Do you think it's un-American for the census to count how many Americans are in America (Page 11): come on byron, you know and everyone knows it was nothing more then a blocking move...

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

byronglimish wrote:

Garland didn't have the Senate v**es for confirmation.

Would've been "another" time wasting event by government.

come on byron, you know and everyone knows it was nothing more then a blocking move and did not follow protocol at all.. Garland was entitled to a v**e.. if not approved, then Obama was entitled to make another nomination...etc...

Cuda2020

Capt-jack wrote:

You and permafrost are so far left you can not see what is going on all around you! If you had a bit of education you would understand it is illegal to enter the US without a visa, all the people that have done that are criminals, plain and simple for most people to understand but you and permitdumb.

You say "no plan to become a socialistic state" You missed all of Berne Sanders's speeches!

I may be ill-informed but not uninformed as you two are.

Yeah I heard him and it's called democratic socialistic, meaning run by the people, not a dictator, big difference, but even with that said it'll never happen, Americans due to their capitalistic ways are they most wasteful, disposable people on the planet, we live to grade up, where'ya been Jack? You afraid to have something for the people and by the people. I'm thinking its beyond your comprehension on how that would work and you never try to inform yourself. It's called being in a preconceived rut.

Cuda2020

permafrost wrote:

come on byron, you know and everyone knows it was nothing more then a blocking move and did not follow protocol at all.. Garland was entitled to a v**e.. if not approved, then Obama was entitled to make another nomination...etc...

So true, LOL

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

permafrost wrote:

come on byron, you know and everyone knows it was nothing more then a blocking move and did not follow protocol at all.. Garland was entitled to a v**e.. if not approved, then Obama was entitled to make another nomination...etc...

Speaking of protocol...

The left has already shown their hand.

They are strongly advocating packing the court with socialist law benders.

Cuda2020

byronglimish wrote:

Speaking of protocol...

The left has already shown their hand.

They are strongly advocating packing the court with socialist law benders.

You mean packing like what the Trump party is doing. You people have really gone over the edge, you're so easily manipulated, and you just don't see it. That's it, ALLLLL the left is for pure unadulterated socialism, can't fool you. Lets divvy up everyone's salary, pass around the food bowl and all wear the same clothes and live in the same huts, yep, that's what we want.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Barracuda2020 wrote:

You mean packing like what the Trump party is doing. You people have really gone over the edge, you're so easily manipulated, and you just don't see it. That's it, ALLLLL the left is for pure unadulterated socialism, can't fool you.

Morning Fred...

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

byronglimish wrote:

Speaking of protocol...

The left has already shown their hand.

They are strongly advocating packing the court with socialist law benders.

Very doubtful, more apt to see age or term limits put on judges..

The law benders are called trump judges....

Kickaha Loc: Nebraska

Barracuda2020 wrote:

You mean packing like what the Trump party is doin... (show quote)

Barracuda, you are completely wrong on packing the court. Trump has not engaged in court packing. He has nominated someone for each vacancy on the court. If these were left leaning judges nominated for these openings, you would think everything is fine and proper. The Democrats are proposing court packing. They are not filling vacancies with judges that fit their ideology, they will create however many new positions necessary until they hold the majority on the court. Say the Democrats create six new justices now, what would stop the Republicans from creating ten new justices when they retake the majority in the Senate and the Presidency? We should back Ted Cruz's amendment to limit the number of Supreme Court justices to nine. That way we don't have to worry about either side politicizing the Supreme Court.

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

Kickaha wrote:

Barracuda, you are completely wrong on packing the... (show quote)

You might as well be talking to a brick wall Kickaha he's just like the rest of the Dems they all don't want any Conservatives and or Christians in Politics as they can't stand anyone disagreeing with them !

Kickaha Loc: Nebraska

4430 wrote:

You might as well be talking to a brick wall Kickaha he's just like the rest of the Dems they all don't want any Conservatives and or Christians in Politics as they can't stand anyone disagreeing with them !

I think the brick wall may have a higher IQ. Seriously though, the left is engaging in Goebbel's technique of the big lie. Tell a lie often enough and loud enough, it becomes the t***h. I cannot allow these lies and misinformation to go unchallenged. As Edmund Burke is credited with saying, the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men to do nothing.

debeda

Kickaha wrote:

Barracuda, you are completely wrong on packing the... (show quote)

debeda

4430 wrote:

You might as well be talking to a brick wall Kickaha he's just like the rest of the Dems they all don't want any Conservatives and or Christians in Politics as they can't stand anyone disagreeing with them !

And it's kind of scary that conservatives and Christians disagree with their whacked out policies😖😖😖

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

Kickaha wrote:

I think the brick wall may have a higher IQ. Seriously though, the left is engaging in Goebbel's technique of the big lie. Tell a lie often enough and loud enough, it becomes the t***h. I cannot allow these lies and misinformation to go unchallenged. As Edmund Burke is credited with saying, the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men to do nothing.

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

debeda wrote:

And it's kind of scary that conservatives and Christians disagree with their whacked out policies😖😖😖

Seems they are all for free speech IF it happens to agree with them !

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

4430 wrote:

Seems they are all for free speech IF it happens to agree with them !