One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Biden's SCOTUS picks
Page 1 of 2 next>
Sep 28, 2020 15:38:16   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
Notice not one Constitutional judge.



Reply
Sep 28, 2020 17:35:43   #
Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Notice not one Constitutional judge.


All corrupt!

Reply
Sep 28, 2020 18:02:58   #
Seth
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Notice not one Constitutional judge.


Today's Democrats don't appoint justices based on their Constitutional expertise, they appoint political activists.

Reply
 
 
Sep 29, 2020 12:56:47   #
FallenOak Loc: St George Utah
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Notice not one Constitutional judge.


Look at the requirements for a Supreme Court Justice. There are no requirements at all. I think if you are breathing you qualify.

Reply
Sep 29, 2020 13:31:40   #
Seth
 
FallenOak wrote:
Look at the requirements for a Supreme Court Justice. There are no requirements at all. I think if you are breathing you qualify.


This is true, but since these justices are supposed to be Constitutionalists, there is no place on the Court for activists of either party's political persuasion -- their job is to rule on constitutionality, not on "how they feel" about an issue at hand.

The Democrats appoint activists where they can, the farther left the better, whereas Trump nominates originalists as the founders intended to have on the Court.

When Hillary lost in the primaries to Obama and then agreed to throw her dubious weight behind his campaign, I believe she was hoping he would nominate her for the next justice slot -- can you imagine Hillary as an associate justice on SCOTUS? -- so she would have an influential position for life, but he didn't want anyone that self-seeking and downright treacherous in that position, so he made her SecState, from whence she was instrumental in making millions of dollars for both of them, much more useful to his own corrupt ambitions.

Reply
Sep 29, 2020 13:39:08   #
woodguru
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Notice not one Constitutional judge.


Bullcrap...his first pick would be Merrick Garland, a slightly right leaning republican centrist with an absolutely sterling record for adhering to the laws and precedents.

..and dem supreme court "packing" (which will happen by the way) will be tightly defined centrists with long judicial histories, judges that will have full approval from the BAR. They will not be liberal, although the right sees anything toward the center from their hard right religiously driven judges as liberals in comparison.

Reply
Sep 29, 2020 13:41:34   #
Seth
 
woodguru wrote:
Bullcrap...his first pick would be Merrick Garland, a slightly right leaning republican centrist with an absolutely sterling record for adhering to the laws and precedents.

..and dem supreme court "packing" (which will happen by the way) will be tightly defined centrists with long judicial histories, judges that will have full approval from the BAR. They will not be liberal, although the right sees anything toward the center from their hard right religiously driven judges as liberals in comparison.
Bullcrap...his first pick would be Merrick Garland... (show quote)


As right of center as, say, Sonya Sotomayor?

Reply
 
 
Sep 29, 2020 14:05:58   #
FallenOak Loc: St George Utah
 
Seth wrote:
This is true, but since these justices are supposed to be Constitutionalists, there is no place on the Court for activists of either party's political persuasion -- their job is to rule on constitutionality, not on "how they feel" about an issue at hand.

The Democrats appoint activists where they can, the farther left the better, whereas Trump nominates originalists as the founders intended to have on the Court.

When Hillary lost in the primaries to Obama and then agreed to throw her dubious weight behind his campaign, I believe she was hoping he would nominate her for the next justice slot -- can you imagine Hillary as an associate justice on SCOTUS? -- so she would have an influential position for life, but he didn't want anyone that self-seeking and downright treacherous in that position, so he made her SecState, from whence she was instrumental in making millions of dollars for both of them, much more useful to his own corrupt ambitions.
This is true, but since these justices are suppose... (show quote)


Agree. However the first politicians of our country did not see politics as their career. Businessmen and farmers they were. Today that is no longer the case. Colleges teach political science as a career activity. It is truly time for this nation to put a maximum amount of time a person can spend in ‘public service’. We are getting a group that equates to the royalty and dictators of the rest of the world. Politicians should also be paid no more than the mean salary of the district they represent. If they leave office much richer than when they were elected they should be vigorously investigated.

Reply
Sep 29, 2020 15:16:45   #
11Bravo
 
Send those turds on a 1 way sabattical to Gitmo.

Reply
Sep 29, 2020 15:50:26   #
Seth
 
FallenOak wrote:
Agree. However the first politicians of our country did not see politics as their career. Businessmen and farmers they were. Today that is no longer the case. Colleges teach political science as a career activity. It is truly time for this nation to put a maximum amount of time a person can spend in ‘public service’. We are getting a group that equates to the royalty and dictators of the rest of the world. Politicians should also be paid no more than the mean salary of the district they represent. If they leave office much richer than when they were elected they should be vigorously investigated.
Agree. However the first politicians of our count... (show quote)


I've been a strong advocate of term limits for a long time. Politics shouldn't be a career field, if for no other reason than the fact that the longer someone stays in Washington, the more he/she loses touch with the realities of life in the private sector and prioritizes his/her political career over the well-being of the people.

The founders didn't want a ruling class.

Reply
Sep 29, 2020 17:54:17   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
Seth wrote:
This is true, but since these justices are supposed to be Constitutionalists, there is no place on the Court for activists of either party's political persuasion -- their job is to rule on constitutionality, not on "how they feel" about an issue at hand.

The Democrats appoint activists where they can, the farther left the better, whereas Trump nominates originalists as the founders intended to have on the Court.

When Hillary lost in the primaries to Obama and then agreed to throw her dubious weight behind his campaign, I believe she was hoping he would nominate her for the next justice slot -- can you imagine Hillary as an associate justice on SCOTUS? -- so she would have an influential position for life, but he didn't want anyone that self-seeking and downright treacherous in that position, so he made her SecState, from whence she was instrumental in making millions of dollars for both of them, much more useful to his own corrupt ambitions.
This is true, but since these justices are suppose... (show quote)


As you said they are supposed to not feel wh**ever but interpret the Constitution.

Reply
 
 
Sep 29, 2020 18:37:58   #
PulletSurprise Loc: Columbus, GA
 
FallenOak wrote:
Agree. However the first politicians of our country did not see politics as their career. Businessmen and farmers they were. Today that is no longer the case. Colleges teach political science as a career activity. It is truly time for this nation to put a maximum amount of time a person can spend in ‘public service’. We are getting a group that equates to the royalty and dictators of the rest of the world. Politicians should also be paid no more than the mean salary of the district they represent. If they leave office much richer than when they were elected they should be vigorously investigated.
Agree. However the first politicians of our count... (show quote)


This is about as good as it gets!
You have the right ingredients for a successful recipe if one accurately measures and steadily stirs the pot.

Reply
Sep 29, 2020 19:02:07   #
Big Kahuna
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Notice not one Constitutional judge.


Just what we need, more social injustice warriors polluting the court. Are they all African American lesbians or t*********red??

Reply
Sep 29, 2020 19:06:32   #
Big Kahuna
 
Seth wrote:
As right of center as, say, Sonya Sotomayor?


Sonya is even a r****t. She favored a person of color who scored lower on an exam and had lesser experience over a white man who scored higher and had greater experience in one of her "affirmative action" r****t vendetta's.

Reply
Sep 29, 2020 19:08:50   #
Big Kahuna
 
11Bravo wrote:
Send those turds on a 1 way sabattical to Gitmo.


Gitmo will be filled with ovommit, Hitlery, the intelligence t*****rs and the deep staters before Trump ends his 2nd term. Send T*****r Joe's Supreme picks there too. Hard labor would be good for all of them.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.