One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Harris, f**e?
Page 1 of 11 next> last>>
Aug 12, 2020 11:06:25   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
Things that make you go Hmmmmm...

I got this from a friend of mine, and thought it was worth sharing.
So U be the judge on this one.
Anyone care to share your thoughts?

FROM WIKI: “Kamala Devi Harris was born on October 20, 1964, in Oakland, CA. Her mother, Shyamala Gopalan, was a breast-cancer scientist who had emigrated from India in 1960 to pursue a doctorate in endocrinology at UC Berkeley. Her father, Donald Harris, is a Stanford University emeritus professor of economics, who emigrated from Jamaica in 1961 for graduate study in economics at UC Berkeley.”
So, two things we can gather just from this information:
1. She is not “a woman of color who overcame poverty, r****m & misogyny to become successful,” as the #L*****tPress is saying today. She came from a successful & educated parents, and very likely endured no such hardships.
2. She was born in Oakland less than 4 years after her parents emigrated here. It takes a solid 5 straight years of U.S. residency to become a citizen. When she was born her parents weren't yet citizens.
So, she is not eligible to become Vice President because she’s not a natural born citizen.
BTW, don’t ever forget how she lied & misrepresented the t***h in the Kavanaugh conformation hearings??

Reply
Aug 12, 2020 11:33:34   #
LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA
 
[

Reply
Aug 12, 2020 12:02:08   #
Carol Kelly
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Things that make you go Hmmmmm...

I got this from a friend of mine, and thought it was worth sharing.
So U be the judge on this one.
Anyone care to share your thoughts?

FROM WIKI: “Kamala Devi Harris was born on October 20, 1964, in Oakland, CA. Her mother, Shyamala Gopalan, was a breast-cancer scientist who had emigrated from India in 1960 to pursue a doctorate in endocrinology at UC Berkeley. Her father, Donald Harris, is a Stanford University emeritus professor of economics, who emigrated from Jamaica in 1961 for graduate study in economics at UC Berkeley.”
So, two things we can gather just from this information:
1. She is not “a woman of color who overcame poverty, r****m & misogyny to become successful,” as the #L*****tPress is saying today. She came from a successful & educated parents, and very likely endured no such hardships.
2. She was born in Oakland less than 4 years after her parents emigrated here. It takes a solid 5 straight years of U.S. residency to become a citizen. When she was born her parents weren't yet citizens.
So, she is not eligible to become Vice President because she’s not a natural born citizen.
BTW, don’t ever forget how she lied & misrepresented the t***h in the Kavanaugh conformation hearings??
Things that make you go Hmmmmm... br br I got thi... (show quote)


Some say her citizenship is covered by the birthright law. I say she isn’t qualified
because she is not an avowed Constitutionalist. She has been a menace since she entered politics in California. Maybe she’ll be sued for sexual abuse by one of her many aids in her climb to success. It would be magnificent to see her harassed as she harassed Kavanagh. For what it’s worth.

Reply
 
 
Aug 12, 2020 12:04:18   #
Seth
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Things that make you go Hmmmmm...

I got this from a friend of mine, and thought it was worth sharing.
So U be the judge on this one.
Anyone care to share your thoughts?

FROM WIKI: “Kamala Devi Harris was born on October 20, 1964, in Oakland, CA. Her mother, Shyamala Gopalan, was a breast-cancer scientist who had emigrated from India in 1960 to pursue a doctorate in endocrinology at UC Berkeley. Her father, Donald Harris, is a Stanford University emeritus professor of economics, who emigrated from Jamaica in 1961 for graduate study in economics at UC Berkeley.”
So, two things we can gather just from this information:
1. She is not “a woman of color who overcame poverty, r****m & misogyny to become successful,” as the #L*****tPress is saying today. She came from a successful & educated parents, and very likely endured no such hardships.
2. She was born in Oakland less than 4 years after her parents emigrated here. It takes a solid 5 straight years of U.S. residency to become a citizen. When she was born her parents weren't yet citizens.
So, she is not eligible to become Vice President because she’s not a natural born citizen.
BTW, don’t ever forget how she lied & misrepresented the t***h in the Kavanaugh conformation hearings??
Things that make you go Hmmmmm... br br I got thi... (show quote)


The fact that the Democrats have actually chosen her as a VP candidate only further shows how unseriously they take America and our entire political system.

