The Legacy of President Barack Obama (Page 8): ================ Everything written was proven factual. Paid? Why will I do that? Years ago, when I was young, I did two jobs at a time.

Radiance3

Tiptop789 wrote:

How much are you paid to make up this crap that you post?

================
Everything written was proven factual.
Paid? Why will I do that? Years ago, when I was young, I did two jobs at a time. Not anymore. Now, I donate money, the fruit of my toil, to those who need.

The radical dems do that, and Soros is their purser.
My mission is to expose the facts of this classless embarrassing president we ever had. To remind the people, the trails of his achievements. We do that since history begun. All our presidents, our founders who gave us this legacy of freedom. They are all written in the history books.

This time, president Obama must also have a printed version of his t***sforming America, to his "hope and change". He still has plenty of time to continue his legacy.

Just few days ago. He delivered another one in his Eulogy to Cong. John Lewis. May he rest in peace! Must have been a solemn dedication on the life of Lewis. But 50% of his time, blasted his huge vocal chord of LIES and FALSEHOODS about president Trump and the Republican party. I consider him a president with no morals and ethics. No other prior presidents have done that before.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Radiance3 wrote:

================ br i Everything written was prov... (show quote)

Because Obama?
https://youtu.be/z-sdO6pwVHQ

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Tiptop789 wrote:

That Obama's is one smart MF. He's turned your brain to mush. You must hear his voice in your head all the time.

No,, Mrs tiptoe thru the tulips, you're wrong, still!!

The l*****ts, especially the gays, you people can't stand it when your leader is exposed.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Mikeyavelli wrote:

I could smell you walking in the door. Club soda only for you pal, 5 bucks, no ice.
Clean glass? 10 bucks.

And underwear on backwards in case of a quick alley date..

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

byronglimish wrote:

And underwear on backwards in case of a quick alley date..

"And underwear on backwards in case of a quick alley date."
LOL
Now that takes pr********n!

Radiance3

eagleye13 wrote:

"And underwear on backwards in case of a quick alley date."
LOL
Now that takes pr********n!

================
You crack me up again. That was impressive.

I thought I must proceed with Obama's historical records of trampling our constitution, using his political correctness.

Ten ways how Obama violated the constitution. From the Federalist paper. on Jan 2017.
By Ilya Shapiro

https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/top-10-ways-obama-violated-constitution-during-presidency

The Obama administration has been the most lawless in U.S. history. The 44th president’s seeing himself as professionally above the law, left the constitution weaker and abused.

Obama Only Furthered the Imperial Presidency
He points first to the 2011 Libya intervention. It involved neither a congressional authorization of the use of force, nor compliance with the 1973 War Powers Act, which requires at least congressional notification of troop commitments and affirmative permission after 60 days. Every president since the WPA’s enactment has claimed that it’s an unconstitutional limit on inherent executive authority over military power. Obama instead claimed that hundreds of missile strikes and dozens of air missions didn’t trigger the WPA because they only constituted “kinetic military action” rather than war.

It just doesn’t pass the smell test. Neither does at least some of the National Security Agency’s robust program of domestic surveillance, about which Director of National Intelligence James Clapper has lied to Congress. And then there’s the aggressive posture towards and persecution of journalists. It’s as if the goal was to show Donald Trump how it’s done.

The Obama administration has been the most lawless in U.S. history.
Here are examples:

How Obama Ignored Constitutional Checks and Balances
President Obama steadily took out his frustrations with the checks and balances that inhibited his ability to “fundamentally t***sform” the country.

A lack of congressional acquiescence didn’t stop this president. Even in Obama’s first term, the administration launched a “We Can’t Wait” initiative, with senior aide Dan Pfeiffer explaining that “when Congress won’t act, this president will.” And when the reelected President Obama announced his second‐term economic plans, he said that “I will not allow gridlock, or inaction, or willful indifference to get in our way.”

But no matter how much you hold it up to the light—and no matter what textual penumbras you induce—there’s no “gridlock clause” in the Constitution by which the president’s power increases to the extent Congress doesn’t support him. Indeed, gridlock is a feature of our system, not a bug, meant to check executive abuse and majoritarian populism both.

As we mark another peaceful t******r of p***r, let’s pause to note the 10 most significant ways in which Barack Obama violated the Constitution, in rough chronological order.

1. The Chrysler Bailout
Building on the Bush administration’s illegal use of TARP funds to bail out the auto industry, the Obama administration in 2009 bullied Chrysler’s secured creditors—who were entitled to “absolute priority”—into accepting 30 cents on the dollar, while junior creditors such as labor unions received much more. This subversion of creditor rights violates not just bankruptcy law, but also the Constitution’s Takings and Due Process Clauses.

