Rule of Law wins again in Michigan
Oct 20, 2020 22:18:04 #
After Court Steps in…Republicans Score BIG Win in Democrat Ran State
Mark MegahanOctober 20, 2020
court
A court of appeals in Michigan has overturned a liberal lower judge’s ruling which would have allowed Democrats to keep packing the b****t box for a full two weeks after the e******n. Republicans are jumping for joy that every b****t must be received, not just postmarked, by 8:00 p.m. on the dot November 3.
Court sides with Republicans
Last month, liberals thought they scored a victory when the lower court ruled that “b****ts could be counted for a full two weeks from E******n day as long as they were postmarked by November 2nd. That’s not good enough to prevent e******n f***d.
The GOP’s top official, Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel, was thrilled, calling the fresh ruling “great news for e******n integrity.” Now if we can only get both sides to agree to and independent audit to confirm each and every v**e, the public might be able to trust the results.
Laura Cox, Chair of the Republican party in Michigan, couldn’t wait to whip out her phone for a tweet. “This is a great day for the rule of law,” she tapped. “It’s important that the rules aren’t changed during an e******n to advantage one party over another.”
Now that Twitter allows more characters, she added, “I applaud the Michigan Court of Appeals for standing up for the rule of law and the laws passed by the people’s representatives.”
Republicans really h**e it when Democrats try to turn our great system of elected officials into a system of mob rule. America is not a Democracy. In this case, the liberal judge was trying to legislate from the bench and got caught at it. The court is supposed to interpret laws and legal precedent, not make new ones, that’s the job of Congress.
The Legislature, not the judiciary
The three judge panel at the Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that “any changes must rest with the Legislature, not the judiciary. The liberal judge who gave the green light to the scheme didn’t even get the precedents right. Absentee b****t extensions have already been overturned by higher courts in Wisconsin and Indiana.
Judge Cynthia Stephens thought she could get away with a court order declaring on her own authority that “any b****ts postmarked by Nov. 2 could be counted if they arrived within two weeks after the Nov. 3 e******n.”
That ought to be just long enough to throw the e******n to the Democrats. The judge admitted that the mail-in b****t situation is total madness, citing “unrefuted evidence” of mail delivery problems because of the c****av***s p******c. For example, “more than 6,400 b****ts arrived too late to be counted in the August primary.”
She wants to make sure that Biden Backers can drop them off by the trunk load for a couple weeks after they find out how many they need to reverse the e******n night deficit.
The appeals court says that’s not her problem. “Although those factors may complicate plaintiffs’ v****g process, they do not automatically amount to a loss of the right to v**e absentee.”
Another controversial stunt Stephens tried to pull was allowing a spouse or even NON-family member to complete a b****t for someone if they couldn’t themselves, through some complicating factor like they aren’t alive anymore or moved out of state.
Mark MegahanOctober 20, 2020
court
A court of appeals in Michigan has overturned a liberal lower judge’s ruling which would have allowed Democrats to keep packing the b****t box for a full two weeks after the e******n. Republicans are jumping for joy that every b****t must be received, not just postmarked, by 8:00 p.m. on the dot November 3.
Court sides with Republicans
Last month, liberals thought they scored a victory when the lower court ruled that “b****ts could be counted for a full two weeks from E******n day as long as they were postmarked by November 2nd. That’s not good enough to prevent e******n f***d.
The GOP’s top official, Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel, was thrilled, calling the fresh ruling “great news for e******n integrity.” Now if we can only get both sides to agree to and independent audit to confirm each and every v**e, the public might be able to trust the results.
Laura Cox, Chair of the Republican party in Michigan, couldn’t wait to whip out her phone for a tweet. “This is a great day for the rule of law,” she tapped. “It’s important that the rules aren’t changed during an e******n to advantage one party over another.”
Now that Twitter allows more characters, she added, “I applaud the Michigan Court of Appeals for standing up for the rule of law and the laws passed by the people’s representatives.”
Republicans really h**e it when Democrats try to turn our great system of elected officials into a system of mob rule. America is not a Democracy. In this case, the liberal judge was trying to legislate from the bench and got caught at it. The court is supposed to interpret laws and legal precedent, not make new ones, that’s the job of Congress.
The Legislature, not the judiciary
The three judge panel at the Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that “any changes must rest with the Legislature, not the judiciary. The liberal judge who gave the green light to the scheme didn’t even get the precedents right. Absentee b****t extensions have already been overturned by higher courts in Wisconsin and Indiana.
Judge Cynthia Stephens thought she could get away with a court order declaring on her own authority that “any b****ts postmarked by Nov. 2 could be counted if they arrived within two weeks after the Nov. 3 e******n.”
That ought to be just long enough to throw the e******n to the Democrats. The judge admitted that the mail-in b****t situation is total madness, citing “unrefuted evidence” of mail delivery problems because of the c****av***s p******c. For example, “more than 6,400 b****ts arrived too late to be counted in the August primary.”
She wants to make sure that Biden Backers can drop them off by the trunk load for a couple weeks after they find out how many they need to reverse the e******n night deficit.
The appeals court says that’s not her problem. “Although those factors may complicate plaintiffs’ v****g process, they do not automatically amount to a loss of the right to v**e absentee.”
Another controversial stunt Stephens tried to pull was allowing a spouse or even NON-family member to complete a b****t for someone if they couldn’t themselves, through some complicating factor like they aren’t alive anymore or moved out of state.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.