One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
When the Dixiecrats left the Dems, the Pubs absorbed them, to their detriment and chagrin
Page <prev 2 of 2
Aug 29, 2020 16:58:34   #
PeterS
 
WEBCO wrote:
One of 21 dixiecrats went to the Republican party, the other 20 stayed Democrat. Your post is completely false. History tells a different story. But hey repeat a lie enough, and people will believe it.

Over time conservative democrats have left the Democratic party as have anyone leaning even slightly left in the Republican party. That's the problem today--we are so divided that there is no ability to compromise. It's all or nothing for both parties. We sorely need a third party if only as a means to break the divide...

Reply
Aug 29, 2020 17:00:34   #
Rose42
 
PeterS wrote:
Over time conservative democrats have left the Democratic party as have anyone leaning even slightly left in the Republican party. That's the problem today--we are so divided that there is no ability to compromise. It's all or nothing for both parties. We sorely need a third party if only as a means to break the divide...


I agree with that. The two parties are too entrenched and its only getting worse.

Reply
Aug 29, 2020 17:02:32   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
WEBCO wrote:
One of 21 dixiecrats went to the Republican party, the other 20 stayed Democrat. Your post is completely false. History tells a different story. But hey repeat a lie enough, and people will believe it.


You make a valid point about the national Democrats, though 3 actually switched. John Tower (TX), Strom Thurmond (SC), and Jessie Helms (NC), all Senators. However, at the state level many more dixiecrats switched to the Republican party. The 'solid south' used to refer to the Democrats' hold over the area, now it is Republicans.

In reality, of course, it was the southern v**ers who switched parties, not necessarily the politicians themselves.

Reply
Aug 29, 2020 18:21:04   #
ImLogicallyRight
 
tNotMyPrez wrote:
By William J. Gerow Jr., Vancouver
Published: August 28, 2020, 6:00am

Dana Milbank’s column regarding GOP loonies (“In GOP, inmates run the asylum,” Aug. 22) was spot-on. In some perverted way, though, Democrats deserve backhanded credit for the situation. In the early 1960s as the liberal wing of the Democratic Party began to champion the civil rights movement, conservative southern Democrats, known as Dixiecrats, started trickling away. The r****ts were soon joined by religious conservatives who never believed in separation of church and state, all manner of no-sex, no-drugs, no rock-n-roll social conservatives, and not a small number of out-and-out aluminum hat nut cases. Who was there to welcome them? Republicans! The Big Tent Party!

Woven into the fabric of the Republican tent is the following: “Give us your disaffected, your unenlightened, your white-hooded masses yearning for fire, the wretched refuse bearing ancient hatreds. Give us your loonies, give us your theocrats yearning to rule us all, give us those who’ve forgotten the message of America or never knew it. Send these, the newly homeless, the discarded, we’ll take them all. We’ll leave a lamp on for you!”

Meanwhile, the Democratic Party is breathing a sigh of relief. After all, what are a few harmless socialists compared to all those r****ts and loonies? And the old-line Republicans are finally realizing they’ve been bitten in their collective you know what.

https://www.columbian.com/news/2020/aug/28/letter-republicans-go-through-changes/
By William J. Gerow Jr., Vancouver br Published: A... (show quote)


NWR

Reply
Aug 29, 2020 18:23:56   #
ImLogicallyRight
 
PeterS wrote:
More dangerous than all the F*****ts taking over the Republican party? You can still be socialist and have a Democracy but once you become F*****t Democracy is dead...


Get out the shovels. The bull s**te is really flying today.

Reply
Aug 29, 2020 18:25:08   #
ImLogicallyRight
 
RandyBrian wrote:
Peter, you throw that word 'f*****t' around so much, it makes me wonder if you even know what it means. Have you tried looking it up in wikipeter?


Probably to busy with wippingpeter

Reply
Aug 29, 2020 18:45:33   #
tNotMyPrez Loc: So. CA, USA
 
ImLogicallyRight wrote:
Probably to busy with wippingpeter

Now that's really funny no matter which side you're on 😂😂😂

Reply
Aug 30, 2020 10:31:00   #
FallenOak Loc: St George Utah
 
PeterS wrote:
Conservatism is a regressive ideology. If it was left up to you we would still be kissing King George's ass. If not for liberalism this country wouldn't exist today...


I question your statement about kissing King George. The states that are definitely anti gun are those controlled by the liberals. If you observation is legitimate then actually the liberal people would have told the Lobsterbacks where the cannon, balls, and powder were located and helped to subdue the Conservatives. We would be singing ‘God Save the Queen’ instead we are singing ‘America’.

Reply
Aug 30, 2020 10:33:42   #
FallenOak Loc: St George Utah
 
PeterS wrote:
Over time conservative democrats have left the Democratic party as have anyone leaning even slightly left in the Republican party. That's the problem today--we are so divided that there is no ability to compromise. It's all or nothing for both parties. We sorely need a third party if only as a means to break the divide...


I have been advocating third party since 1964. Let's get started with getting more people to v**e third party. I feel I have been v****g alone.

Reply
Aug 30, 2020 10:46:51   #
Rose42
 
FallenOak wrote:
I have been advocating third party since 1964. Let's get started with getting more people to v**e third party. I feel I have been v****g alone.


There is a growing number of people who don't support either the democrat or republican party.

Reply
Aug 30, 2020 18:29:39   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
Rose42 wrote:
There is a growing number of people who don't support either the democrat or republican party.


I think it would be fun to have a Conservative Party and a Liberal/C*******t/Progressive Party, in addition to the Republicans and Democrats. It would be entertaining to see which one of the primary parties the repubs and dems gravitated to. Not sure it would be beneficial to the country, though. I don't think we would want to have so many parties that we had to form 'coalition' governments, like many countries do.

Reply
Aug 30, 2020 19:10:46   #
son of witless
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Increasing number of Marxist taking over the Democrat Party are extremely dangerous to America.


After all, what are a few hundred thousand harmless Marxists, Anarchists, L**ters, and Arsonists ?


Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.