This blatant crony capitalism—government-directed industrial policy to help political insiders—discourages investors and generally undermines confidence in American rule of law. The Supreme Court ultimately vacated the Second Circuit ruling that allowed this farce to proceed; Chrysler’s creditors are still out of luck, but there’s no legal precedent.

2. Obamacare Implementation
One can, and many have, written whole articles about how the Affordable Care Act is such an affront to the rule of law that its individual mandate and Medicaid coercion—both of which Chief Justice John Roberts rewrote—are just the tip of the lawless iceberg. On implementation, we can’t blame Congress or courts. Here’s a sample:

This may have been sensible, but changing a law requires actual legislation.

A little‐known part of Obamacare requires congressional staff to get insurance from health exchanges, rather than a taxpayer‐funded program. Obama directed the Office of Personnel Management to interpret the law to maintain the generous benefits.
Obamacare grants tax credits to people whose employers don’t provide coverage if they buy a plan “through an Exchange established by the State”—and then fines employers for each employee receiving such a subsidy. No tax credits are authorized for residents of states where the exchanges are established by the federal government, as an incentive for states to create exchanges themselves. Because so few (16) states did, however, the IRS issued a rule allowing subsidies (and fines) for plans coming from “a State Exchange, regional Exchange, subsidiary Exchange, and federally‐facilitated Exchange.” Yes, we can also blame the Supreme Court for upholding this.

3. Political Profiling by the IRS
After seeing a rise in the number of applications for tax‐exempt status, the IRS in 2010 compiled a “be on the lookout” (“BOLO”) list to identify organizations engaged in political activities. The list included words such as “Tea Party,” “Patriots,” and “Israel”; subjects such as government spending, debt, or taxes; and activities such as criticizing the government, educating about the Constitution, or challenging Obamacare. The targeting continued through May 2013, with no consequences other than Lois Lerner, the chief of the exempt‐organizations unit, being held in contempt of Congress—and then being allowed to peacefully retire.

[/b]4. Recess Appointments[/b]
In January 2012, President Obama appointed three members of the National Labor Relations Board, as well as the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, during what he considered to be a Senate recess. But the Senate was still holding “pro forma” sessions every three days—a technique developed by Sen. Harry Reid to thwart Bush recess appointments. (Meanwhile, the Dodd‐Frank Act, which created the CFPB, provides that authority remains with the Treasury Secretary until a director is “confirmed by the Senate.”) In 2014, Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the NLRB appointments were illegal, and unconstitutional.

5. DACA and DAPA
Congress has shamelessly failed to pass any sort of immigration reform, including for the most sympathetic victims of the current non‐system, young people who were brought into the country illegally as children. Nonetheless, during his 2012 ree******n campaign, President Obama directed the Department of Homeland Security to issue work and residence permits.

The administration engineered this Deferred Action for Parents of Americans in the wake of Congress’s rejection of the same policies, in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, i*********n l*w.

6. Assault On Free Speech and Due Process On College Campuses

In 2013 the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights, in conjunction with the Justice Department, sent the University of Montana a letter that became a national “blueprint” for tackling sexual harassment. The letter urged a crackdown on “unwelcome” speech and requires complaints to be heard in quasi‐judicial procedures that deny legal representation, encourage punishment before trial, and convict based on a mere “more likely than not” standard.

7. The Clean Power Plan
In June 2014, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed a new rule for regulating power‐plant emissions. Despite significant criticism, it finalized the rule in August 2015, giving states until 2018 to develop plans to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, with mandatory compliance beginning in 2022.

The EPA cites Section 111 of the Clean Air Act as justification for this Clean Power Plan, but that section can’t give the agency such authority. Section 111 doesn’t permit the government to require states to regulate pollutants from existing sources when those pollutants are already being regulated under Section 112, like those deriving from coal‐fired plants.

8. The WOTUS Rule

In May 2015, the EPA announced its new Clean Water Rule, which aims to protect streams and wetlands from pollution. The agency insists that the rule doesn’t affect bodies of water not previously regulated, but several groups have sued on the basis that the rule’s definitions of regulated waters greatly exceed the EPA’s authority under the Clean Water Act to regulate “waters of the United States” (WOTUS).

The Supreme Court has thrice addressed the meaning of that phrase.

9. Net Neutrality
In the works throughout the Obama presidency, the Open Internet Rule was adopted in February 2015 and went into effect that June, forbidding internet‐service providers (ISPs) from prioritizing different kinds of internet traffic.

