One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Evidence of Joe Biden Corruption Just Keeps Piling Up, and the Media Refuses to Cover It
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Oct 30, 2020 19:34:55   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Awe... Poor fella... If only there were some sort of law or rule stating that private businesses must carry the news you want to watch😂😂😂😂

Why do people have so much trouble with the concept of businesses not being obligated to sell any given product???

Why do you have so much trouble with the concept of censorship in a free society. Oh yeah, YOU LIVE IN A C*******T COUNTRY!

Reply
Oct 30, 2020 20:52:05   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Parky60 wrote:
Why do you have so much trouble with the concept of censorship in a free society. Oh yeah, YOU LIVE IN A C*******T COUNTRY!


Because it's not censorship.... At least not the kind you're thinking of... Private companies are allowed to censor speech...

Here's an idea...
Start you're own media company... Print every story that comes along... Hope people like it... Earn some money and champion freedom... But then you'd also have to print stories that you don't like... Except you'd probably claim they're lies... So then you wouldn't have to print them... 😂😂😂

As an American, should you not be aware of what the first amendment entails???

And yes, I freely choose to live in China... A nation that you know nothing about... That censors information... Actually censors it... As in there is no choice involved on the part of the media or the public... And people don't whine like spoiled children about it... We just get a VPN and access wh**ever we want...

Reply
Oct 30, 2020 22:16:04   #
rebelwidacoz Loc: Illinois
 
Parky60 wrote:
Evidence of Joe Biden Corruption Just Keeps Piling Up, and the Media Refuses to Cover It
Tyler O'Neil ~ October 29, 2020
On Wednesday, Fox News host Tucker Carlson condemned the legacy media for attempting to bury the bombshell story of Tony Bobulinski, H****r B***n’s former business partner who has testified that Democratic nominee Joe Biden was involved in his family’s influence-peddling operations in China, Ukraine, and elsewhere. More and more sources have confirmed parts of Bobulinski’s story — most recently a Senate committee — but many media outlets have refused to cover it.

“Bobulinski told a remarkable story. Joe Biden — who once again could be [elected] president of the United States next week — was planning business deals with America’s most formidable global opponent. And when he was caught doing it, Joe Biden lied. And then he went further, he slandered an innocent man as a t*****r to his own country,” Carlson explained.

He lamented that “no one in America’s vast media landscape has pressed Joe Biden” for his excuse to smear Bobulinski. “Instead, reporters at all levels, and their editors, and their publishers, have openly collaborated with Joe Biden’s political campaign. That is unprecedented. It has never happened in American history.”

“This morning, the big papers completely ignored what Tony Bobulinski had to say, so did the other television networks. Not a single word about Bobulinski appeared on CNN or anywhere else. Newsweek decided to cover it but came to the conclusion that the real story was about Q***n, somehow,” Tucker added.

“This is Soviet-style suppression of information of a legitimate news story days before an e******n. The ramifications of it are impossible to imagine,” the Fox News host declared. “You should be offended by this not because the media are liberal but because this is an attack on our democracy. You’ve heard that phrase again and again. This is what it actually looks like. In a self-governing country, v**ers have a right to know, and obligation to know, who they’re v****g for.”

“In this case, they have the right to know that the Democratic nominee for president was a willing partner in his family’s lucrative influence-peddling operation. An operation that went on for decades and stretched from China and Ukraine, all the way to Oman, Romania, Luxembourg, and many other countries,” Carlson added. “This is not speculation, once again, and it is not a partisan attack. It’s true and Tony Bobulinski confirmed it.”

Indeed, a spokesperson for Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) told the Daily Caller that all the material Bobulinski provided that the committee had reviewed so far has turned out to be legitimate. The committee did not come across any “signs” or evidence to suggest the content is false.

This confirmation adds to a growing list of evidence suggesting that the bombshells revealed in H****r B***n’s emails and Bobulinski’s testimony are true. While the Biden campaign, Democrats, and legacy media outlets have insisted that the bombshells are Russian disinformation, Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, the FBI, and the DOJ rebutted that claim. Vladimir Putin himself came out in defense of Biden’s business deals.

