One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Thoughts - Should morality be legislated???
Oct 15, 2020 05:59:52   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Durex gets it for going too far
CHINADAILY

Durex, a well-known condom brand, is at the center of online discussions over a fine imposed on its micro blog for a risque advertisement.

The Shanghai Municipal Administration for Market Regulation fined the company running its official microblog 810,000 yuan ($120,509) in December, but the issue became public knowledge on social networking sites only on Thursday. Many users defended Durex, saying that a condom producer has the license to sex up its advertisements.

However, a closer look at the administration's order shows that the advertisement company was penalized not for mentioning "sex" but for breaking some social norms while collaborating with fast food delivery brand ele.me, milk tea brand Heytea and cinema ticket sales platform Taopiaopiao on April 19, 2019. The idea was to market the date, 4.19 or "four one nine", as "for one night", thus encouraging people to have a one-night stand.

Besides, the content Durex used in advertisement posters is quite suggestive. Advertising with the milk tea brand, it lured customers saying, "Not a single drop left", but it was obvious it was hinting at a man's semen. The poster with ele.me said, "Tonight we feed every mouth", leaving no one in doubt that the mouth here referred to the female g*****l organ. The poster with Taopiaopiao screamed, "Tonight just go into that secret corner", giving no prizes for guessing what was implied.

More than hinting at sex, the advertisement drew criticism for alluding to people's private parts. The administration's order clearly listed the procedure for paying the fine, while also saying the company could apply for a hearing if it disagreed with the decision. That the latter did not apply means it accepts it has gone too far this time and there is no reason to blame the administration.

The advertisement should serve as a reminder to all commercial campaigns that advertising about sex might be okay, but encouraging one-night stands is a strict no-no.

Reply
Oct 15, 2020 06:33:01   #
Big dog
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Durex gets it for going too far
CHINADAILY

Durex, a well-known condom brand, is at the center of online discussions over a fine imposed on its micro blog for a risque advertisement.

The Shanghai Municipal Administration for Market Regulation fined the company running its official microblog 810,000 yuan ($120,509) in December, but the issue became public knowledge on social networking sites only on Thursday. Many users defended Durex, saying that a condom producer has the license to sex up its advertisements.

However, a closer look at the administration's order shows that the advertisement company was penalized not for mentioning "sex" but for breaking some social norms while collaborating with fast food delivery brand ele.me, milk tea brand Heytea and cinema ticket sales platform Taopiaopiao on April 19, 2019. The idea was to market the date, 4.19 or "four one nine", as "for one night", thus encouraging people to have a one-night stand.

Besides, the content Durex used in advertisement posters is quite suggestive. Advertising with the milk tea brand, it lured customers saying, "Not a single drop left", but it was obvious it was hinting at a man's semen. The poster with ele.me said, "Tonight we feed every mouth", leaving no one in doubt that the mouth here referred to the female g*****l organ. The poster with Taopiaopiao screamed, "Tonight just go into that secret corner", giving no prizes for guessing what was implied.

More than hinting at sex, the advertisement drew criticism for alluding to people's private parts. The administration's order clearly listed the procedure for paying the fine, while also saying the company could apply for a hearing if it disagreed with the decision. That the latter did not apply means it accepts it has gone too far this time and there is no reason to blame the administration.

The advertisement should serve as a reminder to all commercial campaigns that advertising about sex might be okay, but encouraging one-night stands is a strict no-no.
Durex gets it for going too far br CHINADAILY br ... (show quote)


One night stands are fine for the lesser animals, but those of us of higher intellect have evolved into thinking differently. Even wolves have life partners.

Reply
Oct 15, 2020 07:27:43   #
billy a Loc: South Florida
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Durex gets it for going too far
CHINADAILY

Durex, a well-known condom brand, is at the center of online discussions over a fine imposed on its micro blog for a risque advertisement.

The Shanghai Municipal Administration for Market Regulation fined the company running its official microblog 810,000 yuan ($120,509) in December, but the issue became public knowledge on social networking sites only on Thursday. Many users defended Durex, saying that a condom producer has the license to sex up its advertisements.

However, a closer look at the administration's order shows that the advertisement company was penalized not for mentioning "sex" but for breaking some social norms while collaborating with fast food delivery brand ele.me, milk tea brand Heytea and cinema ticket sales platform Taopiaopiao on April 19, 2019. The idea was to market the date, 4.19 or "four one nine", as "for one night", thus encouraging people to have a one-night stand.

Besides, the content Durex used in advertisement posters is quite suggestive. Advertising with the milk tea brand, it lured customers saying, "Not a single drop left", but it was obvious it was hinting at a man's semen. The poster with ele.me said, "Tonight we feed every mouth", leaving no one in doubt that the mouth here referred to the female g*****l organ. The poster with Taopiaopiao screamed, "Tonight just go into that secret corner", giving no prizes for guessing what was implied.

More than hinting at sex, the advertisement drew criticism for alluding to people's private parts. The administration's order clearly listed the procedure for paying the fine, while also saying the company could apply for a hearing if it disagreed with the decision. That the latter did not apply means it accepts it has gone too far this time and there is no reason to blame the administration.