The real issue, beyond this “net neutrality,” is the Federal Communications Commission’s manufacture of authority to regulate the internet despite clear congressional instruction that the internet

That creative interpretation allowed the FCC to claim the sweeping discretion it had used to manage the AT&T phone monopoly throughout the 20th century.

10. EPA’s Cap‐And‐Trade
In October 2015, the EPA issued a carbon‐emissions cap‐and‐trade regulation, establishing for each state limits on carbon dioxide emission, with four interim steps on the way to the final goal. EPA says that this rule, too, is authorized by Section 111 of the Clean Air Act, but Congress considered and rejected such a cap‐and‐trade program in 2009.

Had president Trump done this, democrat Congress would have impeached him without delay. Though Congress tried with f**e charges. They did not succeed.

I have more of Obama's violations, to be continued later.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Radiance3 wrote:

================
You crack me up again. That was impressive.

I thought I must proceed with Obama's historical records of trampling our constitution, using his political correctness.

Ten ways how Obama violated the constitution. From the Federalist paper. on Jan 2017.
By Ilya Shapiro

https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/top-10-ways-obama-violated-constitution-during-presidency

The Obama administration has been the most lawless in U.S. history. The 44th president’s seeing himself as professionally above the law, left the constitution weaker and abused.

Obama Only Furthered the Imperial Presidency
He points first to the 2011 Libya intervention. It involved neither a congressional authorization of the use of force, nor compliance with the 1973 War Powers Act, which requires at least congressional notification of troop commitments and affirmative permission after 60 days. Every president since the WPA’s enactment has claimed that it’s an unconstitutional limit on inherent executive authority over military power. Obama instead claimed that hundreds of missile strikes and dozens of air missions didn’t trigger the WPA because they only constituted “kinetic military action” rather than war.

It just doesn’t pass the smell test. Neither does at least some of the National Security Agency’s robust program of domestic surveillance, about which Director of National Intelligence James Clapper has lied to Congress. And then there’s the aggressive posture towards and persecution of journalists. It’s as if the goal was to show Donald Trump how it’s done.

The Obama administration has been the most lawless in U.S. history.
Here are examples:

How Obama Ignored Constitutional Checks and Balances
President Obama steadily took out his frustrations with the checks and balances that inhibited his ability to “fundamentally t***sform” the country.

A lack of congressional acquiescence didn’t stop this president. Even in Obama’s first term, the administration launched a “We Can’t Wait” initiative, with senior aide Dan Pfeiffer explaining that “when Congress won’t act, this president will.” And when the reelected President Obama announced his second‐term economic plans, he said that “I will not allow gridlock, or inaction, or willful indifference to get in our way.”

But no matter how much you hold it up to the light—and no matter what textual penumbras you induce—there’s no “gridlock clause” in the Constitution by which the president’s power increases to the extent Congress doesn’t support him. Indeed, gridlock is a feature of our system, not a bug, meant to check executive abuse and majoritarian populism both.

As we mark another peaceful t******r of p***r, let’s pause to note the 10 most significant ways in which Barack Obama violated the Constitution, in rough chronological order.

1. The Chrysler Bailout
Building on the Bush administration’s illegal use of TARP funds to bail out the auto industry, the Obama administration in 2009 bullied Chrysler’s secured creditors—who were entitled to “absolute priority”—into accepting 30 cents on the dollar, while junior creditors such as labor unions received much more. This subversion of creditor rights violates not just bankruptcy law, but also the Constitution’s Takings and Due Process Clauses.

This blatant crony capitalism—government-directed industrial policy to help political insiders—discourages investors and generally undermines confidence in American rule of law. The Supreme Court ultimately vacated the Second Circuit ruling that allowed this farce to proceed; Chrysler’s creditors are still out of luck, but there’s no legal precedent.

2. Obamacare Implementation
One can, and many have, written whole articles about how the Affordable Care Act is such an affront to the rule of law that its individual mandate and Medicaid coercion—both of which Chief Justice John Roberts rewrote—are just the tip of the lawless iceberg. On implementation, we can’t blame Congress or courts. Here’s a sample:

This may have been sensible, but changing a law requires actual legislation.

