WHY: Americans should rebel against C***D mask laws, lockdowns and v*****es
Nov 18, 2020 15:24:44 #
Look what we figured out here...
Please share with all the Bamboozled Stupid Sheeple on all sides... yep you know them !
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
With the p**********l e******n highly contested and the mainstream media hyping the rising infection numbers, the public is now facing important questions regarding the future and lockdowns. Some states have decided to unilaterally introduce "executive orders" to restrict citizen movements, businesses and activities.
Anthony F***i is on the news constantly calling for Americans to cancel Thanksgiving and Christmas and generally trying to drum up fear in the minds of the populace. If Biden does actually end up in the White House, a federalized and national high-level lockdown is on the table starting in January.
In April of this year, I published an article that outlined a social engineering model put forward by g*******ts at MIT and the Imperial College of London which I called "wave theory." The model essentially works like this:
Governments must use the p******c as a rationale for "waves" of restrictive lockdowns, followed by controlled re-openings of the economy and of normal human activity. G*******ts claim that this will "slow" the spread of the c****av***s and save lives. However, they also openly admit that these cycles of closures and openings have other uses.
Over time, the citizenry becomes acclimated to governmental intrusion in their everyday lives, and they get used to the idea of bureaucracy telling them what they are not allowed to do when it comes to the simplest activities. The system thus bottlenecks all human interactions to the point that we are constantly asking for permission. We become s***es to the C****-** response.
As g*******t Gideon Lichfield from MIT stated in his article "We're not going back to normal":
"Ultimately, however, I predict that we'll restore the ability to socialize safely by developing more sophisticated ways to identify who is a disease risk and who isn't, and discriminating — legally — against those who are.
...one can imagine a world in which, to get on a flight, perhaps you'll have to be signed up to a service that tracks your movements via your phone. The airline wouldn't be able to see where you'd gone, but it would get an alert if you'd been close to known infected people or disease hot spots. There'd be similar requirements at the entrance to large venues, government buildings, or public t***sport hubs. There would be temperature scanners everywhere, and your workplace might demand you wear a monitor that tracks your temperature or other vital signs. Where nightclubs ask for proof of age, in future they might ask for proof of immunity — an identity card or some kind of digital verification via your phone, showing you've already recovered from or been v******ted against the latest v***s strains."
Note that Lichfield suggested that in order to participate in the normal economy you might need to show verification that you have been "v******ted against the latest v***s strains." In other words, the elites expect there to be many more v***l events or mutations after C****-** has run its course, and the restrictions and controls we see today are meant to continue forever.
The reality is that the wave model is a method of conditioning people to submit to a high level of control over their personal lives that they never would have accepted otherwise. The C****-** response has also been heralded by elites at the World Economic Forum as a perfect "opportunity" to initiate what they call the "Great Reset," a plan to deconstruct what's left of the free market capitalist system, introduce carbon controls in the name of the g****l w*****g fraud, institute a global cashless monetary system, and finally, move humanity into what they call a "shared economy" in which the average person is no longer allowed to own private property of any kind and is completely dependent.
Of course, such a complex system of "solutions" (dominance) over every individual would need to be managed in a highly centralized way. Meaning, global governance by the elitist establishment would be the end result. Naturally... the g*******ts would reluctantly take the reins of power for "the greater good."
This is the bigger picture, the problem at the core of lockdowns and C****-** laws. That said, there are also numerous reasons based on logic and evidence as to why there is no reason for people to submit to such restrictions. Let's outline them in a simple list:
The c****av***s k**ls less than 1 percent of the people it infects
Medical studies in the U.S. indicate that the c****av***s death rate for citizens not living in nursing homes has been holding well below 1 percent on average. The largest percentage of deaths by far in the U.S. has been in nursing homes among elderly people with preexisting conditions. People in long-term care facilities make up 8 percent of C****-** infection cases but they are 45 percent of all C****-** deaths.
Pneumonia alone k**ls around 50,000 Americans each year according to the CDC, and that's with v******tions, yet, we are supposed to panic and hand over all our freedoms in the name of stopping a disease which affects a tiny percentage of the population? This is why the media and governments have decided to hyperfocus on infection numbers rather than deaths. The death numbers do not warrant the amount of panic the establishment is trying to foment.
