Trump launches fresh attack on McCain after widow endorses Biden
Sep 24, 2020 09:04:51 #
jim_oldman wrote:
Michael"01" No 10 here. Add this to all your positive replies.
Real Class act this window. She picks a fight & then expects no retaliation because she's a window.
All Trump said was she could "have Sleepy Joe."
Go figure she (or you) took it as Trump was letting her have "One Loser for Another."
Real Class act this window. She picks a fight & then expects no retaliation because she's a window.
All Trump said was she could "have Sleepy Joe."
Go figure she (or you) took it as Trump was letting her have "One Loser for Another."
Sep 24, 2020 09:06:59 #
JFlorio wrote:
Damn! and I was just getting deplorable down.
Lololol.. Don’t let despicable catch on we prefer deplorable anyway!!! 😂🤣😊
They are the Despicable, anyway~...
Sep 24, 2020 09:50:51 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
Wonttakeitanymore wrote:
The dems are always confused on hero’s and villains!!!
Exactly. Look who they want to name streets after now.
Sep 24, 2020 12:53:00 #
America 1
Loc: South Miami
lpnmajor wrote:
A despicable president for despicable people.
Now you're adding despicable to deplorable.
Only word despicable enough for you liberals has not yet been discovered.
Sep 24, 2020 15:36:17 #
Michael10 wrote:
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday launched a ... (show quote)
A. How ignorant are you? That suckers thing was debunked. B. You didn't know songbird, did you? We met briefly. The man used relatives who could advance his military career like toilet paper. THAT is your hero.
Sep 24, 2020 15:41:44 #
JFlorio wrote:
Her husband was a POS, not surprising she'd endorse Beijing Biden.
Not at all. Both sold out America, so in a sense both are t*****rs. It wasn't wartime so Biden slipped by that one. For free songbird gave away coordinates to his uncles' ships (a great nephew). At least for money there was a reason, he just did it because he wanted to show that he could. Mao must have been so pleased.
Sep 24, 2020 15:47:41 #
JFlorio wrote:
How do you know?
I don't know for a fact, but I agree with CD. Michael is too succinct yet writes a full message. Rumi has the succinct down, but he seems to think 'that's good enough' and doesn't really finish his post.
Sep 24, 2020 15:54:19 #
lindajoy wrote:
Agree.. All political posturing to keep herself in the news now that her husband can’t do it for them..I guess all her comments of Trump are to be forgotten simply because she was married to McCain..If she doesn’t want retaliation for her actions then perhaps she should keep quiet.. Who cares how she is v****g anyway?? I surely do not...
Because she was married to McCain she really should hide and never be seen with decent people again. However, this is a libcom with shaky rules.
Sep 24, 2020 15:56:40 #
JFlorio wrote:
Have you read his i***tic blather? What else would he do? No way he has a job, unless it is trolling.
You mean the gibberish that ALWAYS has at least one mispelling?
Sep 24, 2020 16:56:47 #
RandyBrian wrote:
Keep up with the facts, please, Michael. Repeating old debunked news is not flattering to you. The only veteran the President has ever called a loser was John McCain. And he was accurate in his charactorization.
Trump was totally accurate.
Sep 24, 2020 23:30:15 #
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Because she was married to McCain she really should hide and never be seen with decent people again. However, this is a libcom with shaky rules.
Hide!!! exactly !!!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.