One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
OPP Poll.... $15.00/hr
Page <<first <prev 12 of 14 next> last>>
Nov 20, 2020 20:54:45   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
DASHY wrote:
You support the point of view that confirms your own conclusions about poverty. I do the same thing. I think supporting social programs designed to help all Americans is a better approach than to continue to help rich people and extremely profitable Corporations acquire even more wealth. One purpose of government is to control conditions that allows all the wealth landing in the hands of a very few individuals.


One thing you libs are going to have to come to grips with is that if we are going to have a vibrant economy which benefits everyone, there are some people who are going to get rich. If that is offensive to you, then you are not in favor of capitalism. You would no doubt be much happier with socialism. Why don't we just agree on that and go on our way. You don't have to actually move to Venezuela or Cuba, you simply have to keep v****g for politicians like Biden and Harris. You might be surprised, but we will be there before you know it.

Reply
Nov 20, 2020 21:22:49   #
Kickaha Loc: Nebraska
 
jwrevagent wrote:
I did not say that we grew up in a large home-my point was that back in the 40's and 50's most people had homes with enough bedrooms to accommodate a grandparent in the family who could not longer look after themselves. And they lived with the family. No thought of putting them in a home-there were not that many available, and those that were, were not exactly where you would want a beloved parent or grandparent to live out their lives. I did not live in a large home, but my grandparents, both sets, ran small family farms, and often the grandchildren would stay with them to help with chores, the cattle, horses-yes they used horses for some jobs back then-FAMILY helped FAMILY. No once considered that the government should take over the responsibility for the family welfare. There were some people of course, who had no family, and they needed some help-but my point is that we look to government to do things they are not well designed to do, and then wonder why it costs more, why we have a national debt and run deficits that are mind boggling, and somehow think we will never have to pay the piper-I believe it is too late for things to change appreciably-but I would imagine that most will be very surprised - as though they did not know that we have debt that approaches our GDP-and that is what happened to Greece.....matters not the numbers or how large-you cannot sustain freedom when your debt is = to or beyond your productivity. I take responsibility for myself, and I have been destitute-got food stamps for 2 months-no other help-no help with utilities or rent or any other thing. It took me over 2 years to pull myself out of that mess-one that was not of my own making, and too long to tell here. So your assumption was wrong. But i fear for my grandchildren.
I did not say that we grew up in a large home-my p... (show quote)


I've been there too. I didn't like it, but it was something I had to do. After my dad had a stroke and my mom had her knee replaced, we put a second house up at the farm (our house was too small to accommodate their needs). While they weren't under our roof, theirs was 50 yards away. They still had a sense of independence and we were there to help with everything. My parents and the farm are gone now. My family is now scattered like most families are nowadays, and as I get older, I wonder how my 'golden year's will play out.

Reply
Nov 21, 2020 07:54:44   #
DASHY
 
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
One thing you libs are going to have to come to grips with is that if we are going to have a vibrant economy which benefits everyone, there are some people who are going to get rich. If that is offensive to you, then you are not in favor of capitalism. You would no doubt be much happier with socialism. Why don't we just agree on that and go on our way. You don't have to actually move to Venezuela or Cuba, you simply have to keep v****g for politicians like Biden and Harris. You might be surprised, but we will be there before you know it.
One thing you libs are going to have to come to gr... (show quote)


I love living in America. I look forward to a vibrant economy under the Biden/Harris Administration. I am not offended by rich people. "Capitalism" and "socialism" can coexist in America. It doesn't have to be one or the other. We need a little more balance. You might be surprised, Biden/Harris will help us get there.

Reply
 
 
Nov 21, 2020 08:00:04   #
DASHY
 
Kickaha wrote:
I've been there too. I didn't like it, but it was something I had to do. After my dad had a stroke and my mom had her knee replaced, we put a second house up at the farm (our house was too small to accommodate their needs). While they weren't under our roof, theirs was 50 yards away. They still had a sense of independence and we were there to help with everything. My parents and the farm are gone now. My family is now scattered like most families are nowadays, and as I get older, I wonder how my 'golden year's will play out.
I've been there too. I didn't like it, but it was ... (show quote)


You are fortunate to be able to "put a second house up" for your parents. Millions of poor Americans are still looking forward to the day they can put up their first small house.

Reply
Nov 21, 2020 08:10:35   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
DASHY wrote:
I love living in America. I look forward to a vibrant economy under the Biden/Harris Administration. I am not offended by rich people. "Capitalism" and "socialism" can coexist in America. It doesn't have to be one or the other. We need a little more balance. You might be surprised, Biden/Harris will help us get there.


