Big dog wrote:
As usual, you defend evil and condemn the righteousness. Kinda t***sparent ya know.
The righteous Neo N**is and Cops that murder people? If that’s who is righteous in your book you have a warped mind.
Kevyn wrote:
The righteous Neo N**is and Cops that murder people? If that’s who is righteous in your book you have a warped mind.
So every cop is a murderous n**i ?
working class stiff wrote:
Unfortunately, the right will skip your points and head straight to attack and condemnation. Totally predictable. I also support B*M, not because some of them are Marxist but because they are going after the right targets. The police forces have always been used to enforce institutional r****m, and that is not different today. Since the right sees them as a threat, B*M must be doing something right.
The 'Marxism' argument is just a smokescreen to keep from facing the real issue: the refusal to see 'white superiority' as the justification for the continued discrimination against against non-white citizens.
The 'a****a' argument smacks of f*****m. The right wants to claim that 'a****a' are a terrorist organization without any proof that it is an organization at all. Who are it's members? Where are the organizational charts?
The right wants to use 'a****a' as a catch all to justify arresting anyone who protests as a member of the 'organization'.
The right would like nothing better than to be able to justify outlawing everything they don't agree with. Especially they fear challenges to the assumptions of white male superiority. Those assumptions are under attack in this e******n....we'll see how the right responds.
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (
show quote)
I'll tell you what working class stiff, next time someone you know is getting mugged, call Kevyn or a member of B*M.
John Meoff wrote:
I'll tell you what working class stiff, next time someone you know is getting mugged, call Kevyn or a member of B*M.
What does that have to do with what I wrote?
Big dog wrote:
So every cop is a murderous n**i ?
Yep! That's the way the left thinks.
working class stiff wrote:
What does that have to do with what I wrote?
I knew you wouldn't understand.
John Meoff wrote:
I knew you wouldn't understand.
Why would I? I'm not a mind reader. Again, what has your post to do with mine?
working class stiff wrote:
Unfortunately, the right will skip your points and head straight to attack and condemnation. Totally predictable. I also support B*M, not because some of them are Marxist but because they are going after the right targets. The police forces have always been used to enforce institutional r****m, and that is not different today. Since the right sees them as a threat, B*M must be doing something right.
The 'Marxism' argument is just a smokescreen to keep from facing the real issue: the refusal to see 'white superiority' as the justification for the continued discrimination against against non-white citizens.
The 'a****a' argument smacks of f*****m. The right wants to claim that 'a****a' are a terrorist organization without any proof that it is an organization at all. Who are it's members? Where are the organizational charts?
The right wants to use 'a****a' as a catch all to justify arresting anyone who protests as a member of the 'organization'.
The right would like nothing better than to be able to justify outlawing everything they don't agree with. Especially they fear challenges to the assumptions of white male superiority. Those assumptions are under attack in this e******n....we'll see how the right responds.
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (
show quote)
People like you who accuse others of being r****t, f*****tic, lovers of institutional r****m and are full of s******c r****m are in most cases themselves the real r****ts and f*****ts. Just look at the ovommits. They spout their anti-r****t chants and complain of s******c r****m when they are 2 of the biggest r****ts and see the color black in everything they come in contact with. Look at a****a, one of the most f*****tic organizations on the planet.
drlarrygino wrote:
People like you who accuse others of being r****t, f*****tic, lovers of institutional r****m and are full of s******c r****m are in most cases themselves the real r****ts and f*****ts. Just look at the ovommits. They spout their anti-r****t chants and complain of s******c r****m when they are 2 of the biggest r****ts and see the color black in everything they come in contact with. Look at a****a, one of the most f*****tic organizations on the planet.
Why bother even responding to the progressives on OPP? They are not interested in discussing issues or principles.
As Daniel P. Moynihan once, famously, said, everyone's entitled to his own opinion but not to his own facts. These liberals manufacture facts out of thin air. Anything is permissible to advance their cause & impose their ideology on government. It's at the heart of c*******m, national socialism, f*****m and progressivism.
It's akin to responding to the question, when did you stop beating your wife. Give it up. You're never going to get anywhere with them.
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
Yep! That's the way the left thinks.
No Bernie, that is the way dishonest folks on the right try to describe people who want to end police brutality and racial profiling. Not too long ago most everyone in the country was vocally against neo n**is and the klan, what changed?
Kevyn wrote:
No Bernie, that is the way dishonest folks on the right try to describe people who want to end police brutality and racial profiling. Not too long ago most everyone in the country was vocally against neo n**is and the klan, what changed?
No, Kev, that's not true! The big problem with the left's analysis is that they take small segments and generalize them as the rule rather than the exception. For instance, your characterization of "dishonest" which makes it appear that all on the right are dishonest. Your comment implies that the right does not want to end police brutality. That is absolutely not true. The hitch comes in the left's conclusion as to the extent and effects of police brutality and racial profiling. Your last sentence implies that the right is no longer against neo-n**is and the Klan. Do you see the jump that is being made by you or do I need to provide you with more reasoning?
Kevyn wrote:
No Bernie, that is the way dishonest folks on the right try to describe people who want to end police brutality and racial profiling. Not too long ago most everyone in the country was vocally against neo n**is and the klan, what changed?
The Klan is a very small group of dissatisfied individuals that were displaced by the new tyrants on the block, the large terroristic c*******tic groups of A****a and Black Lies Matter thugs.
John Meoff wrote:
I don't know what frightens me more, that he posted this or that he might actually believe it.
I don't see how he could believe it,but he evidently does.
I see nothing valid about those two groups, but I'm not surprised he responded.
2bltap wrote:
Since it is well known now that B*M is really nothing more than a Marxist movement based on their own web pages and spoken ideology along with A****A which they refer to themselves ANTI FACISTS which in fact they are themselves do you really support these Marxist and C*******t groups? Is this what you all really support? The American people have been awoken to tall of this Anti American garbage. Do you all really want to associate yourselves with these movements? I get it already! You dont like President Trump without any real understanding of the man and the accomplishments he has accomplished because of orange man bad. Im stil waiting for any logical rationale for the h**e that you all seem to have for him. Im being very serious here! What has he done that has been Anti American Anti United States of America? I have seen postings here that actually must nit pick the things he says or does and then saying that he is un-p**********l. What in thew heck does being so called being p**********l actually mean?
Mike
https://youtu.be/3MWUJbvT0SsSince it is well known now that B*M is really noth... (
show quote)
Top it off saw an article where B*M has joined hands with American based group The Chinese Progressive Association and backed by the Chinese c*******t Goverment
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.