Republican-controlled state legislatures can rectify e******n f***d committed by courts and governors

By the proper power our Constitution gives them.

Who determines the outcome of the p**********l e******n in a given state? Governors? Secretaries of state or boards of e******n superintendents? The courts? Fox News' decision desk? Nope. The president wins a state when e*****rs selected by state legislatures conduct a v**e in their respective states on Dec. 14. Thus, ultimately, according to the Constitution, the state legislators wind up serving as the kingmakers in a disputed e******n.

Endless pots of unverified mail-in b****ts that often fail to meet state e******n law standards weren't created overnight at 3 a.m. on Nov. 4. They were created by a mix of illegal administrative actions taken by Democrat administrations in the key states and state and lower federal courts overriding long-standing state e******n laws. This has been going on for years, but accelerated to a fever pitch over the past few months.

The Constitution, in Art. I, §4, cl. 1, gives state legislatures the power over the times, methods, and procedures of e******ns and provides no "public health emergency" exception that enables governors or judges to override them and create a new system for e******ns. At its core, this is why we have such post-e******n chaos, and it was by design – set in motion for years by the courts and crystalized over the past few months by using C****-** to remake the in-person v****g e*****rate into a postal b****t free-for-all, in what Justice Gorsuch described as the greatest judicial intervention in e******ns in 230 years.

Well, now state legislatures can have their revenge and have the final say, as intended by the Constitution. Mark Levin reminded his audience today that state legislatures are the ones who choose the e*****rs who directly v**e for president in each state.

Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
REMINDER TO THE REPUBLICAN STATE LEGISLATURES, YOU HAVE THE FINAL SAY OVER THE CHOOSING OF E*****RS, NOT ANY BOARD OF E******NS, SECRETARY OF STATE, GOVERNOR, OR EVEN COURT. YOU HAVE THE FINAL SAY -- ARTICLE II OF THE FED CONSTITUTION. SO, GET READY TO DO YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY

In case you think this is some desperate tactic Levin has concocted because he doesn't like the impending results of the state b****t tallies, he has been warning about this for months. While everyone slept as the courts rewrote e******n law, Levin, a constitutional lawyer, warned on Sept. 18, "As in Pennsylvania, the Michigan legislature is controlled by the Republicans. They must meet in emergency session and exercise their Article II power under the federal Constitution and seize back control over the e******n system."

In the run-up to the e******n, courts have allowed "late v****g, namely submission of b****ts after E******n Day so long as they are postmarked before. In addition, a Michigan court allowed b****t-harvesting under certain circumstances, which appears to have occurred late at night in Wayne County. There has been a series of rulings or administrative decisions in numerous states, which are contrary to state law and in some cases federal e******n law, that enabled Democrats to upend the e*******l process – putting aside questions of additional fraud in the early morning of Nov. 4.

Liberals say they want every v**e to count, but having v**es submitted by insidious special-interest groups that violate the terms and conditions of absentee b****ting ensures that the lawfully cast v**es of individuals indeed do not count. We can debate the policy merits of some of these anomalous v****g procedures, but everyone agrees that state legislatures control the process. In many blue states, they have already codified Democrat priorities on b****t-harvesting, registration deadlines (or lack thereof), and weak v**er verification systems. But in states like Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, there were laws on the books that were illegally ignored by the Democrat governors and the courts.

In his 2005 book "Men in Black," Levin noted that the reason the Supreme Court ruling on the Florida recount in 2000 was final was not because the courts are supreme over the e*******l process. Quite the contrary, the Supreme Court was merely rectifying a mistake the state court made, because Democrats were the ones who involved the courts in the e******n process to begin with. But why did Al Gore ultimately accept the decision in Bush v. Gore?

"The Florida legislature could have (and, in fact, was preparing) to intervene and name a slate of e*****rs if the Florida Supreme Court continued to interfere with the e******n," wrote Levin on page 170. "The legislature, which was controlled by the Republican Party in 2000, had absolute authority under the Constitution to choose Florida's members of the e*******l college."

Art. II, Sec. 1, §2 of the Constitution stipulates that "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct" the e*****rs to v**e for president. The Constitution gives Congress the authority to set the date of that v**e, which, pursuant to 3 U.S.C. §7, is the Monday after the second Wednesday in December of p**********l e******n years. This year it is Dec. 14.