I really don't blame you for thinking that Capitalism and Socialism can live harmoniously together, that's what the left has preached for a long time. What really happens is people like free stuff and politicians are only too ready to provide it, or, I should say, they are happy to mandate us to provide it and take credit for it. I think it would be very wise to look a bit deeper into your heroes, Biden and Harris. It looks like you will have a chance but remember, the media and big tech will not help, you'll have to do it on your own.

Reply
Nov 21, 2020 08:25:20   #
American Vet
 
DASHY wrote:
You are fortunate to be able to "put a second house up" for your parents. Millions of poor Americans are still looking forward to the day they can put up their first small house.


If they have the ability and they work hard, they can better themselves.

If you wait on the government to provide for you - well, you got a long wait.

Reply
Nov 21, 2020 08:25:46   #
DASHY
 
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
I really don't blame you for thinking that Capitalism and Socialism can live harmoniously together, that's what the left has preached for a long time. What really happens is people like free stuff and politicians are only too ready to provide it, or, I should say, they are happy to mandate us to provide it and take credit for it. I think it would be very wise to look a bit deeper into your heroes, Biden and Harris. It looks like you will have a chance but remember, the media and big tech will not help, you'll have to do it on your own.
I really don't blame you for thinking that Capital... (show quote)


Our economy is already thriving on social programs than benefit the American people. Public schools, libraries, museums, parks and recreation opportunities. Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are the biggest ones of all. How about police and fire departments? Roads and bridges, public t***sportation, and underground infrastructure. That is what government is all about. Providing things we all need and opportunities for all Americans. We could not have done any of these things "on our own".

Reply
 
 
Nov 21, 2020 08:29:57   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
DASHY wrote:
I love living in America. I look forward to a vibrant economy under the Biden/Harris Administration. I am not offended by rich people. "Capitalism" and "socialism" can coexist in America. It doesn't have to be one or the other. We need a little more balance. You might be surprised, Biden/Harris will help us get there.


This is what you have to look forward to:

"Kamala Devi Harris was born to Donald Harris, her Jamaican-born father and Dr. Shyamala Gopalan, her Tamil Brahmin mother from India. Her father is a Marxist economist who taught at Stanford University."

Who is Willie Brown and what's the connection?
"In 1994, she met Willie Brown, who at the time was the second-most-powerful man in California politics. As Speaker of the State Assembly, Brown was a legend in Sacramento and around the state."

"Brown was under investigation several times,by the State Bar of California, Fair Political Practices Commission,the FBI.
In 1986 ...as California Assembly Speaker, he “received at least $124,000 in income & gifts...from special interests that had biz before the Legislature.”

Now this is neither here nor there for me, except for the political angle:
"Brown was sixty at the time he began dating Kamala, who was twenty-nine. Brown was actually two years older than her father. Their affair was the talk of San Francisco in 1994."

"Kamala’s mother defends her daughter’s decision - and offered choice comments about Brown. "Why shouldn’t she have gone out with Willie Brown? He was a player. And what could Willie Brown expect from her in the future? He has not much life left."

"He (Willie Brown) put Kamala on the State Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board and later the California Medical Assistance Commission. The MAC paid $99k a year in 2002.. UIAB ~$114k.
Both posts were part-time.
At the time, she was working as a county employee making ~$100k"

"During his tenure, Brown came under FBI investigation twice for corruption involving lucrative contracts flowing from the city to his political friends."

""I thought it was only in Third World countries that people were forced to pay bribes to get services they’re entitled to from their government," said U.S. district judge Charles Legge about the rampant corruption under Brown. "But we find it right here in San Francisco.""

"In January 2003, shortly after announcing her campaign, (Kamala) Harris had signed a form saying that she would stick to the city’s $211,000 voluntary spending cap for the campaign (for the San Francisco district attorney e******n)."

"Harris signed the pledge-and then blew right past the spending limit. By the end of Nov, she had raised $621,000...
The San Francisco Ethics Commission v**e to fine Harris was unanimous. Her campaign had to pay a $34,000 fine, a record in city e******ns."

Moving on to the next, and by far the most disturbing aspect:
"Harris often recounts her background as a sex crimes prosecutor earlier in her career to attack others for their legal failings in this area."

"During her decade-and-a-half tenure as a chief prosecutor, Harris would fail to prosecute a single case of priest abuse and her office would strangely hide vital records on abuses that had occurred despite the protests of victims groups."