Lockdowns destroy the economy
It's basic math and finance; the small business sector of the U.S. economy is dying. Small businesses make up around 50 percent of U.S. employment. The C****-** bailout money, handled by international banks like JP Morgan, did not get to the vast majority of small businesses that were supposed to receive it. Those businesses that did get bailouts are still on the verge of closure of bankruptcy. Any further lockdowns will be the final nail in the coffin for the U.S. economy, except for major corporations that are enjoying the lion's share of stimulus cash.
How many lives will be damaged or lost due to poverty and economic collapse if the current trend continues? I suspect far more than any lives lost because of C****-**.
Why is no one in the mainstream talking about the most practical solution to the p******c? The small percentage of people who are most at risk can stay home, while the rest of us get on with our lives. Why are we being ordered to do the exact opposite just to make less than 1 percent of the population feel safer? How is this logical, reasonable or scientific? The only answer that makes sense is that the lockdown response is about control, not saving lives.
State governors have no authority to take away your civil liberties, and neither does the president
Restrictions based on executive order have no legal authority under the Constitution. They are color of law, not law. Laws are discussed and passed by state legislatures, not by state governors. Executive orders only apply to state employees and have no bearing on the citizenry.
L*****ts and statists argue that during a national crisis the governor has emergency powers and states can do wh**ever they want. This is false. Under the constitution and the Bill of Rights, state governors do not get to proclaim a national emergency based on their personal opinion and then declare themselves dictators in response. Any "laws" exerted because of such a process are therefore null and void; they are meaningless.
If the states have the ability to do wh**ever they want without oversight, then they would be able to bring back Jim Crow laws (among other things). Do l*****ts support that idea as well? If the federal government and the president have the power to violate the Bill of Rights during a national emergency, then Donald Trump has the authority to bring in martial law across the country because of l*****t r**ts. Do l*****ts agree with that outcome?
It is interesting to me that the political left, in particular, is so keen on defending the idea of states and governors having the power to unilaterally enforce p******c restrictions without oversight or checks and balances, yet, they have been aggressively opposed to state powers in the past when they had a Democratic president in office. The left has also been staunchly opposed to executive orders applied by Donald Trump, but they applaud the idea of executive orders on lockdowns being instituted by Biden. So, l*****ts support unilateral state power only when it works in favor of their agenda, and they support unilateral federal and p**********l power only when it works in favor of their agenda.
The bottom line is this: State government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. Federal government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. No one has the legal power to take away your inherent liberties. Those that claim otherwise have something to gain from your ens***ement.
Mask laws are unscientific
The majority of masks being used by the public today are cloth masks. Not even the CDC recommends the use of cloth masks for their own employees or medical workers. They only recommend N95 masks. They also admit that cloth masks are much less effective at preventing contact with the v***s. Yet, the CDC supports the enforcement of cloth masks for the public.
On top of that, some states and countries with the most stringent mask laws continue to see huge spikes in c****av***s infections. For example, New York has been one of the most tyrannical enforcers of mask laws in the U.S., but in November the state has witnessed extensive infection increases. California and Illinois have also seen infection spikes this month despite hard enforcement of masks. So, where is the science? It would appear that masks are a placebo; if they worked then the states with the most aggressive enforcement should be seeing a dramatic downturn in cases, not exponential increases.
Furthermore, why are many states and countries trying to force citizens to wear masks outside in open air and sunlight when v***ses cannot survive in such conditions? UV light from the sun is nature's sterilizer, but no one in the mainstream or in government acknowledges this scientific fact. Again, this shows that mask laws are about control, not about science or saving lives.
V******tion is unnecessary and potentially dangerous
Why should people get v******ted for a v***s that over 99 percent of them will easily survive anyway? Why not simply attain "herd immunity" through natural infection spread and antibodies? The mainstream will continue to ignore these questions because they are inconvenient to the wider agenda.