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) claimed his staff had verified the H****r B***n emails. Team Biden has not claimed that the documents were forged. Perhaps most importantly, Bobulinski has risked his reputation to come forward, presenting reams of evidence to back up his story.

The former Biden business partner spoke with Tucker Carlson on Tuesday, recounting the sordid details of his business with the Bidens.

Evidence showed that H****r B***n introduced Bobulinksi to Joe Biden in Los Angeles in May 2017 with these words, “Dad, here’s the individual I told you about that’s helping us with the business that we’re working on and the Chinese.”

Bobulinski presented text messages in which H****r B***n said his “Chairman” — whom Bobulinski claimed was Joe Biden — vetoed a plan for stricter governance on their company doing business with the Chinese.

He also discussed a May 13, 2017 email showing that 10 percent of the company’s equity would go to Joe Biden.

Carlson later revealed that some of the documents detailing the corruption had gone missing, but the Bobulinski interview and the documents the former Biden business partner provided have not been lost.

“Millions of dollars linked to the C*******t Party of China went to Joe Biden’s family, not because they’re capable businessmen, they’re certainly not,” Tucker Carlson explained. “They were cut in on the world’s most lucrative business deals… for one reason. Because Joe Biden was a powerful government official willing to leverage his power on behalf of his family.”

“Now, if that’s not a crime, it’s very close to a crime. And it’s certainly something every person v****g should know about,” the Fox News host insisted.

Indeed, the scandal is quite damning. H****r B***n’s business deals in China arguably undercut America’s interests in military technology, nuclear technology, and rare earth minerals. His deals helped the Chinese in their oppression of the Muslim Uyghur minority.

Yet when the story first broke, Facebook and Twitter took unprecedented actions to suppress The New York Post bombshell. Twitter briefly suspended the accounts of the Trump campaign, the White House press secretary, and a congressional committee. Facebook, meanwhile, moved to suppress the Post article’s reach even before an independent fact check could be performed.

Media outlets also rushed to suppress the story. National Public Radio boasted about its decision not to cover the H****r B***n emails. CBS News’s Leslie Stahl even denied that Biden was facing a scandal at all. CNN’s Jake Tapper described the story as “just nonsense, crap, tied into Q***n, tied into Pizzagate, tied into the worst things you could say about a person — with no evidence, just completely made up.” Journalists started attacking other journalists for daring to post The New York Post story on Twitter.

As more and more of the t***h comes out, the corruption becomes ever more damning not just for Joe Biden’s campaign but for the legacy media who rushed to cover it up.
b Evidence of Joe Biden Corruption Just Keeps Pil... (show quote)


Well~ cuz` Tucker lost his explosive evidence that's why it is not being covered. News Flash ! I heard that it was recovered so hang in there on a pin and a needle.

Reply
 
 
Oct 30, 2020 22:23:22   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Because it's not censorship.... At least not the kind you're thinking of... Private companies are allowed to censor speech...

Here's an idea...
Start you're own media company... Print every story that comes along... Hope people like it... Earn some money and champion freedom... But then you'd also have to print stories that you don't like... Except you'd probably claim they're lies... So then you wouldn't have to print them... 😂😂😂

As an American, should you not be aware of what the first amendment entails???

And yes, I freely choose to live in China... A nation that you know nothing about... That censors information... Actually censors it... As in there is no choice involved on the part of the media or the public... And people don't whine like spoiled children about it... We just get a VPN and access wh**ever we want...
Because it's not censorship.... At least not the k... (show quote)

Facebook has 2.6 billion monthly users; 1.7 billion daily users
Instagram has 1 billion monthly users; 500 million daily users
Twitter 330 million monthly users; 135 million daily users
YouTube 1 billion users

I don’t care that they’re private companies, you find nothing wrong with being able to influence that many people by censoring media if they all have the same ideology? If you don’t, you’re a bigger fool than I thought.

Reply
Oct 31, 2020 00:00:53   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Parky60 wrote:
Facebook has 2.6 billion monthly users; 1.7 billion daily users
Instagram has 1 billion monthly users; 500 million daily users
Twitter 330 million monthly users; 135 million daily users
YouTube 1 billion users

I don’t care that they’re private companies, you find nothing wrong with being able to influence that many people by censoring media if they all have the same ideology? If you don’t, you’re a bigger fool than I thought.