"Harris’s predecessor as San Francisco district attorney, Terence Hallinan, was aware of and had prosecuted numerous Catholic priests on sexual misconduct involving children. And he had been gathering case files for even more."

"Hallinan’s office had launched an investigation and quickly discovered that the San Francisco Archdiocese had extensive internal records concerning complaints going back some seventy-five years."

"In spring of 2002, Hallinan demanded the church turn them over to his office. A month later, the archdiocese reluctantly complied."

"The secret documents were explosive and reportedly contained the names of about forty current and former priests in the San Francisco area who had been identified in sexual abuse complaints."

"Hallinan used the information from the files to begin pursuing legal cases against them. In nearby San Mateo and Marin County, prosecutors obtained the same church records and those in Marin charged Father Gregory Ingels in 2003"

"But by June 2003, Hallinan and other prosecutors had hit a roadblock: the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that California’s law extending the statute of limitations for priest abuse cases was unconstitutional."

"The records that Hallinan had in his possession touched on well-connected institutions at the heart of California’s power structure. St. Ignatius College Preparatory School, in the Archdiocese of San Francisco, counted California governor Jerry Brown ... as alumni."

Now comes the Kamala connection:
"According to San Francisco e******n financial disclosures, high-dollar donations to Harris’s campaign began to roll in from those connected to the Catholic Church institutional hierarchy."

"For some reason, she did not want the documents released in any form.
Harris’s office claimed that the cover-up was about protecting the victims of abuse.
Victims’ groups wanted the documents released and Harris was stopping it."

""They’re full of s**t," said Joey Piscitelli, the northwest regional director of Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests (SNAP), the largest and most active victims’ group. "You can quote me on that. They’re not protecting the victims.""

"With the outcry of victims groups, Harris’s office then attempted to shift blame, claiming that the idea of burying the evidence had been first suggested by her predecessor, Hallinan."

"But he [Hallinan] responded angrily to her claims. "I told Jack Hammel [the archdiocese’s legal counsel] in no uncertain terms that I wouldn’t go along with anything like that."

"James Jenkins..the founding chairman of the archdiocese’s Independent Review Board... resigned from the board... Jenkins argued that Harris’s deal with the archdiocese not only denied the rights of known victims, it also prevented other possible cases from coming forward."

"In April 2010, a journalist with the San Francisco Weekly asked for the records through California’s Public Records Act. Harris’s office denied the request, offering conflicting explanations as to why they could not provide them."

"In 2019, I requested those records through a California attorney. The San Francisco district attorney’s office responded that they no longer had them in their possession. Were they destroyed? Were they moved somewhere else? It remains a disturbing mystery."

"She somehow served as San Francisco district attorney from 2004 to 2011, and then as California attorney general from 2011 to 2017, and never brought a single documented case forward against an abusive priest."

"To put this lack of action in perspective, at least fifty other cities charged priests in sexual abuse cases during her tenure as San Francisco district attorney. San Francisco is conspicuous by its absence."

The next one:
"At San Francisco’s adult entertainment clubs, dancers were taking customers behind closed doors and having sex for money. ... After repeated complaints ... the San Francisco Police Department decided to take action."

"The police action caught the attention of newly installed district attorney Kamala Harris, and her staff sent the message to hold off on the enforcement."

"Meanwhile, in response to continued complaints, the police conducted a pair of sting operations. Three undercover officers went into each of the two clubs and were quickly solicited by female employees for paid sex."

"At both the Market Street Theater & New Century Theater, it happened "within minutes."
When the operations were done, 9 women were arrested, as was the GM of the New Century. The cops claimed that they were “slam-dunk cases."
But Kamala Harris dropped the cases."

"It just leaves me in amazement," said San Francisco Police Department vice captain Tim Hettrich. It was "almost legalizing prostitution."

"Harris’s strange objections to prosecuting prostitution cases connected to these raids have a possible explanation. The owner of both the Market Street and New Century theaters was a company called Déjà Vu."

"An owner of Déjà Vu, Sam Conti, had a long history with Willie Brown. Conti had first hired Brown as his defense attorney back in 1977. They remained friends. At Conti’s 2009 funeral, Brown delivered a videotaped eulogy."

Next one:
"Ricardo Ramirez. Ramirez ran a cement and concrete company called Pacific Cement. As of 2003, a full one-third of the public works projects in San Francisco used Pacific. ... Those contributions often went to the Willie Brown machine and were not always legal."