Also, why should anyone trust a v*****e that was rushed out in less than a year's time? China and the rest of the world spent over a decade trying to develop a v*****e for SARS, but we are supposed to believe that they created a v*****e for SARS related C****-** within months?
The last time the government rushed out a v*****e for a v***l epidemic was the 1976 swine flu scare, and that ended with numerous permanently damaged or dead individuals due to faulty v*****es.
As I noted in May, there are numerous examples of v*****e tests and implementation going very wrong, from Bill Gates and the World Health Organization giving people polio in various countries through v*****es, to Novartis and their deadly testing of a Bird Flu v*****e on homeless people in Poland, to GlaxoSmithCline and the deaths of children due to their pneumonia v*****e.
It is not necessarily the inactive v***s elements within the v*****es that are a threat, but the many other active elements often found within v*****es (including other diseases and cancers) that can cause illness and death. This has been especially true in v*****es that have had limited testing and trials.
Again, it's simply not worth the risk over a v***s that over 99 percent of people will survive.
R*******n is needed to put a stop to the fear machine
In closing, there are endless reasons why we must end the p******c lockdown agenda once and for all. Most importantly, the lockdowns, mask orders and v*****e plans are a stepping stone to something much worse — medical tyranny and centralization on an unprecedented scale. I will not personally follow such rules because they are not scientifically or morally sound. They are nonsense designed to frighten the public into complacency and consent.
A r*******n against such measures would be very easy to win. All we have to do is refuse to follow their mandates. What are they going to do? Lock up millions of people? Maybe shoot us? That would sort of defeat the supposed purpose of the very measures they demand we follow. And, if it comes to violence, so be it. I have no problem fighting to defend my freedoms and the freedoms of future generations. Perhaps it is time for conservatives and moderates that stand against the lockdowns to organize for this possible future.
To t***h and knowledge,
By: Brandon Smith
On Bob Livingston Alerts
Please share with all the Bamboozled Stupid Sheeple on all sides... yep you know them !
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
With the p**********l e******n highly contested and the mainstream media hyping the rising infection numbers, the public is now facing important questions regarding the future and lockdowns. Some states have decided to unilaterally introduce "executive orders" to restrict citizen movements, businesses and activities.
Anthony F***i is on the news constantly calling for Americans to cancel Thanksgiving and Christmas and generally trying to drum up fear in the minds of the populace. If Biden does actually end up in the White House, a federalized and national high-level lockdown is on the table starting in January.
In April of this year, I published an article that outlined a social engineering model put forward by g*******ts at MIT and the Imperial College of London which I called "wave theory." The model essentially works like this:
Governments must use the p******c as a rationale for "waves" of restrictive lockdowns, followed by controlled re-openings of the economy and of normal human activity. G*******ts claim that this will "slow" the spread of the c****av***s and save lives. However, they also openly admit that these cycles of closures and openings have other uses.
Over time, the citizenry becomes acclimated to governmental intrusion in their everyday lives, and they get used to the idea of bureaucracy telling them what they are not allowed to do when it comes to the simplest activities. The system thus bottlenecks all human interactions to the point that we are constantly asking for permission. We become s***es to the C****-** response.
As g*******t Gideon Lichfield from MIT stated in his article "We're not going back to normal":
"Ultimately, however, I predict that we'll restore the ability to socialize safely by developing more sophisticated ways to identify who is a disease risk and who isn't, and discriminating — legally — against those who are.
...one can imagine a world in which, to get on a flight, perhaps you'll have to be signed up to a service that tracks your movements via your phone. The airline wouldn't be able to see where you'd gone, but it would get an alert if you'd been close to known infected people or disease hot spots. There'd be similar requirements at the entrance to large venues, government buildings, or public t***sport hubs. There would be temperature scanners everywhere, and your workplace might demand you wear a monitor that tracks your temperature or other vital signs. Where nightclubs ask for proof of age, in future they might ask for proof of immunity — an identity card or some kind of digital verification via your phone, showing you've already recovered from or been v******ted against the latest v***s strains."