The advertisement should serve as a reminder to all commercial campaigns that advertising about sex might be okay, but encouraging one-night stands is a strict no-no.
Durex gets it for going too far br CHINADAILY br ... (show quote)


One-nighters have been around since the first woman smiled at the first man. They don't need to be marketed.
Some board-room firebrand just wants to enhance his company's image ; like showing close-ups of mouth-watering fried chicken, or the pretty girl you'll meet if you wear a certain cologne.
Morality will never be influenced by a government. They may fine a company for marketing quickies, but that's a battle won, not the war. The governments would do better to encourage a spiritual lifestyle, enhancing the individual's morality.

Reply
 
 
Oct 15, 2020 07:45:44   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
billy a wrote:
One-nighters have been around since the first woman smiled at the first man. They don't need to be marketed.
Some board-room firebrand just wants to enhance his company's image ; like showing close-ups of mouth-watering fried chicken, or the pretty girl you'll meet if you wear a certain cologne.
Morality will never be influenced by a government. They may fine a company for marketing quickies, but that's a battle won, not the war. The governments would do better to encourage a spiritual lifestyle, enhancing the individual's morality.
One-nighters have been around since the first woma... (show quote)


Well said

Reply
Oct 15, 2020 09:25:27   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Durex gets it for going too far
CHINADAILY

Durex, a well-known condom brand, is at the center of online discussions over a fine imposed on its micro blog for a risque advertisement.

The Shanghai Municipal Administration for Market Regulation fined the company running its official microblog 810,000 yuan ($120,509) in December, but the issue became public knowledge on social networking sites only on Thursday. Many users defended Durex, saying that a condom producer has the license to sex up its advertisements.

However, a closer look at the administration's order shows that the advertisement company was penalized not for mentioning "sex" but for breaking some social norms while collaborating with fast food delivery brand ele.me, milk tea brand Heytea and cinema ticket sales platform Taopiaopiao on April 19, 2019. The idea was to market the date, 4.19 or "four one nine", as "for one night", thus encouraging people to have a one-night stand.

Besides, the content Durex used in advertisement posters is quite suggestive. Advertising with the milk tea brand, it lured customers saying, "Not a single drop left", but it was obvious it was hinting at a man's semen. The poster with ele.me said, "Tonight we feed every mouth", leaving no one in doubt that the mouth here referred to the female g*****l organ. The poster with Taopiaopiao screamed, "Tonight just go into that secret corner", giving no prizes for guessing what was implied.

More than hinting at sex, the advertisement drew criticism for alluding to people's private parts. The administration's order clearly listed the procedure for paying the fine, while also saying the company could apply for a hearing if it disagreed with the decision. That the latter did not apply means it accepts it has gone too far this time and there is no reason to blame the administration.

The advertisement should serve as a reminder to all commercial campaigns that advertising about sex might be okay, but encouraging one-night stands is a strict no-no.
Durex gets it for going too far br CHINADAILY br ... (show quote)


America: "if an erection lasts more than 4 hours, seek medical attention".

Reply
Oct 15, 2020 10:27:17   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
lpnmajor wrote:
America: "if an erection lasts more than 4 hours, seek medical attention".


Been there

Not a funny joke

(Although I have to admit it was a pretty decent burn... Cross country team hazing of the freshmen...Those were the days😂😂😂)

Reply
Oct 15, 2020 10:57:01   #
kemmer
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Durex gets it for going too far
CHINADAILY

Durex, a well-known condom brand, is at the center of online discussions over a fine imposed on its micro blog for a risque advertisement.

The Shanghai Municipal Administration for Market Regulation fined the company running its official microblog 810,000 yuan ($120,509) in December, but the issue became public knowledge on social networking sites only on Thursday. Many users defended Durex, saying that a condom producer has the license to sex up its advertisements.

However, a closer look at the administration's order shows that the advertisement company was penalized not for mentioning "sex" but for breaking some social norms while collaborating with fast food delivery brand ele.me, milk tea brand Heytea and cinema ticket sales platform Taopiaopiao on April 19, 2019. The idea was to market the date, 4.19 or "four one nine", as "for one night", thus encouraging people to have a one-night stand.

Besides, the content Durex used in advertisement posters is quite suggestive. Advertising with the milk tea brand, it lured customers saying, "Not a single drop left", but it was obvious it was hinting at a man's semen. The poster with ele.me said, "Tonight we feed every mouth", leaving no one in doubt that the mouth here referred to the female g*****l organ. The poster with Taopiaopiao screamed, "Tonight just go into that secret corner", giving no prizes for guessing what was implied.

More than hinting at sex, the advertisement drew criticism for alluding to people's private parts. The administration's order clearly listed the procedure for paying the fine, while also saying the company could apply for a hearing if it disagreed with the decision. That the latter did not apply means it accepts it has gone too far this time and there is no reason to blame the administration.

The advertisement should serve as a reminder to all commercial campaigns that advertising about sex might be okay, but encouraging one-night stands is a strict no-no.
Durex gets it for going too far br CHINADAILY br ... (show quote)

Since people started to write, legislating morality has always been a failure. People will always find a way around morality laws.

Reply
 
 
Oct 16, 2020 13:22:20   #
F.D.R.
 
Morality can't be legislated, well they can try but different people have different idea's on what's moral. Just look around.

Reply
Oct 16, 2020 23:16:32   #
teabag09
 
Big dog wrote:
One night stands are fine for the lesser animals, but those of us of higher intellect have evolved into thinking differently. Even wolves have life partners.


So do Canada Geese. Mike

Reply
Oct 17, 2020 08:42:17   #
Big dog
 
teabag09 wrote:
So do Canada Geese. Mike


Exactly!!

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.