Reply
Aug 12, 2020 12:04:47   #
hdjimv Loc: South Dakota
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Things that make you go Hmmmmm...

I got this from a friend of mine, and thought it was worth sharing.
So U be the judge on this one.
Anyone care to share your thoughts?

FROM WIKI: “Kamala Devi Harris was born on October 20, 1964, in Oakland, CA. Her mother, Shyamala Gopalan, was a breast-cancer scientist who had emigrated from India in 1960 to pursue a doctorate in endocrinology at UC Berkeley. Her father, Donald Harris, is a Stanford University emeritus professor of economics, who emigrated from Jamaica in 1961 for graduate study in economics at UC Berkeley.”
So, two things we can gather just from this information:
1. She is not “a woman of color who overcame poverty, r****m & misogyny to become successful,” as the #L*****tPress is saying today. She came from a successful & educated parents, and very likely endured no such hardships.
2. She was born in Oakland less than 4 years after her parents emigrated here. It takes a solid 5 straight years of U.S. residency to become a citizen. When she was born her parents weren't yet citizens.
So, she is not eligible to become Vice President because she’s not a natural born citizen.
BTW, don’t ever forget how she lied & misrepresented the t***h in the Kavanaugh conformation hearings??
Things that make you go Hmmmmm... br br I got thi... (show quote)


https://reason.com/2020/08/10/yes-kamala-harris-is-indeed-a-natural-born-citizen/

I guess it depends on which interpretation of "natural born citizen" you think is correct.

Reply
Aug 12, 2020 12:05:21   #
Seth
 
[quote=LAPhil][[/quote]

You forgot the ].

Reply
Aug 12, 2020 12:30:35   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Things that make you go Hmmmmm...

I got this from a friend of mine, and thought it was worth sharing.
So U be the judge on this one.
Anyone care to share your thoughts?

FROM WIKI: “Kamala Devi Harris was born on October 20, 1964, in Oakland, CA. Her mother, Shyamala Gopalan, was a breast-cancer scientist who had emigrated from India in 1960 to pursue a doctorate in endocrinology at UC Berkeley. Her father, Donald Harris, is a Stanford University emeritus professor of economics, who emigrated from Jamaica in 1961 for graduate study in economics at UC Berkeley.”
So, two things we can gather just from this information:
1. She is not “a woman of color who overcame poverty, r****m & misogyny to become successful,” as the #L*****tPress is saying today. She came from a successful & educated parents, and very likely endured no such hardships.
2. She was born in Oakland less than 4 years after her parents emigrated here. It takes a solid 5 straight years of U.S. residency to become a citizen. When she was born her parents weren't yet citizens.
So, she is not eligible to become Vice President because she’s not a natural born citizen.
BTW, don’t ever forget how she lied & misrepresented the t***h in the Kavanaugh conformation hearings??
Things that make you go Hmmmmm... br br I got thi... (show quote)



The natural born citizen law went out the window with the Kenyan reprobate.

Reply
 
 
Aug 12, 2020 12:46:30   #
Seth
 
byronglimish wrote:
The natural born citizen law went out the window with the Kenyan reprobate.


The Democrats do wh**ever they please, Constitutional or not, because they have the advantage of knowing that such stalwarts of "News & Information" as the N.Y. Times, the Washington Post, CNN, the alphabet networks, PBS and the rest will make sure the unsuspecting public continues to be unsuspecting.

On the same token, when they slander political opposition, they rest assured that the same stalwarts of "News & Information" will fully support their slander when "reporting" to aforementioned unsuspecting public.

Disinformation has long been a talent completely mastered by the political left.

Reply
Aug 12, 2020 12:48:46   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Things that make you go Hmmmmm...

I got this from a friend of mine, and thought it was worth sharing.
So U be the judge on this one.
Anyone care to share your thoughts?

