Alexander Hamilton said, "A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger, is prepared for a master and deserves one."

Do you want a master? Do we need a master? Does America need a master?

Ask a Democrat and although they would outwardly say "No", they demonstrate "Yes".

How do they do that? Well I would say, the elite of the Democrat Party, demands that the people, do as they say not as they do. Nancy Pelosi proved that at a hair dresser's appointment. In 1964 Ronald Reagan speaking for Barry Goldwater, demonstrated the fact that the Democrat party, a once honorable political party, has turned to the philosophy of Carol Marx, and the principles of Stalin and Lenin. This has been coming for a long time.

Here is a question to demonstrate my point: Would you rather someone else tell you what e******y is, or would you rather have the freedom to be equal?

Exploring my question, I have found that the first part of the question, is a master/s***e relationship, "I tell you therefore it is", where as the latter part of the question, places the definition on the person. This definition has to be agreed on by the individual, otherwise the individual does exercise it.

Banning anything, with the exception of bans against people for the sake of sex, color, creed, or culture, is wrong and will always end up in a fight of sorts. But to nominate a person to dictate how we think therefore live, is an act of a totalitarian. And Hitler, Mussolini, Lenin and Stalin, as well as Saddam Hussein were all totalitarians.

Caesar Augustus, and Julius Caesar were also totalitarians. When a small group of people, feel they know better than the people, then the lust for power becomes somewhat dangerous and criminal. There is hope though.

Once a people have experienced freedom, there is no turning back. To the totalitarian, freedom and hope, are a disease. A disease that must be stopped. If we cripple the people by taking away their religion, then they have to believe in us. Then we disrupt the family unit, either with divorce or a******n or both. Without religion why should a man and wife stay together? Then those who still hope, we prevent them from congregating. Then we take their weapons away from them so they can't defend themselves. If they get out of line then we can stop them by making up wh**ever slander we can dream up with until no one believes the story and it becomes circumstantial at best. For the story will drowned out the t***h.

This is what we have become in today's society. We are going to be asked to make a choice-Trump or Biden. Do we give the power to a person who lets us choose, like Trump. Or do we give it to Biden, a person who will mandate how we live?

I lived through Carter, Clinton, and Obama, and each of them, either inadvertently or deliberately told the American people how to live. Whereas, Reagan and Trump gave that decision to the people. So when you hear, "Trump is not leading" has it ever dawned upon you that Trump like Reagan is giving you the choice. Decide for yourself.

Look at the mask issue. Trump wants to leave the decision up to the individual. That's freedom. Biden says he will mandate that all must wear a mask. Facts are facts, and facts can be disputed and put the fire. But this fact always remains the same: If a person is mandated, many will not follow that mandate. But if you want to wear a mask, many will.

So the Democrats claim, "Trump is not leading" because he allows the individual to make up their own minds.

Why can't the individual make up their own mind? Oh yea, because we must be told how to make up our own minds? Is that really freedom? Freedom is when the individual chooses, so who has the right to choose?

If we reverse Roe vs Wade, does that mean a******ns will not happen? Or does that mean the people not the government will make that choice?

The e******n of 2020 is coming upon us, which do you choose?

Alexander Hamilton said, "A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger, is prepared for a master and deserves one."

Do you want a master? Do we need a master? Does America need a master?

Ask a Democrat and although they would outwardly say "No", they demonstrate "Yes".

How do they do that? Well I would say, the elite of the Democrat Party, demands that the people, do as they say not as they do. Nancy Pelosi proved that at a hair dresser's appointment. In 1964 Ronald Reagan speaking for Barry Goldwater, demonstrated the fact that the Democrat party, a once honorable political party, has turned to the philosophy of Carol Marx, and the principles of Stalin and Lenin. This has been coming for a long time.

Here is a question to demonstrate my point: Would you rather someone else tell you what e******y is, or would you rather have the freedom to be equal?

Exploring my question, I have found that the first part of the question, is a master/s***e relationship, "I tell you therefore it is", where as the latter part of the question, places the definition on the person. This definition has to be agreed on by the individual, otherwise the individual does exercise it.

Banning anything, with the exception of bans against people for the sake of sex, color, creed, or culture, is wrong and will always end up in a fight of sorts. But to nominate a person to dictate how we think therefore live, is an act of a totalitarian. And Hitler, Mussolini, Lenin and Stalin, as well as Saddam Hussein were all totalitarians.

Caesar Augustus, and Julius Caesar were also totalitarians. When a small group of people, feel they know better than the people, then the lust for power becomes somewhat dangerous and criminal. There is hope though.

Once a people have experienced freedom, there is no turning back. To the totalitarian, freedom and hope, are a disease. A disease that must be stopped. If we cripple the people by taking away their religion, then they have to believe in us. Then we disrupt the family unit, either with divorce or a******n or both. Without religion why should a man and wife stay together? Then those who still hope, we prevent them from congregating. Then we take their weapons away from them so they can't defend themselves. If they get out of line then we can stop them by making up wh**ever slander we can dream up with until no one believes the story and it becomes circumstantial at best. For the story will drowned out the t***h.

This is what we have become in today's society. We are going to be asked to make a choice-Trump or Biden. Do we give the power to a person who lets us choose, like Trump. Or do we give it to Biden, a person who will mandate how we live?

I lived through Carter, Clinton, and Obama, and each of them, either inadvertently or deliberately told the American people how to live. Whereas, Reagan and Trump gave that decision to the people. So when you hear, "Trump is not leading" has it ever dawned upon you that Trump like Reagan is giving you the choice. Decide for yourself.

Look at the mask issue. Trump wants to leave the decision up to the individual. That's freedom. Biden says he will mandate that all must wear a mask. Facts are facts, and facts can be disputed and put the fire. But this fact always remains the same: If a person is mandated, many will not follow that mandate. But if you want to wear a mask, many will.

So the Democrats claim, "Trump is not leading" because he allows the individual to make up their own minds.

Why can't the individual make up their own mind? Oh yea, because we must be told how to make up our own minds? Is that really freedom? Freedom is when the individual chooses, so who has the right to choose?

If we reverse Roe vs Wade, does that mean a******ns will not happen? Or does that mean the people not the government will make that choice?

The e******n of 2020 is coming upon us, which do you choose?