Carol Kelly wrote:
Can’t be doing be too quickly. We are at a crossroad and the more quickly we take the correct road, the better.
I agree with you ,but than it will cross over into the e******n.... It takes couple of months to choose Justice.....We don't have that time,Carol!! If we going to do we have to this NOW and QUICK!
Auntie Dee wrote:
Absolutely! Trump should nominate this next week and the Senate should v**e! Why waste time! Dem's will scream to high heaven but what's new, they do it anyway about any little thing they can dig up! Let's give 'em something to really scream about!!
I agree and I really want to hear the demorats screaming, yelling, cursing, crying, wailling and throwing big time tantrums. Some suicides by big named hollyweird and major media types would be interesting to read about, seeing hoards of l*****ts move to North Korea, China and Venezuela would be a hoot and seeing Oprah and mooch ovommit scream about r****m and white privilege and our caste system would be fun to observe.
proud republican wrote:
It's going to get UGLY X 1000!!!
It could get as ugly as Whoopi Goldberg, mooch ovommit, and most of the l*****t political females (you know the women with big mouths, hair under their armpits and food particles flying out of their mouth as they talk).
CarryOn wrote:
I agree with LT. Get the ball rolling on replacing RBG ... for many reasons, one of them being we need a full SCOTUS for what is looking to be the most historically litigious e******n and battle for the wh ever. The dems can howl all they want. As we discovered when bo nominated Garland, there are video clips of Senators on both sides of the aisle going back decades with different opinions then as opposed to now on the issue. That's all just political grandstanding. This is far too important to worry about what the chuck and nancys think.
Agree with you on the importance of keeping majority in the Senate. Extremely important for another Trump term.
Also would point out that President Trump, as a candidate in 2016, presented a list of judges from which he would choose if vacancies arose on SCOTUS ... and he stuck with that promise. Anyone who v**es for him knows exactly what to expect. NOT SO WITH BIDEN!! You don't know what you're going to get. And with his giant mistake of boxing himself in with the VP se******n by promising to choose a black woman (and look who we ended up with there), who knows what he might do next? If he would put race and/or g****r above any other qualifications for VP then why not for a SC Justice, too? Pretty sure he'd do the same ... anything he (or his handlers) think might get him a few more v**es ...
I agree with LT. Get the ball rolling on replacin... (
show quote)
It's even possible Slo Joe Bribem could nominate Greta Thunberg and put her in blackface. That would create a Constitutional crises but the dems would probably change the requirements for a Supreme Court justice like t***ssexuals like to change their sex every couple years and have it paid by the American taxpayers. I'm sure the dems are already working on a plan to reduce the eligible age of a Supreme Court Justice to 14 or 15.
This post shows how this site is becoming or is... just a right leaning site, and I see no one here who is remotely interested in a balanced judicial system. Judges used to be neutral and unbiased, but it looks like we all know this to be untrue. How can there really be fair and balanced justice this way, how can All of the people be fairly represented? It can't, but this is what every single one of you here want. You all want a one party system, that is nothing close to what our founding fathers wanted. A one party system leaves people without choice, it leads to suppression and a dictatorship, be careful what you wish for.
Barracuda2020 wrote:
This post shows how this site is becoming or is... just a right leaning site, and I see no one here who is remotely interested in a balanced judicial system. Judges used to be neutral and unbiased, but it looks like we all know this to be untrue. How can there really be fair and balanced justice this way, how can All of the people be fairly represented? It can't, but this is what every single one of you here want. You all want a one party system, that is nothing close to what our founding fathers wanted. A one party system leaves people without choice, it leads to suppression and a dictatorship, be careful what you wish for.
This post shows how this site is becoming or is...... (
show quote)
Another fuggin hypocrite. If the shoe was on the other foot, you would be cram your radical left bulls**t down our throat.
proud republican wrote:
Should President Trump replace RBG right away or wait until after e******n? Democrats already raised 6.3 million online . ... Republicans should raise more ASAP ..... Also we have to fight as hell to win Presidency and keep the Senate !! It really should be our number 1 priority right now!!!.....Even bigger priority than nominating replacement for RBG !!!.......Just my opinion!
Yep!
Don't lose focus.
Re-elect Trump so it is a moot point.
Fill the seat now!
The Democrats would, if in the same position.
Barracuda2020 wrote:
This post shows how this site is becoming or is... just a right leaning site, and I see no one here who is remotely interested in a balanced judicial system. Judges used to be neutral and unbiased, but it looks like we all know this to be untrue. How can there really be fair and balanced justice this way, how can All of the people be fairly represented? It can't, but this is what every single one of you here want. You all want a one party system, that is nothing close to what our founding fathers wanted. A one party system leaves people without choice, it leads to suppression and a dictatorship, be careful what you wish for.
This post shows how this site is becoming or is...... (
show quote)
If the left didn't try to make rules from the bench I might agree, but they think the Constitution is changeable.
Look at freedom of speech and gun rights.
Not infringed means nobody can make a law to change it.
Barracuda2020 wrote:
This post shows how this site is becoming or is... just a right leaning site, and I see no one here who is remotely interested in a balanced judicial system. Judges used to be neutral and unbiased, but it looks like we all know this to be untrue. How can there really be fair and balanced justice this way, how can All of the people be fairly represented? It can't, but this is what every single one of you here want. You all want a one party system, that is nothing close to what our founding fathers wanted. A one party system leaves people without choice, it leads to suppression and a dictatorship, be careful what you wish for.
This post shows how this site is becoming or is...... (
show quote)
"This post shows how this site is becoming or is... just a right leaning site, and I see no one here who is remotely interested in a balanced judicial system. - Bacarruda
The right just wants the Constitution to be upheld as written and intended.
You want it changed?
Get an Amendment passed.
You lament there are less Liberals here on OPP?
Well their position gets harder to defend, when there is debate.
If you haven’t noticed the Courts definitely balanced. When’s the last time you had to wonder which way on a major case a liberal justice would v**e? Never. On the other hand the “Conservative Justices “crossover more than I like.
Barracuda2020 wrote:
This post shows how this site is becoming or is... just a right leaning site, and I see no one here who is remotely interested in a balanced judicial system. Judges used to be neutral and unbiased, but it looks like we all know this to be untrue. How can there really be fair and balanced justice this way, how can All of the people be fairly represented? It can't, but this is what every single one of you here want. You all want a one party system, that is nothing close to what our founding fathers wanted. A one party system leaves people without choice, it leads to suppression and a dictatorship, be careful what you wish for.
This post shows how this site is becoming or is...... (
show quote)
proud republican wrote:
Should President Trump replace RBG right away or wait until after e******n? Democrats already raised 6.3 million online . ... Republicans should raise more ASAP ..... Also we have to fight as hell to win Presidency and keep the Senate !! It really should be our number 1 priority right now!!!.....Even bigger priority than nominating replacement for RBG !!!.......Just my opinion!
NOW!!! Dems want to wait cause they want another dem in there
proud republican wrote:
Should President Trump replace RBG right away or wait until after e******n? Democrats already raised 6.3 million online . ... Republicans should raise more ASAP ..... Also we have to fight as hell to win Presidency and keep the Senate !! It really should be our number 1 priority right now!!!.....Even bigger priority than nominating replacement for RBG !!!.......Just my opinion!
Ted Cruz! Constitutionalist!!! Right away!
proud republican wrote:
More important right now is to keep the Senate ,I doubt we can retake the House back!!
Have faith y’all! Our president has God behind him!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.