A little‐known part of Obamacare requires congressional staff to get insurance from health exchanges, rather than a taxpayer‐funded program. Obama directed the Office of Personnel Management to interpret the law to maintain the generous benefits.
Obamacare grants tax credits to people whose employers don’t provide coverage if they buy a plan “through an Exchange established by the State”—and then fines employers for each employee receiving such a subsidy. No tax credits are authorized for residents of states where the exchanges are established by the federal government, as an incentive for states to create exchanges themselves. Because so few (16) states did, however, the IRS issued a rule allowing subsidies (and fines) for plans coming from “a State Exchange, regional Exchange, subsidiary Exchange, and federally‐facilitated Exchange.” Yes, we can also blame the Supreme Court for upholding this.

3. Political Profiling by the IRS
After seeing a rise in the number of applications for tax‐exempt status, the IRS in 2010 compiled a “be on the lookout” (“BOLO”) list to identify organizations engaged in political activities. The list included words such as “Tea Party,” “Patriots,” and “Israel”; subjects such as government spending, debt, or taxes; and activities such as criticizing the government, educating about the Constitution, or challenging Obamacare. The targeting continued through May 2013, with no consequences other than Lois Lerner, the chief of the exempt‐organizations unit, being held in contempt of Congress—and then being allowed to peacefully retire.

[/b]4. Recess Appointments[/b]
In January 2012, President Obama appointed three members of the National Labor Relations Board, as well as the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, during what he considered to be a Senate recess. But the Senate was still holding “pro forma” sessions every three days—a technique developed by Sen. Harry Reid to thwart Bush recess appointments. (Meanwhile, the Dodd‐Frank Act, which created the CFPB, provides that authority remains with the Treasury Secretary until a director is “confirmed by the Senate.”) In 2014, Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the NLRB appointments were illegal, and unconstitutional.

5. DACA and DAPA
Congress has shamelessly failed to pass any sort of immigration reform, including for the most sympathetic victims of the current non‐system, young people who were brought into the country illegally as children. Nonetheless, during his 2012 ree******n campaign, President Obama directed the Department of Homeland Security to issue work and residence permits.

The administration engineered this Deferred Action for Parents of Americans in the wake of Congress’s rejection of the same policies, in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, i*********n l*w.

6. Assault On Free Speech and Due Process On College Campuses

In 2013 the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights, in conjunction with the Justice Department, sent the University of Montana a letter that became a national “blueprint” for tackling sexual harassment. The letter urged a crackdown on “unwelcome” speech and requires complaints to be heard in quasi‐judicial procedures that deny legal representation, encourage punishment before trial, and convict based on a mere “more likely than not” standard.

7. The Clean Power Plan
In June 2014, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed a new rule for regulating power‐plant emissions. Despite significant criticism, it finalized the rule in August 2015, giving states until 2018 to develop plans to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, with mandatory compliance beginning in 2022.

The EPA cites Section 111 of the Clean Air Act as justification for this Clean Power Plan, but that section can’t give the agency such authority. Section 111 doesn’t permit the government to require states to regulate pollutants from existing sources when those pollutants are already being regulated under Section 112, like those deriving from coal‐fired plants.

8. The WOTUS Rule

In May 2015, the EPA announced its new Clean Water Rule, which aims to protect streams and wetlands from pollution. The agency insists that the rule doesn’t affect bodies of water not previously regulated, but several groups have sued on the basis that the rule’s definitions of regulated waters greatly exceed the EPA’s authority under the Clean Water Act to regulate “waters of the United States” (WOTUS).

The Supreme Court has thrice addressed the meaning of that phrase.

9. Net Neutrality
In the works throughout the Obama presidency, the Open Internet Rule was adopted in February 2015 and went into effect that June, forbidding internet‐service providers (ISPs) from prioritizing different kinds of internet traffic.

The real issue, beyond this “net neutrality,” is the Federal Communications Commission’s manufacture of authority to regulate the internet despite clear congressional instruction that the internet

That creative interpretation allowed the FCC to claim the sweeping discretion it had used to manage the AT&T phone monopoly throughout the 20th century.

10. EPA’s Cap‐And‐Trade
In October 2015, the EPA issued a carbon‐emissions cap‐and‐trade regulation, establishing for each state limits on carbon dioxide emission, with four interim steps on the way to the final goal. EPA says that this rule, too, is authorized by Section 111 of the Clean Air Act, but Congress considered and rejected such a cap‐and‐trade program in 2009.

Had president Trump done this, democrat Congress would have impeached him without delay. Though Congress tried with f**e charges. They did not succeed.

I have more of Obama's violations, to be continued later.

================ br i You crack me up again. That... (show quote)

"I have more of Obama's violations, to be continued later." - Radiance

You have more on that sweet boy?

Radiance3

eagleye13 wrote:

"I have more of Obama's violations, to be continued later." - Radiance

You have more on that sweet boy?