Notice how the Constitution specifically gives the job of choosing e*****rs to the legislature, and unlike with standard legislation, there is no shared jurisdiction or responsibility with the governor, much less some random state or federal judge. Charles Pinckney, one of the signers of the Constitution from South Carolina, reiterated on the Senate floor on Jan. 23, 1800, how careful the framers were to cut Congress out of the process.

"The E*****rs are to be appointed by each State, and the whole direction as to the manner of their appointment is given to the State Legislatures," said Pinckney during a Senate debate. "Nothing was more clear … that Congress had no right to meddle with it at all; as the whole was entrusted to the State Legislatures, they must make provision for all questions arising on the occasion."

Technically, this means that state legislatures could even appoint e*****rs and completely avoid or cancel out popular e******n b****ts we have today, at least for the president and vice president. This was the practice in some states in the early days of the republic. As Justice Joseph Story wrote in his 1833 "Commentaries on the Constitution," state legislatures choosing the e*****rs themselves "has been firmly established in practice, ever since the adoption of the constitution, and does not now seem to admit of controversy, even if a suitable tribunal existed to adjudicate upon it."

Indeed, in 1892 (McPherson v. Blacker), in upholding Michigan's practice of dividing the state's e*****rs by congressional district (as done today in Maine and Nebraska), the Supreme Court wrote, "The legislature possesses plenary authority to direct the manner of appointment, and might itself exercise the appointing power by joint b****t or concurrence of the two houses, or according to such mode as it designated." In Bush v. Gore, the high court reiterated that any state legislature "may, if it so chooses, select the e*****rs itself."

Obviously, none of us wants to abolish popular e******ns, but why would the Constitution even grant state legislatures such power? Well, the framers understood that, unlike Congress, these are the bodies that are closest and most accountable to the people, and unlike judges or executives (state or federal), they are numerous in a deliberative body and won't wield unilateral authority without some degree of consensus.

By overriding the legislatures in how to properly conduct the popular e******ns that choose these p**********l e*****rs, the courts and governors have disenfranchised their v**ers. A Michigan court extended E******n Day for two weeks. A Pennsylvania court, along with the Democrat secretary of state, essentially nullified signature verification for mail-in b****ts.

Thus, if there is ample evidence of v***r f***d that would be sufficient to alter the will of the people through this popular e******n, it is incumbent upon the state legislatures in those states to reclaim their authority over the E*******l College and rectify the fraud that has upended our e******n process.

Okay Guys, check this out and I have to thank BladeRunner for posting this. Here is what he posted:



Now based upon what Blade Runner Posted, and this changes the E*******l Map tremendously. The following is the control of the 50 states and their legislators and by party e*******l v**e goes to Trump or Biden:


1. Alabama-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
2. Alaska-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
3. Arizona-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
4. Arkansas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
5. California-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
6. Colorado-(House-Democrat, Senate- Republican)-Biden
7. Connecticut-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
8. Delaware-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
9. Florida-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
10. Georgia-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
11. Hawaii-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
12. Idaho-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
13. Illinois-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
14. Indiana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
15. Iowa-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
16. Kansas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
17. Kentucky-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
18. Louisiana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
19. Maine-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
20. Maryland-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
21. Massachusetts-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
22. Michigan-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
23. Minnesota-(House-Democrat, Senate- Republican)Undecided. Could go either way.
24. Mississippi-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
25. Missouri-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
26. Montana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
27. Nebraska-(trifectas-Republican)Trump
28. Nevada-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
29. New Hampshire-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
30. New Jersey-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
31. New Mexico-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
32. New York-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
33. North Carolina-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)
34. North Dakota-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
35. Ohio-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
36. Oklahoma-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
37. Oregon-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
38. Pennsylvania-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
39. Rhode Island-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
40. South Carolina-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
41. South Dakota-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
42. Tennessee-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
43. Texas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
44. Utah-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
45. Vermont-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
46. Virginia-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
47. Washington-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
48. West Virginia-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
49. Wisconsin-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
50. Wyoming-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump

Now Highlighted above are the six states that are in contention or where there is v***r f***d going on. So if the state legislators would take over when they have to decide on the e*****rities, it is perfectly legal for these legislators to v**e for their parties candidate. Making them responsible to the will of the people. Therefore, if it is done in this e******n then the score card for 270 would look like this:

Trump = 279 and Biden = 259

Now that's about what it should look like. Spread this with your friends and family. Let's see if we can make it go v***l.