"In 1997, state officials found that Ramirez had illegally contributed $2,000 to Brown’s 1995 mayoral campaign.
...
Ramirez never faced charges for delivering substandard concrete. Instead, Harris’s office settled for a plea deal involving a single environmental count"

"illegally storing waste oil at one of his production facilities.
Harris & her office refused to offer an explanation as to why they were going so light on Willie Brown’s friend & donor. "Harris' office had no explanation for why it dropped the concrete case,” - the Chronicle."

"Kamala Harris’s signature program as San Francisco district attorney was called Back on Track-a program designed to give first-time drug offenders an opportunity to avoid a criminal record."

"Those (in the program) included were not just nonviolent, first-time offenders who had committed a single drug offense. Some were i*****l i*******ts and violent criminals such as Alexander Izaguirre."

"Amanda Kiefer was walking down the street when Izaguirre snatched her purse and jumped into a waiting SUV. Rather than drive off, the SUV sped toward Kiefer to run her down. Kiefer jumped on the hood and saw Izaguirre and the driver laughing."

"The driver slammed on the brakes throwing Kiefer to the ground. The impact fractured her skull.
...
Harris did not offer an explanation. Instead, she simply explained that enforcing federal i*********n l*w was not her job."

Next one:
"...in 2015 the attorneys general from fourteen other states, including New York, launched an effort to investigate nutrition companies on the grounds of false advertising and mislabeling."

"the Obama administration’s Department of Justice (DOJ) was also going after dietary supplement producers, charging them with exaggerated claims"

"The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) opened an investigation into Herbalife in March 2014.
In July 2016, the FTC won a $200 million settlement against Herbalife.
But Harris never even investigated the company."

"It is worth noting that those corporations in question all happened to be clients of her husband’s law firm, Venable LLP. GNC, Herbalife, AdvoCare International, Vitamin Shoppe, and others were represented by Venable."

"In 2015, prosecutors from Harris’s own attorney general’s office based out of San Diego sent her a long memorandum arguing that Herbalife needed to be investigated. ... Harris declined to investigate or provide the resources-and never offered a reason."

Reply
Nov 21, 2020 08:34:03   #
American Vet
 
DASHY wrote:
Our economy is already thriving on social programs than benefit the American people. Public schools, libraries, museums, parks and recreation opportunities. Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are the biggest ones of all. How about police and fire departments? Roads and bridges, public t***sportation, and underground infrastructure. That is what government is all about. Providing things we all need and opportunities for all Americans. We could not have done any of these things "on our own".
Our economy is already thriving on social programs... (show quote)


Social programs are one thing - socialism is another.

Police, fire departments, etc., are not 'social programs' - they are part of the fundamental duties of government.

"That is what government is all about. Providing things we all need and opportunities for all Americans." And there is the serious flaw in your non-thinking. Government does not have the responsibility to 'provide the things we need' - that is each individual's job.

Governments job - in the US - is to see that we all have the right to 'life, liberty, and the PURSUIT of happiness'.

Reply
Nov 21, 2020 09:06:56   #
DASHY
 
American Vet wrote:
Social programs are one thing - socialism is another.

Police, fire departments, etc., are not 'social programs' - they are part of the fundamental duties of government.

"That is what government is all about. Providing things we all need and opportunities for all Americans." And there is the serious flaw in your non-thinking. Government does not have the responsibility to 'provide the things we need' - that is each individual's job.

Governments job - in the US - is to see that we all have the right to 'life, liberty, and the PURSUIT of happiness'.
Social programs are one thing - socialism is anoth... (show quote)


As you point out: To provide the things we need is the fundamental duty of government. We need health care. We get Medicare, Medicaid, and access to emergency room services. We need to survive after we stop working. We get Social Security. We need to educate our children, we get public schools. These are all social programs.

Reply
Nov 21, 2020 09:33:02   #
American Vet
 
DASHY wrote:
As you point out: To provide the things we need is the fundamental duty of government. We need health care. We get Medicare, Medicaid, and access to emergency room services. We need to survive after we stop working. We get Social Security. We need to educate our children, we get public schools. These are all social programs.


What you label as 'social programs' are some duties that the people have appointed to the government. That is not 'socialism.

I agree we 'need health care'. My concern is allowing the government to MANAGE health care - imagine the compassion of the IRS and the efficiency of the postal service. Government is not efficient.

