"Apart from an apparent complete ignorance of how civil litigation works in the American court system, specifically evidence FOLLOWS discovery, it is astonishing how easily the power brokers and propaganda arm of the Progressive Socialist movement have dumbed down their collective masses into believing they are incapable of committing v***r f***d.

Over 300 sworn affidavits by e******n employees under penalty of perjury have revealed instances of v***r f***d large and small - from a citizen's discovery of a garbage bag in a dumpster filled with v****g machine printouts of b****ts marked for president Trump to the history of the D******n v**er system and Smartmatic software and how the algorithms were manipulated to alter or change v**es. At present, 3 D******n employees involved in the process have sworn affidavits to that effect.

Statisticians are among those who swore affidavits stating the statistical impossibility of president Trump's 700,000+ lead in PA on e******n night falling to 10,000 v**es behind in less than 4 hours.

Two examples of filings out of hundreds:

(NOTE: in these two cases, Chief Judge Kenny failed to follow civil court procedure by disallowing expedited discovery and summarily dismissing the cases.

Judge Kenny denied the motion for preliminary relief stating that the plaintiffs' "interpretation of events is incorrect and not credible", with plaintiffs not fully comprehending the "absentee b****t tabulation process".)

You don't have to have sworn affidavits to file in civil court, and you certainly don't have to have a ton of evidence. The argument is, "On a reasonable basis in fact and law, I have enough information here to make an allegation, and we want the opportunity to pursue our law suit and conduct discovery - written discovery, document demands, depositions, witness lists, and we want this done quickly."
At this point, you can in fact get subpoenas.

Michigan: Constantino et al v. City of Detroit et al

November 9, 2020, Wayne County Michigan.

State of Michigan Third Judicial Circuit Court for the County of Wayne.
Circuit Court Judge Timothy Kenny Chief Judge Third Judicial Circuit Court of Michigan.

Plaintiff: CHERYL A. COSTANTINO and EDWARD P. McCALL, Jr.,

Plaintiff Attorney: David A. Kallman (P34200) Erin E. Mersino (P70886) Jack C. Jordan (P46551) Stephen P. Kallman (P75622) GREAT LAKES JUSTICE CENTER.

Case No. 20-014780-AW

V***r F***d, V**er Integrity, Plaintiffs alleged e******n f***d, seeking to prevent the e******n results of Detroit and Wayne County from being certified.

Defendant: CITY OF DETROIT; DETROIT E******N COMMISSION; JANICE M. WINFREY, in her official capacity as the CLERK OF THE CITY OF DETROIT and the Chairperson of the DETROIT E******N COMMISSION; CATHY M. GARRETT, in her official capacity as the CLERK OF WAYNE COUNTY; and the WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF CANVASSERS.

To wit:
1. The e******n was held on November 3, 2020 and approximately 850,000 v**es were
reported as cast in Wayne County, Michigan.

2. Plaintiff brings this action to raise numerous issues of fraud and misconduct that
occurred in order to protect the rights of all v**ers in Michigan, especially Wayne County.

3.In summary, this Complaint raises numerous instances of fraud, including, but not limited to:

* Defendants systematically processed and counted b****ts from v**ers whose name
failed to appear in either the Qualified V**er File (QVF) or in the supplemental
sheets. When v**er’s name could not be found, the e******n worker assigned the
b****t to random name already in the QVF to person who had not v**ed.

* Defendants instructed e******n workers to not verify signatures on absentee b****ts,
to backdate absentee b****ts, and to process such b****ts regardless of their validity.

* After e******n officials announced the last absentee b****ts had been received,
another batch of unsecured and unsealed b****ts, without envelopes, arrived in trays
at the TCF Center. There were tens of thousands of these absentee b****ts, and
apparently every b****t was counted and attributed only to Democratic candidates.

* Defendants instructed e******n workers to process b****ts that appeared after the
e******n deadline and to falsely report that those b****ts had been received prior to
November 3, 2020 deadline - i.e., change the date on the b****t.

* Defendants systematically used false information to process b****ts, such as using
incorrect or false birthdays. Many times, the e******n workers inserted new names
into the QVF after the e******n and recorded these new v**ers as having birthdate
0f 1/ 1/ 900.

* On daily basis leading up to the e******n, City of Detroit e******n workers and
employees coached v**ers to v**e for Joe Biden and the Democrat party. These
workers and employees encouraged v**ers to do straight Democrat b****t. These
e******n workers and employees went over to the v****g booths with v**ers in order
to watch them v**e and coach them for whom to v**e.

* Unsecured b****ts arrived at the TCF Center loading garage, not in sealed b****t
boxes, without any chain of custody, and without envelopes.

* Defendant e******n officials and workers refused to record challenges to their
processes and removed challengers from the site if they politely voiced challenge.

After poll challengers started discovering the fraud taking place at the TCF Center,
Defendant e******n officials and workers locked credentialed challengers out of the
counting room so they could not observe the process, during Which time tens of
thousands of b****ts were processed.

* Defendant e******n officials and workers allowed b****ts to be duplicated by hand
without allowing poll challengers to check if the duplication was accurate. In fact,
e******n officials and workers repeatedly obstructed poll challengers from
observing. Defendants permitted thousands of b****ts to be filled out by hand and
duplicated on site without oversight from poll challengers.


Michigan: Stoddard v. City E******n Commission of the City of Detroit

November 4, 2020

State of Michigan Third Judicial Circuit Court for the County of Wayne.
Circuit Court Judge Timothy Kenny Chief Judge Third Judicial Circuit Court of Michigan.

Plaintiff: Sarah Stoddard and E******n Integrity Fund.

Plaintiff Attorney: Edward D. Greim (pro hac forthcoming) Special Counsel, Thomas More Society
Missouri Bar No. 54034, GRAVES GARRETT, LLC. Ian A. Northon (P65082) RHOADES MCKEE PC

Case No. 20-014604-CZ

V***r F***d, V**er Integrity, Plaintiffs, a Michigan poll observer and a nonprofit organization, allege that absentee v**e count centers in Detroit do not have one inspector from each political party present, in violation of state law. Plaintiffs seek to halt the counting of absentee b****ts until observers from both parties are present.

To wit:

1. This lawsuit challenges the ongoing action of the City E******n Commission of the City of Detroit and the Detroit City Clerk with respect to one-party control of the Absent V**er Counting Board (“AVCB”) operating out of TCF Center (formerly known as Cobo Hall).

Specifically, individual inspectors from a single major political party are “curing” rejected absentee b****ts – those absentee b****ts that cannot be properly read by the electronic counting machine -- including t***sposing the v**er’s perceived choices onto a new b****t, without the required oversight and signatures of two e******n inspectors—one from each major political party. These rejected absentee b****ts are reviewed by only one inspector, in most cases a Democratic inspector, who then unilaterally decides how the v**er intended to v**e and creates a b****t that can be read reflecting the inspector’s unilateral decision.

2. This violates MCL 168.765a (10), which requires one inspector from each party to be present at the AVCB. It also violates the Secretary of State’s rule, as set forth in her controlling E******n Officials’ Manual, requiring that any cured b****t bear the signature of two e******n inspectors who have expressed a preference for different political parties. See 168.765a(13). In application, this arrangement in the TCF Center fails to comply with Michigan law and invites fraud.

3. This action seeks an order: (a) halting further “curing” of absentee b****ts rejected by the counting machines until one inspector from each party is present to observe the cure and sign the cured b****t; and (b) segregating the rejected and cured b****ts; and (c) halting certification until the statutorily-required inspectors can be located and used to ensure e******n integrity." - Blade Runner