandate the general population to wear them. Compliance, population-control, and arguments are interesting, but this is MY experience. I'd make an argument for common-sense...but that appears to be a memory these days. Thanks, Mike.

Reply
Nov 19, 2020 07:35:23   #
American Vet
 
billy a wrote:
My experience ; I've been generating sawdust, plexi-dust, and concrete dust for fifty years.Lots of it. I wore common dust-masks most of the time, not the medical grade. Facial hair, sweat, facial-muscles moving when you spoke or grimaced...or farted, allowed all but the coarsest of particles to enter my respiratory system. Very few of the masks I see out there are medical-grade.Hospitals, senior living facilities and wh**ever "hot-spots" should require or provide medical-grade masks. But, in general, I think it's futile to mandate the general population to wear them. Compliance, population-control, and arguments are interesting, but this is MY experience. I'd make an argument for common-sense...but that appears to be a memory these days. Thanks, Mike.
My experience ; I've been generating sawdust, plex... (show quote)


Might add that unless things have changed in the last 6 months, whenever medical personnel leave an isolation room they are supposed to remove contaminated gown/glove/mask - use hand hygiene - new gown/mask/gloves before entering the next room.

Reply
 
 
Nov 19, 2020 11:35:00   #
Sicilianthing
 
zombinis3 wrote:
Think you had better say that to the people throughout the rooms at the hospital that I work at, that it is a f**e v***s and f**e spreading.


>>>

It’s a bad Flu Zombie that’s it...

Even the tests they give you guys are f**e... designed with markers to mostly come back positive

Do some research and learn who manufactured the bio weapon.

The next weapon will be released soon just like this one.

You’re under attack by a stealth enemy with resources beyond your comprehension.

Reply
Nov 19, 2020 14:47:02   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

It’s all F**e NEWS Mike....

F**e V***s
F**e H**x
F**e spreading
F**e deaths...

All choreographed years ago in the making... for their New World Order initial phase rollout collapse leading up to the Great Reset...

And Trump is letting it happen.


What I posted is about as unf**e as you'll find.

Quit crying about Trump.

Reply
Nov 19, 2020 14:48:09   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
ImLogicallyRight wrote:
For those that can't take the time to read the random study on the effectivness of face masks, here is the results.

participants recommended masks (1.8%)
Without masks (2.1%).
The between-group difference was −0.3 percentage point

This was for a free people randomly selected, wandering around society for at least 3 hours per day.
Those masks are just not all they are played up to be.
If you don't agree, come up with another study that proves different.


Thank you. It sure is easy for people to not see the obvious.

Reply
Nov 19, 2020 14:49:21   #
Sicilianthing
 
BigMike wrote:
What I posted is about as unf**e as you'll find.

Quit crying about Trump.


>>>

F**e news !

Reply
 
 
Nov 19, 2020 14:53:15   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
RT friend wrote:
Very informative article, it's unfortunate Commentators don't really read this type of informative information, the objective of this analysis is described in the opening paragraph headed "Background" describing the uncertainty existing about whether wearing face masks in public is mainly for - quote "protection of uninfected wearers (protective effect), via reduced t***smission from infected mask wearers (source control), or both.

9 paragraphs down headed "Conclusion" - "The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce Sars-Cov-2 infection rates among wearers by more than 50%'.

Next paragraph headed " Primary Funding Source" listed as point number (14) - "The World Health Organisation (WHO) and the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (15) strongly recommend that person's with symptoms or known infection wear masks to prevent t***smission".

Really is a no-brainer, South Australia just had a new cluster of 23 infections starting from ground zero, so all grog shops are shutting for a week, there is a bright side to every dark tail, even ones with an arrow tip at the end.


Very informative article, it's unfortunate Comment... (show quote)


People seem to have lost the inclination to digest information on their own and prefer it predigested and regurgitated for them.



Reply
Nov 19, 2020 14:54:14   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

F**e news !


What's f**e about it? And it isn't news, it's a study.

Reply
Nov 19, 2020 18:52:33   #
RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia
 
BigMike wrote:
People seem to have lost the inclination to digest information on their own and prefer it predigested and regurgitated for them.


Me too, I'm into predestination now, it's much less stressful to know what is happening was going to happen anyhow, and the light at the end of the tunnel will be lit by the way everything works out, so it must be burning right now, in fact it is, but only U can explain it.

Don't spare the details.

Reply
Nov 19, 2020 23:20:54   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
RT friend wrote:
Me too, I'm into predestination now, it's much less stressful to know what is happening was going to happen anyhow, and the light at the end of the tunnel will be lit by the way everything works out, so it must be burning right now, in fact it is, but only U can explain it.

Don't spare the details.


As they come to me, naturally.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.