Okay Guys, check this out and I have to thank BladeRunner for posting this. Here is what he posted:



Now based upon what Blade Runner Posted, and this changes the E*******l Map tremendously. The following is the control of the 50 states and their legislators and by party e*******l v**e goes to Trump or Biden:


1. Alabama-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
2. Alaska-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
3. Arizona-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
4. Arkansas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
5. California-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
6. Colorado-(House-Democrat, Senate- Republican)-Biden
7. Connecticut-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
8. Delaware-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
9. Florida-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
10. Georgia-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
11. Hawaii-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
12. Idaho-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
13. Illinois-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
14. Indiana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
15. Iowa-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
16. Kansas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
17. Kentucky-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
18. Louisiana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
19. Maine-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
20. Maryland-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
21. Massachusetts-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
22. Michigan-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
23. Minnesota-(House-Democrat, Senate- Republican)Undecided. Could go either way.
24. Mississippi-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
25. Missouri-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
26. Montana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
27. Nebraska-(trifectas-Republican)Trump
28. Nevada-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
29. New Hampshire-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
30. New Jersey-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
31. New Mexico-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
32. New York-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
33. North Carolina-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)
34. North Dakota-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
35. Ohio-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
36. Oklahoma-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
37. Oregon-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
38. Pennsylvania-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
39. Rhode Island-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
40. South Carolina-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
41. South Dakota-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
42. Tennessee-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
43. Texas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
44. Utah-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
45. Vermont-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
46. Virginia-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
47. Washington-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
48. West Virginia-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
49. Wisconsin-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
50. Wyoming-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump

Now Highlighted above are the six states that are in contention or where there is v***r f***d going on. So if the state legislators would take over when they have to decide on the e*****rities, it is perfectly legal for these legislators to v**e for their parties candidate. Making them responsible to the will of the people. Therefore, if it is done in this e******n then the score card for 270 would look like this:

Trump = 279 and Biden = 259

Now that's about what it should look like. Spread this with your friends and family. Let's see if we can make it go v***l.

Okay Guys, check this out and I have to thank BladeRunner for posting this. Here is what he posted:



Now based upon what Blade Runner Posted, and this changes the E*******l Map tremendously. The following is the control of the 50 states and their legislators and by party e*******l v**e goes to Trump or Biden:


1. Alabama-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
2. Alaska-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
3. Arizona-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
4. Arkansas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
5. California-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
6. Colorado-(House-Democrat, Senate- Republican)-Biden
7. Connecticut-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
8. Delaware-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
9. Florida-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
10. Georgia-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
11. Hawaii-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
12. Idaho-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
13. Illinois-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
14. Indiana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
15. Iowa-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
16. Kansas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
17. Kentucky-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
18. Louisiana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
19. Maine-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
20. Maryland-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
21. Massachusetts-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
22. Michigan-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
23. Minnesota-(House-Democrat, Senate- Republican)Undecided. Could go either way.
24. Mississippi-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
25. Missouri-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
26. Montana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
27. Nebraska-(trifectas-Republican)Trump
28. Nevada-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
29. New Hampshire-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
30. New Jersey-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
31. New Mexico-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
32. New York-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
33. North Carolina-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)
34. North Dakota-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
35. Ohio-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
36. Oklahoma-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
37. Oregon-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
38. Pennsylvania-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
39. Rhode Island-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
40. South Carolina-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
41. South Dakota-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
42. Tennessee-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
43. Texas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
44. Utah-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
45. Vermont-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
46. Virginia-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
47. Washington-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
48. West Virginia-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
49. Wisconsin-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
50. Wyoming-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump

Now Highlighted above are the six states that are in contention or where there is v***r f***d going on. So if the state legislators would take over when they have to decide on the e*****rities, it is perfectly legal for these legislators to v**e for their parties candidate. Making them responsible to the will of the people. Therefore, if it is done in this e******n then the score card for 270 would look like this:

Trump = 279 and Biden = 259

Now that's about what it should look like. Spread this with your friends and family. Let's see if we can make it go v***l.

Well we may have to go to war, not with the Dems, not yet but against the Media, for this reason:

Okay Mr. PeterS you asked for evidence, here you go:

To begin with, let me ask you this, how does foreign countries interfere in an American e******n? Russia uses disinformation right?

Well this is the first charge:

The media called the e******n for former Joe Biden. And they called him "President-elect"

According to the law, this is disinformation. Here's why- a candidate is only President-elect when the candidate's opponent concedes the e******n or when the e*******l college elects the candidate as president. Then the candidate can be called "President-Elect" this is the two conditions that the candidate's status changes. Therefore, what the media has done, is cry 'fire' in a crowded theater.