==============
Sorry, I am not a boy though.

If you have more of president Obama's accomplishments, put them out.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Radiance3 wrote:

==============
I am not a boy though.

"You have more on that sweet boy?" No Comma used.

You read it wrong.
Obama is the sweet boy.

Radiance3

eagleye13 wrote:

"You have more on that sweet boy?" No Comma used.

You read it wrong.
Obama is the sweet boy.

==============
Okay, I understand now. I know you know I am a girl, lol..

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Radiance3 wrote:

==============
Okay, I understand now. I know you know I am a girl, lol..

Radiance; You are a sweet girl in a good sense.
Obama is a "sweeet boy" in bad sense.
A Limp wrist.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Radiance3 wrote:

The emergence of president Obama at the WH, has adversely changed America. Racial hatred built up, and political upheaval to the bitter end.
Prior to president Obama, all the presidents coming and going had respect for the Office of the President. Both parties Republican and Democrat, respect each other in terms of succession. The outgoing welcomes the incoming and a dignified protocol of succession had been followed.
Not with president Obama.

President Obama divided America so much to racial hatred and political upheaval. It is tragic.
https://www.bnd.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article149550879.html

Before he left the presidency, he designed a massive political scheme using the federal agencies supposed to serving the American people, as tools to destroy people they are supposed to serve. These weapons are the Deep State, and the Obama Gate. Very powerful tools that made innocent victims suffer while the perpetrator and the members of his weapons are all protected and safe. It made so many innocent people of the Republican party suffer. The most relentlessly attacked victim has been president elect Trump. Then his associates. Using the money of the people this sophisticated scheme played the villain as they tried to catching and convicting the innocent elected Donald Trump in order to remove him from office.

I think president Obama wants to continue to rule in order to realize his t***sformation of America. “The Hope and Changed" he had envisioned during his 2008 campaign.

President Obama continued to vilify president Trump. I have never seen prior presidents doing that since history. Prior presidents have high moral and ethics, respecting their position. Prior presidents considered put the country's welfare, above their own political aggrandizement.

But president Obama did the opposite. Acted like the outside enemy of our country, disregarding the moral equivalence of respect and dignity for his position. While campaigning for Joe Biden, Barack recently attacked president Trump as the "1st r****t president", without any proof to justify his claim. No prior president ever attacked the succeeding president, except him.

Now we are here amidst a great turmoil destroying the very inherent values we are supposed to cherish. The emergence of so many upheavals of destruction of our nation has faced a brave and dedicated leader too much to undertake with so short of a time. Where is our country going? I feel the pain because I love this country, seeing the way it is now, makes me want to cry.

As our country struggles fighting for this China C****av***s, our cities run by the democrat mayors are burning. Massive destruction have been going on yet, the democrat mayors, don’t care, and allowed them to continue. Why? Then blame the republican party, when the president suggested to help. Something must be seriously wrong going on.

In Addition, our country’s division has been so enlarged that Congress under the democrat control, are populated by rude and uncivilized behavior of these elected representatives who supposed to serve the people. But no, they’ve lost any sense of human decency, and dignity, their unethical and very rude behavior does not represent a civilized world. It is embarrassing.

We were used to be proud Americans. But these democrats in Congress have eroded the dignity and respect of our used to be the most civilized nation of the world. That does not exist anymore. The democrat leaders behave like untamed, and have brought down the used to be bright a shining armor of our cherished legacy of liberty. I am ashamed of them.

We the people must decide where we are going. That is why this Nov. 2020 e******n is the most important time of our history that will define the direction of our nation.
We must preserve our most cherished legacy of freedom, so much blood of those ahead of us, and still at present, have been shed to obtain our freedom. Please think America. Please don't lose our legacy of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness under God.
We must stay Christians, because I believe this is the last bastion of Christianity. May God bless America, and His people. May God bless president Trump! Thank you.

i The emergence of president Obama at the WH, has... (show quote)

Nothing more than a PO~

Radiance3

lindajoy wrote:

Nothing more than a PO~

=================
Lol, that cracks me up Linda, where did you pick that up?

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

lindajoy wrote:

Nothing more than a PO~

How old was he in this picture?

Radiance3

eagleye13 wrote:

Radiance; You are a sweet girl in a good sense.
Obama is a "sweeet boy" in bad sense.
A Limp wrist.

=================
This is a diversion from the topic.
I have a question for you. Remember the Jewish bloodline, you've been writing about? Do you think the t*****r George Soros is a descendant of Isau? Why is he against the Jewish when he has a Jewish blood? And he has been a t*****r to the American civilization.