The concern of many people is the massive government we have - as someone once said “In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem, government IS the problem." How did we move so fast to get a v*****e for the C***d v***s? Was it because government agencies jumped on the problem? No - it was because President Trump basically told the government agencies to back off and let the private sector get it done.

Reply
 
 
Nov 21, 2020 09:52:50   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
DASHY wrote:
Our economy is already thriving on social programs than benefit the American people. Public schools, libraries, museums, parks and recreation opportunities. Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are the biggest ones of all. How about police and fire departments? Roads and bridges, public t***sportation, and underground infrastructure. That is what government is all about. Providing things we all need and opportunities for all Americans. We could not have done any of these things "on our own".
Our economy is already thriving on social programs... (show quote)


There are a number of things that the Government can do that for the most part, it is easier to allocate them to the Government instead of arranging for private industry to handle them. There is a point at which government moves into existing for itself rather than the people. In modern parlance, that is referred to as a tipping point. Some fear we are getting too near that point. Some don't fear it at all and wish we would go further. I guess that's something you will have to decide for yourself. If you can look at some of the things that government is evolving to and not worry, well, good luck. You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to be in that camp. All you have to do is look to Venezuela and see if there are any similarities to how they came to go from a rich country to destruction in 20 years and to the way we are moving today. Think of gun confiscation, e******n f***d, which the left is willing not only to deny, but to squelch among other things. Hope you become able to see these things without being clouded with politics.

Reply
Nov 21, 2020 10:09:31   #
DASHY
 
American Vet wrote:
What you label as 'social programs' are some duties that the people have appointed to the government. That is not 'socialism.

I agree we 'need health care'. My concern is allowing the government to MANAGE health care - imagine the compassion of the IRS and the efficiency of the postal service. Government is not efficient.

The concern of many people is the massive government we have - as someone once said “In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem, government IS the problem." How did we move so fast to get a v*****e for the C***d v***s? Was it because government agencies jumped on the problem? No - it was because President Trump basically told the government agencies to back off and let the private sector get it done.
What you label as 'social programs' are some dutie... (show quote)


To help the private sector "get it done" Trump gave $6 Billion to private sector companies with no t***sparency requirement attached. Big Pharma got this money with no strings attached. The federal agency overseeing this giant giveaway (BARDA) does nothing to guarantee that its Pharma partners will make products developed with this funding widely available and affordable once they hit the market. That's Trump's idea of telling agencies to back off.

Reply
Nov 21, 2020 10:20:51   #
Kickaha Loc: Nebraska
 
DASHY wrote:
You are fortunate to be able to "put a second house up" for your parents. Millions of poor Americans are still looking forward to the day they can put up their first small house.


It came from hard work and mortgaging the farm along with selling my parents home. It was either that or we go through the same thing without putting up the other house (a modular home) and we pay everything for them to be in a nursing home somewhere with our assets draining away. With my parents gone, my siblings leveraged their position to steal the farm from under me. In a way I didn't care because moving to town made more sense for my late wife's health. I bought the house, paying cash. It's nothing fancy, 133 years old in a small town and about 1100 square feet. It provided home for my wife and I, along with my daughter, her boyfriend and her two little girls. It was crowded, but worked for us.

Reply
Nov 21, 2020 10:31:58   #
DASHY
 
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
There are a number of things that the Government can do that for the most part, it is easier to allocate them to the Government instead of arranging for private industry to handle them. There is a point at which government moves into existing for itself rather than the people. In modern parlance, that is referred to as a tipping point. Some fear we are getting too near that point. Some don't fear it at all and wish we would go further. I guess that's something you will have to decide for yourself. If you can look at some of the things that government is evolving to and not worry, well, good luck. You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to be in that camp. All you have to do is look to Venezuela and see if there are any similarities to how they came to go from a rich country to destruction in 20 years and to the way we are moving today. Think of gun confiscation, e******n f***d, which the left is willing not only to deny, but to squelch among other things. Hope you become able to see these things without being clouded with politics.
There are a number of things that the Government c... (show quote)


Let's remember this. The Government is: of the people, by the people, and for the people. Government does not exist for itself, it is not a separate entity. There is no tipping point between government and the people who created it. We don't fear government, we fear its leaders. Under the totally incompetent, chaotic, self-serving leadership of Trump we had reason to be afraid. Under the experienced, fair-minded, competent leadership of Joe Biden we have reason to believe things will improve. The only people who were talking about gun confiscation and e******n f***d will be leaving in January.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 12 of 14 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.