Note that Lichfield suggested that in order to participate in the normal economy you might need to show verification that you have been "v******ted against the latest v***s strains." In other words, the elites expect there to be many more v***l events or mutations after C****-** has run its course, and the restrictions and controls we see today are meant to continue forever.
The reality is that the wave model is a method of conditioning people to submit to a high level of control over their personal lives that they never would have accepted otherwise. The C****-** response has also been heralded by elites at the World Economic Forum as a perfect "opportunity" to initiate what they call the "Great Reset," a plan to deconstruct what's left of the free market capitalist system, introduce carbon controls in the name of the g****l w*****g fraud, institute a global cashless monetary system, and finally, move humanity into what they call a "shared economy" in which the average person is no longer allowed to own private property of any kind and is completely dependent.
Of course, such a complex system of "solutions" (dominance) over every individual would need to be managed in a highly centralized way. Meaning, global governance by the elitist establishment would be the end result. Naturally... the g*******ts would reluctantly take the reins of power for "the greater good."
This is the bigger picture, the problem at the core of lockdowns and C****-** laws. That said, there are also numerous reasons based on logic and evidence as to why there is no reason for people to submit to such restrictions. Let's outline them in a simple list:
The c****av***s k**ls less than 1 percent of the people it infects
Medical studies in the U.S. indicate that the c****av***s death rate for citizens not living in nursing homes has been holding well below 1 percent on average. The largest percentage of deaths by far in the U.S. has been in nursing homes among elderly people with preexisting conditions. People in long-term care facilities make up 8 percent of C****-** infection cases but they are 45 percent of all C****-** deaths.
Pneumonia alone k**ls around 50,000 Americans each year according to the CDC, and that's with v******tions, yet, we are supposed to panic and hand over all our freedoms in the name of stopping a disease which affects a tiny percentage of the population? This is why the media and governments have decided to hyperfocus on infection numbers rather than deaths. The death numbers do not warrant the amount of panic the establishment is trying to foment.
Lockdowns destroy the economy
It's basic math and finance; the small business sector of the U.S. economy is dying. Small businesses make up around 50 percent of U.S. employment. The C****-** bailout money, handled by international banks like JP Morgan, did not get to the vast majority of small businesses that were supposed to receive it. Those businesses that did get bailouts are still on the verge of closure of bankruptcy. Any further lockdowns will be the final nail in the coffin for the U.S. economy, except for major corporations that are enjoying the lion's share of stimulus cash.
How many lives will be damaged or lost due to poverty and economic collapse if the current trend continues? I suspect far more than any lives lost because of C****-**.
Why is no one in the mainstream talking about the most practical solution to the p******c? The small percentage of people who are most at risk can stay home, while the rest of us get on with our lives. Why are we being ordered to do the exact opposite just to make less than 1 percent of the population feel safer? How is this logical, reasonable or scientific? The only answer that makes sense is that the lockdown response is about control, not saving lives.
State governors have no authority to take away your civil liberties, and neither does the president
Restrictions based on executive order have no legal authority under the Constitution. They are color of law, not law. Laws are discussed and passed by state legislatures, not by state governors. Executive orders only apply to state employees and have no bearing on the citizenry.
L*****ts and statists argue that during a national crisis the governor has emergency powers and states can do wh**ever they want. This is false. Under the constitution and the Bill of Rights, state governors do not get to proclaim a national emergency based on their personal opinion and then declare themselves dictators in response. Any "laws" exerted because of such a process are therefore null and void; they are meaningless.
If the states have the ability to do wh**ever they want without oversight, then they would be able to bring back Jim Crow laws (among other things). Do l*****ts support that idea as well? If the federal government and the president have the power to violate the Bill of Rights during a national emergency, then Donald Trump has the authority to bring in martial law across the country because of l*****t r**ts. Do l*****ts agree with that outcome?
It is interesting to me that the political left, in particular, is so keen on defending the idea of states and governors having the power to unilaterally enforce p******c restrictions without oversight or checks and balances, yet, they have been aggressively opposed to state powers in the past when they had a Democratic president in office. The left has also been staunchly opposed to executive orders applied by Donald Trump, but they applaud the idea of executive orders on lockdowns being instituted by Biden. So, l*****ts support unilateral state power only when it works in favor of their agenda, and they support unilateral federal and p**********l power only when it works in favor of their agenda.