FROM WIKI: “Kamala Devi Harris was born on October 20, 1964, in Oakland, CA. Her mother, Shyamala Gopalan, was a breast-cancer scientist who had emigrated from India in 1960 to pursue a doctorate in endocrinology at UC Berkeley. Her father, Donald Harris, is a Stanford University emeritus professor of economics, who emigrated from Jamaica in 1961 for graduate study in economics at UC Berkeley.”
So, two things we can gather just from this information:
1. She is not “a woman of color who overcame poverty, r****m & misogyny to become successful,” as the #L*****tPress is saying today. She came from a successful & educated parents, and very likely endured no such hardships.
2. She was born in Oakland less than 4 years after her parents emigrated here. It takes a solid 5 straight years of U.S. residency to become a citizen. When she was born her parents weren't yet citizens.
So, she is not eligible to become Vice President because she’s not a natural born citizen.
BTW, don’t ever forget how she lied & misrepresented the t***h in the Kavanaugh conformation hearings??
Things that make you go Hmmmmm... br br I got thi... (show quote)


The facts are that in spite of the real intent of the 14th Amendment, anyone born in this country is considered a birth citizen. There is no difference between a birth citizen and a "natural born citizen." The two are synonymous.
What the men who wrote the 14th actually said was that it was not meant to apply to aliens. However, this has been lost in spite of the verbatim comments of the 39th Congress on this matter, and rulings such as US v Wong Kim Ark 1898, and Elk v Wilkins 1884.
It boils down to a question of "subject to the jurisdiction." Foreigners in this country legally are not "subject to the jurisdiction" in the same way a US citizen is, much less a wetback. I******s cannot v**e, they cannot legally hold a job, or even stay here. They cannot be drafted into the military and except in extraordinary circumstances even enlist in the military, and they cannot be charged with or tried for treason.
A foreigner is NOT "subject to the jurisdiction" of the US in the same way as a citizen, so their progeny's citizenship should be limited to the parent's country of origin.
The situation changes if one parent is a citizen or a permanent legal resident. If either of Harris' parents were a legal resident then she is a citizen under the original context of the 14th.
If indeed, anyone who can fog a mirror is a birth citizen by virtue of being born here as some people claim the 14th Amendment states, then why was it necessary to enact the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924? Indians born in this country to parents who were born in this country were not considered citizens, because of the jursidiction question until passage of this law, some 50 odd years AFTER the 14th was ratified.
In the case of Elk v Wilkins 1884, John Elk's claim to birth citizenship was denied in spite of the fact that he was born here, due in no small part to his parents' status as Indians before the ICA 1924.
In the case of US v Wong Kim Ark1898, Wong Kim Ark was ruled to be a birth citizen because his parent, while not citizens, were the 19th century equivalent of "permanent legal residents." The first sentence of the SCOTUS decision makes this plain when they say that the parents of Wong Kim Ark maintained a US domicile. I looked up the 1898 definition of domicile and it means a primary and permanent legal residence.
I digress. Although it is a legal fiction, Harris' status as a birth citizen will not be questioned successfully in any court, due to the unconstitutional interpretation of the 14th Amendment being used today which flies in the face of the intent of the 39th Congress and the people of the 1868 United States.
That is, unless of course either or both of her parents had made it to "permanent legal resident" status.

Reply
Aug 12, 2020 13:24:37   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Seth wrote:
The Democrats do wh**ever they please, Constitutional or not, because they have the advantage of knowing that such stalwarts of "News & Information" as the N.Y. Times, the Washington Post, CNN, the alphabet networks, PBS and the rest will make sure the unsuspecting public continues to be unsuspecting.

On the same token, when they slander political opposition, they rest assured that the same stalwarts of "News & Information" will fully support their slander when "reporting" to aforementioned unsuspecting public.

Disinformation has long been a talent completely mastered by the political left.
The Democrats do wh**ever they please, Constitutio... (show quote)



I couldn't agree more.

