Tiptop789 wrote:
Because his (Biden) lead is to great to be overcome by the few b****ts left to be counted.
I've posted the following info on a number of threads. So, let's do it again as a favor to those who think this e******n was as clean as a whistle and fair to ALL Americans who v**ed.
But first: How is it that in PA, within 24 hrs of the polls closing at 8pm, president Trump was leading by 700,000 v**es, yet within the next 24 hours, he was behind 10,000 v**es? Here's why. Media be damned, a constitutional lawyer with an impressive resume who has high level contacts in his home state of PA, made some inquiries.
The counting staff at each venue was made up of Republicans and democrats. At around 8pm on the second day of counting, the supervisor of the e******n board announced an 8 hour suspension of counting so the staff could get some rest. Everybody went home, or so it seemed. Around midnight, the democrat staff went back to work. Pallets of b****ts mysteriously appeared, and at some point the next day, the count put Trump down 10,000 v**es. So how do we account for a sudden increase of nearly 3/4 million v**es for Biden?
President Trump ran 3 to 5 rallies a day and drew an average of 30,000 supporters - in one city in PA, there were 57,000 supporters - and this on top of boat armadas, truck convoys, street marches, and a profusion of TRUMP 2020 yard signs and f**gs in cities and towns all over the country, all showing overwhelming support for president Trump. The Biden campaign rallies were dismal, turnout of supporters were nothing even comparable to that for president Trump.
The massive support for president Trump was confirmed in the down b****t v**es. Republicans scored big in local, state, and federal races, yet we're supposed believe that the top slot goes to Trump's opponent.
I am reminded of the 2009 Green Revolution in Iran. The Iranian v**ers were c***ted. I speak for myself, but I guarantee I am not alone. In the most critical e******n of choosing our national leader, I don't like to be c***ted.
So, let's take a look:
Bryan Cutler, the PA SoH, had the following letter hand delivered to governor Tom Wolf:
(This is essentially a statement of grievances, but it could easily serve as the body of an indictment of the PA supreme court for violating the US constitution and state e******n laws.)
November 6,2020
Tom Wolf Governor
225 Main Capitol Building
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120
HAND
DELIVERED
Dear Governor:
As you are aware, the General E******n currently being conducted in the Commonwealth has generated a significant amount of interest among our citizens, who have been anxiously awaiting results since the e******n concluded at the lawfully enacted deadline of November 3,2020 at 8:00 PM.
For months, I, along with many members of the House of Representatives and Senate, have raised serious concerns relating to the administration of the e******n, specifically because this was the first full year Pennsylvanians would be able to use no-excuse absentee mail-in b****ts.
Unfortunately, some of the concerns that were previously raised have manifested into issues which cannot be overlooked.
First, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court unconstitutionally extended the deadline to receive late b****ts and openly ignored the findings of fact and law that were issued by the Commonwealth Court. That issue is now being litigated at the United States Supreme Court. However, this judicial intervention created unnecessary chaos and uncertainty as to what constitutes a timely and lawfully cast v**e.
Second, your Secretary of State initiated another legal action in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to "clarify" whether signatures on returned absentee and mail-in b****ts could be reviewed for authenticity by counties during the pre-canvassing of b****ts.
Without permitting the House or Senate to intervene and defend the existing law, the Court unilaterally directed the county boards of e******ns to not reject absentee or mail-in b****ts for counting, computing and tallying based on signature comparisons conducted by county e******n officials or employees, or as the result of third party challenges based on such comparisons.
This, of course, is a significant departure from Pennsylvania law and practice, and it eliminated one of the most important security and anti-fraud features used with absentee and mail-in b****ts. It also treats v**ers who v**e on E******n Day in person different from those that used the absentee b****t or mail-in program.
Additionally, notwithstanding assuring the United States Supreme Court that late arriving b****ts would be fully segregated, the Secretary of State issued conflicting "guidance" to counties regarding how to manage late arriving b****ts. Full segregation, as initially contemplated, was replaced with guidance that encouraged the counties to process b****ts but keep totals separated.
Also, prior to e******n day, and in contravention of state law and a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling, some counties began pre-canvassing b****ts by reviewing the declarations to find "defects" which they then sought to have v**ers "cure".
The Secretary of State permitted these actions, which are now subject to several court cases in both federal and state courts. Not surprisingly, very serious equal protection rights issues now exist due to the disparate treatment of v**ers from different counties.
Further, poll watchers, which are the hallmark of our E******n Day process to promote t***sparency and fairness, were unlawfully denied the opportunity to meaningfully observe the proceedings of all pre-canvass and canvassing activities.
Finally, it is my understanding that among all our counties, an unprecedented 105,000 provisional b****ts have been issued.
Under our statutes, provisional b****ts may only be issued if there is an issue with a v**er (e.g. a v**er's name does not appear in the poll or supplemental poll book, a v**er was issued but did not successfully v**e an absentee or mail-in b****t).
Clearly, the significant number provisional b****ts are indicative of v**er issues across the Commonwealth. Governor, all these issues could have been avoided had your Secretary of State and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court simply followed the law as written.
The uncertainty surrounding these interventions has cast an unnecessary cloud on a process - the e******n - that invites our people to question the results, regardless of which candidate or party may prevail.
As such, and due directly to these issues (and any others that may arise), I am requesting that a full audit be conducted of the 2020 General E******n prior to the certification of any results.
The House of Representatives and Senate previously required a report of the 2020 Primary E******n (Act 35 of 2020), which provided meaningful, actionable information regarding the administration of the absentee and mail-in b****t program.
In response, the House passed House Bill2626 which would have provided remedies to nearly all the known issues. However, that legislation was not considered in the Senate because of your opposition to the bill and veto threat.
Now, we must take every possible step to ensure that all Pennsylvanians, and all Americans,know that our Commonwealth has conducted the General E******n with integrity. That can best be accomplished through an audit and a verification that our e******n law and processes were appropriately administered and followed.
Like you, I call on all Pennsylvanians to remain calm as we work through these issues.
If we work cooperatively to end the e******n in an open and t***sparent manner, then I am confident that regardless of winner, our people can accept the results.
Sincerely,
BRYAN D. CUTLER
The Speaker
Pennsylvania House of Representatives.The letterThe following information is a synthesis of collected sources.
Democrats spent the entire Trump presidency, particularly the last six months to a year, going into states and filing lawsuits, or colluding with democrat lawmakers and governors to change their laws to accommodate their nominee and the democrat party.
320 lawsuits were filed since the primaries across 45 states, D.C. and Puerto Rico. Almost all of them were filed by progressives in the democrat party. This is a record number of law suits. These suits pushed mail-in v****g, no signatures necessary, counting v**es well beyond e******n day, and in some cases, pushed to allow v****g to take place AFTER the polls close. They focused on swing states, battleground and purple states. They got what they wanted.
In September, Joe Biden's campaign formally assembled a war room comprised of lawyers who were fighting cases nationwide. Mark Elias, former general counsel for Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign and who was the slip-and-fall lawyer behind the infamous Steele dossier, was Biden's war room boss. (Elias is the head of the Political Law practice at Perkins Coie).
"We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive v***r f***d organization in the history of American politics."
Joe Biden, October, 2020
Elias & Co were involved in more than 60 of the cases nationwide. In the few cases they lost, they claimed "v**er suppression".It is patently obvious to me that democrats have waged an ongoing campaign to unconstitutionally and illegally corrupt our E*******l system to favor their candidates and their party.