The bottom line is this: State government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. Federal government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. No one has the legal power to take away your inherent liberties. Those that claim otherwise have something to gain from your ens***ement.
Mask laws are unscientific
The majority of masks being used by the public today are cloth masks. Not even the CDC recommends the use of cloth masks for their own employees or medical workers. They only recommend N95 masks. They also admit that cloth masks are much less effective at preventing contact with the v***s. Yet, the CDC supports the enforcement of cloth masks for the public.
On top of that, some states and countries with the most stringent mask laws continue to see huge spikes in c****av***s infections. For example, New York has been one of the most tyrannical enforcers of mask laws in the U.S., but in November the state has witnessed extensive infection increases. California and Illinois have also seen infection spikes this month despite hard enforcement of masks. So, where is the science? It would appear that masks are a placebo; if they worked then the states with the most aggressive enforcement should be seeing a dramatic downturn in cases, not exponential increases.
Furthermore, why are many states and countries trying to force citizens to wear masks outside in open air and sunlight when v***ses cannot survive in such conditions? UV light from the sun is nature's sterilizer, but no one in the mainstream or in government acknowledges this scientific fact. Again, this shows that mask laws are about control, not about science or saving lives.
V******tion is unnecessary and potentially dangerous
Why should people get v******ted for a v***s that over 99 percent of them will easily survive anyway? Why not simply attain "herd immunity" through natural infection spread and antibodies? The mainstream will continue to ignore these questions because they are inconvenient to the wider agenda.
Also, why should anyone trust a v*****e that was rushed out in less than a year's time? China and the rest of the world spent over a decade trying to develop a v*****e for SARS, but we are supposed to believe that they created a v*****e for SARS related C****-** within months?
The last time the government rushed out a v*****e for a v***l epidemic was the 1976 swine flu scare, and that ended with numerous permanently damaged or dead individuals due to faulty v*****es.
As I noted in May, there are numerous examples of v*****e tests and implementation going very wrong, from Bill Gates and the World Health Organization giving people polio in various countries through v*****es, to Novartis and their deadly testing of a Bird Flu v*****e on homeless people in Poland, to GlaxoSmithCline and the deaths of children due to their pneumonia v*****e.
It is not necessarily the inactive v***s elements within the v*****es that are a threat, but the many other active elements often found within v*****es (including other diseases and cancers) that can cause illness and death. This has been especially true in v*****es that have had limited testing and trials.
Again, it's simply not worth the risk over a v***s that over 99 percent of people will survive.
R*******n is needed to put a stop to the fear machine
In closing, there are endless reasons why we must end the p******c lockdown agenda once and for all. Most importantly, the lockdowns, mask orders and v*****e plans are a stepping stone to something much worse — medical tyranny and centralization on an unprecedented scale. I will not personally follow such rules because they are not scientifically or morally sound. They are nonsense designed to frighten the public into complacency and consent.
A r*******n against such measures would be very easy to win. All we have to do is refuse to follow their mandates. What are they going to do? Lock up millions of people? Maybe shoot us? That would sort of defeat the supposed purpose of the very measures they demand we follow. And, if it comes to violence, so be it. I have no problem fighting to defend my freedoms and the freedoms of future generations. Perhaps it is time for conservatives and moderates that stand against the lockdowns to organize for this possible future.
To t***h and knowledge,
By: Brandon Smith
On Bob Livingston Alerts
Nov 18, 2020 15:42:46 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
Look what we figured out here... br br Please sh... (show quote)
OUTSTANDING!! Thanx Sici !! We the people better get our game on FAST too.
Nov 18, 2020 15:48:40 #
11Bravo wrote:
OUTSTANDING!! Thanx Sici !! We the people better get our game on FAST too.
>>>
Indeed sharing information and the t***h is paramount in saving the Republic.
More-so in preparing the sheeple for the horrors to come.
