lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Hope, gratitude and optimism sustains us..

I happen to think this way~~ There are two ways to be happy: improve your reality, or lower your expectations... Since lowering my expectations isn’t something I choose I like working on improving my reality. If you expect nothing from someone that’s ultimately what you’ll get...

I expect plenty from those I v**e into office and yet am not at all pleased with their performance...At this point I can’t lower my expectations anymore than I have already so it’s time to push towards Accountability and achievements..

Perfect example of lowered expectations is the common core introduction into our educational system and look what we wound up with because of it... No thank you..

Hug

Of Course!

Hug

Story has been out for a long time, not f**e news. Joe told all about it.

SSDD

I must have missed it, I KNOW I missed the news yesterday dye to being so busy. Since it is such "common knowledge" and being reported on "everywhere", I wonder why the stories I have read all seem to lack the contents or even mere details of those E-mails.

Since you seem so reluctant to provide any links and I have yet to find any that go into any details, well, I guess I will have to "eagle eye" the news and hope to catch wind of these details and if they continue to fail to provide the details... I guess in that case I will choose to consider it a non-issue, I certainly won't just take your word for it, I don't know you, don't know your sources and as I recall correctly, you have shown support for... We shall call it "mis-information" as I don't know if you KNEW it to be false before you posted it, otherwise I would call it dis-information, the difference is intent.





Edit: I just went back and saw the your comment that led to my reply that you were replying to (directly above your reply, duh on my part) and it seems you meant the reporting is that this mysterious E-mail that is so "damning" that nobody reports on this "damning content" was in fact from H****r, I never said H****r doesn't E-mail, I never questioned that the specific E-mail wasn't from him, I have only said that thus far, none of US, OPP posters, know what the details of this E-mail are and until we know more about this E-mail, speculation is a fool's game. Pardon me for not realizing my mistake earlier.

Tug484

Go to YouTube and type in Steven Crowder videos. It was posted yesterday or the day before with a picture of H****r passed out in bed with a crack pipe in his mouth.
The FBI should have already investigated this.
They've had the info for 13 months.
This has to do with national security and definitely blackmail if Bidens elected. Hatred for Trump should not give this a pass.
That whole family made millions off this garbage.

SSDD

Steven Crowder? Yeah, no thanks. I am not a fan of loud, h**e spewing, nut jobs, never liked his "Louder with Crowder" show and not of fan of him either.

Tug484

It's not his louder with Crowder.
It's an interview with Rudy and he's calm.

SSDD

Have NEVER seen a calm Steven Crowder, must be about as rare as a sane Rudy Giuliani moment, at least in recent years.

Tug484

This one is calm.
It even amazed me.

Big Dolly

I totally agree which is why I'm an Independent and don't support either party. Besides, no two people within the same party think exactly alike. For example, you'd be amazed to learn that some Democrats are against a******n while some Republicans support it! That's why I look beyond the party and at the individual candidates. Perhaps the reason why there's so much corruption in government is that far too many v**ers are allowing political parties to do their thinking for them.

SSDD

Ahem... lyin' to me now?



Just because it displays a "#CrowderTownHall" tag in lower left corner a majority of the video, that doesn't make it NOT a "Lowder with Crowder" episode, check the 0:12 mark and it clearly displays the "Louder with Crowder" opening logo.

Of course I will assume that perhaps you missed the logo. Compared to other videos I have seen of the ... Goose frabba, goose frabba, goose frabba, nah just kidding, not to say that I have any good opinion of the ...
Anyways, that is the most subdued that I have ever seen the guy. Of course he was still spewing h**e, just in a cheerful, joking manner and he was still spewing ... Well ... I can't really give him the benefit of doubt, he is ALWAYS spinning facts into fantasy, at least every time I have seen him. He is a fine purveyor of dis-information and conspiracy theory.

Rudy was typical Rudy though. Well ... Typical Rudy interviewed by someone allowing and even encouraging Rudy to push his current narrative unchecked that is. I have seen interviews where someone was giving mild pushback and ... Let's just say Rudy comes apart easy.

It was actually nice to see BOTH of them so calm, it isn't so common. That said, I really don't like wonderland and tend to avoid rabbit holes.

I did watch at least half of the video but saw nothing to point out the contents or even vague details of what precisely this E-mail was concerning. Something vague about a China or Chinese aspect, just nothing that gives any real idea of what it was regarding. I suppose that eventually we will either get more details or the E-mail will fall into obscurity. Either way we win, if there is a "there" there, criminal proceedings will hopefully bring justice, if not the E-mail will vanish into obscurity and both sides can stop arguing about it. Now that is what I call a win/win, no matter which way it goes, we ALL win.

SSDD

Some Democrats against? Some Republicans supporting? That aint nothing... I go BOTH ways on that issue.

I don't like a******n, but then I'm not so sure it is all too wise to try to deprive unwilling would-be mothers of a safe alternative to back alley or DIY solutions to a tricky situation. When one is desperate enough, even the most dangerous alternatives can start looking viable. Far too many policy issues create fairly insurmountable obstacles for my supporting EITHER party, that is why I am "party unaffiliated" myself.

Tug484

I didn't say louder with Crowder.
I said Steven Crowder up front.

SSDD

Wow... Really? I NEVER said you claimed the video was "Louder with Crowder", in fact, I said quite the opposite, that you claimed it WASN'T "Louder with Crowder" which it clearly was if you will notice the logo at the 0:12 mark. That is not to say that you intentionally lied to me, as I tongue in cheek accused you of in last reply as a JOKE, merely that MAYBE you were honestly unaware that it was in fact "Louder with Crowder", the very show I pointed out that I DON'T like. Let me AGAIN point you to what you DID say below.



By the way, I included that very same quote in last post as well, perhaps you should take your time when reading my posts, if you try to rush through them and then rush to judgement, you will in all likelihood misunderstand me completely, as you obviously did this last time around, made obvious by the fact you thought that I was saying that YOU said it WAS "Louder with Crowder". That isn't even in the same ballpark as what I was ACTUALLY saying, in fact polar opposite to what I said you claimed.

Again, in my last reply to you, the "accusation" of you lying to me, that was tongue in cheek as I went with the assumption that it was an honest mistake on your part and NOT an intentional lie. Please give me the benefit of the doubt in the future and if need be, read the post more than once to be sure you understand what I was saying. I find that in some cases, especially when I am tired or exhausted, I have to re-read other peoples' posts to be sure that I have the proper understanding and still, sometimes even so, I get it wrong.

Tug484

I did read it.
If louder with Crowder was in the video, I didn't see it.
I'm merely pointing out the YouTube channel only said Steven Crowder .