EmilyD wrote:
You can average it out or do wh**ever you think is going to make this look like the big bad wolf, but that's all it is....a fairy tale. I can average out the number of heart disease victims...that number is 250,000. Or cancer victims: 252,000.
It's clear you want the panic to continue about C-19, but the fact is it is not that big a deal. And the fact that you use this h**x to rant about Trump proves why you want the panic to continue.
You have a serious TDS problem. I highly recommend you deal with that before you go soliciting for people to cry with you for people who are just dying of a seasonal flu. Unfortunately, this happens every year...and people will continue to die from the flu every year. It is sad that people have to die from C-19....and it is sad that they die from other things too. Again, death is a part of life.
You can average it out or do wh**ever you think is... (
show quote)
emily, you people are truly insane.. nothing is so outlandish and foolish you will still try and defend your i***t of an orange slug in the oval office..
The C-19 is a world wide crisis and you insist, as you insist mass k*****gs are nothing to to be concerned with because car accidents k**l more people. do not concern ourselves with gun deaths..
what sort of defective bubble do you people keep yourselves locked into??
denial is a religion with you.. refuse to admit a problem is real only because the fool in the white house has called it a h**x..
the whole world is working to stem the c-19 only trump supporters and the truly stupid do other wise.
It is far from minor.. it is not a form of the flu (influenza).. not even the same family of v***s..
get some t***h to your life.. that can not hurt you. only protect you..
This is an old article , from May 2020, so numbers are not near up to date. but you can get the picture.. but of course you will not..
Minn Post...interview with health experts from U of M..
Even as the death toll from C****-** climbs, there are people out there claiming the threat of the novel v***s is being exaggerated and that it’s really no worse than a bad flu.
While it’s true that both are caused by v***ses that are respiratory in nature and both have the potential to cause symptoms like coughs and fevers, it’s becoming increasingly clear they are not all that similar.
Their differences start with the packaging the v***ses come in, and they continue through the way they attack people’s i****e s****ms, even onto how deadly they are. Here’s a look at how they’re different and why.
They’re caused by different types of v***ses
Influenza and c****av***s are two different families of v***ses. While they both are made up of RNA (some diseases’ genetic material is DNA), the protein layers that surround the RNA, causing the immune response, are different in the two pathogens.
Influenza’s shell features hemagglutinin and neuraminidase proteins. C****av***ses get their name from the glycoprotein spikes that surround them, giving them a crown-like appearance under magnification. Those different surface proteins interact differently with human cells.
The flu has been around for a long time, and we know a lot about it
Historians say the flu may date back millennia. Some of the first written descriptions of the v***s are thought to date back to Hippocrates, around 410 BCE.
The influenza v***s itself was identified in 1933, so people have had a long time to figure out how the flu works. We know when it’s likely to hit each year, and we know who’s more susceptible to severe complications.
“We know a lot about the flu. It’s got seasonality. We know what time of year it hits. We know that pregnant women, older people and young kids are at particularly high risk,” said Dr. David Ingbar, a professor of medicine, the director of the pulmonary, allergy, critical care and sleep division at the University of Minnesota’s Medical School and Executive Director of the Center for Lung and Science Health.
One of the numbers underpinning policy discussions about C****-** is something called an R0. Pronounced “R-naught,” this number refers to how many other people, on average, a person with a given v***s will infect.
For seasonal influenza, the R0 is thought to be between 0.9 and 2.1, meaning the average infected person will infect one or two others. The Minnesota C****-** model currently predicts an R0 of 3.87, meaning the average infected person infects about 3.9 others. That means C****-** is more infectious than the flu.
Flu also has a shorter incubation period than C****-**. It usually between one and four days for someone infected with the flu to show symptoms. With C****-**, the incubation period may be up to 14 days, making it more likely people will spread the v***s before they show symptoms.
C****-** is more deadly
It’s been tough for researchers to get a handle on the death rate of C****-**, partly because so many people seem to be getting it without showing symptoms.
Early estimates in China put the death rate at around 3 percent. Recent research put the mortality rate in the U.S. around 1.3 percent, or a little over one in 100 infections.
That might not seem terribly high, but it’s much higher than a seasonal flu, which typically sees death rates around 0.10 percent, or one in 1,000 infections.
That suggests C****-** is about 10 times more fatal than a seasonal flu.
In Minnesota, there have been 683 confirmed deaths due to C****-** as of Friday morning. That’s four times higher than the number of people — 153 — believed to have died of flu so far this flu season. It’s one-third higher than the number of people who died of flu in 2017-18, a particularly deadly year when A H3 was prevalent, but Minnesota is believed to have yet seen the peak of C****-** cases and deaths.
While C****-** is more deadly than influenza, people shouldn’t downplay the dangers of the flu, Ingbar said.