Reply
Aug 12, 2020 13:30:01   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
The facts are that in spite of the real intent of the 14th Amendment, anyone born in this country is considered a birth citizen. There is no difference between a birth citizen and a "natural born citizen." The two are synonymous.
What the men who wrote the 14th actually said was that it was not meant to apply to aliens. However, this has been lost in spite of the verbatim comments of the 39th Congress on this matter, and rulings such as US v Wong Kim Ark 1898, and Elk v Wilkins 1884.
It boils down to a question of "subject to the jurisdiction." Foreigners in this country legally are not "subject to the jurisdiction" in the same way a US citizen is, much less a wetback. I******s cannot v**e, they cannot legally hold a job, or even stay here. They cannot be drafted into the military and except in extraordinary circumstances even enlist in the military, and they cannot be charged with or tried for treason.
A foreigner is NOT "subject to the jurisdiction" of the US in the same way as a citizen, so their progeny's citizenship should be limited to the parent's country of origin.
The situation changes if one parent is a citizen or a permanent legal resident. If either of Harris' parents were a legal resident then she is a citizen under the original context of the 14th.
If indeed, anyone who can fog a mirror is a birth citizen by virtue of being born here as some people claim the 14th Amendment states, then why was it necessary to enact the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924? Indians born in this country to parents who were born in this country were not considered citizens, because of the jursidiction question until passage of this law, some 50 odd years AFTER the 14th was ratified.
In the case of Elk v Wilkins 1884, John Elk's claim to birth citizenship was denied in spite of the fact that he was born here, due in no small part to his parents' status as Indians before the ICA 1924.
In the case of US v Wong Kim Ark1898, Wong Kim Ark was ruled to be a birth citizen because his parent, while not citizens, were the 19th century equivalent of "permanent legal residents." The first sentence of the SCOTUS decision makes this plain when they say that the parents of Wong Kim Ark maintained a US domicile. I looked up the 1898 definition of domicile and it means a primary and permanent legal residence.
I digress. Although it is a legal fiction, Harris' status as a birth citizen will not be questioned successfully in any court, due to the unconstitutional interpretation of the 14th Amendment being used today which flies in the face of the intent of the 39th Congress and the people of the 1868 United States.
That is, unless of course either or both of her parents had made it to "permanent legal resident" status.
The facts are that in spite of the real intent of ... (show quote)




Thanks Smedley...very informative.

Reply
 
 
Aug 12, 2020 13:51:21   #
Radiance3
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Things that make you go Hmmmmm...

I got this from a friend of mine, and thought it was worth sharing.
So U be the judge on this one.
Anyone care to share your thoughts?

FROM WIKI: “Kamala Devi Harris was born on October 20, 1964, in Oakland, CA. Her mother, Shyamala Gopalan, was a breast-cancer scientist who had emigrated from India in 1960 to pursue a doctorate in endocrinology at UC Berkeley. Her father, Donald Harris, is a Stanford University emeritus professor of economics, who emigrated from Jamaica in 1961 for graduate study in economics at UC Berkeley.”
So, two things we can gather just from this information:
1. She is not “a woman of color who overcame poverty, r****m & misogyny to become successful,” as the #L*****tPress is saying today. She came from a successful & educated parents, and very likely endured no such hardships.
2. She was born in Oakland less than 4 years after her parents emigrated here. It takes a solid 5 straight years of U.S. residency to become a citizen. When she was born her parents weren't yet citizens.
So, she is not eligible to become Vice President because she’s not a natural born citizen.
BTW, don’t ever forget how she lied & misrepresented the t***h in the Kavanaugh conformation hearings??
Things that make you go Hmmmmm... br br I got thi... (show quote)

===============
Yes, I remember that Kavanaugh Hearing. She was the driver on the Kanavaugh attacks. The innocent Kavanaugh and his family endured the pains and sufferings because of the political lies like Kamala Harris who is not a natural born citizen. Kamala Harris supports a******n.

Reply
Aug 12, 2020 13:53:39   #
Crayons Loc: St Jo, Texas
 
Any and all negative intel on the d**gon lady will be scrubbed from the internet...My guess is they are already
removing everything everywhere...photo's of Harris smokin the smokola, Harris in c*********d photos et`al
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/07/07/wikipedia-editors-sanitize-the-page-of-potential-biden-vp-kamala-harris/

Mountain-view-marxists aren't gonna leave anything unfavorable to be discovered like they did
with 'choom-gang-boy'

Reply
Aug 12, 2020 13:54:36   #
Sonny Magoo Loc: Where pot pie is boiled in a kettle
 
Camel la is an opportunist that will do anything for power. Way more dangerous than Trump.
Here namesake the camel can go on and on without water. She can go on and on without telling the t***h.

Reply
Aug 12, 2020 14:26:00   #
LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA
 
Seth wrote:
You forgot the ].

I don't know how to delete a comment here, so I just leave any character. I don't think you can just erase the entire thing without it getting kicked back.

Reply
Page 1 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.