Helping them wake up is showing them the slow motion creeping encroachments over decades... so slow they can’t see or feel it but just sense something is terribly wrong.
Nov 18, 2020 15:56:16 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
Look what we figured out here... br br Please sh... (show quote)
Good piece, thanks for sharing. I just read this morning that Denmark passed a v*****e law, and there was such an uprising of the people they had to rescind it....
Nov 18, 2020 15:59:37 #
debeda wrote:
Good piece, thanks for sharing. I just read this morning that Denmark passed a v*****e law, and there was such an uprising of the people they had to rescind it....
>>>
Indeed...
Nov 18, 2020 16:06:08 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>
Indeed sharing information and the t***h is paramount in saving the Republic.
More-so in preparing the sheeple for the horrors to come.
Helping them wake up is showing them the slow motion creeping encroachments over decades... so slow they can’t see or feel it but just sense something is terribly wrong.
Indeed sharing information and the t***h is paramount in saving the Republic.
More-so in preparing the sheeple for the horrors to come.
Helping them wake up is showing them the slow motion creeping encroachments over decades... so slow they can’t see or feel it but just sense something is terribly wrong.
I've been aware of the subversive activity for decades & nobody listened to me @ the time. Now I get the usual request for advice,like you do, so I try to help but I feel apathy from them. Death Before Dishonor!!
Nov 18, 2020 16:11:36 #
11Bravo wrote:
I've been aware of the subversive activity for decades & nobody listened to me @ the time. Now I get the usual request for advice,like you do, so I try to help but I feel apathy from them. Death Before Dishonor!!
>>>
Just stay in the fight... more people are waking up everyday but it takes months and even years for them to truly turn the corner.
We need as many like you as we can get.
SemperFi for a domestic Cause !
Nov 18, 2020 16:51:59 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>
Just stay in the fight... more people are waking up everyday but it takes months and even years for them to truly turn the corner.
We need as many like you as we can get.
SemperFi for a domestic Cause !
Just stay in the fight... more people are waking up everyday but it takes months and even years for them to truly turn the corner.
We need as many like you as we can get.
SemperFi for a domestic Cause !
I'm in w/the program, like you, I use my training daily. Thanx,Sici !
Nov 18, 2020 17:04:32 #
Nov 18, 2020 17:23:17 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
Look what we figured out here... br br Please sh... (show quote)
Psychotic t*****r!
Nov 18, 2020 18:52:16 #
Nov 18, 2020 20:33:27 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>
Please elaborate
Please elaborate
Not wasting any more time w/ you Sici. You're mind is shut tight and locked. Such a shame too that you are so misguided because I know you are a very intelligent person.
Nov 18, 2020 20:39:39 #
GoCubs wrote:
Not wasting any more time w/ you Sici. You're mind is shut tight and locked. Such a shame too that you are so misguided because I know you are a very intelligent person.
>>>
Why do you accuse me of these things... I’m willing to listen and read everything anyone posts...
Believe me I spend about 6 to 8 hours a day reading and researching and cross referencing things everywhere.
We’ve been in this fiasco for 10months and good people, real patriots are trying to show you data and facts the MSM wont publish anywhere.
So much has been revealed about the great conspiracy and H**X...
Brandon is one of the few who have called it right all along for years.... and now this...
Why do you bash me ?
Nov 18, 2020 21:58:20 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>> br br Why do you accuse me of these ... (show quote)
The REAL patriots are the front line workers; the Doctor's, Nurses, EMT's, etc. that you are disrespecting by posting all this garbage. The people that will do everything they can to save people like you and yours. I ask you again Sici, does your niece know about you posting all of this rubbish? Does she know that you are disrespecting her?
Nov 18, 2020 23:29:20 #
GoCubs wrote:
The REAL patriots are the front line workers; the Doctor's, Nurses, EMT's, etc. that you are disrespecting by posting all this garbage. The people that will do everything they can to save people like you and yours. I ask you again Sici, does your niece know about you posting all of this rubbish? Does she know that you are disrespecting her?
>>>
She knows how I feel about it and she hasn’t objected to it rather stated things that she doesn’t know what all the hysteria is all about.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.