Therefore, the Media is guilty of misinformation but there is more:

How can the Media call an e******n before all the v**es are in? Especially when the polls are still open. In "Gore vs Bush" the Supreme Court said that the calling of the e******n for Gore in Florida, before the polls closed was improper and v**er suppression. In the case of the 2020 e******n Virginia was called when Trump had 49% and Biden had 26% of the v**e, and the polls were just closing. They called Arizona before the polls closed, and Trump had a modest lead in Arizona and when the call came in they predicted with perfect accuracy what the result would be down to the ballet. How is that possible, unless the media had inside information. This again is calling Fire in a crowded theater.

And there is more evidence if you want more evidence. In addition to a massive disinformation campaign against one candidate, they called the e******n before the e*******l college v**ed and began calling their guy President-elect. That is against the Law. This was argued in Gore vs Bush. Therefore this is media, not Russia, interference in an American E******n. The media cannot call any race, whether it be President, Senate, or House, or even the propositions until the Secretary of State of the particular state has released the certified talley.

But there is more. There was found to be a software glitch in a county of Wisconsin. This software glitch stole v**es from one candidate and applied it to another. Over 3,000 v**es were found that this effected. But that number is too small to effect an e******n right? But the same software was used in all counties of Wisconsin. There are 72 counties in the state of Wisconsin. Therefore that's 3,000 x 72 =216,000 v**es changed. Now that's 1/4 of a million v**es. This occured in not only Wisconsin but also other states, 30 other states, so that number could be in the millions of v**es changed. but there is more

It may be negligible, but there has been found that dead people had v**ed in this e******n. And this does seem and I agree to be negligible, however the other irregularity found in this e******n, is the total number of registered v**ers is less than the total number of v**es cast for the candidates. This number can be found by going to the particular state registrar office and comparing the number of registered v**ers to the number of v**es cast, and the number of v**es cast should be equal to or less than the number of registered v**ers. but there is more....

V**ers used a sharpie on the v****g b****t in Arizona, a numerous amount of b****ts were affected. Total number of affected b****ts is still unknown until the State reviews the b****ts. The b****t has state law written on the b****t, "Use only black or blue pen ink". This was not adhered to. As a result, and just as the warning on the b****t states, "Otherwise your v**e shall not be counted." per Arizona State Law. For a polster to try to guess the intent of the v**er, is too much for a human being to understand therefore the v**e should be thrown out. If done by mail, the v**er should be notified to redo their b****t and the spoiled b****t should be thrown out. This was not done here, instead the pollster made the decision. and there is more.........

When the results were coming in, there were b****t dumps. Please explain to me and the American public, that if I had a bag of marbles, 500,000 red and 500,000 blue, and I was counting the marbles and I take a random sample of the marbles say 20,000, how can all 20,000 marbles be of just one color? What are the odds? However according to the news this was true not once but many times for Biden v**es. The evidence is in the reporting of the news on e******n night. Are people sandbagging the b****ts? or what? Did they manufacture b****ts? What happened here? but there is more

Arizona was called for Biden, and Gov. Doug Ducey said, "Not so fast" and told the news media to retract their statement. The news media refused. That is calling Fire in a crowded theater for the state did not allow the media to call the state, yet the media called the state anyways. That is illegal!

Pete I like a good football, basketball, baseball, soccer, and hockey game. However when the players have to fight not only the opposing side, but also the refs I get a bit irate. And when the teams have to not only face the refs but also the local media, I get even more upset. Both are true in the 2020 e******n.

There is more evidence and I will post it as it comes up but this is a Contested E******n, where the States have not called any e******n therefore no candidate is in the xxx-elect status. On top of the litigation, for example the state of Penn, broke the Constitution by going through the governor and the courts rather than the legislator to decide on state law, therefore in violation of the US Constitution. Thus the Supreme Court Justice ordered the state to segregate the b****ts and not include them in the final tally, but did Penn do that? The question is unknown but to date that has not been done, and Penn is in violation of US General E******n laws.

Now the Media (MSNBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, CNN, FOX) are all publishers and not covered by the same rules as Facebook, Google, and Twitter. Yet all of these are guilty of Media interference with a P**********l e******n.

Therefore, Sleep well little buddy, enjoy your celebration, because the hang over will be a b***h.