Gun-wielding St. Louis couple seek prosecutor's removal (Page 2): Probably. Be hard to do though. Especially you thought your property was being destroyed.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Lonewolf wrote:

We agree but I think they would have been safer and smarter staying inside the house .

Probably. Be hard to do though. Especially you thought your property was being destroyed.

Lonewolf

JFlorio wrote:

Probably. Be hard to do though. Especially you thought your property was being destroyed.

Most states won't let you use deadly force to protect property. You need to convince them that you were certain you would be k**led if you didn't shoot.
Better done inside out of sight.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Lonewolf wrote:

Most states won't let you use deadly force to protect property. You need to convince them that you were certain you would be k**led if you didn't shoot.
Better done inside out of sight.

All true. Even the concealed carry instructor said if you k**l someone on your porch d**g them inside.

Lonewolf

JFlorio wrote:

All true. Even the concealed carry instructor said if you k**l someone on your porch d**g them inside.

And shoot to k**l then there is only one person in front of the judge telling the story.

teabag09

Lonewolf wrote:

They would have been smart to stay in the house pull some chairs up facing the door and shoot them when they entered then the law would have been on their side .

The law should be on their side anyway, they didn't shoot anyone just brandished weapons. Mike

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

teabag09 wrote:

The law should be on their side anyway, they didn't shoot anyone just brandished weapons. Mike

Ya want every moron waving a a gun at ya?

woodguru

byronglimish wrote:

They should receive medals for bravery in the face of d******c t*******ts.

Actually they should have simply stayed in their houses since there was not any "terrorist" acts being perpetrated. Being afraid something will be done has no reality with whether it actually happens.

Where is the line between that and shooting someone because they were scary A****a dudes?

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Well fool, there was no police presence and the mob had broken down the private property gate. They should have stayed inside so they could fire from cover if need be.

woodguru wrote:

Actually they should have simply stayed in their houses since there was not any "terrorist" acts being perpetrated. Being afraid something will be done has no reality with whether it actually happens.

Where is the line between that and shooting someone because they were scary A****a dudes?

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

woodguru wrote:

Actually they should have simply stayed in their houses since there was not any "terrorist" acts being perpetrated. Being afraid something will be done has no reality with whether it actually happens.

Where is the line between that and shooting someone because they were scary A****a dudes?

The mob of terrorists had already broke the security gate down.

Since you are a low information v**er, here is some news.

A****a has k**led some people already.

Even a pussy with a gun is dangerous.

You ever been in a shootout? I have and s**t happens real quick.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Bad Bob wrote:

Ya want every moron waving a a gun at ya?

We hope you don't have one.

son of witless

Bad Bob wrote:

Lockum up

For standing up to a Left Wing Street Mob ? You put me on that Jury and not only will they go free, but this prosecutor would be singled out for verbal abuse.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

son of witless wrote:

For standing up to a Left Wing Street Mob ? You put me on that Jury and not only will they go free, but this prosecutor would be singled out for verbal abuse.

Did they all have a big D on their chest?

son of witless

Bad Bob wrote:

Did they all have a big D on their chest?

If they di-int, why did the prosecutor charge the law abiding couple ? If the threatening mob had been right wing, the prosecutor would have given them a commendation.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

son of witless wrote:

If they di-int, why did the prosecutor charge the law abiding couple ? If the threatening mob had been right wing, the prosecutor would have given them a commendation.

Why would a prosecutor charge a law abiding couple ?

Prosecutors give commendations?

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Bad Bob wrote:

Why would a prosecutor charge a law abiding couple ?

Prosecutors give commendations?

Why would a prosecutor charge law abiding citizens???

Obviously the prosecutor has an agenda against the 2nd amendment.

And is a Soros funded hack.