Actually, low paid jobs have always been part time work for various types of dependants and after school jobs for school children to put a little money in their pockets while teaching them about the work ethic.

I mentioned previously those who are promoted to supervisory positions, well guess what? These are young people who generally live with their parents and will soon be graduating from high school. They can enter the job market with work experience and that responsible charge resume item I referred to.

An adult with responsibilities like raising a family, paying rent, etc has no business seeking that kind of job, and contrary to the fairy tale you seem to regard as reality, most jobs don't pay $7.50 an hour no matter what the minimum wage happens to be, unless it's entry level in a small business whose owner requires a 90 day introductory period to see how someone works out prior to paying a more liveable wage.

Any employer worth working for will pay an employee what the position and the employee's performance are worth, and most employers strive to avoid turnover because it's expensive to train a new hire only to have him/her leave soon after in pursuit of higher compensation.

As far as the government "helping" a business, the nearest you'll get to that is being able to write off some losses and some of the cost of doing business, but those write-offs aren't available until tax time the following year -- in the meantime, it's up to the business owner to keep his business afloat.

Perhaps you've occasionally seen a store that has "sale" signs in the windows with as much as 75% off -- that's generally an indication that for wh**ever reason, the store isn't doing well enough to pay it's employees, bills and other overhead, so they're dumping merchandise at or near their wholesale prices just to try and generate enough money to stay afloat.

The government is not there to send them bailout money.

You, Milosia, are living in another dimension.

What I see in your posts is that you may well be the kind of paranoiac the far left loves to capitalize (no pun intended) on, the perfect propaganda target because of your gullibility and obvious paucity of understanding of how either the private or the public sectors work.

The most affluent in any society, even the kind of liberty challenged, oppressive government that your ilk, knowingly or unknowingly endorses, always tends to be privileged -- this is both historical fact and human nature.

Look at the Soviet Union, Venezuela, Cuba, China and N**i Germany, all pillars of the socialism you endorse. Every one of them, just like our capitalist republic and any democracy you care to name, has its privileged rich.

Why?

Because even the most idealistic, most barbaric or most civilized politicians know their limitations -- it takes money to run a country, and it's those achievers and visionaries whose primary sk**l sets involve generating wealth, not "the guy who sweeps," who are able to generate that wealth. They are the people who actually harness the productivity of the country's human resources and have a conception of how best to allocate them to advantage.

That's reality.

In a more Democratic society where politicians have to compete for the v**e, money to finance a campaign is of paramount importance to a candidate, and that's something that will never change as long as the law permits the phenomenon of political careerism. If there were term limits, contributions from special interests would not be viewed as long term investments and at the same time there would be less opportunity for the kind of political and monetary corruption that has become business as usual in today's Democratic Party.

And yes, career politicians do tend to sing for their supper.

That party your ilk supports while ignoring their blatant corruption (or are you ignoring it, or just accepting it as permissible because your politics, like those of today's Democrats, transcend all morality?) has mastered the art of corruption which, again looking at reality, is most pervasive in countries run by totalitarian governments.

Just like the one your ilk would like to impose on America.

What you seem to be is one of those totally clueless, naive souls who exist in some Never Neverland where confused mental impulses clash with snippets of profound unreality shaped by blurbs of bumper sticker leftism and combine to form what passes for your opinion.

I would suggest that you use the Medicaid that no doubt comes with your monthly check to make an appointment, at your earliest convenience, with a professional.

**Look at the Soviet Union, Venezuela, Cuba, China and N**i Germany, all pillars of the socialism you endorse. Every one of them, just like our capitalist republic and any democracy you care to name, has its privileged rich. **
First, the Soviet Union dissolved moons ago.
Venezuela was the only actual socialist country that wasn’t a dictatorship.
The people of Venezuela were doing quite well living off the oil money their country had. They had schools , health insurance ,
An overall good place to live.
Their troubles started when they refused to join OPEC. The OPEC mafia didn’t like that much. And it was all downhill after that.
The people in the other countries listed were not happy people.

**Look at the Soviet Union, Venezuela, Cuba, China and N**i Germany, all pillars of the socialism you endorse. Every one of them, just like our capitalist republic and any democracy you care to name, has its privileged rich. **
First, the Soviet Union dissolved moons ago.
Venezuela was the only actual socialist country that wasn’t a dictatorship.
The people of Venezuela were doing quite well living off the oil money their country had. They had schools , health insurance ,
An overall good place to live.
Their troubles started when they refused to join OPEC. The OPEC mafia didn’t like that much. And it was all downhill after that.
The people in the other countries listed were not happy people.