Bigmac495 Loc: Indiana

Evidently your idea of factual proof is only in your warped mind! I can't post fact that it was a congressional bill because it wasn't. You said that , not me. I posted a very plain site showing it was a bill enacted by the state of Georgia which you evidently can't understand . I'm through trying to tell you something that you might want to ponder and do some research on by your self. It's a total waste of time both both of us!

Bigmac495 Loc: Indiana

That will work! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Ranger7374 Loc: Arizona, 40 miles from the border in the DMZ

Now this could be a stretch for factual proof. It isn't on the issue of the Guillotines but it is an issue for obstruction of Justice, and how the Department of Justice, under Eric Holder, led ultimately by President Obama, has been c*********d.

I present testimony for special counsel for the IRS Scandal by Jay Sekulow, from the American Center For Law and Justice, as Evidence that the Executive Department, more specifically the Department of Justice has been c*********d, as a result of this compromise, the Executive Department cannot be trusted, in a court of law, until its leaders are brought to Justice by independent counsel. This must be done by Congress.

May I remind you that obstruction of justice is an impeachable offense. The evidence of obstruction is here at http://media.aclj.org/pdf/jay-sekulow-congressional-testimony-irs-scandal-request-for-special-counsel.pdf

Now, I am not a lawyer, but when the Head attorney for the American Center for Law and Justice, states in his testimony that,

"The emails that I have referenced and included with my written statement for the record directly link the DOJ as potential co-conspirators in the crime that is the focus of its investigation.

The DOJ has been c*********d.

The DOJ no longer has the credibility to argue that a Special Counsel should not be appointed. I am well aware of the standard for assigning a Special Counsel.

Because of the separation of powers principals established in the U.S. Constitution, federal law enforcement is an executive function. As such, the power to appoint a Special Counsel to conduct criminal investigations and prosecutions on behalf of the United States lies solely with the Attorney General. Both H.Res. 565 and the joint letter sent to Attorney General Holder accurately state the standards for the appointment of a Special Counsel. These standards are found in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which states that a Special Counsel should be appointed when an Attorney General determines that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted and; that
investigation or prosecution would present a conflict of interest for the Department or other extraordinary circumstances; and that under the circumstances, it would be in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the matter.

It should be clear that all of these elements have been met. We already know that a criminal investigation is warranted. Indeed, the Attorney General launched just such an investigation last
year. The conflict of interest is also obvious. In fact, there are multiple conflicts."--Jay Sekulow, Attorney for the American Center For Law and Justice

and in conclusion Jay testifies, "The targeting of any American based upon their personal beliefs or freedoms of association is
repugnant to the Constitution. Americans are outraged, and its time for a real investigation. We need to know what happened. Those responsible for this scandal must be brought to justice.
In this case, the IRS and the DOJ have proven that they are completely c*********d on this investigation.

The Constitution requires the President to faithfully execute the laws of the United States by defending the First Amendment rights of all American citizens. If my clients are going to find
justice, we must have a Special Counsel."--Jay Sekulow.

This thus, shows conspiracy and obstruction, between the IRS and the Department of Justice. Justice is thus, c*********d. If the Department of Justice is truly guilty of conspiracy and obstruction here, then what other areas have be c*********d by the Obama Administration?

Which may make the Guillotine issue, probable. Interesting huh?

semper-fi Loc: Corrupticut

Scary stuff but I can see our govt doing this. Lock and load
Pilgrims this could get ugly.

Ranger7374 Loc: Arizona, 40 miles from the border in the DMZ

Well, if you are going to obstruct justice, you are capable of anything....against the people.

semper-fi Loc: Corrupticut

Very.

Ranger7374 Loc: Arizona, 40 miles from the border in the DMZ

Just a lesson from AZ SB1070. When the law refuses to enforce the law, the people take matters into their own hands. A famous example of this is why the South succeeded from the union. They charged the federal government with crimes against the constitution. This was in the efforts of James Buchanan who did nothing to return the fugitives of s***e states back to southern states.

Lincoln after the war, tried up until his death, to unite the country. He took the loss of life at Gettysburg, very personally. He was then the last casualty of the war, and his vice president would be impeached. Go figure. Sound familiar?