Do you agree or disagree with Thursday's Night football show of solidarity for B*M
Sep 12, 2020 21:52:48 #
Sep 12, 2020 21:56:21 #
rumitoid wrote:
Are those protestors to be considered "thugs" and "terrorists." Tell me why.
Not thugs and terrorists. Useful i***ts.
Sep 12, 2020 22:11:59 #
Sep 12, 2020 22:19:57 #
rumitoid wrote:
Okay. Explain why.
Those who were solid with Black L***s M****r at the football game are not thugs and terrorists because they are not r**ting, l**ting, and burning. They are useful i***ts because they are solid with Black L***s M****r.
Does that answer your question ?
Sep 12, 2020 23:39:09 #
rumitoid wrote:
Are those protestors to be considered "thugs" and "terrorists." Tell me why.
Fools and tools, maybe.
Sep 12, 2020 23:41:14 #
rumitoid wrote:
Okay. Explain why.
Nutshell: Get woke, go broke.
We like to take a frelling break from politics and BS when we go to a game and if we don't get that we won't bother going.
Sep 13, 2020 06:32:10 #
son of witless wrote:
Those who were solid with Black L***s M****r at the football game are not thugs and terrorists because they are not r**ting, l**ting, and burning. They are useful i***ts because they are solid with Black L***s M****r.
Does that answer your question ?
Does that answer your question ?
I thought Rumitoid was referring to the fans that booed as "protesters".
Then you, son of witless, flipped the script to label the fans supporting the B*M organization (Belligerent Lying Marxists) to be the protesters and answered t***hfully.
So was I wrong in my initial assumption? If so it was because I was trying to see things from Rumi's point of view.
I know that there is r****m all over the world and many hearts and minds need to be changed. But the phrase, "Black L***s M****r" misses the mark. And the self-described Marxist organization B*M is inhuman in their anti-family agenda.
It will take someone more erudite than I to suggest a better anti-r****m slogan, one that will resonate with everyone.
Anyway, as far as football is concerned, and at the risk of offending many, especially Permafrost, Go Pack Go!
Sep 13, 2020 08:56:54 #
Roamin' Catholic wrote:
I thought Rumitoid was referring to the fans that ... (show quote)
You have stated it another way that I had not considered. I took it as the protesters being the NFL. I see your point and I hope I did not misunderstand Rumitoid's question. If I did, I am obviously wrong in my response.
Many times I understand a statement based on who made it. I took Rumitoid's question a certain way because it came from him. That may have been an error
Sep 13, 2020 09:37:08 #
Our American country used to be entertained with the game of football. We didn't even mind that the players were paid with more money than most Americans who watch them play make in a lifetime. But now their owners have decided to take their teams to another country and play for them. I would like to watch these teams play, especially the '49ners and Cowboys, but my television set cannot tune in the C*******t Chinese channel.
Sep 13, 2020 12:49:51 #
I see its perfectly clear now ,certain people have better first amendment rights than others.
It's ok for trump to try and hide the pow f**g flying over the WH by moving it to ware it can no longer be seen by the public.
But football player's can't voice their opinions I get it.
It's ok for trump to try and hide the pow f**g flying over the WH by moving it to ware it can no longer be seen by the public.
But football player's can't voice their opinions I get it.
Sep 13, 2020 12:56:37 #
rumitoid wrote:
Are those protestors to be considered "thugs" and "terrorists." Tell me why.
The boos the Chiefs and the other team got speak clearly at least for those whom watched.. I did not, actually I quit watching football when Kaepernick took his knee..
Entitled to voice their opinion so am I. I don’t think I’ll be watching any sports again. Having gotten away from it I no longer miss it...
Thugs or terrorist, no, just insignificant to the scheme of things.. irrelevant, definitely. Useful in creating and causing division sure that’s the reason they’re doing it after all right?
I will close by asking you, what does it matter at this point, sound familiar LOL LOL
Sep 13, 2020 12:57:37 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
Lonewolf wrote:
I see its perfectly clear now ,certain people have better first amendment rights than others.
It's ok for trump to try and hide the pow f**g flying over the WH by moving it to ware it can no longer be seen by the public.
But football player's can't voice their opinions I get it.
It's ok for trump to try and hide the pow f**g flying over the WH by moving it to ware it can no longer be seen by the public.
But football player's can't voice their opinions I get it.
Here's a good example of your theory.
Sep 13, 2020 12:58:59 #
byronglimish wrote:
Here's a good example of your theory.
Powerful~~ well said!!!
Sep 13, 2020 13:14:15 #
Sep 13, 2020 13:15:41 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
Lonewolf wrote:
I see its perfectly clear now ,certain people have better first amendment rights than others.
It's ok for trump to try and hide the pow f**g flying over the WH by moving it to ware it can no longer be seen by the public.
But football player's can't voice their opinions I get it.
It's ok for trump to try and hide the pow f**g flying over the WH by moving it to ware it can no longer be seen by the public.
But football player's can't voice their opinions I get it.
Comment on the factual meme I posted, or does the t***h Scare you into running?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.