Stop using them if you don't like their business model...

Don't be a whiny sheeple...

Reply
Oct 31, 2020 00:02:05   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
rebelwidacoz wrote:
Well~ cuz` Tucker lost his explosive evidence that's why it is not being covered. News Flash ! I heard that it was recovered so hang in there on a pin and a needle.


If FOX has information they should release it.. Not d**g it out...
It's almost as though they care more about their ratings than the t***h....

Reply
Oct 31, 2020 00:08:06   #
Digger47
 
Sooo, you do live in China? That explains a lot. You don't dare say anything negative about the Chinese government and they're censorship. They do bad things to people who talk bad about them!

Reply
 
 
Oct 31, 2020 00:23:40   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Digger47 wrote:
Sooo, you do live in China? That explains a lot. You don't dare say anything negative about the Chinese government and they're censorship. They do bad things to people who talk bad about them!


It does explain a lot...

Although I doubt you've hit the nail on this one...

If you were following the thread you would see where I pointed out that censorship...

Sigh...

Reply
Oct 31, 2020 00:33:33   #
Digger47
 
Like I said,, you have to play nice, your life depends on it!

Reply
Oct 31, 2020 01:08:22   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Digger47 wrote:
Like I said,, you have to play nice, your life depends on it!


Not in the least...

My life is in no danger...

Such hyperbole...

Reply
Oct 31, 2020 01:55:09   #
SSDD
 
drlarrygino wrote:
Private companies have no right to publish blatantly f**e news as the major networks have been doing for the last 4 years. News Networks are supposed to be non biased but nowadays most people know the media is more Lamestream than mainstream!!


Technically they do, and the offended party has the right to sue for slander and/or libel. Odd that you would take such a stance when the very "news organizations" I suspect you get your news from, that is their bread and butter, the lies they tell or perhaps better said as "the lies they sell". You seem well versed on the latest conspiracy theories, dis-information and propaganda, too well versed to not be getting your "news" from such sites. Those who live in glass houses...

Reply
 
 
Oct 31, 2020 02:15:09   #
SSDD
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Awe... Poor fella... If only there were some sort of law or rule stating that private businesses must carry the news you want to watch😂😂😂😂

Why do people have so much trouble with the concept of businesses not being obligated to sell any given product???


Wait.... What? Do you mean to tell me that if I do my research, go into a convenience store with the same kind of gun and same caliber and demand they sell me ammo for my gun, they don't have to sell it to me? It would be beneficial to someone robbing the joint for two reasons, A. The shop owner would KNOW the gun is loaded, and B. The shop owner would KNOW his own gun wasn't, on account they sold the ammo it was loaded with.

Damn, I gotta call my accomplices.... err.... I mean friends and tell them tonight is off. Be back later.

Reply
Oct 31, 2020 02:31:42   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Not in the least...

My life is in no danger...

Such hyperbole...
Everybody's life is in danger. This dynamic, ever-changing world is fraught with danger - man caused or otherwise. Pray for the best, prepare for the worst.

Reply
Oct 31, 2020 02:34:54   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Everybody's life is in danger. This dynamic, ever-changing world is fraught with danger - man caused or otherwise. Pray for the best, prepare for the worst.


Or just live life...

One beer at a time🍺

Reply
Oct 31, 2020 02:42:47   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
SSDD wrote:
Wait.... What? Do you mean to tell me that if I do my research, go into a convenience store with the same kind of gun and same caliber and demand they sell me ammo for my gun, they don't have to sell it to me? It would be beneficial to someone robbing the joint for two reasons, A. The shop owner would KNOW the gun is loaded, and B. The shop owner would KNOW his own gun wasn't, on account they sold the ammo it was loaded with.

Damn, I gotta call my accomplices.... err.... I mean friends and tell them tonight is off. Be back later.
Wait.... What? Do you mean to tell me that if I do... (show quote)
Where do you come up with this crap? If you had done your research, you would know that convenience stores don't sell guns and ammo. Your scenario of confronting a convenience store clerk with a gun in your hand is ludicrous. Many such clerks are armed.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.